Between 1978 and 1997 all newborns in the Austrian province of Tyrol were reviewed regarding hip dysplasia and related surgery. This involved a mean of 8257 births per year (7766 to 8858). Two observation periods were determined: 1978 to 1982 (clinical examination alone) and 1993 to 1997 (clinical examination and universal ultrasound screening). A retrospective analysis compared the number and cost of interventions due to hip dysplasia in three patient age groups: A, 0 to <
1.5 years; B, ≥ 1.5 to <
15 years; and C, ≥ 15 to <
35 years. In group A, there was a decrease in hip reductions from a mean of 25.2 (. sd. 2.8) to 7.0 (. sd. 1.4) cases per year. In group B, operative procedures decreased from a mean of 17.8 (. sd. 3.5) to 2.6 (. sd. 1.3) per year. There was a 75.9% decrease in the total number of interventions for groups A and B. An increase of €57 000 in the overall cost per year for the second period (1993 to 1997) was seen, mainly due to the screening programme. However, there was a marked reduction in costs of all surgical and non-surgical treatments for dysplastic hips from €410 000 (1978 to 1982) to €117 000 (1993 to 1997). We believe the small proportional increase in costs of the universal
Between May 1992 and April 1997, there were 20 452 births in the Blackburn District. In the same period 1107 infants with hip ‘at-risk’ factors were screened prospectively by ultrasound. We recorded the presence of dislocation and dysplasia detected under the age of six months using Graf’s alpha angle. Early dislocation was present in 36 hips (34 dislocatable and 2 irreducible). Of the 36 unstable hips, 30 (83%) were referred as being Ortolani-positive or unstable; 25 (69%) of these had at least one of the risk factors. Only 11 (31%) were identified from the ‘at-risk’ screening programme alone (0.54 per 1000 live births). Eight cases of ‘late’ dislocation presented after the age of six months (0.39 per 1000 live births). The overall rate of dislocation was 2.2 per 1000 live births. Only 31% of the dislocated hips belonged to a major ‘at-risk’ group. Statistical analysis confirmed that the risk factors had a relatively poor predictive value if used as a screening test for dislocation. In infants referred for doubtful clinical instability, one dislocation was detected for every 11 infants screened (95% confidence interval (CI) 8 to 17) whereas in infants referred because of the presence of any of the major ‘at-risk’ factors the rate was one in 75 (95% CI 42 to 149). Routine
The purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence of the different ultrasound phenotypes of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), and to determine their subsequent course. A consecutive series of 28 092 neonates was screened and classified according to the Graf method as part of a nationwide surveillance programme, and then followed prospectively. Abnormal hips were followed until they became normal (Graf type I). Type IIb hips and higher grades were treated by abduction in a Tübinger orthosis until normal. Dislocated hips underwent closed or open reduction.Aims
Patients and Methods
Aims. We investigated the prevalence of late developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), abduction bracing treatment, and surgical procedures performed following the implementation of universal
Congenital Talipes Equinovarus (CTEV) is one
of the most common congenital limb deformities. We reviewed the records
of infants who had received treatment for structural CTEV between
1 January 2007 and 30 November 2012. This was cross-referenced with
the prenatal scans of mothers over a corresponding period of time.
We investigated the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative
predictive values of the fetal anomaly scan for the detection of CTEV
and explored whether the publication of Fetal Anomaly Screening
Programme guidelines in 2010 affected the rate of detection. During the study period there were 95 532 prenatal scans and
34 373 live births at our hospital. A total of 37 fetuses with findings
suggestive of CTEV were included in the study, of whom 30 were found
to have structural CTEV at birth. The sensitivity of screening for
CTEV was 71.4% and the positive predictive value was 81.1%. The negative
predictive value and specificity were more than 99.5%. There was
no significant difference between the rates of detection before
and after publication of the guidelines (p = 0.5). We conclude that a prenatal fetal anomaly ultrasound screening
diagnosis of CTEV has a good positive predictive value enabling
prenatal counselling. The change in screening guidance has not affected
the proportion of missed cases. This information will aid counselling
parents about the effectiveness and accuracy of prenatal ultrasound
in diagnosing CTEV. Cite this article:
Between 1985 and 1998, 12 331 patients were included in the general neonatal
Aims. The present study seeks to investigate the correlation of pubofemoral distances (PFD) to α angles, and hip displaceability status, defined as femoral head coverage (FHC) or FHC during manual provocation of the newborn hip < 50%. Methods. We retrospectively included all newborns referred for
Results clinically & statistically of a 10 year prospective observational longitudinal study of the effects of sonographic screening for ‘risk’ factors in DDH. From 1997 to 2006 the project analysed the results of a sonographic screening programme for clinical instability & ‘risk factors’ in Blackburn (modified Graf system). ‘Risk factors’ included: breech presentation, strong family history, foot deformities & oligohydramnios. Statistically 95% confidence intervals, relative risk, sensitivity, specificity PPV & NPV were calculated. The outcome measure was irreducible dislocation of the hip joint. There was a birth population of 37,510, of which 2693 were ‘at risk’ & 132 clinically unstable. Three subsections: The overall irreducible dislocation rate was 0.51 per 1000 live births. ‘Risk factors’: mGraf Type III/IV/ Irreducible: Narrow 95% CI for Breech, CTCV & CTEV Wide 95% CI for Family history, oligohydramnios & TEV (postural) 95% CI (RR) for Oligohydramnios & TEV not significant. RR for clinical hip instability was 983.6 Percentage female 34.15% of clinically unstable hip joints had a ‘risk factor’Purpose of study
Methods & Results
1. Clinically unstable hips (birth)
2 irreducible dislocations
2. ‘At risk’
6 irreducible dislocations
3. Secondary referral (GP screening)
11 irreducible dislocations
CTCV:
1: 13.8
RR = 26.5
Family history:
1:18.5
RR = 23.3
Breech:
1:35
RR = 14.8
Oligohydramnios
1:99.5
TEV (postural)
1:202
CTEV (fixed)
0.0
18/19 irreducible hips
94.74%
64/92 Type IV hips
69.56%
26/30 Type III hips
86.66%
We have analysed the patterns of management of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in Coventry over a period of 20 years during which three different screening policies were used. From 1976 to the end of 1985 we relied on clinical examination alone. The mean surgical cost for the treatment of DDH during this period was £5110 per 1000 live births. This was reduced to £3811 after the introduction of ultrasound for infants with known risk factors. Since June 1989 we have routinely scanned all infants at birth with a mean surgical cost of £468 per 1000 live births. This reduction in cost is a result of the earlier detection of DDH with fewer children requiring surgery. In those who do, fewer and less invasive procedures are needed. The overall rate of treatment has not increased and regular review of patients managed in a Pavlik harness has allowed us to avoid the complication of avascular necrosis. When we add the cost of running the screening programme to the expense of treating the condition, the overall cost for the management of DDH is comparable for the different screening policies.
The aim was to compare the efficacy of selective ultrasound-screening (SUSS) for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) to clinical screening alone, by comparing outcomes in a contemporary group with those from a 40 year old cohort. This was a retrospective cohort study. The department's DDH and surgical databases were used to identify all cases of DDH, and all cases of surgery for DDH during the study period (2009–13). Patients born outside our region, and teratologic cases were excluded from analysis. The Obstetric database provided the total number of live births over the five-year period. This data was used to calculate the incidence of late-diagnosis (age over 3 months) DDH and the rate of surgery for DDH in our region. These results were compared to those of a similar study from our institution published in 1977, after the introduction of universal clinical screening. Relative risk (RR) was calculated for the two groups, and analysed for statistical significance. The incidence of late-diagnosis DDH over the recent 5-year study period was 0.66/1000 live births, compared to 0.6/1000 in the control group. The RR for late-diagnosis DDH was not significantly different between the two groups (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.6 to 2.2). The rate of surgery for DDH was 0.86/1000, compared to 0.9/1000 live births in the control group. The RR for surgery for DDH in the current study population compared to the historic control was 0.97, but this difference was not statistically significant (95% C.I. 0.57 to 1.68; p=0.92). Despite advances in screening for DDH over the last 40 years, neither the incidence of late diagnosis DDH, nor rates of surgery for DDH in our region have changed. Whilst previous studies have demonstrated that SUSS does not eliminate late-presenting DDH, this study suggests it confers no advantage over clinical screening alone.
Early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is associated with improved outcomes of conservative treatment. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate a novel screening programme that included both the primary risk factors of breech presentation and family history, and the secondary risk factors of oligohydramnios and foot deformities. A five-year prospective registry study investigating every live birth in the study’s catchment area (n = 27,731), all of whom underwent screening for risk factors and examination at the newborn and six- to eight-week neonatal examination and review. DDH was diagnosed using ultrasonography and the Graf classification system, defined as grade IIb or above or rapidly regressing IIa disease (≥4o at four weeks follow-up). Multivariate odds ratios were calculated to establish significant association, and risk differences were calculated to provide quantifiable risk increase with DDH, positive predictive value was used as a measure of predictive efficacy. The cost-effectiveness of using these risk factors to predict DDH was evaluated using NHS tariffs (January 2021).Aims
Methods
The association between idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) and developmental dysplasia of the hip is uncertain. We present an observational cohort study spanning 6.5 years of selective
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether universal (all neonates) or selective (neonates belonging to the risk groups)
Aims. Despite the presence of screening programmes, infants continue
to present with late developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), the
impact of which is significant. The aim of this study was to assess
infants with late presenting dislocation of the hip despite universal
clinical neonatal and selective
Of the 34 723 infants born between 1 June 1992 and 31 May 2002, the hips of 2578 with clinical instability or at-risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip were imaged by ultrasound. Instability of the hip was present in 77 patients, of whom only 24 (31.2%) had an associated risk factor. From the ‘at-risk’ groups, the overall risk of type-III dysplasia, instability and irreducibility was 1:15 when family history, 1:27 when breech delivery and 1:33 when foot deformity were considered as risk factors. Of those hips which were ultrasonographically stable, 88 had type-III dysplasia. A national programme of selective
Aims. The significance of the ‘clicky hip’ in neonatal and infant examination
remains controversial with recent conflicting papers reigniting
the debate. We aimed to quantify rates of developmental dysplasia
of the hip (DDH) in babies referred with ‘clicky hips’ to our dedicated
DDH clinic. Patients and Methods. A three-year prospective cohort study was undertaken between
2014 and 2016 assessing the diagnosis and treatment outcomes of
all children referred specifically with ‘clicky hips’ as the primary
reason for referral to our dedicated DDH clinic. Depending on their
age, they were all imaged with either ultrasound scan or radiographs. Results. There were 69 ‘clicky hip’ referrals over the three-year period.
This represented 26.9% of the total 257 referrals received in that
time. The mean age at presentation was 13.6 weeks (1 to 84). A total
of 19 children (28%) referred as ‘clicky hips’ were noted to have
hip abnormalities on ultrasound scan, including 15 with Graf Type
II hips (7 bilateral), one Graf Type III hip, and three Graf Type
IV hips. Of these, ten children were treated with a Pavlik harness, with
two requiring subsequent closed reduction in theatre; one child
was treated primarily with a closed reduction and adductor tenotomy.
In total, 11 (15.9%) of the 69 ‘clicky hip’ referrals required intervention
with either harness or surgery. Conclusion. Our study provides further evidence that the ‘clicky hip’ referral
can represent an underlying diagnosis of DDH and should, in our
opinion, always lead to further clinical and radiological assessment.
In the absence of universal
The practice of regular radiological follow-up of infants with a positive family history of developmental dysplasia of the hip is based on the widespread belief that primary acetabular dysplasia is a genetic disorder which can occur in the absence of frank subluxation or dislocation. We reviewed all infants who were involved in our screening programme for developmental dysplasia of the hip, between November 2002 and January 2004, and who had a normal clinical and ultrasound examination of the hip at six to eight weeks of age, but who, because of a family history of developmental dysplasia of the hip, had undergone further radiography after an interval of 6 to 12 months. The radiographs of 89 infants were analysed for signs of late dysplasia of the hip and assessed independently by three observers to allow for variability of measurement. There were 11 infants (11%) lost to follow-up. All the patients had normal radiographs at the final follow-up and none required any intervention. We therefore question the need for routine radiological follow-up of infants with a positive family history of developmental dysplasia of the hip, but who are normal on clinical examination and assessment by
A national screening programme has existed in the UK for the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) since 1969. However, every aspect of screening and treatment remains controversial. Screening programmes throughout the world vary enormously, and in the UK there is significant variation in screening practice and treatment pathways. We report the results of an attempt by the British Society for Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS) to identify a nationwide consensus for the management of DDH in order to unify treatment and suggest an approach for screening. A Delphi consensus study was performed among the membership of BSCOS. Statements were generated by a steering group regarding aspects of the management of DDH in children aged under three months, namely screening and surveillance (15 questions), the technique of ultrasound scanning (eight questions), the initiation of treatment (19 questions), care during treatment with a splint (ten questions), and on quality, governance, and research (eight questions). A two-round Delphi process was used and a consensus document was produced at the final meeting of the steering group.Aims
Methods
Within healthcare, several measures are used to quantify and compare the severity of health conditions. Two common measures are disability weight (DW), a context-independent value representing severity of a health state, and utility weight (UW), a context-dependent measure of health-related quality of life. Neither of these measures have previously been determined for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The aim of this study is to determine the DW and country-specific UWs for DDH. A survey was created using three different methods to estimate the DW: a preference ranking exercise, time trade-off exercise, and visual analogue scale (VAS). Participants were fully licensed orthopaedic surgeons who were contacted through national and international orthopaedic organizations. A global DW was calculated using a random effects model through an inverse-variance approach. A UW was calculated for each country as one minus the country-specific DW composed of the time trade-off exercise and VAS.Aims
Methods
Aims. We aimed to examine the true incidence of DDH in our area, and to investigate both known and unknown risk factors for the condition. Methods. Data were prospectively recorded on all live births in the Exeter area from January 1998 to December 2008. The data included the baby's gestational age, sex, demographic details of parents, maternal age and parity, geographic and socioeconomic data, mode of presentation and delivery, and family history of DDH. Data were also collected prospectively on all treated cases of DDH (Graf 2c and above) for the same period. Using the population live birth data as controls, odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals were calculated. Results. The incidence of DDH in our area was 4.9 per 1000 live births. Although this might have been influenced by selective