We conducted an anatomical study to determine the best technique for transfer of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) for the treatment of proximal ulnar nerve injuries. The AIN, ulnar nerve, and associated branches were dissected in 24 cadaver arms. The number of branches of the AIN and length available for transfer were measured. The nerve was divided just proximal to its termination in pronator quadratus and transferred to the ulnar nerve through the shortest available route. Separation of the deep and superficial branches of the ulnar nerve by blunt dissection alone, was also assessed. The mean number of AIN branches was 4.8 (3 to 8) and the mean length of the nerve available for transfer was 72 mm (41 to 106). The transferred nerve reached the ulnar nerve most distally when placed dorsal to flexor digitorum profundus (FDP). We therefore conclude that the AIN should be passed dorsal to FDP, and that the deep and superficial branches of the ulnar nerve require approximately 30 mm of blunt dissection and 20 mm of sharp dissection from the point of bifurcation to the site of the anastomosis. The use of this technique for transfer of the AIN should improve the outcome for patients with proximal ulnar nerve injuries. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:789–94

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the correlation between the occurance of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury and frontal and saggital angular insertion of the medial pin in pediatric type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures treated with closed reduction and percutaneous fixation using a crossed-pin configuration. Method: Among 164 patients with type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures, treated with closed reduction and percutaneous fixation using a crossed-pin configuration while the elbow was in hyperflexion, between 1999 and 2003, ninety patients (54 male and 36 female, mean age 6.1 years) with complete clinical and radiological records and follow-up period of at least 6 months were included the study. Frontal humerus-pin angle (FHPA) was the angle between the long axis of humerus and the axis of the medial pin measured on an anteroposterior radiograph. Saggital humerus-pin angle (SHPA) was the angle between the long axis of humerus and the axis of the medial pin measured on a lateral radiograph and expressed as a positive value if the medial pin direction was anteroposterior and as a negative value if the direction was posteroanterior. All the mesurements were made by the same observer blinded to the clinical records of the patients. Results: Postoperative ulnar nerve injury was observed in 18 patients. The ulnar nerve injury group and control group were similar with respect to age and gender. Mean FHPA was 36.6 and 33.8 degrees in ulnar nerve injury and control groups respectively (p=0.270). Mean SHPA was 12.1 and 1.6 degrees in ulnar nerve injury and control groups respectively, and the difference was significant (p=0.001). All the patients with ulnar nerve injury had complete recovery within 3 months following surgery. Conclusion: There are several methods to avoid iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury in supracondylar fractures such as insertion of two or three lateral pins, insertion of the medial pin while the elbow is less than 90 degrees of flexion. The findings of this retrospective study revealed that there was a considerable correlation between the occurence of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury and sagittal angular insertion of the medial pin. We suggest that if a crossed-pin figuration is desired, it is better to insert the medial pin neutral or posteroanterior direction in the sagittal plane if the elbow is in hyperflexion

Supracondylar humeral fractures are the most common elbow injury in children, usually sustained from a fall on the outstretched hand. Iatrogenic ulnarnerve injury is not uncommon following cross K wiring. NNH is the number of cases needed to treat in order to have one adverse outcome. A systemic review was undertaken to calculate relative risks, risk difference and number needed to harm following management of supracon-dylar fractures with cross or lateral K wires. It was found that there was one iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury for every twenty-seven cases that were managed with crossed K wires. The aim of this study was to calculate the number of cross K wiring of supracondylar fractures of the humerus that would need to be performed for one iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury to occur. Iatrogenic ulnarnerve injury is not uncommon following cross K wiring of supracondylar fractures of the humerus. To date there are no clinical trials showing the benefit of cross K wiring over lateral K wiring in the management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. If it can be confirmed that lateral K wiring is as effective as crossed K wiring, iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury can be avoided. A systematic review of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injuries following management of supracondylar fractures was conducted. The databases MEDLINE 1966 – present, EMBASE 1980 – present, CINAHL 1982 – present, CDSR, and DARE were searched along with a meticulous search of the Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics from 1998 to 2004. Of the two hundred and forty-eight papers identified, only thirty-six met the inclusion criteria. The papers where both lateral crossed K wires were used as treatment were identified for calculating relative rates, risk difference and number needed to harm. NNH was 7.69. When a sensitivity analysis removing two studies that had five subjects or fewer and a 100% ulnar nerve injury rate was peformed, the NNH was 27.7. In other words, there was one iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury for every twenty-seven cases that were managed with crossed K wires

Introduction: Crossed K-wires provide a stable fixation for supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children but are associated with a risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury (≈5%). There is reluctance by many surgeons to use the medial approach and crossed K-wires because of the liability of ulnar nerve injury. Aim: To assess the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury using the mini medial incision to reduce and stabilise displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children with crossed K-wires. Methods: We performed a retrospective evaluation of 26 children with closed Wilkins type IIB and III supracondylar fractures of the humerus, without vascular deficit, between January 1999 and April 2007. Mean age was 5.5 years (2.5–11 years). All were treated with open reduction and crossed K-wire fixation using a mini medial incision (5cm). Our modification is that we do not expose the fracture site or the ulnar nerve. It is a ‘feel’ rather than ‘see’ approach. The medial K-wire is placed under direct vision. All patients had early and late (4 months) post-operative ulnar nerve assessment. Patient outcome was assessed clinically using Flynn’s classification and radiologically using the metaphyseal-diaphyseal and humerocapitellar angles. Mean length of follow-up was 5 months (4–8 months). Results: There was no post-operative ulnar nerve injury. Clinically and radiologically there were 23 excellent and 3 good results. Conclusions: The mini medial incision is simple. It provides an excellent view for correct medial pin entry; hence it reduces the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Crossed K-wires provide a stable and reliable fixation

Aim: To assess the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury using the mini medial incision to reduce and stabilise displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children with crossed K-wires. Methods: We performed a retrospective evaluation of 26 children with closed Wilkins type IIB and III supracondylar fractures of the humerus, without vascular deficit, between January 1999 and April 2007. Mean age was 5.5 years (2.5–11 years). All were treated with open reduction and crossed K-wire fixation using a mini medial incision (5cm). Our modification is that we do not expose the fracture site or the ulnar nerve. It is a “feel” rather than “see” approach. The medial K-wire is placed under direct vision. All patients had early and late (4 months) post-operative ulnar nerve assessment. Patient outcome was assessed clinically using Flynn’s classification and radiologically using the metaphyseal-diaphyseal and humerocapitellar angles. Mean length of follow-up was 5 months (4–8 months). Results: There was no post-operative ulnar nerve injury. Clinically and radiologically there were 23 excellent and 3 good results. Conclusions: The mini medial incision is simple. It provides an excellent view for correct medial pin entry; hence it reduces the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Crossed K-wires provide a stable and reliable fixation

Introduction: The standard treatment of displaced supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus in children is closed reduction and pin fixation, but the optimal pin configuration is controversial. Crossed-pin fixation of the humerus is mechanically more stable than any other kind of pin configuration, but this fixation may cause iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Many authors recommended fixation from the lateral side in order to eliminate this complication. Since 1999, we have been using a 3-pinfixation technique with insertion of the first two pins with the elbow in full flexion, followed by insertion of the third wire through the medial side with the elbow in full extension. We call this the “flexion-extension cross-pinning technique”. Method: This is a retrospective review of 64 displaced supracondylar fractures fixed by flexion-extension cross pinning. Results: Eleven children had Gartland type 2 fractures and 53 children had Gartland type 3 fractures. There was no iatrogenic ulnar neve palsy. Loss of reduction in two children was related to technical errors. One patient had superficial pin tract infection. Conclusion: We feel that this technique and pins configuration is safe and easy to learn. It has become the standard method of fixation of displaced supracondylar fractures in our institution

Aims. Medial humeral epicondyle fractures (MHEFs) are common elbow fractures in children. Open reduction should be performed in patients with MHEF who have entrapped intra-articular fragments as well as displacement. However, following open reduction, transposition of the ulnar nerve is disputed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the need for ulnar nerve exploration and transposition. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study. The clinical data of patients who underwent surgical treatment of MHEF in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2022 were collected. The patients were allocated to either transposition or non-transposition groups. Data for sex, age, cause of fracture, duration of follow-up, Papavasiliou and Crawford classification, injury-to-surgery time, preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms, intraoperative exploration of ulnar nerve injury, surgical incision length, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative ulnar nerve symptoms, complications, persistent ulnar neuropathy, and elbow joint function were analyzed. Binary logistic regression analysis was used for statistical analysis. Results. A total of 124 patients were followed up, 50 in the ulnar nerve transposition group and 74 in the non-transposition group. There were significant differences in ulnar nerve injury (p = 0.009), incision length (p < 0.001), and blood loss (p = 0.003) between the two groups. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms (p = 0.012) were risk factors for postoperative ulnar nerve symptoms. In addition, ulnar nerve transposition did not affect the occurrence of postoperative ulnar nerve symptoms (p = 0.468). Conclusion. Ulnar nerve transposition did not improve clinical outcomes. It is recommended that the ulnar nerve should not be transposed when treating MHEF operatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(2):212–218

Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning has become the most common technique for the treatment of Type III displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the loss of reduction in lateral K wiring is non-inferior to crossed K wiring in this procedure. A prospective randomised non-inferiority trial was conducted. Patients aged three to seven presenting to the Emergency Department with a diagnosis of Type III supracondylar humerus fracture were eligible for inclusion in the study. Consenting patients were block randomised into one of two groups based on wire configuration (lateral or crossed K wires). Surgical technique and post-operative management were standardised between the two groups. The primary outcome was loss of reduction, measured by the change in Baumann's angle immediately post –operation compared to that at the time of K wire removal at three weeks. Secondary outcome data collected included Flynn's elbow score, the humero-capitellar angle, and evidence of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Data was analysed using a t-test for independent means. A total of 52 patients were enrolled at baseline with 23 allocated to the lateral pinning group (44%) and 29 to the cross pinning group (56%). Six patients (5 crossed, 1 lateral) received a third wire and one patient (crossed) did not return for x-rays at pin removal and were therefore excluded from analysis. A total of 45 patients were subsequently analysed (22 lateral and 23 crossed). The mean change in Baumann's angle was 1.05 degrees, 95% CI [-0.29, 2.38] for the lateral group and 0.13 degrees, 95% CI [-1.30, 1.56] for the crossed group. There was no significant difference between the groups in change in Baumann's Angle at the time of pin removal (p = 0.18). Two patients in the crossed group developed post-operative iatrogenic ulnar nerve injuries, while none were reported in the lateral group. Preliminary analysis shows that loss of reduction in Baumann's angle with lateral K wires is not inferior to crossed K wires in the management of Type III supracondylar humerus fractures in children. The results of this study suggest that orthopaedic surgeons who currently use crossed K wires could consider switching to lateral K wires in order to reduce the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injuries without significantly compromising reduction

In combined high median and ulnar nerve injury, transfer of extensor digiti minimi (EDM) and extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) nerve branches to restore intrinsic hand function is previously described. A segment of nerve graft is required in this operation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using the sensory branch of radial nerve (SRN) as an “in situ vascular nerve bridge'” (IVNB) instead of sural nerve graft. Twenty fresh cadavers were dissected. In proximal forearm incision, the feasibility of transferring the EDM/ECU branches to the distal stump of transected SRN was evaluated. In distal forearm incision, the two distal branches of the SRN were transected near the radial styloid process to determine whether transfer of the proximal stumps of these branches to the motor branches of the median (MMN) and ulnar (MUN) nerves is possible. The number of axons in each nerve was determined. The size of the dissected nerves and their location demonstrate that tension free nerve coaptation is easily possible in both proximal and distal incisions. Utilisation of the SRN as an IVNB instead of the conventional sural nerve graft has some advantages. Firstly, the sural nerve graft is a single branch and could be sutured to either the MMN or MUN, whereas the SRN has two terminal branches and can address both of them. Secondly, the IVNB has live Schwann cells and may accelerate the regeneration. Finally, this IVNB does not require leg incision and could be performed under regional anesthesia. The SRN as an IVNB is a viable option which can be used instead of conventional nerve graft in some brachial plexus or high median and ulnar nerve injuries when restoration of intrinsic hand function by transfer of EDM/ECU branches is attempted

Aim. To investigate the effectiveness of a decision-based protocol designed to minimise the use of medial incisions when performing crossed-wire fixation of supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus whilst minimising ulnar nerve injury. Method. We have employed a protocol for placing the medial wire during crossed k-wire fixation of supracondylar fractures dependent upon the medial epicondyle. When this is palpable, the wire is introduced percutaneously; when it is not, a mini-incision is made. All cases of closed reduction and crossed K-wiring of supracondylar fracture over a three year period (2008–2011) were identified from our department database. Cases with a neurological injury identified pre-operatively, and those in which the protocol had not been followed were excluded. Casenotes were reviewed to determine the incidence and outcomes of post-operative ulnar nerve deficit. Results. A total of 106 cases were identified, from which 36 cases were excluded, leaving 70 cases in the study. The mean age was 5 (range 1–11). 68 were extension-type injuries, of which 29 (41%) were type 2 and 39 (56%) type 3 according to the classification of Gartland. 2 were flexion-type. A mini-incision for placement of the medial K-wire was required in only 3 cases (4.3%), with percutaneous placement in all other cases. There was clinical evidence of partial ulnar nerve injury in 1 case (1.4%) which recovered spontaneously within 11 months. Conclusion. The results of this study demonstrate our protocol to be effective. Careful percutaneous placement of the medial wire can be performed in the majority of cases with little risk of significant or permanent injury to the ulnar nerve. Open placement of the medial wire is indicated in only a small proportion of cases. We suggest that the routine use of a medial mini-incision should be re-considered

Thirty-four acute traumatic dislocations in children aged 5 to 13 years, treated between 1994 and 2002, were reviewed retrospectively. All injuries were caused by a fall. Two injuries were compound. Two children had ulnar nerve injuries, one a radial nerve injury, and one median nerve and brachial artery injury. Posterolateral dislocations were seen in 22 children, posteromedial in eight, posterior in one, anteromedial in two and anterolateral in one. Pure dislocations occurred in eight children and 26 had associated elbow injuries, including 11 medial epicondyle, five lateral mass, one olecranon, one radial head and eight combined injuries. In the combined group, six children had associated fractures and two had divergent dislocation of the proximal radio-ulnar joint. Twenty required open reduction. The injury was initially missed in eight. The child with vascular and median nerve injury had not recovered by four months. Among the others, at follow-up of 4 to 48 months 22 results were excellent to good, 10 fair and one poor. Complications included pseudarthrosis of the medial epicondyle in one child and loss of flexion and rotation of 10° to 30° in 15. Radial and ulnar nerve injuries recovered. A high index of suspicion, good clinical examination and compared radiographs are recommended to avoid missed injuries

Purpose: To eliminate iatrogenic Ulnar Nerve injury. Methods: We prospectively reviewed 25 consecutive paediatric gartland’s type 3 supracondylar fractures with a minimum follow-up of 1 yr operated by our novel technique. Good reduction was achieved with closed reduction in 20 and 5 cases warranted an open reduction. Our technique involved passage of two percutaneous 1.6 mm smooth K-wires supero-medially from lateral condyle across the fracture site to obtain a purchase in upper medial cortex of proximal fragment. A third K-wire was passed percutaneously from lateral supracondylar pillar proximal to the fracture site in infero-medial direction to gain purchase in distal fragment’s subchondral bone of medial condyle thus creating a cross construct. Care was taken not to breach the subchondral bone so as to avoid ulnar nerve injury. All patients were operated in supine position under general anaesthesia and lateral collateral approach was used with same K-wire construct in cases that needed open reduction. Stability was checked post-operatively by rotation under real time imaging. The mean age of patients was 6.8 yrs. The mean time from sustaining the fracture to operative pinning was 24 hrs. An above elbow immobilisation backslab was applied for 3 weeks. The K-wires were removed at 3 and 4 weeks in cases that had closed and open reduction respectively and active assisted movements were initiated. All patients were followed up at 1/52, 3/52, 6/52, 3/12, 6/12 and 1 year post-operatively. Results: Flynn’s criterion was used for post-op functional evaluation. 20 cases had excellent and 5 had good outcome at end of 1 year. There was no case of nerve palsy (superficial radian or ulnar N), pin-tract infection, loss of reduction or late cubitus varus/valgus or hyper-extension deformities. Conclusion: Our innovative technique is an excellent alternative option without compromising on fracture stability in the treatment of these fractures

Purpose: Biomechanical studies have shown that fixation by two lateral pins of supracondylar fractures in children provide less stability than crossed pin fixation from lateral and medial sides. However, closed percutaneous medial pin fixation may be associated with ulnar nerve injury. Soft tissue edema or excessive mobility of ulnar nerve may be predisposing factors for iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. We present our experience with the use of nerve stimulator in preventing such complications during surgery. Material and Methods: During the last two years 22 children with supracondylar fractures (20- extension type; 2- flexion type) underwent surgery by closed reduction and percutaneous crossed KW fixation. The average age was 5.3 years (range 3–9 years). Detection of the ulnar nerve location was made possible by continuous intraoperative use of nerve stimulator, connected to the medial pin during its insertion. In 4/22 Pts irritation of ulnar nerve during pin insertion was observed by the appearance of clear contractions of forearm and hand muscles, and therefore, the location of the medial pin was immediately changed. Results: In all cases anatomic reduction was achieved. No cases of nerve or vascular injury were observed. No cases of secondary fracture displacement were noted. Conclusions: Based on this study it seems that the use of intraoperative nerve stimulator, during percutaneous crossed pin fixation of supracondylar fractures in children, may assist in localizing the nerve and prevent its injury during medial pin insertion. Changes in original setting of the standard anesthesiology nerve stimulator may be performed easily in order to allow such monitoring. The use of nerve stimulator during such procedures is very simple, even in cases of emergency. Monitoring of ulnar nerve by nerve stimulator is reliable and enables safe pin placement, decreasing the risk of nerve injury

Paediatric supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fracture in children, and is associated with an 11% incidence of neurologic injury. The goal of this study is to investigate the natural history and outcome of motor nerve recovery following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of this injury. A total of 246 children who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning following supracondylar humerus fractures were prospectively enrolled over a two year period. Patient demographics (age, weight), Gartland fracture classification, and associated traumatic neurologic injury were collected and analyzed with descriptive statistics. Patients with neurologic palsies were separated based on nerve injury distribution, and followed long term to monitor for neurologic recovery at set time points for follow up. Of the 246 patient cohort, 46 patients (18.6%) sustained a motor nerve palsy (Group 1) and 200 patients (82.4%) did not (Group 2) following elbow injury. Forty three cases involved one nerve palsy, and three cases involved two nerve palsies. No differences were found between patient age (Group 1 – 6.6 years old, Group 2 – 6.2 years old, p = 0.11) or weight (Group 1 – 24.3kg, Group 2 – 24.5kg, p = 0.44). A significantly higher proportion of Gartland type III and IV injuries were found in those with nerve palsies (Group 1 – 93.5%, Group 2 – 59%, p < 0 .001). Thirty four Anterior Interosseous Nerve (AIN) palsies were observed, of which 22 (64.7%) made a full recovery by three month. Refractory AIN injuries requiring longer than three month recovered on average 6.8 months post injury. Ten Posterior Interosseous Nerve (PIN) palsies occurred, of which four (40%) made full recovery at three month. Refractory PIN injuries requiring longer than three month recovered on average 8.4 months post injury. Six ulnar nerve motor palsies occurred, of which zero (0%) made full recovery at three month. Ulnar nerve injuries recovered on average 5.8 months post injury. Neurologic injury occurs significantly higher in Gartland type III and IV paediatric supracondylar fractures. AIN palsies remain the most common, with an expected 65% chance of full recovery by three month. 40% of all PIN palsies are expected to fully recover by three month. Ulnar motor nerve palsies were slowest to recover at 0% by the three month mark, and had an average recovery time of approximately 5.8 months. Our study findings provide further evidence for setting clinical and parental expectations following neurologic injury in paediatric supracondylar elbow fractures

The treatment for Humeral Supracondylar fractures in children is percutaneous fixation with Kirschner wires using a unilateral or crossed wire configuration. Capitellar entry point with divergent wires is thought crucial in the lateral entry approach. Crossed wire configuration carries a risk of Ulnar nerve injury. Our department had recorded a number of failures and this required review. A search was conducted for children with this injury and surgical fixation. A two year time frame was allocated to allow for adequate numbers. The hospitals radiography viewing system and patient notes were utilized to gather required information. 30 patients from 2–14 years all underwent surgery on the day of admission or the following day. 18 had sustained Gartland grade 3 or 4 injuries. Unilateral configuration was used in 10 cases; a loss of reduction was noted in 5 of these with one case requiring reoperation. Crossed wires were used in 20 cases with a loss of reduction in 1. Crossed wire configuration provides a more reliable fixation with a lower chance or re-operation. Our DGH policy now advises the use of this configuration. A small “mini-open” ulnar approach is utilized with visualization and protection of the nerve

Supra-condylar humerus fractures (SCHF) are amongst the most common fractures requiring surgical stabilisation in the pediatric age group (1). Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation with Kirschner wires (KW) is currently the standard of care (2). The number of KW used and their configuration has been the subject of much research (3, 4). The failure modes leading to loss of fracture reduction are not clear and have not been quantified. The aim of this study is to compare the mechanical stability of the opt-used configurations for various loading modes and contact interactions at the KW/bone interface. A Gartland type-III SCHF was introduced to a fourth generation composite saw bone (Sawbones®, Vashon, Washington, USA). The model was CT scanned with a slice spacing of 0.5mm and pixel size 0.3×0.3mm. The CT data set was imported into AmiraDev (AmiraDev 5.2 Visage Imaging, Inc). A uniaxial mechanical test was conducted in order to measure the KW pullout forces from the distal humerus. A model of the fractured humerus was constructed with the following steps: 1) manual segmentation; 2) surface generation of each fragment, and; 3) automatic volumetric grid generation for each fragment. The fracture was then virtually reduced and KWs were placed at the desired configurations (Fig 1a-b). For each configuration, a separate model was generated. Material properties were assigned to the bone-model elements according to the manufacturer's data sheet; Young's modulus E = 16GPa and E = 150MPa for the cortical and cancellous bone respectively. The KW were assigned a Young's modulus of 200GPa. Each of the models created in Amira was imported to a finite element application (Abaqus 6.9, DS-Simula) for structural analysis. For each of KW configuration four different torque forces load types were simulated (Fig 1c left): 1) a clockwise and counterclockwise torque with a magnitude of 1.5 NM (Newton/Meters); 2) a translational force with a magnitude of 30 N (Newtons) in the direction of the humerus shaft, and; 3) a shear force with a magnitude of 30 N in the direction parallel to the fracture plane. The results were normalised such that the maximum displacement for the crossed pin configuration with a coefficient of friction equal to zero (μ = 0) was used as unity for each load configuration. Similarly, for each of KW configuration four different translational forces load types were simulated (Fig 1c right): 1) a clockwise and counter clock-wise torque with a magnitude of 1.5 NM (Newton/Meters); 2) a translational force with a magnitude of 30N in the direction of the humerus shaft, and; 3) a shear force with a magnitude of 30N in the direction parallel to the fracture plane. The results were normalised as described above. Results. Torque forces: the crossed configuration was found to be almost independent of the bone-implant friction and was symmetric in terms of direction of the applied torque. The diverging configuration exhibited larger dependency on the bone-implant interface. This is especially noticed as the coefficient of friction (COF) reduced to values below μ = 0.2. Translational forces: the diverging configuration exhibited high sensitivity to reduction of the COF μ = 0. Displacement of the fracture for μ = 0 was substantially larger for the diverging configuration relative to the crossed configuration: 13.5 times and 19 times for the transverse and pullout directions, respectively. As the COF increased to values above μ = 0.5, both fixation configurations performed in a similar manner. Stabilisation of SCHF has been the subject of numerous studies. Relative stability of the different configurations and the risk for iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury has been in the center of the debate. Crossed KW configuration was shown in some clinical studies to be more stable than two lateral KW while others demonstrated no significant difference in stability. As ulnar nerve injury may occur in up to 15.4% of surgeries even if insertion of a medial KW is performed under direct vision, utilisation of two lateral KW configurations offers the advantage of reducing this risk significantly. The main finding of this study is that for a COF exceeding a threshold level (µ = 0.2) the crossed KW configuration did not offer any mechanical advantage over the diverging lateral KW configuration. However, for very low COF values (µ<0.2) the crossed configuration exhibited improved performance when compared with divergent lateral KW (figure 1d). The data demonstrates that the KW-bone bonding has a profound effect on the stability of the fixated bone construct. This is mostly evident when distraction forces are applied but also occurs, to a lesser degree, with rotational or translational forces. This may be a clinically important consideration in the rare SCHF in children with abnormal bones and possibly more commonly, when the KW-bone bonding was compromised after multiple attempts of passing the KW through the same entry point. We have conducted a combined in-vitro mechanical test and finite element-based simulations of a fixated SCHF with different KW configurations, under various friction conditions. Under normal bone-implant interface bonding conditions, the two diverging lateral KW configuration offers adequate mechanical stability and may be the preferred choice of SCHF fixation

Purposes of study. Evaluation of the pre-operative documentation of neurovascular status in children presenting with Gartland Grades 2 and 3 supracondylar fractures and the development of an Emergency Department Proforma. Methods and results. A retrospective case-note review was performed on patients with Gartland Grade 2 and 3 supracondylar fractures observed in a two-year period from July 2008 – July 2010. 137 patients were included; sixteen patients (11.7%) sustained a Gartland Grade 2a fracture, sixty patients (43.8%) a Gartland Grade 2b fracture and sixty-one (44.5%) a Gartland Grade 3 fracture. Mean patient age at presentation was 5.59 years (range 12 months to 13 years). Nineteen patients (13.9%) had evidence of neurological deficit at presentation and thirteen patients (9.5%) presented with an absent radial pulse. Only twelve patients (8.8%) and nineteen patients (13.9%) respectively had a complete pre-operative neurological or vascular assessment documented. Regarding the individual nerves, fifty-nine (43.1%) patients had median nerve integrity documented, fifty-five (40.1%) ulnar nerve and forty-nine (35.8%) radial nerve integrity documented. Only eighteen patients (13.1%) had their anterior interosseous nerve function documented. Ten patients (7.3%) had post-operative neurological dysfunction, consisting of eight ulnar nerve injuries, and two radial nerve injuries. vi) Conclusions. Pre-operative documentation of neurovascular status in children with displaced supracondylar fractures was poor. Documentation of anterior interosseous nerve examination was particularly poor. We propose the introduction of a proforma (Liverpool Upper-limb Fracture Assessment – LUFA) to increase documentation of neurovascular assessment and optimise emergency department evaluation of children presenting with upper limb injuries

Introduction: To access efficacy of our protocol for treatment of displaced Gartland type 3 supracondylar fracture humerus in children by giving a small incision medially to identify correct entry point of medial wire and to save the ulnar nerve. This incision is extendable for open reduction if required and have no effect on morbidity. Methods: All Patients with displaced Gartland type 3 supracondylar fractures of humerus admitted from October 1997 to October 2003 were included into this study. They were all treated by closed or open reduction through medial approach and fixed with medial and lateral cross K-wires within 12 hours of admission. Results: There were 43 children with a mean age of 7.2 years at presentation. Follow up time averaged 48 months (range 12–84 months). No patient had iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. The postoperative mean value of Bauman’s angle in affected elbow was 76.7° with +/− 1.0° and 74.8° with +/− 0.6° on the unaffected elbow. All patients showed satisfactory results according to Flynn’s criteria. Discussion: Cross K-wires give reliable results; a small medial incision is cosmetically more acceptable, provides an excellent view for correct entry point of the wire after visualising ulnar nerve with added advantage of extension if fracture required open reduction

Aim: To identify reasons why surgical management of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children failed. Method: A retrospective analysis of 42 patients treated at our department over a 4 year period with case note and radiological review. Data was recorded with regards to mechanism of injury, operative method and technique with radiological assessment using Bauman’s angle and the Shaft-condylar angle. Using follow up information in case notes and radiologically, surgical “failures” were identified. Results: Overall demographics were consistent with previous studies with a median age of 6.5 years. 95% of the case notes and 75% of the X-rays were reviewed. 80% of the injuries were Gartland 3 type fractures. We noted a 9% incidence each of preoperative neurological and vascular injury and ipsilateral fracture. Median time to surgery following admission to A+E was 3.5 hours with 90% performed before midnight. Overall early fracture displacement rate was 25% with a reoperation rate of 14%. 88% of the early displacement resulted from Gartland 3 fractures treated with manipulation only. The remainder was attributable to CRIF/ORIF using a crossed lateral wiring configuration. We noted 1 case of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury, 2 cases of cubitus varus @ 1 year associated with medial column comminution, 2 cases of hypertrophic scar formation and 3 cases of asymptomatic cubitus valgus. No deep infection. 2 superficial infections. Conclusion: The management of displaced supracondylar fractures can potentially be fraught with problems therefore a standardisation of surgical management should be set for each hospital

Introduction: The preferred treatment for displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children is closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Cross-wiring techniques are biomechanically superior to parallel lateral wiring techniques. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with a novel cross wiring technique performed entirely from the lateral side. This avoids the potential for ulnar nerve injury in these difficult cases. Patients and Methods: We collected all children with supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus who were manipulated and wired by one surgeon, using a lateral cross wiring technique. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, fracture classification (Gartland’s classification) and associated neurovascular injuries were noted. At follow-up (12 weeks), range of motion and carrying angle were measured. Results: Twenty patients were identified and reviewed. There were 8 female and 14 male patients, mean age 10 years (range 2–11). Two fractures were Type II, 12 were Type IIIA and 6 were Type IIIB. Three patients had signs of an anterior interosseous nerve injury and one patient had a brachial artery laceration. All fractures were reduced, cross-wired from the lateral side, and rested in an above elbow slab. Wires were removed at 4 weeks. At follow-up, all children had a full range of motion and the mean carrying angle was 17° (range: 15–20). All three patients with pre-operative nerve injuries had full recovery of nerve function. Conclusions: Lateral cross wiring of supracondylar fractures represents a real option in the treatment of these injuries. It offers the biomechanical advantages of traditional cross-wiring without the risk of nerve injury