Aims. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of repeat epidural steroid injections as a form of treatment for patients with insufficiently controlled or recurrent radicular pain due to a lumbar or cervical disc herniation. Patients and Methods. A cohort of 102 patients was prospectively followed, after an epidural steroid injection for radicular symptoms due to lumbar disc herniation, in 57 patients, and cervical disc herniation, in 45 patients. Those patients with persistent pain who requested a second injection were prospectively followed for one year. Radicular and local pain were assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS), functional outcome with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) or the Neck Pain and Disability Index (NPAD), as well as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-12). Results. A second injection was performed in 17 patients (29.8%) with lumbar herniation and seven (15.6%) with cervical herniation at a mean of 65.3 days . (sd. 46.5) and 47 days . (sd. 37.2), respectively, after the initial injection. All but one patient, who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy, responded satisfactorily with a mean VAS for leg pain of 8.8 mm . (sd. 10.3) and a mean VAS for arm pain of 6.3 mm . (. sd. 9) one year after the second injection, respectively. Similarly, functional outcome and HRQoL were improved significantly from the baseline scores: mean ODI, 12.3 (. sd. 12.4; p < 0.001); mean NPAD, 19.3 (. sd. 24.3; p = 0.041); mean SF-12 physical component summary (PCS) in lumbar herniation, 46.8 (. sd. 7.7; p < 0.001); mean SF-12 PCS in cervical herniation, 43 (. sd. 6.8; p = 0.103). Conclusion. Repeat steroid injections are a justifiable form of treatment in symptomatic patients with lumbar or cervical disc herniation whose symptoms are not satisfactorily relieved after the first injection. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1364–71

Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, Ashington, UK. To assess if a pain diary is useful in assessment and management of patients who undergo diagnostic nerve root block (NRB) for lumbar radicular pain. Prospective study. 23 patients who underwent diagnostic NRB for lumbar radicular pain were given a pain diary. They recorded their response to one of four options from Day 0 to Day 14 (good relief, partial satisfactory, partial unsatisfactory, and no relief of leg pain) and could also add additional comments. A Consultant Spinal Surgeon reviewed the diary with the patient at 6-week follow up appointment to formulate a management plan. Patient response, completion of the pain diary and final clinical outcome (surgical or non surgical treatment). The response rate was 91% (21/23). The pain diary was very useful in 43% (9/21), useful in 33% (7/21) and not useful in 24% (5/21) of patients in formulating further management. There was a tendency for patients with complex problems and poor response to add descriptive notes and comments (9/ 23). Patient compliance with pain diary was good and it has been valuable in making further management decisions. We found the pain diary to be a useful and inexpensive adjunct in the assessment of patients who underwent diagnostic NRB

To investigate the clinical effectiveness and complications of caudal epidural steroid injections in the treatment of sciatica in patients with an MRI proven sacral tarlov cyst. A Prospective case control study. All patients with corresponding radicular pain received a course of three caudal epidural steroid injections, two weeks apart and patients were reviewed at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year interval in a dedicated epidural follow up clinic. Data including demographics, MRI results, diagnosis and complications were documented. Outcome measures included the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ), the visual analogue score (VAS) and the hospital anxiety and depression (HADS) score. Overall patient satisfaction was recorded on a scale of 0-10. 38 patients with a sacral tarlov cyst were compared to a matched control group. In the sacral cyst group, mean VAS for axial pain reduced from 5.859 to 2.59 at three months (p<0.001). VAS for limb pain reduced from 6.23 to 2.53(<0.005). Mean ODI reduced from 45.49 at first visit to 21.98 at 3 months. Mean HADS also improved from 17 to 7. There was no statistical difference between the two groups. BMI did not affect the outcome in either group. Based on our study, we conclude that presence of a sacral tarlov cyst is not a contraindication to caudal epidural steroid injection, as comparable significant improvement in both axial and limb pain in the short and intermediate periods was achieved without any major complications

Aims. To study the associations of lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) with low back pain (LBP), radicular leg pain, and disability. Methods. This was a cross-sectional study of 2,206 subjects along with L1-S1 axial and sagittal MRI. Clinical and radiological information regarding their demographics, workload, smoking habits, anteroposterior (AP) vertebral canal diameter, spondylolisthesis, and MRI changes were evaluated. Mann-Whitney U tests and chi-squared tests were conducted to search for differences between subjects with and without DSS. Associations of LBP and radicular pain reported within one month (30 days) and one year (365 days) of the MRI, with clinical and radiological information, were also investigated by utilizing univariate and multivariate logistic regressions. Results. Subjects with DSS had higher prevalence of radicular leg pain, more pain-related disability, and lower quality of life (all p < 0.05). Subjects with DSS had 1.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 2.1; p = 0.027) and 1.8 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.6; p = 0.001) times higher odds of having radicular leg pain in the past month and the past year, respectively. However, DSS was not associated with LBP. Although, subjects with a spondylolisthesis had 1.7 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.5; p = 0.011) and 2.0 (95% CI 1.2 to 3.2; p = 0.008) times greater odds to experience LBP in the past month and the past year, respectively. Conclusion. This large-scale study identified DSS as a risk factor of acute and chronic radicular leg pain. DSS was seen in 6.9% of the study cohort and these patients had narrower spinal canals. Subjects with DSS had earlier onset of symptoms, more severe radicular leg pain, which lasted for longer and were more likely to have worse disability and poorer quality of life. In these patients there is an increased likelihood of nerve root compression due to a pre-existing narrowed canal, which is important when planning surgery as patients are likely to require multi-level decompression surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):131–140

Background:. Lumbar intraspinal cysts (LICs) are rare incidental MRI findings in back pain. Their space-occupying nature make them plausible factors in both non-specific and radicular back pain. Methods:. Retrospective cohort study of patients with MRI reports of LICs at our center over 5 years. N=26, 13 male, mean age 66 ± 12 years. Results:. LICs originated at levels from L1-S2 (61.5% at L4/5), reaching 17mm. 2. (rapid one year progression in this case). LICs were described as synovial in all but two cases (hemorrhagic cyst; Tarlov perineural cysts). Background degenerative changes were reported in 88.5% of cases. Patients described up to 30-year histories of non-specific back pain. Clinical features of radiculopathy plus concomitant MRI findings were indications for surgical decompression (n=14) and cyst excision (n=13/14). 2 cases of spontaneous LIC resolution, and 2 cases of post-operative complications were identified (inflammatory/scar tissue stenosis). 0% cyst recurrence rate with sustained resolution of symptoms currently stands. Conclusions:. Frequent co-existence of LICs with degeneration implicates the former as a product of osteoarthritic processes, conceivably contributing to patient accounts of chronic non-specific pain. LICs may equally constitute acute direct causes of radiculopathy, owing to their diverse origins and potential to rapidly expand. A role of LICs in axial and radicular pain, independent of other degenerative changes, is supported by symptom alleviation in cases of spontaneous resolution, versus progression with decompression performed without cyst excision (Tarlov cyst), or following novel cyst formation at the level of previous spinal fusion. Whether image-guided aspiration might reduce surgery-related side-effects is a topic for further work

We have examined the outcome in 19 professional rugby union players who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion between 1998 and 2003. Through a retrospective review of the medical records and telephone interviews of all 19 players, we have attempted to determine the likelihood of improvement, return to professional sport and the long-term consequences. We have also attempted to relate the probability of symptoms in the neck and radicular pain in the arm to the position of play. Neck and radicular pain were improved in 17 patients, with 13 returning to rugby, the majority by six months after operation. Of these, 13 returned to their pre-operative standard of play, one to a lower level and five have not played rugby again. Two of those who returned to the game have subsequently suffered further symptoms in the neck, one of whom was obliged to retire. The majority of the players with problems in the neck were front row forwards. A return to playing rugby union after surgery and fusion of the anterior cervical spine is both likely and safe and need not end a career in the game

Introduction. Advanced practice physiotherapists (APPs) manage the national low back and radicular pain pathway across the UK. A novel spinal APP-led same-day emergency care (SDEC) pathway in Nottingham, manages patients referred from community services and the emergency department (ED). Patients may attend ED in the belief their pain is due to sinister or ‘red flag’ pathology. Little data exists on prevalence of spinal ‘red flag’ pathologies within a secondary care setting. This paper aims to review the number of ‘red flag’ pathology identified by APP's on a same-day emergency care pathway. Methods. Retrospective data from 1 year of routinely collected information was extracted and analysed by two APPs. Counts were reported as a percentage of total patients seen on the SDEC unit over a one-year period and compared to nationally reported figures. A total of 2042 patients were assessed on the unit in 2021, of which, 293 (14%) had serious pathology identified. Patients were classified into type of serious pathology: myelopathy (126, 6.1%), fractures (72, 3.5%), cauda equine compression (40, 1.9%), infection (37, 1.8%), cancers (28, 1.3%), neurological conditions (14, 0.6%) and other (16, 0.8%) serious pathology. Conclusion. APP's working within an emergency pathway are highly likely to see and diagnose serious spinal pathology. The most common include cord or cauda equina compression, fractures, infection and cancers. Figures reported are slightly higher than previously documented. Knowledge and training to identify ‘red flags’ and robust pathways of escalation are essential in support of APP roles and services. Conflict of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No sources of funding

Background. Pain with radiation to the leg is a common presentation in back pain patients. Radiating leg pain is either referred pain or radicular, commonly described as sciatica. Clinically distinguishing between these types of leg pain is recognized as difficult but important for management purposes. The aim of this study was to investigate inter-therapist agreement when diagnosing referred or radicular pain. Methods. Thirty-six primary care consulters with low back-related leg pain were assessed and diagnosed as referred or radicular leg pain by one of six trained experienced musculoskeletal physiotherapists. Assessments were videoed, excluding any diagnosis discourse, and viewed by a second physiotherapist who made an independent diagnosis. Therapists rated their confidence with diagnosis and reasons for their decision. Data was summarized using percentage agreements and kappa (K) coefficients with two sided 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results. The therapists assessing and therapists watching the video both diagnosed radicular pain in 25 of the 36 patients. Agreement was 72% with fair inter-rater reliability (K = 0.35, 95% CI 0.07, 0.63, p<0.05). Mean confidence in diagnosis was 87% for radicular pain and 83% for referred pain. In the subgroup of patients where therapists' confidence in diagnosis was ≥ 80% (n=28), agreement was 86% with substantial reliability (K = 0.65, 95% CI 0.37, 0.93 p<0.001). Conclusion. Reliability was fair among therapists when diagnosing back-related leg pain. This concurs with current opinion that differentiating between types of back-related leg pain can be difficult. However, when confidence in clinical diagnosis is high, levels of agreement and reliability indices improve substantially

The use of nerve root blocks is common in the management of radicular pain due to lumbar disc prolapse. However, most papers reporting their use do not necessarily specify the position or level at which the needle is positioned with respect to the level of pathology. We therefore set out to investigate this. We performed a survey of medical practitioners across the UK with an interest or involvement in the management of radicular pain secondary to lumbar disc prolapse The survey depicted the clinical scenario of a patient with radicular pain from an L4/5 disc prolapse and a number of questions were asked in relation to the use of nerve root blocks. Questionnaires were sent to 319 practitioners. We received 153 responses of which, 120 (37.6%) were sufficiently complete to be analysed. Of those who responded, 83% used a combination of local anaesthetic and steroids together with or without contrast. There were variations across the respondents in terms of the level injected with 22.5% injecting at the level of the L4/5 foramen, while 45% injected at the level of the L5/1 foramen. Differences were also noted when respondents were subgrouped according to their speciality. Of those who worked in pain management, 34.1% injected at the L4/5 foramen while 31.8% injected at the L5/1 foramen. For spine surgeons the respective figures were 20.5% and 43.2% and for radiologists 9.4% and 65.6%. In the treatment of radicular leg pain, there are apparent variations in the use and positioning of root blocks for a given level of disc pathology. This suggests that caution is necessary when considering the validity of published studies on the use of root blocks relative to an individual clinician's practice

We analysed prospectively 26 patients who had revision operations for ipsilateral recurrent radicular pain after a period of pain relief of more than six months following primary discectomy. They were assessed before the initial operation, between the two procedures and at a minimum of two years after reoperation. MRI was performed before primary discectomy and reoperation. Fifty consecutive patients who had a disc excision during the study period but did not have recurrent radicular pain, were analysed as a control group. Of the study group 42% related the onset of recurrent radicular pain to an isolated injury or a precipitating event, but none of the control group did so (p < 0.001). T2-weighted MRI performed before primary discectomy showed that patients in the study group had significantly more severe disc degeneration compared with the control group (p = 0.02). Intraoperative findings revealed recurrent disc herniation in 24 patients and bulging of the disc in two, one of whom also had lateral stenosis. Epidural scarring was found to be abundant, intraoperatively and on MRI, in eight and in nine patients, respectively. At the last follow-up, the clinical outcome was satisfactory in 85% of patients in the study group and in 88% of the control group (p > 0.05). Work or daily activities had been resumed at the same level as before the onset of symptoms by 81% of the patients in the study group and 84% of the control group. No correlation was found between the amount of epidural fibrosis, as seen intraoperatively and on MRI, and the result of surgery. The recurrence of radicular pain caused no significant changes in the psychological profile compared with the assessment before the primary discectomy

Objectives. In order to elucidate the influence of sympathetic nerves on lumbar radiculopathy, we investigated whether sympathectomy attenuated pain behaviour and altered the electrical properties of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons in a rat model of lumbar root constriction. Methods. Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three experimental groups. In the root constriction group, the left L5 spinal nerve root was ligated proximal to the DRG as a lumbar radiculopathy model. In the root constriction + sympathectomy group, sympathectomy was performed after the root constriction procedure. In the control group, no procedures were performed. In order to evaluate the pain relief effect of sympathectomy, behavioural analysis using mechanical and thermal stimulation was performed. In order to evaluate the excitability of the DRG neurons, we recorded action potentials of the isolated single DRG neuron by the whole-cell patch-clamp method. Results. In behavioural analysis, sympathectomy attenuated the mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia caused by lumbar root constriction. In electrophysiological analysis, single isolated DRG neurons with root constriction exhibited lower threshold current, more depolarised resting membrane potential, prolonged action potential duration, and more depolarisation frequency. These hyperexcitable alterations caused by root constriction were significantly attenuated in rats treated with surgical sympathectomy. Conclusion. The present results suggest that sympathectomy attenuates lumbar radicular pain resulting from root constriction by altering the electrical property of the DRG neuron itself. Thus, the sympathetic nervous system was closely associated with lumbar radicular pain, and suppressing the activity of the sympathetic nervous system may therefore lead to pain relief

Purpose of study and background. The use of NRB (Nerve Root Block) in radicular pain caused by stenosis is considered controversial in some centres, whereas its indication in radiculitis caused by disc herniation is widely accepted. Most studies evaluating NRB have combined disc herniation and stenosis pathologies in their inclusion criteria. This study explores the efficacy of NRB in different categories of stenosis: lateral recess, foraminal and combined. Methods and results. 68 patients underwent NRB by an ESP (Extended Scope Physiotherapist). 37 females, 31 males, mean age 75 years (range 23–87). Their stenosis was categorized as either lateral recess (n=43), foraminal (n=18), or combined (n=7) on MRI scan evaluation by 2 reviewers. Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and Visual Analogue Scores were recorded pre-injection and 6 weeks post injection. 2 year final outcome was recorded with an ‘in-house’ questionnaire. 2 year outcome: Lateral recess stenosis: 37% had surgery, 40% required no further treatment. In foraminal stenosis: 17% had surgery, 50% required no further treatment. Combined pathology: 43% had surgery, 57% required no further treatment. Patients requiring no further treatment rated their 2 year outcome as satisfactory symptom control. Of the whole group 15% required a repeat injection, 7% were referred to pain clinic and one patient had died. Conclusion. A single NRB is an effective long term (two year) treatment for 44% of patients undergoing the procedure for radicular pain secondary to spinal stenosis. Its use should be considered as a first-line intervention in this group of patients prior to exploring surgical options. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

Background. The national back pain pathway sets out the gold standard pathway for patients with back and radicular pain. To improve implementation we needed to understand current practice and identify divergences from the pathway. Objectives. 1) What patient is referred into the surgical clinic?. 2) What treatments had they tried?. 3) How many had spinal interventions. 4) Consider ways to improve the appropriateness of referrals. Method. 100 new patients attending the Spinal Orthopaedic Clinic from December 2018 to February 2019 were asked to complete a questionnaire asking about previous interventions and benefit gained. Symptoms and outcomes were recorded from the clinical entries and MRI's reviewed. Results. Over 90 had tried analgesics with only 60 reporting more than 50% benefit. Only 6 had tried neuromodulators all with poor results. 82 attended physiotherapy with 62 reporting some benefit. 84 tried exercises and 31 found it helpful whereas 17 had acupuncture and 8 of those reported benefit. 65 had consistent findings on their MRI and 31 elected to have an intervention. 8 were better, 22 wanted to self-manage and 4 went to other providers. Conclusion. 82% of our patients had tried analgesics and physical therapy before being referred to secondary care. Few opted to have an intervention and could possibly have been managed in a non-surgical clinic. If appropriate training and management is put into primary care settings, secondary care referrals could be reduced. Only 1/3 of the patients were right patient right place right time. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No funding obtained

Background and aims. The EU-funded Back-UP project aims to develop a cloud computer platform to guide the treatment of low back and neck pain (LBNP) in first contact care and early rehabilitation. In order to identify evidence-based treatment options that can be recommended and are accessible to people with LBNP across Europe, we conducted a systematic review of recently published guidelines. Methods. Electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, HMIC, Epistemonikos, PEDro, TRIP, NICE, SIGN, WHO, Guidelines International Network (G-I-N) and DynaMed Plus were searched. We searched for guidelines published by European health professional or guideline development organisations since 2013, focusing on the primary care management of adult patients presenting with back or neck pain (including whiplash associated symptoms, radicular pain, and pregnancy-related LBP). The AGREE-II tool was used to assess the quality of guideline development and reporting. Results. Searches generated 3098 unique citations that were screened for eligibility. A total of 189 full-texts were retrieved, and 18 guidelines were included in the review (from the UK, Germany, France, Italy, Denmark, Poland, Belgium, and the Netherlands). Data extraction showed considerable variation in guideline development processes, especially regarding the methods used for identifying, appraising, and synthesising evidence, and for formulating, agreeing, and grading recommendations. Conclusions. Recommendations for the management of LBNP cover a wide range of treatment options, with self-management advice, analgesics, and exercise proposed as core treatments by most guidelines. A narrative synthesis, taking into account consistency, strength, and quality of guideline recommendations, will be presented. No conflicts of interest. Funding: This abstract presents independent research within the Back-UP project, which has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 777090. This document reflects only the views of the authors, and the European Commission is not liable for any use that may be made of its contents. The information in this document is provided “as is”, without warranty of any kind, and accept no liability for loss or damage suffered by any person using this information

Aims. To investigate whether the duration of pain has an influence on the clinical outcomes of patients with low back pain (LBP) managed through the North East of England Regional Back Pain and Radicular Pain Pathway (NERBPP). Patients and Methods. The NERBPP is a clinical pathway based upon NICE guidelines (2009) for LBP. Patients with LBP referred onto the NERBPP by their General Practitioner (GP) between May 2015 and January 2017 were included in this evaluation. Data from 635 patients, who provided pre and post data for pain (Numerical rating scale [NRS]), function (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) and quality-of-life (EuroQol [EQ5D]), were analysed using a series of covariate adjusted models in SPSS. Patients were categorised into four groups based upon pain duration: <3months, ≥3 to <6months, ≥6months to <12months, ≥12months. Results. Each group showed improved outcomes greater than MCID for each measure as defined in NICE guidelines (2016). Preliminary analysis raises the possibility of a trend towards better outcomes for those with shorter pain durations. Conclusion. Patients with all durations of back pain showed benefit on the NERBPP. Clinical relevance. Recent changes to NICE guidelines (2016), advocate the same management of all LBP patients regardless of pain duration. These findings explore the appropriateness of those changes. Conflicts of interest: None. The study was supported by funding from the Health Foundation and the North East Academic Health Science Network. For table, please contact authors directly by clicking on ‘Info & Metrics’ at the top of the abstract for their contact details

Background. The BACK To Health programme is part of the wider North of England back pain and radicular pain pathway. The purpose of this programme is to provide a CPPP approach based on the NICE guidelines CG88 for those with back pain that has not responded to early management and simpler therapies. The purpose of this study is to present preliminary results of this programme. Method. Referral onto the programme occurred through triage and treat practitioners or consultant clinics. A total of 44 patients were referred, with 31 attending the programme. The programme was delivered as a 3 week residential programme, with patients present 9am-5pm Monday to Thursday. A MDT provided an intense programme consisting of education, physical exercise, practical coping strategies and group discussion. The work has received ethical approval from the School of Health and Social Care Research Ethics and Governance committee at Teesside University. Results. Significant improvements (p<0.05) were seen in the, EQ-5D-5L, GAD-7, PHQ9, pain VAS scores (respective mean improvement 0.170, 5.2, 5.5 and 1.25). Significant improvement (p<0.05) was seen in ODI scores but with a mean improvement of 7% clinical significance was not achieved. Self-management confidence by the end averaged 6/10. Conclusion. The majority of patients showed good response to the BACK To Health Programme. After undergoing 3 weeks of education and exercise using cognitive behavioural principles early improvements were seen in GAD-7, PHQ9, Pain VAS and EQ/5D/5L. At 6 months and 1 year we will follow these patients up to continually assess progress. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Introduction. The authors recognised that patients presenting to the Orthopaedic Spinal Rapid Access Service with symptoms and or signs of cauda equina syndrome may not have the diagnosis confirmed radiologically. Altered sensation in the ‘saddle area’, bilateral sciatica, urinary incontinence or retention, altered bowel habit, and sexual dysfunction are well recognised symptoms of cauda equina syndrome. Recognised side-effects of neuropathic medications commonly prescribed for radicular pain include: altered sensation, urinary incontinence or retention, and sexual dysfunction. We have undertaken a retrospective cohort analysis in order to identify the relationship between prescribed medications and presenting symptoms and signs. Method. 151 patients were referred to the service within a 6 month period. Case notes of 34 patients presenting with symptoms and or objective signs of CES in absence of positive radiological findings were reviewed. Data collected included the patient's age, sex, prescribed medications and presenting symptoms. Results. Of these 34, 9(26%) presented with altered bladder function and ‘saddle area’ sensation and 25(74%) with isolated bladder symptoms. Mean age was 47 in both female and males, 26 females and 8 males. 16(47%) were taking neuropathic medications, 7(22%) anti-depressants and 9(28%) anti-convulsant medications. Conclusion. 16(47%) of patients presenting with CES in the absence of radiological evidence were prescribed neuropathic medications with known side effects that may contribute to their symptoms. Therefore clinicians should take due consideration of prescribed medications as a possible cause of CES signs and symptoms. Further work is required to analyse data from a larger patient population in order to identify if particular medications carry a higher risk. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No funding obtained

Aims

The aim of the study was to determine if there was a direct correlation between the pain and disability experienced by patients and size of their disc prolapse, measured by the disc’s cross-sectional area on T2 axial MRI scans.

Establish the positive predictive value of clinical examination predicted radicular level to MRI. To identify the value of the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) assessment tool in the assessment of patients presenting with radicular symptoms of lumbar spine source. 8 patients attending the ESP Orthopaedic triage service, presenting with radicular pain in which MRI is clinically indicated. Prospective study on patients attending ESP Orthopaedic triage service. Patients were clinically examined, both parts LANSS score was completed. Following the assessment a radicular level was selected. Following MRI the results were compared. Positive predicted values (PPV) for clinical examination and sensitivity and specificity of a LANSS score>12 was calculated. LANSS score. MRI report. PPV of 75% of therapist predicted level being same level or adjacent level to MRI stated level. 66% specificity and 100% sensitivity of patients in study with LANNS>12 having MRI evaluated radicular nerve root compression. This pilot suggests that clinical examination and the LANSS score is useful in establishing the presence of radicular nerve root compression. This evidence supports the need for further research

Research literature suggests sub classification of LBP may improve clinical outcome. Audit aim is to evaluate the outcome of treatment pathways according to sub classification. Patients had standardised assessment and completed Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) following assessment and on discharge. Patients were subgrouped into; non specific LBP, radicular pain, LBP with high psychosocial indicators. Patients were allocated to 3 treatment pathways; individual treatment, functional Back class, back care programme. 200 adult patients referred to physiotherapy for low back pain. Exclusion criteria; red flag presentation, patient requiring advice only (n=38). Pre treatment and post treatment HAD, ODI. Of 162 patients Individual treatment, 87 (40%)Functional Back Class, 41 (19%). Back Care Programme, 34 (16%). Each pathway demonstrated a clinically significant change in outcome measures. Patient's achieved an average change of between 11 – 17% dependant on pathway. This suggests that the sub classification criteria used allowed the correct pathway choice for patients conditions