The aim of this retrospective study was to review the outcome of patients treated with Fassier-Duval (FD) rods and highlight some of the complications found during treatment. Between April 2006 and August 2010 we inserted 24 FD rods in 13 patients. 17 rods for osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), 2 for fractures and deformity associated with cerebral palsy, 1 for fracture associated with muscular dystrophy, 1 for fibrous dysplasia and 3 for centralisation of single bone forearms. In the upper limb one patient required revision for proximal migration of the male component and another patient is waiting for revision for the same problem. In the lower limb, a tibial nail was revised because of proximal migration of the male component. A femoral nail was adjusted because of loss of the proximal fixation. One of the OI patients fell, fractured the femur and bent a femoral nail. This awaits revision at a later date. A second OI patient fell on 2 separate occasions bending both a tibial and a femoral nail respectively. These were both revised to trigen intramedullary nails. In all the other cases there were no complications. In summary the Fassier Duval system provides a versatile way of providing intramedullary stabilisation for growing bones through a single entry point. However in our experience we have a 33% complication rate most notably bending of the rods. We advocate careful patient selection and using as high a diameter nail as is feasible

This study compares the initial outcomes of minimally invasive techniques for single-event multi-level surgery with conventional single-event multi-level surgery. The minimally invasive techniques included derotation osteotomies using closed corticotomy and fixation with titanium elastic nails and percutaneous lengthening of muscles where possible. A prospective cohort study of two matched groups was undertaken. Ten children with diplegic cerebral palsy with a mean age of ten years six months (7.11 to 13.9) had multi-level minimally invasive surgery and were matched for ambulatory level and compared with ten children with a mean age of 11 years four months (7.9 to 14.4) who had conventional single-event multi-level surgery. Gait kinematics, the Gillette Gait Index, isometric muscle strength and gross motor function were assessed before and 12 months after operation.

The minimally invasive group had significantly reduced operation time and blood loss with a significantly improved time to mobilisation. There were no complications intra-operatively or during hospitalisation in either group. There was significant improvement in gait kinematics and the Gillette Gait Index in both groups with no difference between them. There was a trend to improved muscle strength in the multi-level group. There was no significant difference in gross motor function between the groups.

We consider that minimally invasive single-event multi-level surgery can be achieved safely and effectively with significant advantages over conventional techniques in children with diplegic cerebral palsy.