Introduction

The trapezio-metacarpal joint (TMCJ) is subject to constant multiplanar forces and is stabilised by the bony anatomy and ligamentous structures. Ligament reconstruction can correct the hypermobility and potentially prevent osteoarthritis. Eaton and Littler proposed a surgical technique to reconstruct the volar ligamentous support of this joint. In our cadaveric biomechanical study, we aimed to evaluate the resultant effect of this technique on the mobility of the thumb metacarpal.

Aim. Arthroscopic interventions have revolutionized the treatment of joint pathologies. The appropriate diagnostics and treatment are required for infections after ligament reconstructions using non-resorbable material such as tendon grafts, anchors, and sutures, prone to biofilm formation. The infection rate is around 1% for knee and shoulder, while up to 4% for Achilles tendon reconstructions. Despite high number of these procedures worldwide, there is limited evidence about the best treatment protocol. Our study aimed to provide a general protocol for the treatment of small implants for soft tissue reconstruction. Method. Between 2019 and 2023, we treated 48 infections of ligament, meniscus, and tendon reconstructions out of 7291 related procedures performed in the same time period. Early infection (<30 days) were treated with an arthroscopic debridement and implant retention (DAIR), except Achilles tendons had open DAIR, while those with delayed or chronic infection (>30 days) were treated with extensive debridement and lavage combined with one-stage exchange (OSE) or implant removal. During surgery, at least 5 microbiological s and samples for histopathology were obtained. The removed material was sonicated. After surgery, all patients were one week on iv. antibiotics, followed by oral antibiofilm antibiotics for 6 weeks including rifampicin and/or a quinolone. All patients were followed for at least 1 year. Failure was defined as the need for additional revision surgery after finished iv. antibiotic treatment. Results. Among 48 patients, 38 were early and 10 were late acute or chronic infections. The incidence of infection for our cohort was 0.7%. We observed 27 infections after ligament reconstruction of the knee, 15 of the shoulder, 5 of the ankle, and 1 infection of the elbow joint. 40 patients were treated with DAIR, 5 with OSE, and 3 with implant removal. We had 11 C. acnes, 10 S. aureus, 6 S. epidermidis, 2 P. aeruginosa, 2 S. lugdunensis, 10 mixed flora, and 3 culture-negative infections. 12 patients received antibiotics before surgery, and all culture-negative infections were related to this subgroup. We observed 2 failures, both in a combination of proximal tibial osteotomy and ligament reconstruction of the knee joint. The success rate of our protocol was 96%. Conclusions. Prompt surgical treatment followed by 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment cured 96% of infections of small implants after reconstruction procedures of knee, shoulder, and ankle joints. Our study is the first to provide a treatment protocol for infections of small implants after ligament reconstruction procedures

Objectives. An optimal reconstruction of the joint anatomy and physiology during revision total knee replacement (RTKR) is technically demanding. The standard navigation systems were developed for primary procedures, and their adaptation to RTKR is difficult. We present a new navigation software dedicated to RTKR. The rationale of this new software was to allow a virtual planning of the joint reconstruction just after removal of the primary prosthesis. Methods. The new software was developed on the basis of a non-image based navigation system which has been extensively validated for implantation of a primary TKR. Following changes have been implemented: 1) to define and control the vertical level of the joint space on both tibia and femoral side; 2) to measure the tibio-femoral gaps independently in flexion et en extension on both medial and lateral tibio-femoral joints; 3) to virtually plan and control the vertical level and the orientation of the tibia component; 4) to virtually plan and control the sizing and the 3D positioning of the femoral component (figure 1); 5) to virtually plan and control the potential bone resection; 6) to virtually plan and control the potential bone defects and their reconstruction (bone graft or augments) (figure 2); 7) to virtually plan and control the size, the length and the orientation of the stems extensions independently on the femoral and on the tibia side (figure 3). The validity of the concept has been tested by 20 patients operated on for RTKR for any reason, with a routine reconstruction with a cemented, unconstrained revision implant. The accuracy of the experimental software was assessed 1) during the procedure after implantation of the RTKR by measuring the medial and lateral laxity in full extension and 90° of knee flexion with the navigation system, and 2) on post-operative radiographs. Results. No system failure was observed. The virtual planning of the reconstruction was possible in all cases. The intra-operative control of the different reconstruction steps was possible in all cases. The mean coronal tibio-femoral angle was 0+3°, and no outlier was observed. Coronal and sagittal orientation of the prosthetic components was considered satisfactory in all directions for 16 cases. The desired vertical level of the joint space was achieved in all cases. The desired patella height was achieved in 15 cases. The measurement of the knee laxity was satisfactory in 16 cases. A good bone-prosthesis contact was achieved in 17 cases for the tibia, but it was not possible to analyze accurately this criterion for the femur. Conclusion. The software used in the current study allowed performing a straightforward reconstruction of the knee joint anatomy and physiology during RTKR. The virtual planning prevented to perform repetitive trials with different technical solutions which are often necessary during conventional RTKR. The operating time may be consequently decreased

Introduction. An optimal reconstruction of the joint anatomy and physiology during revision total knee replacement (RTKR) is technically demanding. A new software was developed to allow a virtual planning of the joint reconstruction just after removal of the primary prosthesis. Material. Following changes have been implemented to the standard navigation software: 1) to define and control the vertical level of the joint space on both tibia and femoral side, and to allow performing the potential change decided prior to the revision procedure according to the preoperative imaging planning; 2) to measure the tibio-femoral gaps independently in flexion et en extension on both medial and lateral tibio-femoral joints; 3) to virtually plan and control the vertical level and the orientation of the tibia component; 4) to virtually plan and control the sizing and the 3D positioning of the femoral component; 5) to virtually plan and control the potential bone resection; 6) to virtually plan and control the potential bone defects and their reconstruction (bone graft or augments); 7) to virtually plan and control the size, the length and the orientation of the stems extensions independently on the femoral and on the tibia side. Methods. The validity of the concept has been tested by 20 patients operated on for RTKR for any reason, with a routine reconstruction with a cemented, unconstrained revision implant. The accuracy of the experimental software was assessed 1) during the procedure after implantation of the RTKR by measuring the medial and lateral laxity in full extension and 90° of knee flexion with the navigation system, and 2) on post-operative radiographs: coronal tibio-femoral angle, coronal and sagittal orientation of both tibia and femur components, vertical level of the reconstructed joint space, patella height, quality of the bone-prosthesis contact of both tibia and femur components. Results. No system failure was observed. The virtual planning of the reconstruction was possible in all cases. The intra-operative control of the different reconstruction steps was possible in all cases. The mean coronal tibio-femoral angle was 0+3°, and no outlier was observed. Coronal and sagittal orientation of the prosthetic components was considered satisfactory in all directions for 16 cases. The desired vertical level of the joint space was achieved in all cases. The desired patella height was achieved in 15 cases. The measurement of the knee laxity was satisfactory in 16 cases. A good bone-prosthesis contact was achieved in 17 cases for the tibia, but it was not possible to analyse accurately this criterion for the femur. Discussion. The software used in the current study allowed performing a straightforward reconstruction of the knee joint anatomy and physiology during RTKR. The virtual planning prevented to perform repetitive trials with different technical solutions which are often necessary during conventional RTKR. The operating time may be consequently decreased

Surface replacement of the hip has become established as an alternative treatment to total hip replacement in the younger, active, male patient. By the very nature of preserving the femoral head and neck, there may be failures due to femoral neck fracture and femoral component loosening. Additionally, revisions of hip resurfacing for acetabular loosening may be necessary. Other scientific papers have described problems that may arise as a result of the metal-on-metal bearing either due to excess metal production or an immunologic-mediated reaction to the metal debris. Grammatopolous et al. describe poor results of revisions of surface replacements due to massive tissue destruction at the time of revision surgery, persistent pain, and swelling. In my experience with hip resurfacing, this complication is extremely rare. In my series of 925 resurfacings with a minimum of 2 year follow up, 12 revisions (1.3%) have been performed. Of these revisions, only 3 (0.3%) were for complications related to the metal-on-metal bearing; 2 for edge-loading and excess metal production, and 1 for metal hypersensitivity. None of the revision cases have had abductor destruction, or nerve/vascular involvement. Reconstruction of the joint was carried out with standard and revision components; post-operative function of these patients has been comparable to that of a primary total hip replacement. With careful monitoring of the post-operative resurfacing patient, problems can be identified early and surface replacement conversion can be performed with excellent results

Introduction. Accurate alignment of components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a known factor that contributes to improvement of post-operative kinematics and survivorship of the prosthetic joint. Recently, CAOS has been introduced into TKA in effort to reduce positioning variability that may deviate from the mechanical axis. However, literature suggests that clinical outcomes following TKA with CAOS may not present a significant improvement from traditional methods of implantation. This would infer that achieving correct alignment, alone, might be insufficient for ensuring an optimal reconstruction of the joint. Therefore, this study seeks to evaluate the importance of soft-tissue balancing, through the quantification of joint kinetics collected with intraoperative sensors, with or without the combined use of CAOS. Methods. Seven centers have contributed 215 patients who have undergone primary TKA with the use of intraoperative sensors. Of the 7 surgeons contributing patients to this study, 3 utilize CAOS; 4 utilize manual techniques. Along with standard demographic and surgical data being collected as per the multicenter study protocol, soft-tissue release techniques and medial-lateral intercompartmental loads—as indicated by the intraoperative sensors—were also captured pre- and post-release. “Optimal” balance was defined as a medial-lateral load difference of ≤ 15 lbs. A chi-squared analysis was performed to determine if the percentage of soft-tissue release was significantly different between the two groups: patients with CAOS, and patients without CAOS. Results. Of the 215 patients (35% with CAOS, 65% without CAOS) who have received TKA, using intraoperative sensors to assess mediolateral balance, 92.6% underwent soft-tissue release. Stratifying this data by surgical technique: 89% of the patients with CAOS, and 94% of patients without CAOS, were released. A chi-squared analysis—with 3 degrees of freedom; and 99% confidence—was executed to determine if the 5% difference between the two groups was significant. The analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups, thus we can conclude that soft-tissue release is as equally necessary in the CAOS TKA group, as it is in the traditional TKA group. Discussion. It is widely accepted that correct alignment of TKA components contributes to improved kinematic function of the affected joint. Recently, technology has been developed to digitally guide surgeons through bony cuts, thereby decreasing the incidence of deviation from the mechanical axis. However, alignment may not be the foremost contributing factor in ensuring an optimal joint state. In this evaluation, 92.6% of the cohort required some degree of releasing of ligamentous structures surrounding the knee joint, regardless of intraoperative technique used. A chi-squared analysis of the data supports the claim that soft-tissue release is used in nearly all cases, irrespective of the use of CAOS (p < 0.001). This suggests that soft-tissue release is necessary in nearly all cases, even after appropriate alignment has been digitally verified. The data strongly supports the idea that obtaining an optimally functioning joint is multifactorial, and that alignment may play a more minor role in achieving ideal joint reconstruction than previously assumed, being superseded by the necessity to achieve soft-tissue balance

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) represents one of the most safe and effective medical procedures. However, with an unchanged rate of 3% in primary and 10% in revision THAs, despite alleged surgical technique and implant design improvements, dislocation continues to be a matter of concerns with important functional and financial consequences. A number of parameters influence the risk for dislocation including patient specific factors, surgeon experience, femoral head size, implant orientation, and surgical approach. The latter has been less investigated during the past 15 years, as it was supposed that large femoral heads or specifically designed implants such as dual mobility sockets would notably decrease the risk for dislocation. Also, minimally invasive approach including the anterior approach, and rapid recovery have been aggressively marketed, making the transtrochanteric approach rarely if ever used by most surgeons. Also, this surgical technique is demanding and time consuming, not exactly what is expected in the 21st century. However, there are some clear advantages to the transtrochanteric approach both in primary and revision THAs: it gives a large view on the acetabulum allowing for anatomic reconstruction of the artificial joint and correct implants orientation; it allows for preservation of the entire periarticular muscles and tendons including the external rotators (external obturator+++); and it permits to balance the abductors tension by lowering and/or translating the greater trochanter. These advantages can notably reduce the rate of dislocation in both primary and revision THAs. Data from our institution including senior and junior surgeons have showed rates of dislocation ranging from 0.1 to 1.7% in primary THAs and from 1.5 to 2.3% in revision THAs. Our rate of nonunion is less than 2% even in revision using a specifically designed trochanteric claw plate almost systematically used in revision THAs to allow for a more rigid fixation. Finally, the transtrochanteric approach can be extended to the femur to cope with specific situations. The surgical tips and tricks of this approach will be discussed in the presentation

The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of a new 4 Dimensional CT scan aids the clinician in defining the size and area of the scapular bone to be removed arthroscopically in patients with Snapping Scapular Syndrome. From January 2009 – January 2011 nine consecutive patients with Snapping Scapular Syndrome were included. In six patients, (mean age 21±5 years, range 15–27) conservative treatment failed. These patients were positioned prone and demonstrated their snapping motion during the 7 seconds duration of the scan. The 4D CT machine scans 16 cm volumes in 0.3 seconds. It also scans motion, allowing a 3D reconstruction of the scapulothoracic joint, its’ movements and the dynamic area of impingement of the scapula on the surrounding structures. This scan has already improved arthroscopic removal of the supero-medial angle of the scapula. The scan showed in one case not only snapping of the superior medial angle of the scapula on the 2nd rib, but also extra bone impinging on the 3rd rib. Another case showed no real impingement but movement of the 2nd and 3rd rib by a tethering structure and a third case demonstrated impingement of the lateral third of the clavicle on the 2nd rib. The images provided by this new 4D CT scan offer greater pre-operative insight on the pathology in each individual patient with Snapping Scapular Syndrome. Therefore, we feel that it is a valuable addition to the assessment and treatment of these patients

The purpose of this study was to determine the motion pattern of the Acromio-Clavicular (AC) joint in a normal shoulder with the use of the new 4 Dimensional CT scan. From April 2010 till January 2011 fourteen healthy volunteers (4 female, 10 male)(mean age 42±11 years) with no previous history of shoulder complaints participated in this study. The 4D CT machine scans motion, allowing a 3D reconstruction of the shoulder joint and its movements. Patients were positioned supine with their arm elevated 90° in the sagittal plane. During the 7 seconds duration of the scan they adducted their arm at that level and then elevated their arm upwards resisted by the gantry for 4 seconds, in this way simulating the clinical Bell-van Riet test for AC pathology. In the transverse plane the mean AC joint space measured in the neutral position is 1.8±0.5 mm. While adducting the arm the AC joint narrows 0.0±0.4 mm (with a positive value being narrowing and a negative value widening). On resisted elevation the joint space is narrowed 0.2±0.6 mm. The mean antero-posterior (AP) translation in this same plane is 0.2±2.2 mm on adduction (with a positive value being posterior translation of the clavicle and a negative value anterior translation) and 0.4±2.9 mm on resisted elevation. The new 4D CT scan demonstrates that the AC joint in a normal shoulder mainly translates in an AP direction, rather than being narrowed or widened, when the arm is adducted (with or without resisted active elevation)