Introduction:. Hallux surgery is the most commonly performed elective surgery in the foot and ankle. As with all surgery, there are many potential complications quoted in the literature. Venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) incidence and prophylaxis, however, is not adequately addressed and remains controversial. Material and Method:. This prospective study includes one hundred patients who underwent hallux surgery. Risk factors implicated to increase the risk of developing venous thromboembolic disease as well as anaesthetic time, thigh tourniquet time and regional anaesthetic blocks were documented. Compressive ultrasonography was performed in all the patients postoperatively to assess for deep vein thrombosis. Results:. There was one incident of calf deep vein thrombosis (DVT). No patient developed a pulmonary embolus. The one patient who developed a DVT was not at any higher risk than the average patient in the study. Conclusion:. As a result of the low incidence of venous thromboembolic disease in this study, the authors do not recommend the routine use of chemical venous thrombo-prophylaxis in patients undergoing hallux surgery. The decision to give postoperative anticoagulation remains the surgeon's responsibility. The duration of prophylaxis will depend on when the patient is fully mobile

Purpose

The frequency of venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) after total hip arthroplasty(THA) is 20–30% and it is serious complication under THA. Therefore it is necessary to detect and prevent VTE. The purpose of this study were examined the frequency of VTE and the factor of incidence of VTE in our hospital.

Aim

To investigate the incidence, types and trends in diagnosis of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) over a ten-year period.

This population-based study investigated the incidence and trends in venous thromboembolic disease after total hip and knee arthroplasty over a ten-year period. Death or readmission for venous thromboembolic disease up to two years after surgery for all patients in Scotland was the primary outcome. The incidence of venous thromboembolic disease, including fatal pulmonary embolism, three months after surgery was 2.27% for primary hip arthroplasty and 1.79% for total knee arthroplasty. The incidence of fatal pulmonary embolism within three months was 0.22% for total hip arthroplasty and 0.15% for total knee arthroplasty. The majority of events occurred after hospital discharge, with no apparent trend over the period. The data support current advice that prophylaxis should be continued for at least six weeks following surgery. Despite the increased use of policies for prophylaxis and earlier mobilisation, there has been no change in the incidence of venous thromboembolic disease

Pathologic fractures about the hip are an uncommon, but increasingly prevalent, clinical scenario encountered by orthopaedic surgeons. These fractures about the hip usually necessitate operative management. Life expectancy must be taken into account in management, but if survivorship is greater than 1 month, operative intervention is indicated. Determination must be made prior to operative management if the lesion is a solitary or metastatic lesion. Imaging of the entire femur is necessary to determine if there are other lesions present. Bone lesions that have a large size, permeative appearance, soft tissue mass, and rapid growth are all characteristics that suggest an aggressive lesion. Biopsy of the lesion in coordination with the operative surgeon should be conducted if the primary tumor is unknown. Metastatic disease is much more common than primary tumors in the adult population. Many metastatic fractures in the intertrochanteric region, and all fractures in the femoral neck and head are an indication for hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. Cemented femoral implants are generally indicated. This allows immediate weight bearing in a bone with compromised bone stock, thus reducing the risk of peri-operative fractures. Additionally, patients are often treated with radiation and/or chemotherapy, which may prevent proper osseointegration of an ingrowth femoral component. Highly porous ingrowth shells have been shown to provide reliable and durable fixation even in these situations. Management of a periacetabular pathologic fracture, particularly resulting in a pelvic discontinuity is a particularly challenging situation. Use of a highly porous acetabular component combined with an acetabular cage, a custom acetabular component, a cemented Harrington technique, or a primary acetabular reconstruction cage may be utilised. Patients with neoplastic disease are often at risk for infection and thromboembolic disease both from the disease and treatment. Pre-operative evaluation of nutrition status by measuring albumin and pre-albumin will give the surgeon insight. Additionally, dehydration is commonly seen in cancer patients, and adequate pre-operative optimization of fluids and electrolytes may reduce peri-operative complications from other organ systems

Thromboembolic disease (TED) remains as a major concern for orthopaedic surgeons and is a well-known complication of lower extremity joint replacement procedures. While there is voluminous literature on the topic, it is difficult for the average orthopaedic surgeon to keep up with all the advancements in this area as well as the newer pharmacological options for prophylaxis. To address this, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) has developed a clinical practice guideline (CPG) in this area to provide treatment recommendations based on the best available evidence. Historically, guidelines for TED prophylaxis have been based largely on randomised controlled trials whose outcome measure was venographically documented deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, many venographically documented DVTs, particularly those distal to the popliteal vein, are of no clinical consequence. Therefore, in the AAOS CPG the systematic review of the literature was focused on those outcomes that have the most clinical relevance: all-cause mortality, symptomatic or fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), proximal DVT, major bleeding and symptomatic DVT rates. Using these as the clinically important endpoints, it is evident that the extant literature is insufficient to provide definitive guidance in this area and to make specific recommendations about optimal pharmacological prophylaxis. Nonetheless, one strong recommendation has emerged from this systematic review: the guideline recommended against routine post-operative duplex ultrasonography screening of patients who undergo elective hip or knee arthroplasty. Only one risk factor – previous history of TED – had evidence demonstrating a higher risk beyond the risk from elective hip or knee arthroplasty itself (weak recommendation). There was not sufficient evidence that other potential risk factors increase the risk of TED, likely because of the relatively high background risk of elective hip or knee arthroplasty. In addition, there is very little evidence defining populations at increased risk for bleeding and bleeding-associated complications associated with pharmacological prophylaxis. However, the panel did come to a consensus that patients with known bleeding disorders or active liver disease are at an increased risk for post-operative bleeding. In these circumstances, it is recommended that mechanical compressive devices be the primary modality of prophylaxis as pharmacologic prophylaxis may increase the risk of bleeding. There was a moderate strength recommendation for the superiority of neuraxial anesthesia to limit blood loss even though there is no demonstrable effect on the incidence of TED. Finally, there was a moderate grade recommendation that pharmacologic agents (including aspirin) and/or mechanical compression devices be utilised for the prevention of VTE in patients that are undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty who are not at elevated risk beyond that of the surgery itself for VTE or bleeding. Clearly there is great need for better evidence with appropriately powered studies that examine the most clinically relevant outcomes in TED prophylaxis

My goal for every patient undergoing THA is to achieve a perfect result. At the very least this includes no pain at any time, normal range of motion, normal functionality and a minimal chance of a second operation. Both the Posterolateral Approach (PLA) and the Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) have the capability of achieving these important goals. However, when you dive deeper into the goal of a “perfect” THA, some differences between the approaches become apparent. These include less muscle damage, faster recovery, and no restrictions at any time with the DAA as opposed to the PLA. Also there is some evidence of better wound healing (Poehling) and less chance of thromboembolic disease with the DAA (Stryker). The PLA violates all posterior structures of the hip joint, and specifically also goes through the gluteus maximus muscle. Done properly, the DAA spares all the gluteal muscles, and all of the posterior muscles about the hip. Bergin, who demonstrated lower levels of creatine kinase using the DAA vs PLA, has provided evidence of lower muscle damage. Faster recovery patterns have been well documented after DAA (Christen, Taunton). Part of this may be related to not needing hip precautions after DAA, while PLA patients are restricted in certain activities and positions in the postoperative period, because of the violation of the posterior capsule. Not having any restrictions enhances patient confidence, and patients tend to do more activities sooner with less reluctance and a subsequent faster recovery. It is my belief that DAA problems (outside the learning curve) are related to the dependence upon special tables and fluoroscopy, as opposed to proper exposure, to perform a DAA. If you don't test hip stability in the OR, you will miss subtle impingement that can lead to postoperative dislocation. If you depend upon fluoroscopy to guide acetabular reaming (without proper exposure), you run the risk of over-reaming or asymmetric reaming with dire consequences. If you don't measure leg length directly, but rely on fluoroscopic measurements, you run the risk of inadvertent leg lengthening

Background. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common, costly, and morbid complication following TJA. Consequently, the current standard of care recommends that all TJA candidates receive some form of thromboprophylaxis postoperatively. Chemoprophylaxis, however, is not without its own risks and has been associated with greater risk of perioperative complications such as major bleeding, infection, stroke, and increased wound drainage. Mechanical compression devices serve as an alternative to chemoprophylaxis. Compression devices are thought to function by decreasing venous stasis and activating fibrinolysis. Intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPCD) function by providing pressure at a constant cycle; whereas continuous enhanced circulation therapy (CECT) devices such as ActiveCare portable system (Medical Compression Systems, Or Akiva, Israel) function in a synchronized manner with the patient's own respiratory cycles. While both of these systems are widely utilized, there is scarce data comparing their effectiveness as thromboprophylatic agents following TJA. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to comparatively evaluate the efficacy of ActiveCare to IPCDs in the prevention of thromboembolic events following TJA. Methods. A literature search using PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were used to identify all articles published between January 2000 and August 2016. Key words used to conduct the search were venous foot pump, intermittent pneumatic compression, total hip arthroplasty/replacement, total knee arthroplasty/replacement, deep vein thrombosis, thromboembolic disease and pulmonary emboli. Two independent investigators carried out the literature review using the PRISMA guidelines (Figure 1). Analysis of risk ratio was performed by evaluation of studies which compared IPCD with any control chemoprophylaxis regiment or ActiveCare with any control chemoprophlaxis regiment. Assessment of heterogeneity and analysis of data were operated by Review Manager 5.3. Results. Our primary search protocol yielded 968 individual studies by both reviewers of which 525 were duplicates. After screening the remaining 443 abstracts for relevancy 357 were excluded, leaving 86 for full text examination. After a thorough evaluation, 60 were further excluded, and a total of 24 studies, published between 2000 and 2014, were included for analysis, representing 9,134 patients. Of these, 13 were randomized controlled trials and 11 were retrospective studies. When compared to control chemoprophylactic groups, the risk ratio (RR) of DVT development was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.39 – 0.67; I. 2. =69%) with NSIPCDs and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.27 – 0.80; I. 2. =0%) with RSCDs. The RR for development of PE in these groups respectively were 0.24 (95% CI: 0.04 – 0.15) versus 0.55 (95% CI: 0.35 – 0.88) (Figure 3). Conclusion. When compared to chemoprophylaxis alone, compression devices appear to reduce the incidence of VTEs following TJA. The addition of mechanical prophylaxis to any chemoprophylactic regimen increased VTED prevention Following a comparative analysis of IPCDs and ActiveCare our study suggests that ActiveCare may be more effective at preventing VTE events, albeit not statistically significant. Thus, our results demonstrate that while both devices are effective thromboprophylactic modalities, more research is warranted to better elucidate the strengths and limitations of compression devices as thromboprophylatic agents. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Hip fractures are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly, with approximately 30,000 hip fractures a year in Canada. Many hip fracture patients are prone to heart failure and present anticoagulated with Warfarin for medical comorbidities including atrial fibrillation or previous thromboembolic disease. Reversal of warfarin anticoagulation to an INR < 1.5 preferred for surgery but this often contributes to a delay to hip fracture surgery, which increases patient pain, morbidity, mortality, and length of stay Octaplex is a small-volume prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) that reverses Warfarin-related anticoagulation in 15–60 minutes. It has been shown to be safe and effective in the management of intracranial and gastrointestinal bleeding in warfarinised patients. It is recommended by Bone and Joint Canada as an option for urgent warfarin reversal in hip fracture patients. However, there has been no published literature on the use of Octaplex or other PCCs in orthopaedic patients. Our objective is to assess the effectiveness of Octaplex for rapid reversal of warfarin anticoagulation in hip fracture patients. A database review of all patients who received Octaplex was performed. Medical records of all hip fracture patients in Calgary who received Octaplex between December 2009 and February 2015 were reviewed. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 33 patients were identified. A timeline of International Normalised Ratio (INR), Octaplex administration, and hip fracture surgery was recorded. Mortality and complications were assessed at 30 days. A single dose of Octaplex corrected the INR to < 1.5 in 29 cases (88%). Median time from administration of Octaplex to a measured INR < 1.5 was 1.1 hours. Median time from admission to hip fracture surgery was 22 hours. Mortality at 30 days was 15.2%, mostly from cardiac arrest. A further 12% of patients developed cardiac or thrombotic complications. Multiple medical comorbidities were common including coronary artery disease (55%), congestive heart failure (45%), and chronic pulmonary disease (39%). Patients who received both fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and Octaplex for warfarin reversal had much higher mortality than those who only received Octaplex (40% vs 4.3% mortality at 30 days), but also had more medical comorbidities. Octaplex is effective at rapidly reversing warfarin anticoagulation and reducing time to surgery, potentially reducing the morbidity and mortality of hip fractures. Administration of both Octaplex and FFP were associated with higher early mortality in this case series. Further research is required to assess the safety of Octaplex, vitamin K, and FFP for reversal of warfarin anticoagulation in this population

Acute peri-operative blood loss warranting transfusion is a frequent consequence of major joint replacement (TJR) surgery. Significant peri-operative anemia can contribute to hypotension, dyspnea, coronary ischemia and other peri-operative medical events that can result in increased risk of peri-operative complications, readmissions and impair the patient's ability to mobilise after surgery resulting in a longer length of stay (LOS) and increase skilled nursing facility (SNF) utilization. The risks associated with allogeneic blood transfusions (ABT) administered to treat symptomatic peri-operative anemia are numerous and extend beyond the concerns of transmission of communicable disease (HIV, hepatitis, other). Patients receiving ABTs have been shown to have a longer hospital LOS, higher risk of infection, and higher mortality after TJR than those who do not require transfusion after surgery. As a result, many different pre-operative, peri-operative and post-operative strategies have been utilised to minimise peri-operative blood loss and transfusion need for patients undergoing TJR. Several studies have shown that the strongest predictor of the need for ABT in the TJR patient is the pre-operative hematocrit (Hct). As a result, all patients with unexplained pre-operative anemia should be evaluated for an underlying cause prior to elective TJR surgery. In recent years, focus has shifted towards peri-operative reduction of blood loss with the use of pharmacologic agents like tranexamic acid (TXA). These agents work by inhibiting fibrinolysis and activating plasminogen. Numerous studies have shown that TXA given IV, applied topically into the surgical wound or given orally have been shown to reduce peri-operative bleeding and ABT after both THA and TKR. Regardless of route of administration, all appear to be more efficacious and considerably more cost-effective in reducing the need for ABT than other methods discussed previously. Despite concerns about the potential increased thromboembolic risk in patients undergoing TJR, there does not appear to be any conclusive evidence suggesting an increased risk of venous thromboembolic disease (VTED) in TJR patients who receive peri-operative TXA. Although it may be unnecessary, many TJR surgeons still, however, avoid use of TXA in patients with a past history of VTED, stroke, coronary artery disease (including coronary stents), renal insufficiency, hypercoagulable state and seizure disorder. The use of topical TXA may be safer in some of these high risk patients since systemic absorption is minimal when administered via this route. Although the optimal method of administration (IV, topical, oral or combined) has not yet been determined based on safety, cost and reduction of need for ABT, incorporation of tranexamic acid into a blood conservation program is clearly the standard of care for all TJR programs that should nearly eliminate the need for ABT for patients undergoing TJR

There is widespread appreciation amongst orthopaedic surgeons of the importance of thromboprophylaxis. However much of the evidence is based on surrogate outcomes of clinical end-points. This population-based study aims to identify the incidence and trends in venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) following total hip (THR) and knee arthroplasty (TKR) with death or readmission for VTE up to two years following surgery for all patients in Scotland as the primary outcome. We used the Scottish Morbidity Record (SMR01) system to identify all patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty over the ten-year period from 1992 to 2001. Patients undergoing cataract surgery over the same period were identified as a control group. Record linkage for all patients to subsequent SMR01 and Registrar General records provided details of further admissions due to DVT or non-fatal PE and deaths within Scotland up to two years after the operation. The cause of death was determined from the Registrar General Records. The incidence of VTE (including fatal pulmonary embolism (PE)) three months following primary THR was 2.27% and primary TKR was 1.79%. The incidence of fatal PE within three months of THR was 0.22% and TKR was 0.15%. The majority of events occurred in the interval from hospital discharge to six weeks after surgery. There was no apparent trend over the period. An apparent reduction in the overall mortality within 365 days of surgery appears to be due to a reduction in the incidence of acute myocardial infarct. The data support the current advice that prophylaxis should be continued for at least six weeks following surgery. Despite increased uptake of prophylaxis regimens and earlier mobilisation, there has been no apparent change in the incidence of symptomatic VTE over the ten-years from 1992 to 2001

Patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures have a high risk of developing thromboembolic complications. Despite routine screening, the risk of PE remains high and may develop in patients with negative DVT screening. The search for a means to identify the patient ‘at risk’ has been elusive. 537 consecutive patients, referred to Royal Adelaide Hospital over a 20 year period for treatment of pelvic and acetabular fractures, were evaluated prospectively for pulmonary embolus (PE). 352 patients referred directly to the author were treated with variable dose heparin as prophylaxis to venous thromboembolic (VTE) disease. 184 patients primarily admitted under the general surgeons or to ITU, prior to referral to the author, were treated with fixed dose heparin or Enoxaparin. All patients were followed prospectively to determine the rate of pulmonary embolus. The heparin dosage requirements of those who developed pulmonary emboli were compared to those who did not. Patients were also identified for whom a clinical diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was made during the study and their heparin dosage requirements were determined. 7 of 352 patients treated with variable dose heparin developed PE (1.98%). 13 of 184 patients treated with fixed dose heparin, Enoxaparin, or combinations, developed PE (7.06%). An incidental finding of DVT was made in 36 patients. Of these, 10 patients (2.8%) were treated with variable dose heparin and 26 patients (14.1%) with fixed dose heparin or Enoxaparin. The average Injury Severity Score was higher in patients treated with variable dose heparin than those treated with fixed dose regimes. Patients treated with variable dose heparin who developed PE showed a progressively increasing heparin requirement. The majority of patients who did not develop PE (72%) showed a progressively decreasing heparin requirement (suggesting reversal of a prothrombotic state). 21% showed an initial increasing heparin requirement followed by a decreasing requirement (suggesting a prothrombotic state that was reversed, e.g. a DVT successfully treated by the increasing heparin dose provided by a variable dose regime). 4% manifested a static heparin requirement (suggesting maintenance of a prothrombotic state). 8 patients treated with variable dose heparin developed DVT. 6/8 patients manifested a phase of progressively increasing heparin requirement, followed by a decreased requirement, and 2/8 patients manifested a sustained level of heparin requirement. Patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures treated with variable dose heparin showed a rate of PE (1.98%). This is remarkably low compared with published rates of PE in such patients, and particularly compared with those patients treated only with chemoprophylaxis. The rate of PE was 3.5x higher and the rate of DVT was 5x higher in patients treated with fixed dose heparin or Enoxaparin. Patients who developed PE or DVT manifested an increasing heparin requirement. An increasing dosage of heparin may protect the ‘at risk’ patient from venous thromboembolism. Fixed dose unfractionated heparin/LMWH may be insufficient to treat the ‘at risk’ patient. An increasing heparin requirement may identify the patient ‘at risk’