The trapeziometacarpal joint (TMCJ) is the most common hand joint affected by osteoarthritis (OA), and trapezium implant arthroplasty is a potential treatment for recalcitrant OA. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of various trapezium implants as an interventional option for TMCJ OA. Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library databases were searched for relevant studies up to May 2022. Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines were adhered to and registered on PROSPERO. The methodological quality was assessed by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute tools for observational studies and the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Subgroup analyses were performed on different replacement implants, the analysis was done via Open Meta-Analyst software and P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. A total of 123 studies comprising 5752 patients were included. Total joint replacement (TJR) implants demonstrate greater significant improvements in visual analogue scale pain scores postoperatively. Interposition with partial trapezial resection implants was associated with the highest grip strength and highest reduction in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score. Revision rates were highest in TJR (12.3%), and lowest in interposition with partial trapezial resection (6.2%). Total joint replacement and interposition with partial trapezial resection implants improve pain, grip strength, and DASH scores more than other implant options. Future studies should focus on high-quality randomized clinical trials comparing different implants to accumulate higher quality evidence and more reliable conclusions

Aim. In 10% of the presumed aseptic hip or knee revisions, a low-grade infection is unexpectedly diagnosed based on the tissue samples taken during revision. Extended antimicrobial prophylaxis can possibly reduce the failure rate in cases of unexpected PJI, because the prophylaxis can be considered as early empiric treatment. In this randomized controlled study we analysed whether extended antimicrobial prophylaxis compared to a single dose is beneficial to improve the outcome of treatment in unexpected PJI in revision arthroplasty. Method. This study was nested in a randomized clinical trial comparing single-dose cefazolin with prolonged prophylaxis (15 doses of cefazolin over 5 days) for revision arthroplasty of the hip or knee. For this analysis, patients were included if an unsuspected PJI (defined as ≥2 positive intraoperative tissue samples with the same microorganism) was diagnosed. PJI treatment consisted of 12 weeks of a rifampicin-based regimen in Staphylococcal PJI, without removal of the prosthesis. We examined Infection characteristics and success of treatment after one year, defined as the absence of signs or treatment for PJI during follow-up. Results. After randomization of 662 patients, 68 unexpected PJI were diagnosed. In 5 cases no antimicrobial treatment was started. The success rate after one year follow-up for those who received PJI treatment was 96% (28/29) in the single dose group and 91% (31/34) in the extended prophylaxis group (p=1.00). The most frequently identified pathogens in unexpected PJI were Cutibacterium acnes (n=50) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (n=14). The causatives were susceptible for the cefazolin prophylaxis in 61 of the 63 cases. The interval between the stopped prophylaxis and the re-start of antimicrobial treatment was on average 10 days (SD 4) for the single dose and 5 days (SD 4) for the extended group. The mean duration of antimicrobial treatment was 83 days (SD 12) and did not differ between both groups (p=0.16). Conclusions. This is the first randomized controlled trial in which extended prophylaxis showed no benefit on the prosthesis survival for patients with an unexpected PJI after assumed aseptic revision of the hip or knee prosthesis. The results imply that extended prophylaxis should not be given as part of early empiric therapy

Previously, we conducted a multi-center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopic Bankart repair with and without remplissage. The end point for the randomized controlled trial was two years post-operative, providing support for the benefits of remplissage in the short term in reducing recurrent instability. The aim of this study was to compare the medium term (3 to 9 years) outcomes of patients previously randomized to have undergone isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) or Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) for the management of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. The rate of recurrent instability and instances of re-operation were examined. The original study was a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial with two 1:1 parallel groups with recruitment undertaken between 2011 and 2017. For this medium-term study, participants were reached for a telephone follow-up in 2020 and asked a series of standardized questions regarding ensuing instances of subluxation, dislocation or reoperation that had occurred on their shoulder for which they were randomized. Descriptive statistics were generated for all variables. “Failure” was defined as occurrence of a dislocation. “Recurrent instability” was defined as the participant reporting a dislocation or two or more occurences of subluxation greater than one year post-operative. All analyses were undertaken based on intention-to-treat whereby their data was analyzed based on the group to which they were originally allocated. One-hundred and eight participants were randomized of which 50 in the NO REMP group and 52 in the REMP group were included in the analyses in the original study. The mean number of months from surgery to final follow-up was 49.3 for the NO REMP group and 53.8 for the REMP group. The rates of re-dislocation or failure were 8% (4/52) in the REMP group at an average of 23.8 months post-operative versus 22% (11/50) in the NO REMP at an average of 16.5 months post-operative. The rates of recurrent instability were 10% (5/52) in the REMP group at an average of 24 months post-operative versus 30% (15/50) in the NO REMP group at an average of 19.5 months post-operative. Survival curves were significantly different favouring REMP in both scenarios. Arthroscopic Bankart repair combined with remplissage is an effective procedure in the treatment of patients with an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion and minimal glenoid bone loss (<15%). Patients can expect favourable rates of recurrent instability when compared with isolated Bankart repair at medium term follw-up

Aim. There are no studies in literature that analyze the effectiveness of closed-incisional negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) in the treatment of bone and joint infections (BJI). The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of the application of ciNPWT in the postsurgical wound management of patients with osteoarticular infections. Method. We conducted a perspective single-center study on patients with BJI treated between 01/2022 and 10/2022 with ciNPWT dressing application at the end of the surgical procedure. All patients were treated by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach and operated by the same surgical equipe. Inclusion criteria were: presence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), fracture-related infection (FRI), osteomyelitis (OM), septic arthritis (SA) surgically treated, after which ciNPTW was applied over the closed surgical wound. 30 patients (19M, 11F) have been analyzed with mean age of 56,10±17,11 years old; BJIs were all localized in the lower limb (16 PJI, 12 FRI, 1 SA, 1 OM). Results. We considered the following clinical local pre-operative parameters: presence of fistula (10 patients, 33,33%), presence of erythema (18 patients, 60%), presence of previous flap in the incisional site (7 patients, 23,33%). In 11 cases (36,67%) more than 3 previous surgical procedures were performed in the surgical site. The following surgical procedures were performed: 8 debridement and implants removal, 7 DAIR, 3 one-stage exchange, 6 two-stage exchange, 3 spacer exchange, 3 resection arthroplasty. Nineteen patients (63,34%) showed no occurrence of any local post-operative complication (erythema, hematoma, wound breakdown, wound blister, necrosis). Seven (23,33%) patients showed the presence of one or more postoperative complications that didn't require additional surgery. We observed four (13,33%) failures, defined as the need for further surgical procedures following the onset of a local complication: two patients had a wound breakdown before wound closure and two had a recurrence of infection after an uneventfully wound closure. All failures were within the group of joint infection (PJI+SA) and were affected by a multi drug resistant pathogen. Conclusions. In our series four patients required further surgery, but only two cases were related to incisional wound problems, that is consistent with aseptic joint revision surgeries data that are available in literature (3.4%-6.9%)[1-2]. Patients affected by BJI are a group with significant high risk of failure and therefore the use of ciNPWT should be considered. However, randomized clinical trials are needed to establish the superiority of the ciNPWT dressing over the standard one

Aim. This was a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial to compare the 90-day 1) incidence of surgical site complications (SSC); 2) health care utilization (the number of dressing changes, readmission, and reoperation); and 3) the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in high-risk patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) with postoperative closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPT) versus a standard of care (SOC) silver-impregnated occlusive dressing. Method. A total of 294 rTKA patients (15 centers) at high-risk for wound complications were prospectively randomized to receive either SOC or ciNPT (n = 147 each). The ciNPT system was adjusted at 125 mmHg of suction. Investigated outcomes were assessed weekly up to 90 days after surgery. A preset interim analysis was conducted at 50% of the intended sample size, with planned discontinuation for clear efficacy/harm if a significance of p < 0.005 was attained. Results. A total of 242 patients completed the required follow-up (ciNPT: n = 124 (84.4%); SOC: n = 118 (80.3%)). Demographics, baseline comorbidities, causes of revision (prosthetic joint infection, aseptic loosening, implant-related, and periprosthetic fractures), and duration of treatment were similar in both cohorts (p > 0.05). Intention to treat analysis demonstrated lower rates of SSC with ciNPT (3.4%) compared to SOC (14.3%) (p = 0.0013) (Table 1 – not included in the proceeding). Similar outcomes were obtained with the modified intention to treat analysis (p = 0.0013). The ciNPT cohort exhibited lower readmission rates (p = 0.0208), and number of dressing changes (p = 0.0003). Conversely, differences in the 90-day incidence of SSI and measured patient-reported outcomes did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). Conclusions. ciNPT mitigates the risk of SSC and readmission among high-risk rTKA patients. The lower frequency of dressing changes within the ciNPT cohort may provide added value for healthcare utilization without compromising pain and function. For the table, please contact authors directly

It is unusual, if not unique, for three major research papers concerned with the management of the fractured neck of femur (FNOF) to be published in a short period of time, each describing large prospective randomized clinical trials. These studies were conducted in up to 17 countries worldwide, involving up to 80 surgical centers and include large numbers of patients (up to 2,900) with FNOF. Each article investigated common clinical dilemmas; the first paper comparing total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for FNOF, the second as to whether ‘fast track’ care offers improved clinical outcomes and the third, compares sliding hip with multiple cancellous hip screws. Each paper has been deemed of sufficient quality and importance to warrant publication in The Lancet or the New England Journal of Medicine. Although ‘premier’ journals, they only occationally contain orthopaedic studies and thus may not be routinely read by the busy orthopaedic/surgical clinician of any grade. It is therefore our intention with this present article to accurately summarize and combine the results of all three papers, presenting, in our opinion, the most important clinically relevant facts. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:198–202

Flexible fixation techniques combined with anatomic (open) syndesmosis reduction have demonstrated improved functional outcomes and rates of malreduction. Suture-button devices allow physiologic motion of the syndesmosis without need for implant removal, which may lower the risk of recurrent syndesmotic diastasis. There is limited longer-term assessment of the maintenance of reduction between static and flexible syndesmotic fixation using bilateral ankle CT evaluation. This is an a priori planned subgroup analysis of a multi-centre, randomized clinical trial comparing static syndesmosis fixation (two 3.5 mm screws) with flexible fixation (single knotless Tightrope) for patients with AO- OTA 44-C injuries. Patients who completed bilateral ankle CT scans at 3- and 12-month follow-up were included. The primary outcome measure was syndesmotic malreduction based on bilateral ankle CT scans, using the uninjured, contralateral ankle as a control. Anterior (ASD), middle (MSD), and posterior (PSD) syndesmosis distance were calculated to measure syndesmosis reduction. Secondary outcomes included re-operation, adverse events and functional outcomes including the EQ5D, Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OM), Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI), and Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI). Paired samples t-tests were used to compare injured to control ankles (R, v 3.5.1). 42 patients (24 Group S, 18 Group T) were included. ASD for Group T was 5.22mm (95%CI 4.69–5.77) at 3 months compared to 4.26mm (95%CI 3.82–4.71; p=0.007) in controls and 5.38mm (95%CI 4.72–6.04) at 12 months compared to 4.44mm (95%CI 3.73–5.16; p=0.048) in controls. ASD for Group S was 4.63mm (95%CI 4.17– 5.10) at 3 months compared to 4.67mm (95%CI 4.24–5.10; p=0.61) in controls, but significantly increased to 5.73mm (95%CI 4.81–6.66) at 12 months compared to 4.65mm (95%CI 4.15–5.15; p=0.04) in controls. MSD results were similar; Group T had a larger MSD than control ankles at 3 months (p=0.03) and 12 months (p=0.01), while the MSD in Group S was not different at 3 months (p=0.80) but increased at 12 months (p=<0.01). 88% (21/24) of Group S had broken or removed screws by 12 months. Unplanned re-operation was 15% in Group S and 4% in Group T (p=0.02), with an overall re-operation rate of 30% in Group S. There was no significant difference between treatment groups for EQ-5D, OM, FADI or WPAI at 3- or 12-month follow-up. Tightrope fixation resulted in greater diastasis of the ASD and MSD compared to contralateral, uninjured ankles at 3- and 12-months post-fixation. Group S initially had syndesmotic reduction similar to control ankles, but between 3- and 12-months post-fixation, there was significantly increased syndesmosis diastasis compared to controls. The majority of Group S (88%) had either broken screws or scheduled screw removal, which may explain the increased tibio-fibular diastasis seen at 12-months

Management of the pathologic long-head biceps tendon remains controversial. Biceps tenotomy is a simple intervention but may result in visible deformity and subjective cramping. Comparatively, biceps tenodesis is technically challenging, and has increased operative times, and a more prolonged recovery. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of popeye deformity following biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis, identify predictors for developing a deformity, and compare subjective and objective outcomes between those that have one and those that do not. Data for this study were collected as part of a randomized clinical trial comparing tenodesis versus tenotomy in the treatment of lesions of the long head of biceps tendon. Patients 18 years of age or older with an arthroscopy confirmed biceps lesion were randomized to one of these two techniques. The primary outcome measure for this sub-study was the rate of a popeye deformity at 24-months post-operative as determined by an evaluator blinded to group allocation. Secondary outcomes were patient reported presence/absence of a popeye deformity, satisfaction with the appearance of their arm, as well as pain and cramping on a VAS. Isometric elbow flexion and supination strength were also measured. Interrater reliability (Cohen's kappa) was calculated between patient and evaluator on the presence of a deformity, and logistic regression was used to identify predictors of its occurrence. Linear regression was performed to identify if age, gender, or BMI were predictive of satisfaction in appearance if a deformity was present. Fifty-six participants were randomly assigned to each group of which 42 in the tenodesis group and 45 in the tenotomy group completed a 24-month follow-up. The incidence of popeye deformity was 9.5% (4/42) in the tenodesis group and 33% (15/45) in the tenotomy group (18 male, 1 female) with a relative risk of 3.5 (p=0.016). There was strong interrater agreement between evaluator and patient perceived deformity (kappa=0.636; p<0.001). Gender tended towards being a significant predictor of having a popeye with males having 6.6 greater odds (p=0.090). BMI also tended towards significance with lower BMI predictive of popeye deformity (OR 1.21; p=0.051). Age was not predictive (p=0.191). Mean (SD) satisfaction score regarding the appearance of their popeye deformity was 7.3 (2.6). Age was a significant predictor, with lower age associated with decreased satisfaction (F=14.951, adjusted r2=0.582, p=0.004), but there was no association with gender (p=0.083) or BMI (p=0.949). There were no differences in pain, cramping, or strength between those who had a popeye deformity and those who did not. The risk of developing a popeye deformity was 3.5 times higher after tenotomy compared to tenodesis. Male gender and lower BMI tended towards being predictive of having a deformity; however, those with a high BMI may have had popeye deformities that were not as visually apparent to an examiner as those with a lower BMI. Younger patients were significantly less satisfied with a deformity despite no difference in functional outcomes at 24 months. Thus, biceps tenodesis may be favored in younger patients with low BMI to mitigate the risk of an unsatisfactory popeye deformity

Nearly one quarter of ankle fractures have a recognized syndesmosis injury. An intact syndesmosis ligament complex stabilizes the distal tibio-fibular joint while allowing small, physiologic amounts of relative motion. When injured, malreduction of the syndesmosis has been found to be the most important independent factor that contributes to inferior functional outcomes. Despite this, significant variability in surgical treatment remains. This may be due to a poor understanding of normal dynamic syndesmosis motion and the resultant impact of static and dynamic fixation on post-injury syndesmosis kinematics. As the syndesmosis is a dynamic structure, conventional CT static images do not provide a complete picture of syndesmosis position, giving potentially misleading results. Dynamic CT technology has the ability to image joints in real time, as they are moved through a range-of-motion (ROM). The aim of this study was to determine if syndesmosis position changes significantly throughout ankle range of motion, thus warranting further investigation with dynamic CT. This is an a priori planned subgroup analysis of a larger multicentre randomized clinical trial, in which patients with AO-OTA 44-C injuries were randomized to either Tightrope or screw fixation. Bilateral ankle CT scans were performed at 1 year post-injury, while patients moved from maximal dorsiflexion (DF) to maximal plantar flexion (PF). In the uninjured ankles, three measurements were taken at one cm proximal to the ankle joint line in maximal DF and maximal PF: Anterior (ASD), middle (MSD), and posterior (PSD) syndesmosis distance, in order to determine normal syndesmosis position. Paired samples t-tests compared measurements taken at maximal DF and maximal PF. Twelve patients (eight male, six female) were included, with a mean age of 44 years (±13years). The mean maximal DF achieved was 1-degree (± 7-degrees), whereas the mean maximal PF was 47-degrees (± 8-degrees). The ASD in DF was 3.0mm (± 1.1mm) versus 1.9mm (± 0.8mm) in PF (p<0.01). The MSD in DF was 3.3mm (±1.1mm) versus 2.3mm (±0.9mm) in PF (p<0.01). The PSD in DF was 5.3mm (±1.5mm) versus 4.6mm (±1.9mm) in PF (p<0.01). These values are consistent with the range of normal parameters previously reported in the literature, however this is the first study to report the ankle position at which these measurements are acquired and that there is a significant change in syndesmosis measurements based on ankle position. Normal syndesmosis position changes in uninjured ankles significantly throughout range of motion. This motion may contribute to the variation in normal anatomy previously reported and controversies surrounding quantifying anatomic reduction after injury, as the ankle position is not routinely standardized, but rather static measurements are taken at patient-selected ankle positions. Dynamic CT is a promising modality to quantify normal ankle kinematics, in order to better understand normal syndesmosis motion. This information will help optimize assessment of reduction methods and potentially improve patient outcomes. Future directions include side-to-side comparison using dynamic CT analysis in healthy volunteers

The optimal management of rotationally-unstable ankle fractures involving the posterior malleolus remains controversial. Standard practice involves trans-syndesmotic fixation (TSF), however, recent attention has been paid to the indirect reduction of the syndesmosis by repairing small posterior malleolar fracture avulsion fragments, if present, using open reduction internal fixation. Posterior malleolus fixation (PMF) may obviate the need for TSF. Given the limited evidence and diversity in surgical treatment options for rotationally-unstable ankle fractures with ankle syndesmosis and posterior malleolar involvement, we sought to assess the research landscape and identify knowledge gaps to address with future clinical trials. We performed a scoping review to investigate rotational ankle fractures with posterior malleolar involvement, utilizing the framework originally described by Arksey and O'Malley. We searched the English language literature using the Ovid Medline and Embase databases. All study types investigating rotationally-unstable ankle fractures with posterior malleolus involvement were categorized into defined themes and descriptive statistics were used to summarize methods and results of each study. A total of 279 articles published from 1988 to 2018 were reviewed, and 70 articles were included in the final analysis. The literature consists of studies examining the surgical treatment strategies for PMF (n=21 studies, 30%), prognosis of rotational ankle fractures with posterior malleolar involvement (n=16 studies, 23%), biomechanics and fracture pattern of these injuries (n=13 studies, 19%), surgical approach and pertinent anatomy for fixation of posterior malleolus fractures (n=12 studies, 17%), and lastly surgical treatment of syndesmotic injuries with PMF compared to TSF (n=4 studies, 6%). Uncontrolled case series of single treatment made up the majority of all clinical studies (n=44 studies, 63%), whereas controlled study designs were the next most common (n=16 studies, 23%). Majority of research in this field has been conducted in the past eight years (n=52 studies, 74%). Despite increasing concern and debate among the global orthopaedic community regarding rotationally-unstable ankle fractures with syndesmosis and posterior malleolar involvement, and an increasing trend towards PMF, optimal treatment remains unclear when comparing TSF to PMF. Current research priorities are to (1) define the specific injury pattern for which PMF adequately stabilizes the syndesmosis, and (2) conduct a randomized clinical trial comparing PMF to TSF with the assistance of the orthopaedic community at large with well-defined clinical outcomes

The syndesmosis ligament complex stabilizes the distal tibiofibular joint, while allowing for the subtle fibular motion that is essential for ankle congruity. Flexible fixation with anatomic syndesmosis reduction results in substantial improvements in functional outcomes. New dynamic CT technology allows real-time imaging, as the ankle moves through a range of motion. The aim of this study was to determine if dynamic CT analysis is a feasible method for evaluating syndesmosis reduction and motion following static and flexible syndesmosis fixation. This is a subgroup analysis of a larger multicenter randomized clinical trial, in which patients with AO 44-C injuries were randomized to either Tightrope (one knotless Tightrope, Group T) or screw fixation (two 3.5-mm cortical screws, Group S). Surgical techniques and rehabilitation were standardized. Bilateral ankle CT scans were performed at one year post-injury, while patients moved from maximal dorsiflexion (DF) to maximal plantar flexion (PF). Three measurements were taken at one cm proximal to the ankle joint line in maximal DF and maximal PF: anterior, midpoint, and posterior tibiofibular distances. T-tests compared Group T and Group S, and injured and uninjured ankles in each group. Fifteen patients (six Group T [three male], nine Group S [eight male]) were included. There was no difference for mean age (T = 42.8 ± 14.1 years, S = 37 ± 12.6, P = 0.4) or time between injury and CT scan (T = 13 ± 1.8 months, S = 13.2 ± 1.8, P = 0.8). Of note in Group S, seven of nine patients had at least one broken screw and one additional patient had screws removed by the time of their dynamic CT. There was no significant difference between treatment groups for tibiofibular distance measurements in maximal PF or DF. Group T showed no significant difference between the injured and uninjured side for tibiofibular measurements in maximal PF and DF, suggesting anatomic reduction. For Group S, however, there was a significantly larger distance for all three measurements at maximal PF compared to the uninjured ankle (all P < 0 .05). In all but one Group S patient, screws were broken or removed prior to their dynamic CT, allowing possible increased syndesmotic motion, similar to Group T. Despite this, dynamic CT analysis detected increased tibiofibular distance in Group S as ankles moved into maximal PF when compared with the uninjured ankle. Given the importance of anatomic syndesmosis reduction, dynamic ankle CT technology may provide valuable physiologic information warranting further investigation

Summary. A meta-analysis was performed to compare rate of SSI after application of chlorhexidine vs. iodine in total joint arthroplasty. Chlorhexidine had significantly lower odds of SSI. Introduction. Surgical site infections (SSI) are a significant source of morbidity and mortality. The optimal preoperative skin preparation in lower extremity total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains debatable between chlorhexidine and iodine-containing solutions. This meta-analysis sought compare SSI rates between chlorhexidine cloth application the night before surgery plus povidone-iodine-alcohol (povidone-iodine) solution at surgery or only povidone-iodine at surgery. Methods. A structured literature search was performed using Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and comparative studies that evaluated preoperative chlorhexidine-gluconate versus iodine-alcohol exclusively in TJA patients. Databases were searched from database inception to January 2, 2018, and studies were included if they had specific aims and 1) compared preoperative chlorhexidine-gluconate cloths to povidone-iodine at surgery, or 2) if they compared preoperative chlorhexidine-gluconate cloths and povidone-iodine at surgery, to solely povidone-iodine at surgery. The main outcome was deep or superficial SSI at or before 1 year postoperatively. If multiple studies reported the same patient cohort, the more recent study was used. To compare the chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine groups, pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used to calculate odds of SSI. Results. Four studies involving 2,997 TJA patients were included in this meta-analysis. Three were retrospective cohort studies, and one was a RCT. One retrospective cohort study assessed chlorhexidine to povidone-iodine using a historical control. One RCT compared chlorhexidine to povidone-iodine. The remaining two studies compared chlorhexidine in addition to povidone-iodine, to only povidone-iodine. Bias analysis showed low-to-moderate quality cohort studies and one moderate-quality RCT. Chlorhexidine had significantly lower odds of SSI compared to povidone iodine (OR=0.28; 95%CI: 0.15–0.51; p<0.0001). Conclusion. Preoperative chlorhexidine-gluconate was superior at reducing SSI risk in patients who underwent lower extremity TJA, compared to povidone-iodine. This can potentially lead to decreased morbidity and lower surgical revision rates for infections. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Purpose. Dislocation after revision total hip is a common complication. The purpose of this study was to assess whether a large femoral head (36/40mm) would result in a decreased dislocation rate compared to a standard head (32mm). Method. A randomized clinical trial was undertaken to assess the effect of large femoral heads on dislocation after revision total hip. Patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty at seven centers were randomized to 32mm head or 36/40mm head. Patients were stratified according to surgeon. Primary endpoint was dislocation. Rates were compared with Fishers exact test. Secondary outcome measures were quality of life: WOMAC, SF-36 and satisfaction. One hundred eighty four patients were randomized: 92 in the 32mm head group and 92 in the large head group. Baseline demographics were similar in the two groups. Patients were followed from two to five years postoperatively. Results. In the large head group dislocation rate was 1.1% (1/92) versus 8.7% (8/92) for the 32mm head (p=0.035). In this study there was no difference in quality of life between the two groups. Conclusion. This randomized clinical trial demonstrates that a large femoral head (36/40mm) can significantly reduce dislocation rate in patients undergoing revision total hip. As a result of this study the authors now routinely use large heads in all revision hip arthroplasty

Aim. Following clean (class I, not contaminated) surgical procedures, the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) should be less than approximately 2%. However, an infection rate of 12.2% has been reported following removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the effect of a single dose of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of SSIs following removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee. Method. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial included 500 patients from 19 hospitals with a follow-up of 6 months. Eligible were patients aged 18 to 75 years with previous surgical treatment for fractures below the knee who were undergoing removal of orthopedic implants. Exclusion criteria were an active infection or fistula, antibiotic treatment, reimplantation of osteosynthesis material in the same session, allergy for cephalosporins, known kidney disease, immunosuppressant use, or pregnancy. The intervention was a single preoperative intravenous dose of 1000 mg of cefazolin (cefazolin group, n = 228) or sodium chloride (0.9%; saline group, n = 242). Primary outcome was SSI within 30 days as measured by the criteria from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Secondary outcome measures were functional outcome, health-related quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Results. Among 477 randomized patients (mean age, 44 years [SD, 15]; women, 274 [57%]; median time from orthopedic implant placement, 11 months [interquartile range, 7–16]), 470 patients completed the study. Sixty-six patients developed an SSI (14.0%): 30 patients (13.2%) in the cefazolin group vs 36 in the saline group (14.9%) (absolute risk difference, −1.7 [95% CI, −8.0 to 4.6], P = .60). Conclusions. In patients undergoing surgery for removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee, a single preoperative dose of intravenous cefazolin compared with placebo did not reduce the risk of surgical site infection within 30 days following implant removal

Background. Intraoperative blood loss is a known potential complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to reduce intraoperative blood loss and postoperative transfusion in patients undergoing TKA. While there are numerous studies demonstrating the efficacy of intravenous and topical TXA in patients undergoing TKA, there are comparatively few demonstrating the effectiveness and appropriate dosing recommendations of oral formulations. Methods. A retrospective cohort study of 2230 TKA procedures at a single institution identified 3 treatment cohorts: patients undergoing TKA without the use of TXA (no-OTA, n=968), patients undergoing TKA with administration of a single-dose of oral TXA (single-dose OTA, n=164), and patients undergoing TKR with administration of preoperative and postoperative oral TXA (two-dose OTA, n=1098). The primary outcome was transfusion rate. Secondary outcomes included maximum postoperative decline in hemoglobin, number of blood units transfused, length of hospital stay, total drain output, cell salvage volume, and operating room time. Results. Transfusion rates decreased from 24.1% in the no-OTA group to 13.6% in the single-dose OTA group (p<0.001) and 11.1% in the two-dose OTA group (p<0.001), with no significant difference in transfusion rates between single- and two-dose OTA groups (p=0.357). Operating room time was reduced from 154 minutes in the no-OTA group to 144 minutes in the one-dose OTA group and 144 minutes in the two-dose OTA group (p<0.01). Additionally, maximum postoperative decline in hemoglobin was reduced from 4.3 g/dL in the no-OTA group to 3.5 g/dL in the single-dose OTA group (p<0.01) and 3.4 g/dL in the two-dose OTA group (p<0.01), without a significant difference between the single- and two-dose regimens (p=0.233). Conclusions. OTA reduces transfusions and operating room time, with the potential advantages of greater ease of administration and improved cost effectiveness relative to other routes of administration. Further study such as a randomized clinical trial is needed to verify the effectiveness of OTA and further optimize dosing regimens in the TKA setting. Level of Evidence. Therapeutic Level III

A group of Athletes with torn ACL (insufficient knees) suffer from bowleg or valgus knees. AT this points we don't have a general consensus in literature. This study is based on a randomized clinical trial with double blind randomization of young athletes not more than 36 years and not over than 82 kg weight. Each groups contained by 30 patient with ACL deficient knees and bowlegs with Mikolicz line on the most medical 1/3rd of medial condyle of femur on worse. with follow up of 2 to 6 years and in all three groups we tried to control the knee by KT 2000, Tegner's score and IKDC and lysholm's scores in all patient. At final exam we had chance to meet 29 patients with simultaneous HTO (open wedge + plate) and ACL – R and 26 patients with HTO 1st, and 6 months later for ACL – R and only 24 patients with ACL – R 1st, 6 patients of this group and a patient of HTO 1st didn't show for rest of their procedures. Conclusion: by P value (o.o1) Simultaneous ACL – R and HTO had higher rate of success and between two other groups except osteoarthritis out come in short period of time (2 – 6 years) HTO had better results than ACL –R 1st with P value of (0.05)

Aim. Different perioperative strategies have been implemented to reduce the devastating burden of infection following arthroplasty. The use of iodophor-impregnated adhesive incise drapes is one such strategy. Despite its wide adoption, there is little proof that this practice leads to a reduction of bacterial colonization. The aim of this randomized, prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of iodophor-impregnated adhesive drapes for reducing bacterial count at the incision site. Method. A total of 96 patients undergoing open joint preservation procedure of the hip were enrolled in this prospective, randomized clinical trial of iodophor-impregnated adhesive drapes. *. One half of patients (n=48) had iodophor-impregnated adhesive drapes. *. applied to the skin prior to incision and kept on throughout the procedure, while the other half (n=48) underwent the same surgery without the use of iodophor-impregnated adhesive drapes. *. Culture swabs were taken from the surgical site at five different time points during surgery (pre-skin preparation, after skin preparation, post-incision, before subcutaneous closure, and prior to dressing application) and sent for culture and colony counts. Mixed-effects and multiple logistic regression analyses were utilized. Results. Iodophor-impregnated adhesive drapes resulted in a significant reduction of bacterial colonization of the surgical incision. At the conclusion of surgery, 12.5% (6/48) of incisions with iodophor-impregnated adhesive drapes. *. and 27.0% (13/48) without adhesive drapes were positive for bacteria. When controlling for preoperative colonization and other factors, patients without adhesive drapes were significantly more likely to have bacteria present at the incision at the time of closure (odds ratio (OR) 11.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45–80.00), and at all time-points when swab cultures were taken (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.00–6.15). Conclusions. Based on this skin sampling study, incise draping significantly reduces the rate of bacterial colonization/contamination during hip surgery. The bacterial count at the skin was extremely high in some patients without iodophor-impregnated adhesive drapes. *. , which raises the possibility that a subsequent surgical site infection or periprosthetic joint infection could likely arise if an implant had been utilized

Accurate implant placement is important to the success of joint replacement surgery. Three dimensional pre-operative planning optimizing the ability to define the anatomy and select the desired implant and its location. Linking this information into implant and patient specific instrumentation has been termed smart instrumentation. Single use instruments contain the patient's topographical boney anatomy and implant information. This same information can be placed within a bone model and a reusable instrument placed onto the bone model can be adjusted to capture the information originally in the planning software. This instrument can then be placed into the surgical site, registered to the bone surfaces and used to modify the bone surfaces to replicate the surgical plan. These concepts, technology and devices have been developed and clinically tested in randomized clinical trials for shoulder arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION. The hip arthroplasty implant is currently growing up both in orthopedic and trauma practice. This increases the frequency of prosthesis revision due to implant loosening often associated with periprosthetic osteolysis that determine the failure and lead to a loss of bone substance. Nowadays there are numerous biotechnologies seeking to join or substitute the autologous or omologous bone use. These biotechnologies (mesenchymal stromal cells, growth factors and bone substitutes) may be used in such situations, however, the literature doesn't offer class 1 clinical evidences in this field of application. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We performed a literature review using the universally validated search engines in the biomedical field: PubMed / Medline, Google Scholar, Scopus, EMBASE. The keywords used were: “Growth Factors”, “Platelet Rich Plasma”, “OP-1”, “BMP”, “BMP-2”, “BMP-7”, “Demineralized Bone Matrix”, “Stem Cell”, “Bone Marrow”, “Scaffold”, “Bone Substitutes” were crossed with “hip”, “revision”, “replacement” / “arthroplasty”, “bone loss” / “osteolysis.”. RESULTS. The search led to 321 items, of these were considered relevant: as regards the growth factors 21 articles related to in vivo animal studies and 2 articles of human clinical use of BMPs and 1 single article on the use of PRP; as regards the mesenchymal stromal cells 2 items of application in animals; as regards the use of bone substitutes we have analyzed a review of this application. DISCUSSION. The use of biotechnologies in hip prosthetic revisions has produced conflicting results: autologous growth factors (PRP) have definitely been proven effective in maxillofacial surgery, in animal studies the results of BMPs are inconsistent with articles that validate their use and others that don't recommend it. Clinical application has demonstrated, today, the limited use of BMP-7 in revisions with even an increased risk of early re-mobilization, PRP appears to be rather effective only in the early stages of peri-prosthetic osteolysis. The mesenchymal cells can increase the chances of recovery and integration of the grafts but an important variable is the number of cells that are still alive after the impaction of the graft which affects their vitality. The bone substitutes appear to be safe and very useful, particularly if applied in order to implement the omologous bone, which is still the most scaffolds used in this surgery. CONCLUSIONS. The systematic review of the literature has shown an important lack of clinical studies regarding the use of biotechnologies for prosthetic revisions. It is therefore difficult to draw guidelines that regulate the application, prospective randomized clinical studies are therefore needed to validate its effectiveness

Suction drains provide an easy and feasible method for controlling hemorrhage after total knee arthroplasty. However, there has been no compromise regarding the optimal clamping time for these drains. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to compare 12-hour drain clamping and continuous drainage after total knee arthroplasty in terms of wound complications, blood loss and articular range of motion. In order to eliminate any other factor except duration of clamping, we chose to compare knees belonging to one single person, as well as restricting the study to those knees undergoing surgery due to osteoarthritis. From a total of 100 knees (50 patients) studied, the 12-hour clamping method resulted in a significantly smaller amount of post-operative blood loss (p<0.001). The passive ranges of motion and wound complications were not significantly different between the two groups