Introduction. Thoracic pedicle screws have been proven to be safe and effective in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, the effect of the instrumentation alloy has not yet been investigated. We aimed to compare segmental versus non segmental thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation in patients with AIS. Methods. A consecutive series of 143 patients with AIS (Lenke classification 1–4) surgically treated from 1998 to 2005 by means of thoracic pedicle screws were retrospectively reviewed. Considering implant density (number of fixation anchors placed per available anchors sites; segmental =60% [S], non-segmental =60% [NS]) and implant alloy used (titanium [Ti] vs stainless steel [SS]) we divided the cohort into four groups: Ti-S (48 cases); Ti-NS (34 cases); SS-S (35 cases); and SS-NS (26 cases). Groups were similar for preoperative mean age, sex distribution, Risser sign, main thoracic curve, and thoracic kyphosis. Pearson correlation coefficient and univariate analysis of variance were used. Results. At a mean follow-up of 6·2 years (range 3–10) the overall final main thoracic curve correction was a mean of 61·4% (20–89), whereas the implant density within the major curve was 71% (15–100%). We recorded a significant correlation between implant density and percentage major curve correction (r=0·41, p<0·002); when the four groups were compared we noted that the SS-S group showed the greatest average correction (75%), followed by the Ti-S, SS-NS, and Ti-NS groups. We detected no significant differences between SS-S versus Ti-S versus SS-NS (r=0·002, p>0·05; r=0·13, p>0·05; r=0·07, p>0·01, respectively), whereas the Ti-NS group showed a statistically significant inferior percentage correction when compared with all other groups (average 52%; p<0·001). Nevertheless, no significant difference between groups was recorded on the SRS-30 assessment, showing a postoperative improvement in both self-image and satisfaction. Conclusions. When an SS instrumentation is used, non-segmental pedicle screw constructs seem to be equally effective as segmental instrumentations in obtaining satisfactory results in patients with main thoracic AIS. When the implant alloy used is titanium, an implant density of greater than 60% should be guaranteed so as to achieve similar results to those recorded in this study

We compared the clinical, radiological and quality-of-life outcomes between hybrid and total pedicle screw instrumentation in patients undergoing surgery for neuromuscular scoliosis. A matched comparison using prospectively collected data was undertaken. A total of 66 patients underwent posterior or anteroposterior correction and fusion with hybrid (n = 33, mean age at surgery 15.8 years (9.10 to 19.6)) or total pedicle screw instrumentation (n = 33, mean age 14.7 years (7.0 to 20.7)) with a minimum follow-up of two years. The major curve pre-operatively was a mean of 87° (sd 29, 25° to 141°) and 81° (sd 18, 47° to 116°) in the hybrid and total pedicle screw groups, respectively (p = 0.29) and at a minimum of two years it was 33° (sd 20; 2° to 87°) and 20° (sd 12; 1° to 55°), respectively (p = 0.0016). The mean correction of the major curve was 59% (41% to 88%) in the hybrid and 75% (43% to 99%) in the total pedicle screw groups at two-year follow-up (p = 0.0011). The mean operating time was 7.45 hours (sd 2.18) and 6.04 hours (sd 1.71) in the hybrid and total pedicle screw groups, respectively (p = 0.001), and the mean intra-operative blood loss was 3760 ml (sd 2790) and 1785 ml (sd 1110), respectively (p = 0.001).

Total pedicle screw instrumentation provided shorter operating times, less blood loss and better correction of the major curve compared with hybrid constructs in patients undergoing surgery for neuromuscular scoliosis.

Inflammatory markers such as the C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count and body temperature are easy to measure and are used as indicators of infection. The way in which they change in the early post-operative period after instrumented spinal surgery has not been reported in any depth.

We measured these markers pre-operatively and at one, four, seven and 14 days postoperatively in 143 patients who had undergone an instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

The CRP proved to be the only sensitive marker and had returned to its normal level in 48% of patients after 14 days. The CRP on day 7 was never higher than that on day 4. Age, gender, body temperature, operating time and blood loss were not related to the CRP level. A high CRP does not in itself suggest infection, but any increase after four days may presage infection.