Local antimicrobial therapy is an integral aspect of treating orthopaedic device related infection (ODRI), which is conventionally administered via polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement. PMMA, however, is limited by a suboptimal antibiotic release profile and a lack of biodegradability. In this study, we compare the efficacy of PMMA versus an antibioticloaded hydrogel in a single- stage revision for chronic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ODRI in. sheep. Antibiofilm activity of the antibiotic combination (gentamicin and vancomycin) was determined in vitro. Swiss alpine sheep underwent a single-stage revision of a tibial intramedullary nail with MRSA infection. Local gentamicin and vancomycin therapy was delivered via hydrogel or PMMA (n = 5 per group), in conjunction with systemic antibiotic therapy. In vivo observations included: local antibiotic tissue concentration, renal and liver function tests, and quantitative microbiology on tissues and hardware post-mortem. There was a nonsignificant reduction in biofilm with an increasing antibiotic concentration in vitro (p = 0.12), confirming the antibiotic tolerance of the MRSA biofilm. In the in vivo study, four out of five sheep from each treatment group were culture negative. Antibiotic delivery via hydrogel resulted in 10–100 times greater local concentrations for the first 2–3 days compared with PMMA and were comparable thereafter. Systemic concentrations of gentamicin were minimal or undetectable in both groups, while renal and liver function tests were within normal limits. This study shows that a single-stage revision with hydrogel or PMMA is equally effective, although the hydrogel offers certain practical benefits over PMMA, which make it an attractive proposition for clinical use

Fracture related infection remains a major challenge in musculoskeletal trauma surgery. Despite best practice, treatment strategies suffer from high failure rates due to antibiotic resistance and tolerance. Bacteriophages represent a promising alternative as they retain activity against such bacteria. However, optimal phage administration protocols remain unknown, although injectable hydrogels, loaded with phage and conventional antibiotics, may support conventional therapy. In this study we tested the activity of meropenem, and two newly isolated bacteriophages (ϕ9 and ϕ3) embedded within alginate-chitosan microbeads and a hydrogel. Antibiotic and phage stability and activity were monitored in vitro, over a period of 10 days. In vivo, the same material was tested in treatment of a 5-day old Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection of a tibial plate osteotomy in mice. Treatment involved debridement and 5 days of systemic antibiotic therapy plus: i- saline, ii-phages in saline, iii-phages and antibiotics loaded into a hydrogel (n=7 mice/group). To assess the efficacy of the treatments, the infection load was monitored during revision surgery with debridement of the infected tissue after 5,10 and 13 days (euthanasia) by CFU and PFU quantification. In vitro testing confirmed that the stability of meropenem and activity of ϕ9 and ϕ3, was not affected within the alginate beads or hydrogel over 10 days. The in vivo study showed that all mice receiving phages and antibiotics loaded into a hydrogel survived the infection with a reduction of the bacterial load in the soft tissue. Active phages could be recovered from the infected site at euthanasia (10. 4. PFU/g). The hydrogel loaded with bacteriophages and meropenem showed a positive result in locally reducing the infection load indicating a synergistic effect of the selected antimicrobials. Overall, our new strategy shows encouraging results for improving the treatment of antibiotic-resistant biofilm infections that are related to medical implants

Aim. The duration of systemic antibiotic therapy following first-stage surgery is contentious. Our Institution's philosophy is to perform an aggressive debridement, use high concentration targeted antibiotics through cement beads and systemic prophylactic antibiotics alone. In the presence of significant soft tissue infection or microbiological diagnostic uncertainty; systemic antibiotics may be prescribed for 5 days whilst awaiting tissue culture results. The aim of this study was to assess the success of our philosophy in the management of PJI of the hip using our two-stage protocol. Method. A retrospective review of our Institution's prospectively-collected database was performed to identify those patients who were planned to undergo a two-stage hip revision procedure for PJI. All patients had a confirmed diagnosis of PJI as per the major criteria of MSIS 2013, a minimum 5-years follow up and were assessed at the time of review using the MSIS working group outcome-reporting tool (2018). They were then grouped into “successful” or “unsuccessful” (suppressive antibiotics, further revision for infection, death within 1 year). Results. 299 intended two-stage hip revisions in 289 patients (6 repeat ipsilateral two-stage, 4 bilateral two-stage) met our inclusion criteria. 258 (86%) patients proceeded to 2. nd. stage surgery. Median follow up was 10.7 years. 91% success rate was observed for those patients who underwent reimplantation; dropping to 86% when including the patients who did not proceed to second stage surgery. The median duration of post-operative systemic antibiotics following first stage surgery was 5 days (IQR 5–9). No significant difference in outcome was observed in patients who received either; < / = 48 hours (86%; n=70) compared to > 48 hours antibiotics (86%; n=229; p=0.96) or </= 5 days of antibiotics (88%; n=202) compared to > 5 days antibiotics (82%; p=0.38). A significant majority had gram-positive (88%) infection with 30% being polymicrobial. Greater success rates were observed for gram-positive PJI (87%); than for gram-negative PJI (84%) and mixed Gram infection (72%; p=0.098). Conclusion. Aggressive surgical debridement with high concentration, targeted local antibiotic delivery at time of first stage hip surgery, without prolonged systemic antibiotics, provides a high rate of success, responsible antibiotic stewardship and reduced hospital costs

The management of periprosthetic joint infection is challenging and the duration of systemic antibiotic therapy whether it be during the interval phase or after reimplantation of a new prosthesis is controversial. We report our experience of managing chronic periprosthetic infection of the hip by the two stage exchange procedure. Patients who were scheduled to undergo a two stage revision for chronic periprosthetic infection of the hip were identified from our prospective database. Of 425 patients with microbiologically proven periprosthetic infection, 369 (87%) underwent a two stage procedure, leaving 56 patients who did not proceed to reimplantation. 41 of these were clinically infection free but for personal or medical reasons did not proceed. The remaining 15 had persistent infection. The mean age at the time of the first stage was 68 years (26 – 92 yrs). 256 (61%) patients were alive for review. The mean time between stages was 6.3 months with a mean follow up after the second stage was 65 months (range 5 to 276 months). The success rate of a single 1. st. stage debridement, confirmed by negative cultures at the time of second stage reimplantation was 94%. 19 patients underwent a repeat 1. st. stage debridement and were classed as failures of the 1. st. stage. At the time of final review, 340 (92%) patients were deemed infection free out of those who had completed a 2 stage exchange. The duration of systemic antibiotic treatment after both the 1. st. and 2. nd. stages was divided into <48 hrs and >48 hours. There was no significant difference in the success of the 1. st. stage procedure in patients who received < 48 hours (48% of the patients) as opposed to > 48 hours (p = 0.98, Chi Squared Test, Relative Risk 1.009). Similarly there was no difference in the overall success of the two stage procedure irrespective of the duration of antibiotic therapy with 76% of patients receiving <48hrs of antibiotics after the second stage. Aggressive surgical debridement together with targeted local and short term systemic antibiotic therapy should be the mainstay of treatment in two stage revision surgery

We describe a case series using calcium sulphate bio composite with antibiotics (Cerament/Stimulan) in treating infected metalwork in the lower limb. Eight patients aged 22–74 (7 males, 1 female) presented with clinical evidence of infected limb metal work from previous orthopaedic surgery. Metal work removal with application of either cerement in 5 cases (10–20ml including 175mg–350mg gentamycin) or stimulan in 3 cases (10–20ml including either 1g vancomycin or clindamycin 1.2g or 100mg tigecycline) into the site was performed. Supplemental systemic antibiotic therapy (oral/intravenous) was instituted based on intraoperative tissue culture and sensitivity. Four patients had infected ankle metalwork, 2 patients infected distal tibial metalwork and 2 had infected external fixators. Metal work was removed in all cases. The mean pre operative CRP was 15.8mg/l (range 1–56mg/l). The mean postoperative CRP at 1 month was 20.5mg/l (range 2–98mg/l). The mean pre op WCC was 7.9×10. 9. (range 4.7–10.5 ×10. 9. ). Mean post op WCC at 1 month was 7.1×10. 9. (range 5.0–9.2×10. 9. ). The organisms cultured included enterobacter, staphylococcus aureus, staphylococcus epidermidis, staphylococcus cohnii, stenotrophomonas, acinetobacter, group B streptococcus, enterococcus and escherichia coli. No additional procedures were required in any case. All surgical wounds went on to heal uneventfully. Infection control and union was achieved both clinically and radiologically in all cases. Our results support the use of a calcium sulphate bio composite with antibiotic as an adjuvant for effective local infection control in cases with implant related bone sepsis. The technique is well tolerated with no systemic or local side effects. We believe that implant removal, debridement and local antibiotic delivery can minimise the need for prolonged systemic antibiotic therapy in such cases

Aim. We describe a case series using adjuvant calcium sulphate bio composites with antibiotics in treating infected metalwork in the foot and ankle. Method. 11 patients aged 22–81 (9 males, 2 females) were treated with clinical evidence of infected limb metal work from previous orthopaedic surgery. Metal work removal with intra osseous application of either cerement in 8 cases (10–20ml including 175mg–350mg gentamycin) or stimulan in 3 cases (5–12ml including 1g vancomycin) into the site was performed. Supplemental systemic antibiotic therapy (oral/intravenous) was instituted based on intraoperative tissue culture and sensitivity. Results. 7 patients had infected ankle metalwork, 2 had infected foot metalwork and 2 had infected external fixators. Metal work was removed in all cases. Mean pre operative CRP was 25.4 mg/l (range 1–137mg/l). Mean postoperative CRP at 1 week was 15.4mg/l (range 2–36mg/l) and at 1 month was 16.1mg/l (range 2–63mg/l). Mean pre op WCC was 8.5×10. 9. (range 6.2–10.6×10. 9. ). Mean post op WCC at 1 week was 8.8×10. 9. (range 5.1–12.7×10. 9. ) and 1 month was 7.1×10. 9. (range 3.7–10.4×10. 9. ). Organisms cultured included enterobacter, staphylococcus species, stenotrophomonas, acinetobacter, group B streptococcus, enterococcus, escherichia coli, pseudomonas, morganella morganii and finegoldia magna. Infection eradication as a single stage procedure with primary would closure and healing was achieved in 10 out of 11 cases (90.9%). No additional procedures were required in these cases. Conclusions. Our results support the use of a calcium sulphate bio composite with antibiotic as an adjuvant for effective local infection control in cases with implant related bone sepsis. The technique is well tolerated with no systemic or local side effects. Our results show that a single stage implant removal, debridement and local antibiotic delivery can achieve over 90% success rates. We theorise that it could minimise the need for prolonged systemic antibiotic therapy in such cases

Two stage exchange treatment of the infected TKA involves two separate surgical procedures separated by an interval of several weeks of pathogen specific antibiotic therapy. The first stage involves removal of all of the infected arthroplasty components and any cement or foreign material, followed by aggressive debridement of nonviable bone and soft tissues. This is followed by placement of an antibiotic-laden spacer which may be either static (molded solid PMMA block) or mobile (shaped blocks or implants that allow knee motion). With both static and mobile spacers high local doses of antibiotic are delivered from the cement in addition to systemic antibiotic therapy usually employing an IV for around 6 weeks post debridement. The choice between static and mobile spacers is dictated by surgeon preference, soft tissue status (i.e. need for adjunctive muscle flaps), and by the severity of bone loss present with static spacers more likely to be used for more major soft tissue or bone defect cases. Mobile spacers have the advantage of allowing interval motion of the knee which may improve final range of motion. Static spacers usually require adjunctive brace or cast immobilization to prevent migration and bone damage. The second stage is performed at around 6 to 8 weeks after completion of systemic antibiotic therapy and preferably after normalization (or improvement) in laboratory indicators such as ESR and CRP. Routine repeat aspiration of all knees before reimplantation is not usual, but selective aspiration for culture may be helpful if concern exists that infection may still be present due to systemic signs, wound appearance or abnormal laboratory parameters. The second stage procedure involves removal of the antibiotic-laden spacer, repeat complete debridement of the knee, and insertion of revision knee components. Frequently adjunctive stems, blocks, cones or sleeves are needed to achieve adequate implant fixation due to associated bone loss. Careful attention to soft tissue balancing is required at the time of reimplantation in order to optimise motion and function while also avoiding laxity or maltracking. Two stage exchange remains the gold standard in North America for the management of infected TKA. While this method is used by some surgeons for all chronically infected TKA patients, it is employed even by most one stage exchange devotees when the infecting organism is unknown, infection involves a highly resistant or difficult to manage pathogen (i.e. fungal), is associated with a sinus track or marginal soft tissues, or in many cases of immunocompromised patients or those with multiple comorbidities

Introduction and Objective. Management of bone loss associated with bone contamination or infection represents a double biological and clinical challenge frequent in traumatology. The advent of new biomaterials can allow a different approach in the treatment of bone gap. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prophylactic and therapeutic effectiveness of addition of a new absorbable bone substitute (BS) eluting different antibiotics in reconstruction of bone defects after infections and fractures with soft tissue damage. Materials and Methods. We conducted a review of patients with contaminated or infected bone defects treated using a new biomaterial, a porous composite of collagen matrices and Beta tricalcium phosphate (β TCP), able to provide a long-term release of different antibiotics. We have included treatment of osteomyelitis and osteosynthesis of exposed fracture (Gustilo Anderson 1–3b) or fractures with soft tissue damage and high risk of contamination. Surgical technique included debridement filling bone defect with BS eluting antibiotics, osteosynthesis (plate, nail, external fixator, kirschner wire), soft tissue coverage, and systemic antibiotic therapy. Radiographic and clinical data including complications (wound dehiscence, superficial or deep infection, osteomyelitis) were collected. Results. We treated 25 patients (21 male, 4 female) with mean age 47 yrs. (range 21–83). The locations treated (for incidence) was: 9 femurs (7 plates, 2 nail), 7 calcanei (one bilateral), 3 tibias, 2 forearms, 2 metatarsi, 2 hands, 1 elbow. 6 patients had large bone loss. 7 patients had bone infections (4 were Cierny Madern 4); 8 patients had osteosynthesis of exposed fractures Gustilo Anderson 1–3b (9 plate, one bilateral calcaneus). 8 patients had treatment for pseudoarthrosis of exposed fractures (6 femurs, 1 forearm, 1 metatarsus) and 3 patients a prophylactic treatment for calcaneal fractures with soft tissue damage. 4 deep infection were treated with multiple surgical debridement and new filling bone defect with BS eluting antibiotic with infection eradication. We have used a combination of vancomycin and gentamicin on 15 cases, vancomycin alone on 4 cases, combination of vancomycin and amikacin on 1 case and amikacin and Linezolid in a targeted multi drug resistance. At final follow-up functional outcome was good in all cases with bone healing. Conclusions. Extensive debridement is a fundamental requisite for eradication of bone infections and contamination. Filling of the bone void with loaded bio-composite eluting diversifiable local antibiotics with synergistic anti-biofilm activity is desirable. Treatment of this bone defects are advantaged when combining his reconstruction with BS and the possibility of release high antibiotic concentration at least for 10 days. This is an important complementing prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial option with adjuvant role to systemic therapy that enlarges the success rate

Device-associated infection remains a serious clinical problem in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. The emergence of resistant organisms such as methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has further exacerbated this problem by limiting the range of treatment options. Currently, systemic antibiotic therapy is the cornerstone of treatment, alongside surgical resection of infected tissues and implant removal. The potential for antibiotic loaded biomaterials to support the prevention and treatment of infection is significant, although the currently available options are limited in number and often re-purposed from other applications e.g. antibiotic loading of bone cement. The first part of the talk will cover the basic concepts involved in antibiotic treatment, with an emphasis on the ideal antibiotic release kinetics from biomaterials, and how bacterial biofilms and antibiotic resistance influence antimicrobial efficacy. The next generation of biomaterials for antibiotic delivery should be specifically designed with this knowledge in mind. Regulatory approval of antimicrobial combination devices, however, is an evolving process as regulatory bodies seek more robust and clinically relevant efficacy data. Approval will require preclinical efficacy using standardized animal models that recapitulate the key features of the clinical disease. The second part of this talk will cover best practice in this important stage of development

Aim. Antibiotic loaded spacers are often used during a two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) both for its mechanical properties and as a means for local antibiotic delivery. The main goal of this study is to compare the rate of positive cultures during reimplantation with the use of different antibiotic loaded spacers: aminoglycoside only vs. combined glycopeptide/aminoglycoside vs. combined glycopeptide/carbapenem/aminoglycoside. Method. We retrospectively evaluated every two-stage exchange procedures for infected hip/knee arthroplasty between 2012–2018. Microbiological findings in the first and second stage were registered as well as the type of spacer and antibiotic(s) used. Cases in whom no cultures were obtained during reimplantation and cases without sufficient data on antibiotic(s) used in cement spacers were excluded. Results. Fifty-four cases were included (20THA and 34TKA), with an overall rate of positive cultures during reimplantation of 18.5% (10/54). The rate of positive cultures was statistically significant higher among spacers with monotherapy with aminoglycoside compared to spacers with combined antibiotic therapy- 35.7% (5/14) vs. 12.5% (5/40) respectively(p<0.05). Comparing those with combined glycopeptide/aminoglycoside (2/19) with triple glycopeptide/carbapenem/aminoglycoside therapy (3/21) there was no significant difference. Microorganisms present during the second stage were mostly staphylococci (coagulase-negative in four cases, S.aureus in three), Corynebacterium striatum, Enterococcus faecalis, C.albicans in one case each. In most cases (8/10), the isolated microorganism was the same as the first stage and was resistant to the antibiotic(s) used in the spacer in seven cases. Failure rate with the need for subsequent surgery was significantly higher at 60% (6/10) in cases with positive cultures at reimplantation compared to 4.5% (2/44) for those with negative cultures during reimplantation(p=0.0005). Conclusions. It has recently been suggested that adding a glycopeptide to the spacer may be advantageous when compared to spacers with aminoglycoside monotherapy, as it will produce significantly lower rates of positive cultures during reimplantation which have been shown to increase the risk of subsequent failure as is the case in our study. Local unavailability of obtaining powder aminoglycosides has driven us to manually add high doses of vancomycin and meropenem to commercially available low-dose gentamicin cement in many of our spacers and they seem to to perform just as well as commercially available vancomycin/gentamicin combination. Although many other variables not considered in this study may influence the rate of positive cultures during the second stage (quality of initial debridement, systemic antibiotic therapy, etc.), we believe these results portrait a sufficiently accurate picture of clinical results with the use of different spacers

Aim. Propionibacterium acnes (PA) is an important cause of shoulder prosthetic joint infections (SPJIs) for which the optimal treatment has not yet been determined. Rifampicin and Levofloxacin both showed not benefit in recent experimental models of PA-SPJIs. We describe herein the experience of five different medical French centers in order to assess factors associated with patient's outcome with special emphasize on antibiotic regimens. Method. A multicentric retrospective study was performed, on consecutive patients with PA – related SPJIs diagnosed on the basis of at least 2 or more positive cultures of either per-operative or joint aspiration and clinical history compatible with a PJI according to the current guidelines. All patients had surgical management, followed by systemic antibiotic therapy. Remission was defined as an asymptomatic patient with functioning prosthesis at the last contact. Results. Fifty-nine patients of mean age 66.2 ± 10.5 years were included. Most patients were at least ASA 2 (66%), 8 (14%) diabetes mellitus, 3 (5%) had neoplasia. Fourteen patients (24%) had acute, 34 (58%) subacute, and 11 late infections (19%). The mean delay from symptoms of infection to surgery was 89 ± 141 days (1–660). Surgical management consisted in implant exchange in 40 (68%) patients. Antibiotic treatment included mainly clindamycin (49%), levofloxacin (44%) and rifampin (17%), with a mean duration of 52.3 ± 31.9 days. The mean follow-up duration was 540 days ± 488 (range 12 ™ 1925). Forty-five patients were in remission (76%) in this study, 8 patients had a relapsing infection (14%), 1 a recurrence (2%) and 5 a superinfection ™ i.e, due to a different pathogen − (8%). In monovariate analysis, rifampicin/levofloxacin treatment was significantly associated with failure (p=0.038). In multivariate analysis, levofloxacin use and implants retention were significantly related to failure (p=0.02 and p=0.003, respectively). Conclusions. Our results suggest that implant retention and levofloxacin use are two independents factors of failure in patients treated for PA – related SPJIs

Aim. The optimal surgical approach for patients hospitalized for moderate to severe septic bursitis is not known, and there have been no randomized trials of a one-stage compared with a two-stage (i.e., bursectomy, followed by closure in a second procedure) approach. Thus, we performed a prospective, non-blinded, randomized study of adult patients hospitalized for an open bursectomy. Method. Patients were randomized 1:1 to a one-stage vs. a two-stage surgical approach. All patients received postsurgical oral antibiotic therapy for 7 days. These are the final results of the prospective study registered at ClinicalTrials (NCT01406652). Results. Among 164 enrolled patients, 130 had bursitis of the elbow and 34 of the patella. The surgical approach used was one-stage in 79 and two-stage in 85. The two groups were balanced with regards to sex, age, causative pathogens, levels of serum inflammatory markers, co-morbidities, and cause of bursitis. Overall, there were 22 treatment failures: 8/79 (10%) in the one-stage arm and 14/85 (16%) in the two-stage arm (Pearson-χ2-test; p=0.23). Recurrent infection was caused by the same pathogen a total of 7 patients (4%), and by a different pathogen in 5 episodes (3%). The incidence of infection recurrence was not significantly different between those in the one- vs. two-stage arms (6/79 vs. 8/85; χ2-test: p=0.68). In contrast, outcomes were better in the one- vs. two-stage arm for wound dehiscence (2/79[3%] vs. 10/85[12%]; p=0.02), median length of hospital stay (4.5 vs. 6 days), nurses’ workload (605 vs. 1055 points) and total costs (6,881 vs. 11,178 Swiss francs) (all p<0.01). Conclusions. For adult patients with moderate to severe septic bursitis requiring hospital admission, bursectomy with primary closure, together with 7 days of systemic antibiotic therapy, was safe, resource-saving and effective. Using a two-stage approach did not reduce the risk of infectious recurrence, and may be associated with a higher rate of wound dehiscence than the one-stage approach

Aim. The treatment of osteomyelitis often requires extensive surgical debridement and removal of all infected tissues and foreign bodies. Resulting bone loss can then eventually be managed with antibacterial bone substitutes, that may also serve as a regenerative scaffold. Aim of the present study is to report the clinical results of a continuous series of patients, treated at our centre with an antibacterial bioglass*. Method. From November 2010 to May 2016, a total of 106 patients, affected by osteomyelitis, were included in this prospective, single centre, observational study. Inclusion criteria were the presence of osteomyelitis with a contained bone defect or segmental defects < 10 mm, with adequate soft tissue coverage. All patients underwent a one-stage procedure, including surgical debridement and bone void filling with the bioactive glass*, with systemic antibiotic therapy and no local antibiotics. Clinical, radiographic and laboratory examinations were performed at 3, 6 and 12 months and yearly thereafter. Results. Two patients were lost to follow-up, hence a total of 104 patients (65 males, 39 females; mean age: 46 ± 17 years, min 6 – max 81) were available at an average follow-up of 38 ± 26 months (range: 12 – 68); forty-eight patients (46.1%) were classified as Type A, 48 (46.1%) as Type B and 8 (7.7%) as Type C hosts, according to McPherson classification. Tibia (N=61) and femur (N=33) were the most common involved bones. On average patients had undergone 2.1 ± 1.3 (min 0 – max 7) previous surgical operations, with a mean infection duration of 18.7 ± 16.6 months (min 2 – max 120). Infection recurrence was observed in 10 patients (9.6%), most often within one year from surgery (8/10). Negative prognostic factors included infection duration > 2 years, Gram negative or mixed flora or negative cultural examination, Type B or C hosts and soft tissue defect. No side effects or complications related to bioglass were noted. Conclusions. This is to our knowledge the longest and the largest single centre consecutive series of patients, affected by bone infections of the long bones, treated according to a one-stage procedure using bioactive glass. Our results confirm, on a larger population and at a longer follow-up, previous reports. Early treatment, pathogen identification and adequate management of soft tissues should be considered to further reduce infection recurrence rate. *BonAlive®

To evaluate the clinical outcome of three different local antibiotic delivery materials, used as bone defect fillers after excision of chronic osteomyelitis. We reviewed all patients receiving Collagen Fleece with Gentamicin (Septocoll E)(n=74), Calcium Sulphate with Tobramycin pellets (Osteoset T)(n=166) or Calcium Sulphate/Hydroxyapatite biocomposite with Gentamicin (Cerament G)(n=73) for dead space filling after resection of C-M Stage III and IV chronic osteomyelitis. Data was collected on patient comorbidities, operation details, microbiology, postop complications and need for plastic surgery or external fixation. All operations were performed by two surgeons. All patients had similar systemic antibiotic therapy and rehabilitation. Primary outcomes were recurrence rate, fracture rate and wound leakage rate. All three groups had very similar mean age and range, microbiological cultures, need for free muscle flaps or local flaps, proportion of femur, tibia and upper limb bones and use of external fixation. There were small differences in the proportion of C-M Class B hosts and anatomic Type IV cases, between the groups. All patients were followed up for at least one year. Mean follow-up was 1.75 years for Septocoll E, 1.96 years for Osteoset T and 1.78 years for Cerament G. After surgery, there were fewer prolonged wound leaks with Cerament G (leakage persisting for more than 2 weeks). Fracture rates and infection recurrence were twice as common with Osteoset T compared with Cerament G at between one and two years after operation (see Table). The use of a biocomposite material delivering local aminoglycoside was associated with lower recurrence rates and few wound problems, compared with collagen or calcium sulphate alone. This may reflect the higher levels of antibiotic in the defect and controlled release profile. The improved recurrence rate was despite a higher percentage of compromised Class B hosts

Osteoarticular infections in paediatric population are primarily hematogenous in origin, although cases secondary to penetrating trauma, surgery or contiguous site are also reported. Despite being rare, numerous studies report infection relapse rates around 5 %. Osteomyelitis complications in children include septic arthritis, osteonecrosis of the bone segment, impaired growth. 7 years old male patient presented with history of traffic injury in January 2004. He sustained closed diaphyseal fracture of the right femur initially treated by elastic osteosynthesis. Four years after traffic injury he was diagnosed at our Institution of chronic femoral Osteomyelitis with positive cultures for methicillin sensible Staphylococcus aureus, requiring multiple surgical debridements and systemic antibiotic therapy. Five years follow- up the patient developed valgus deformity of his right knee (mechanical axis 11° genu valgum) with limb length discrepancy of 15 mm, intermalleolar distance of 15 cm and bone edema in external compartment of the knee (MRI). At this time the patient did not present any recurrence of septic process with normalization of laboratory parameters (ESR and CRP) and clinically asymptomatic. In February 2014, at the end of growth, a distal femoral varus osteotomy was used to treat valgus knee malalignment. Medial closing wedge osteotomy was performed satisfactorily using Tomofix® Osteotomy System (DePuySynthes). 18 months follow- up after varus osteotomy the patient progressed satisfactorily without pain and a normal function of his right knee. Correction limb length discrepancy was achieved (5 mm) with a normal alignment of his right limb (mechanical axis 3° genu valgum). Although Osteomyelitis is not very frequent in children population, its treatment requires not only prolonged antibiotic therapy but also multiple surgical debridements. We recommend monitoring over a long period of time children affected with Osteomyelitis in order to prevent and treat correctly impaired growth

Aim. To prevent infections after orthopaedic surgery, intravenous antibiotics are administered perioperatively. Cefazolin is widely used as the prophylactic antibiotic of choice. Systemic antibiotic therapy may however be less effective in longstanding surgery where bone allografts are used. Bone chips have been shown to be an effective carrier for certain types of antibiotics and may provide the necessary local antibiotic levels for prophylaxis. To be efficient a prolonged release is required. In contrast to vancomycin with proven efficient prolonged release from Osteomycin, this has not been described for cefazolin. We developed a protocol to bind cefazolin to bone chips by means of a hydrogel composed of proteins naturally present in the human body. Method. Three types of bone chips were evaluated: fresh frozen, decellularized frozen and decellularized lyophilized. Bone chips were incubated with 20 mg/ml cefazolin or treated with liquid hydrogel containing either 1 mg/ml fibrin or 1 mg/ml collagen and 20 mg/ml cefazolin. The cefazolin hydrogel was distributed in the porous structure by short vacuum treatment. Bone chips with cefazolin but without hydrogel were either incubated for 20 min- 4h or also treated with vacuum. Cefazolin elution of bone chips was carried out in fetal bovine serum and analysed by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography – Diode Array Detection. Results. Soaking of bone chips without hydrogel resulted in a quick release of cefazolin, which was limited to 4 hours. When vacuum was applied elution of >1 µg/ml cefazolin was measured for up to 36 hours. Combination with collagen hydrogel resulted in a higher cefazolin concentration released at 24 hours (3.9 vs 0.3 µg/ml), but not in a prolonged release. However, combination of decellularized frozen bone chips with fibrin hydrogel resulted in an initial release of 533 µg/ml followed by a gradual decline reaching the minimal inhibitory concentration for S. aureus at 72 hours (1.7 µg/ml), while not measurable anymore after 92 hours. Conclusions. Processed bone chips with hydrogel-cefazolin showed a markedly prolonged cefazolin release. When combined with a fibrin hydrogel, high initial peak levels of cefazolin were obtained, followed by a decreasing release over the following three days. This elution profile seems desirable, with high initial levels to maximize anti-bacterial action and low levels for a limited time to stimulate osteogenesis. Further preclinical studies are warranted to show effectiveness of hydrogel-cefazolin impregnated bone chips

Aim. Treatment principles of chronic osteomyelitis include debridement, clean sampling, excision of dead bone, stabilization, dead space management, soft tissue closure and systemic antibiotic therapy. Dead space management becomes very complicated, if the bone infection is caused by multi-resistant bacteria. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the effect of a new vancomycin-loaded hydroxyapatite / calcium sulfate composite. *. in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis (OM) caused by multi-resistant bacteria. Method. From June 2015 to November 2015, 7 patients (4 males, 3 females, average age 52.6y) were treated according to the above mentioned principles using the new vancomycin-loaded hydroxyapatite / calcium sulfate composite. *. Infections were caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), multi-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) and polymicrobial, vancomycin-sensitive bacteria. We used a two-stage protocol with debridement, excision of bone and external stabilization in the first stage, followed by bone defect reconstruction. To fill the residual bone defects, in 3 patients the new vancomycin-loaded hydroxyapatite / calcium sulfate composite. *. (10mL) was used on its own and in 4 patients combined with 18mL of an unloaded calcium sulfate / hydroxyapatite composite. **. Post-operative follow-up was evaluated clinically and by radiographs and CT scans at 6, 14 and 24 weeks. Results. In 6 of 7 patients rapid control of infection was achieved. Soft tissue reactions and prolonged white wound drainage (caused by calcium sulfate dissolution) was seen in 3 of 7 patients. In 6 of 7 patients recurrence of infection has not been observed so far. Radiographs showed different elution intervals of the radiocontrast agent (Iohexol), depending on anatomical location. Bone remodelling or replacement of the composite by new bone was not uniform in the patients and showed specific radiographic signs. In addition to the so-called „puddle sign“, we found septae, membranes, vacuoles and sometimes arc-like structures. Therefore, we suggest the name “arc-sign” for these formations. Conclusions. During the follow-up of the first 7 patients treated with the unloaded calcium sulfate / hydroxyapatite composite. **. in 6 of 7 cases no recurrence of infection was observed. This is very promising in the difficult situation of bone infections caused by multi-resistant bacteria. Follow-up radiographs and CT-scans showed specific patterns during the resorption of the composite and the formation of new bone, which have not been described in other bone graft substitutes so far. The bone defects are not completely filled yet, but the affected bones are clinically stable and patients can ambulate with full weight bearing

Statement of purpose. To describe the results and technique of ankle fusion following failed Total Ankle Replacement (TAR) in a limb reconstruction unit. Methods. Retrospective case note, microbiology and imaging review was performed on four consecutive patients referred to the limb reconstruction unit for salvage of infected total ankle replacement surgery since 2009. The patients were identified from operative list and tertiary referral records. A review of the current literature regarding TAR was performed. Results. Three patients were treated with a two stage surgical approach with initial removal of metalwork, debridement of infected tissue and temporary spanning external fixation. Local and systemic antibiotic therapy was then implemented for an average period of 53 days (range 48–61 days), before definitive fixation with a circular frame. One patient showed no clinical evidence of infection during preoperative investigation or intraoperatively, and was therefore treated with a single stage procedure with application of a circular frame. All four patients grew Staphylococci on culture of excised tissue and in one case there was additional growth of Proteus species. Bony union was achieved after fusion with a circular frame in all cases. Conclusion. TAR is gaining popularity for the treatment of severe talocrural arthritis, and several series with medium term results report low numbers of infected cases requiring revision. This case series discusses and describes the management strategy for failed TAR due to infection employed by a limb reconstruction unit

A two-stage procedure was carried out on 57 patients with confirmed infection in a hip replacement. Allograft bone was used in the second stage. Pathogenic organisms were identified in all patients. In stage 1, the prosthesis was removed together with infected tissue. Antibiotics were added to customised cement beads. Systemic antibiotics were not used. At the second stage, 45 of the patients had either acetabular impaction grafting, femoral impaction grafting or a combination; 12 had a massive allograft. Eight patients suffered recurrent infection (14%), in six with the original infecting organism. The risk factors for re-infection were multiple previous procedures and highly resistant organisms. We believe that systemic antibiotic therapy should be considered for these patients. Allograft bone is shown to be a useful adjunct in most infected hip replacements with considerable loss of bone stock