C. Difficile infections in elderly patients with hip fractures is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Antibiotic regimens with penicillin and its derivatives is a leading cause. Antibiotic prophylactic preferences vary across different hospitals within NHS. We compared two antibiotic prophylactic regimens - Cefuroxime only prophylaxis and Teicoplanin with Gentamicin prophylaxis in fracture neck of femur surgery, and evaluated the incidence of C. Difficile diarrhea and Surgical Site Infection (SSI). To assess the Surgical Site Infection and C. Difficile infection rate associated with different regimens of antibiotics prophylaxis in fracture neck of femur surgery. Data was analyzed retrospectively. Neck of femur fracture patients treated surgically from 2009 in our unit were included. Age, gender, co morbidities, type of fracture, operation, ASA grade was collected. 1242 patients received Cefuroxime only prophylaxis between January 2009 and December 2012 (Group 1) and 486 patients received Teicoplanin with Gentamicin between October 2015 and March 2017 (Group 2). There were 353 males and 889 female patients in Group 1 and 138 males and 348 female patients in Group 2. The co morbidities in both groups were comparable. Incidence of C. Difficile diarrhea and Surgical Site Infection (SSI) was noted. Statistical analysis with chi square test was performed to determine the ‘p’ value. C. Diff diarrhea rate in Group 2 was 0.41 % as compared to 1.29 % in Group 1. The Surgical Site Infection (SSI) rate in Group 2 was 0.41 % as compared to 3.06 % in Group 1. The comparative results were statistically significant (p = 0.0009). Prophylactic antibiotic regimen of Teicoplanin with Gentamicin showed significant reduction in C. Difficile diarrhea & Surgical Site Infection in fracture neck of femur patients undergoing surgery

Prophylactic antibiotics administered prior to joint arthroplasty have become standard practice. Due to concern over the risk that 2nd generation cephalosporins posed to the elderly, as regards clostridium difficile associated infections the antimicrobial management team in our unit changed the protocol for prophylactic antibiotics. As of 1st September 2009, flucloxacillin and gentamicin were preferred over cefuroxime as the first choice of prophylactic antibiotic. However, it was noted that postoperatively patients were experiencing a decrease in renal function. One hundred patients who underwent a total hip replacement following the policy change were randomly selected from the departmental joint arthroplasty database. This group was age and sex matched to 100 patients undergoing their surgery prior to the change. Data was collected on renal function, length of stay, antibiotic and age. Any change in renal function was categorised using the RIFLE criteria. Exclusion secondary to variations from protocol or treatment for femoral neck fractures resulted in a total number of 156 patients with 78 in each arm. The average age for both groups was 64 years. Non-parametric analysis of preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine concentrations and Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) demonstrated a significant difference between the two groups, showing that GFR decreased (p=0.041) and serum creatinine concentration increased (p=0.037) in the cohort receiving gentamicin. Classing the impaired renal function as: risk, injury or failure (RIFLE criteria) demonstrated a statistically significant difference for any criterion positive (p=0.016) but no significant difference for the specific RIFLE groups (p=0.068). Acknowledging the small numbers and potential confounders for renal impairment, this study was able to show a difference in renal function for patients receiving gentamicin over cefuroxime as prophylaxis for joint arthroplasty

Introduction. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis use in modern orthopaedic procedures is well established. Studies have shown significant reduction in risk of post-operative infections. However, as effectiveness of these antibiotics is dependent on achieving high serum and tissue concentrations that exceed the minimum inhibitory concentrations of infective organisms for operation duration, the timing of prophylaxis is crucial. Although, optimal timing for administering prophylaxis varies in the literature, 30 to 60 minutes prior to skin incision or inflation of tourniquet is considered best standards. Objectives. To audit our practice of timing of administration of perioperative prophylactic antibiotics in trauma and orthopaedic procedures. Methods. A double-centre prospective analysis was conducted over a period of 2 week (trauma) and 2 months (elective). Centre A involved trauma cases where centre B involved elective Total Knee Arthroplasty cases. Patients were excluded if they were already on regular antibiotics or when prophylaxis was not indicated. Prescription charts and anaesthetic charts were reviewed along with electronic theatre database. Results. A total of 109 patients were included (52 elective and 57 trauma). Only 21% of patients received prophylactic antibiotics within 30 to 60 minutes of knife to skin time or inflation of tourniquet. Two third of patients received prophylaxis earlier than recommended with 28% receiving prophylaxis between 5 to 10 minutes and 33% between 15 to 20 minutes prior to knife to skin time or inflation of tourniquet. Conclusions. Our audit highlights an important deviation from standard best practice. To address this problem we recommend a multidisciplinary team approach including anaesthetic, ward and theatre teams. Level of Evidence. III - Evidence from case, correlation, and comparative studies

Summary. There is little knowledge in surgeons about the guidelines for prophylactic antibiotics in patients with prosthetic joints when undergoing a dental procedure. This study confirms this and there is need for robust and universal guidelines given the disastrous nature of prosthetic infection. Introduction. Infection as an indication for revision has increased to 12 % of the total revisions (NJR 9. th. report). However, it is next to impossible to find out the cause for a delayed prosthetic infection. With increasing number of arthroplasty procedures, is there a need for prophylactic antibiotics in patients with prostheses?. Methods. At London Knee Meeting 2012, a total of 163 surgeons were asked to take part in a survey. This was to find out if they knew of any existing guidelines for prophylaxis for dental procedures, if there was a need to practice more uniformly, and if they recommend such prophylaxis to their patients routinely. The grade of the surgeon and their experience in years was also noted. Results. Among the 163 surgeons who participated, 102 (62.6%) were arthroplasty surgeons. Of these, 73 (71.5%) were consultants with 3 or more years of experience. For this study, responses from these 102 surgeons were taken into consideration. Out of the 102 surgeons, only 39 (38%) were aware of AAOS recommendations. However, only 26 (25.5%) felt the need for such prophylaxis, other 37 (36%) were not sure if such prophylaxis was necessary. The remaining 39 (38.5%) did not think the prophylaxis was necessary. There was no difference found in the responses between the consultant and non-consultant surgeons. Conclusions. From this survey, it is clear that there is no uniformity of the knowledge of existing recommendations for prophylaxis of such patients with prostheses. There is probably a need to develop robust guidelines for prophylaxis, given the devastating nature of an infected prosthesis

Whilst the SIGN Guidelines state that the use of prophylactic antibiotics in surgery unequivocally reduces major morbidity, reduces hospital costs and is likely to decrease overall consumption of antibiotics they state the chosen antibiotics must reflect local, disease-specific information about the common pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility. Growing healthcare concern regarding the rates of Clostridium Difficile (C. Diff) within the hospital setting have led to rationalised and better streamlined prescribing practice within the NHS. In NHS Lanarkshire this led to revised guidelines for prophylactic antibiotic use in Orthopaedics in 2010. Routine use of 3. rd. generation Cephalosporin has been replaced by Flucloxacillin 1g and Gentamicin 1mg/kg. Anecdotally the surgeons within our department were concerned that they were recognising more post-operative renal impairment than before 2010. Our study took 902 consecutive cases treated surgically with either Total Hip Replacement, Total Knee Replacement, Dynamic Hip Screw for fracture and Hemiarthroplasty for fracture since the introduction of the new antibiotic policy. We compared this with a similar number of cases treated with the same operations pre-2010. We looked at the pre admission Urea & Electrolystes compared with immediate post-operative results and applied the definition of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) as defined by the Acute Kidney Injury Network. A. A rapid time course (less than 48 hours) and B. Reduction of kidney function either as an absolute increase in serum creatinine of ≥26.4μmol/l (≥0.3 mg/dl) or a percentage increase in serum creatinine of ≥50%. Based on this definition we found an increased rate of AKI of 13.7% after the introduction of the use of Gentamicin from 9.8% before its routine use. We wish to highlight that the routine widespread use of Gentamicin may be increasing the rate of acute renal dysfunction seen in Orthopaedic patients undergoing major surgery

We investigated the antibiotic concentration in fresh-frozen femoral head allografts harvested from two groups of living donors. Ten samples were collected from patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and ten from those with a fracture of the neck of the femur scheduled for primary arthroplasty. Cefazolin (1 g) was administered as a pre-operative prophylactic antibiotic. After storage at −80°C for two weeks the pattern of release of cefazolin from morsellised femoral heads was evaluated by an in vitro broth elution assay using high-performance liquid chromatography. The bioactivity of the bone was further determined with an agar disc diffusion and standardised tube dilution bioassay. The results indicated that the fresh-frozen femoral heads contained cefazolin. The morsellised bone released cefazolin for up to four days. The concentration of cefazolin was significantly higher in the heads from patients with osteoarthritis of the hip than in those with a fracture. Also, in bioassays the bone showed inhibitory effects against bacteria. We concluded that allografts of morsellised bone from the femoral head harvested from patients undergoing arthroplasty of the hip contained cefazolin, which had been administered pre-operatively and they exhibited inhibitory effects against bacteria in vitro

Allograft bone is widely used in orthopaedic surgery, but peri-operative infection of the graft remains a common and disastrous complication. The efficacy of systemic prophylactic antibiotics is unproven, and since the graft is avascular it is likely that levels of antibiotic in the graft are low. Using an electrical potential to accelerate diffusion of antibiotics into allograft bone, high levels were achieved in specimens of both sheep and human allograft. In human bone these ranged from 187.1 mg/kg in endosteal (. sd. 15.7) to 124.6 (. sd. 46.2) in periosteal bone for gentamicin and 31.9 (. sd. 8.9) in endosteal and 2.9 (. sd. 1.1) in periosteal bone for flucloxacillin. The antibiotics remained active against bacteria in vitro after iontophoresis and continued to elute from the allograft for up to two weeks. Structural allograft can be supplemented directly with antibiotics using iontophoresis. The technique is simple and inexpensive and offers a potential means of reducing the rate of peri-operative infection in allograft surgery. Iontophoresis into allograft bone may also be applicable to other therapeutic compounds

Introduction. Guidelines from the North American Spine Society (2009 and 2013) are the best evidence-based instructions on venous thromboembolism (VTE) and antibiotic prophylaxis in spinal surgery. NICE guidelines exist for VTE prophylaxis but do not specifically address spinal surgery. In addition, the ruling of the UK Supreme Court in 2015 resulted in new guidance on consent being published by the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSEng). This study assesses our compliance in antibiotic, VTE prophylaxis and consent in spinal surgery against both US and UK standards. Methods. Retrospective review of spinal operations performed between August and December 2016. Case notes, consent forms and operation notes were analysed for consent, peri-operative antibiotic prescribing and post-operative VTE instructions. Results. Four Spinal surgeons performed 45 operations during this period. 31 patients (69%) received a copy of the signed consent with this process being formally documented in 22 (71%) of those cases. All patients were consented by a competent surgeon. 82% of cases consented prior to the date of procedure were countersigned on the day of operation. There was a mean time of 25.3 days between initial consent and operation (Range: 0–170). 37 (82%) cases had clear instructions for VTE and antibiotic prophylaxis. All prescribed post-operative antibiotics were administered. Discussion. The North American Guidelines state that prophylactic antibiotic is appropriate in all spinal surgery with prolonged cases requiring intraoperative re-dosing and only complex cases needing a postoperative regimen. Eight patients underwent a complex procedure and 7 appropriately received postoperative antibiotics. Of the 29 patients that underwent a simple procedure, 12 did not receive post-operative regimen, in line with the guidelines. However, the remainder 17 were over treated. The US Guidelines recommend mechanical VTE prophylaxis only in elective spinal surgery except in high risk patients. All our patients received VTE mechanical prophylaxis. RCSEng guidelines require consent being taken prior to procedure by a competent surgeon and confirmed on day of procedure. All patients in our cohort were consented prior to the date of operation allowing time for considering options and independent research. 82% of patients had consent confirmed on day of operation. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that we met guideline advice for all patients with regards VTE prophylaxis. We have a tendency to over treat with post-operative antibiotics and not all patients had their consent confirmed on day of procedure but was consented well before day of operation. North America still lead the way with guidelines on spinal surgery to which we should adhere, with NICE guidelines providing limited instructions. New consenting guidelines from RCSEng may not be currently widely known and thus should be a source of education for all surgeons

To prevent infections after orthopedic surgery, intravenous antibiotics are administered perioperatively. Cefazolin is widely used as the prophylactic antibiotic of choice. Systemic antibiotic therapy may however be less effective in longstanding surgery where bone allografts are used. Bone chips have been shown to be an effective carrier for certain types of antibiotics. Bone allografts impregnated with antibiotics may therefore provide the necessary local antibiotic levels for prophylaxis. To be efficient, a prolonged release from these bonechips is required. In contrast to vancomycin, for which prolonged release has clearly been proven effective from Osteomycin®, a commercially available impregnated bone allograft, no prolonged release bone chip preparations have been described so far for cefazolin. We developed a protocol to bind cefazolin in the porous structure of bone chips by means of a hydrogel composed of proteins naturally present in the human body. Three types of bone chips were evaluated: fresh frozen, decellularized frozen and decellularized lyophilized. Bone chips were incubated with 20 mg/ml cefazolin or treated with liquid hydrogel containing either 1 mg/ml fibrin or 1 mg/ml collagen and 20 mg/ml cefazolin. The cefazolin hydrogel was distributed in the porous structure by short vacuum treatment. Bone chips with cefazolin but without hydrogel were either incubated for 20 min- 4h or also treated with vacuum. Cefazolin elution of bone chips was carried out in fetal bovine serum and analyzed by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography – Diode Array Detection. Soaking of bone chips without hydrogel resulted in a quick release of cefazolin, which was limited to 4 hours. When vacuum was applied elution of >1 µg/ml cefazolin was measured for up to 36 hours. Combination with collagen hydrogel resulted in a higher cefazolin concentration released at 24 hours (3.9 vs 0.3 µg/ml), but not in a prolonged release. However, combination of decellularized frozen bone chips with fibrin hydrogel resulted in an initial release of 533 µg/ml followed by a gradual decline reaching the minimal inhibitory concentration for S. aureus at 72 hours (1.7 µg/ml), while not measurable anymore after 92 hours. Processed bone chips with hydrogel-cefazolin showed a markedly prolonged cefazolin release. When combined with a fibrin hydrogel, high initial peak levels of cefazolin were obtained, followed by a decreasing release over the following three days. This elution profile is desirable, since high initial levels are important to maximize anti-bacterial action whereas low levels of antibiotic for a limited time may stimulate osteogenesis. It is important that antibiotic release is ending after a few days as prolonged low levels of antibiotics are not clinically helpful and may lead to antibiotic resistance. Further preclinical studies are warranted to show effectiveness of hydrogel-cefazolin impregnated bone chips

Objectives

To review the current best surgical practice and detail a multi-disciplinary approach that could further reduce joint replacement infection.

Objectives

We have increased the dose of tranexamic acid (TXA) in our enhanced total joint recovery protocol at our institution from 15 mg/kg to 30 mg/kg (maximum 2.5 g) as a single, intravenous (IV) dose. We report the clinical effect of this dosage change.

Objectives

The objective of this study is to determine an optimal antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) for infection prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

We studied the effects of coating titanium implants with teicoplanin and clindamycin in 30 New Zealand White rabbits which were randomly assigned to three groups. The intramedullary canal of the left tibia of each rabbit was inoculated with 500 colony forming units of Staphylococcus aureus. Teicoplanin-coated implants were implanted into rabbits in group 1, clindamycin-coated implants into rabbits in group 2, and uncoated implants into those in group 3. All the rabbits were killed one week later. The implants were removed and cultured together with pieces of tibial bone and wound swabs. The rate of colonisation of the organisms in the three groups was compared.

Organisms were cultured from no rabbits in group 1, one in group 2 but from all in group 3. There was no significant difference between groups 1 and 2 (p = 1.000). There were significant differences between groups 1 and 3 and groups 2 and 3 (p < 0.001). Significant protection against bacterial colonisation and infection was found with teicoplanin- and clindamycin-coated implants in this experimental model.

We used interconnected porous calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic to bridge a rabbit ulnar defect. Two weeks after inducing the defect we percutaneously injected rabbit bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells labelled with ferumoxide. The contribution of an external magnetic targeting system to attract these cells into the ceramic and their effect on subsequent bone formation were evaluated.

This technique significantly facilitated the infiltration of ferumoxide-labelled cells into ceramic and significantly contributed to the enhancement of bone formation even in the chronic phase. As such, it is potentially of clinical use to treat fractures, bone defects, delayed union and nonunion.

Impaction allograft is an established method of securing initial stability of an implant in arthroplasty. Subsequent bone integration can be prolonged, and the volume of allograft may not be maintained. Intermittent administration of parathyroid hormone has an anabolic effect on bone and may therefore improve integration of an implant.

Using a canine implant model we tested the hypothesis that administration of parathyroid hormone may improve osseointegration of implants surrounded by bone graft. In 20 dogs a cylindrical porous-coated titanium alloy implant was inserted into normal cancellous bone in the proximal humerus and surrounded by a circumferential gap of 2.5 mm. Morsellised allograft was impacted around the implant. Half of the animals were given daily injections of human parathyroid hormone (1–34) 5 μg/kg for four weeks and half received control injections. The two groups were compared by mechanical testing and histomorphometry. We observed a significant increase in new bone formation within the bone graft in the parathyroid hormone group. There were no significant differences in the volume of allograft, bone-implant contact or in the mechanical parameters.

These findings suggest that parathyroid hormone improves new bone formation in impacted morsellised allograft around an implant and retains the graft volume without significant resorption. Fixation of the implant was neither improved nor compromised at the final follow-up of four weeks.

This study investigates the use of porous biphasic ceramics as graft extenders in impaction grafting of the femur during revision hip surgery.

Impaction grafting of the femur was performed in four groups of sheep. Group one received pure allograft, group two 50% allograft and 50% BoneSave, group three 50% allograft and 50% BoneSave type 2 and group four 10% allograft and 90% BoneSave as the graft material. Function was assessed using an index of pre- and post-operative peak vertical ground reaction force ratios. Changes in bone mineral density were measured by dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scanning. Loosening and subsidence were assessed radiographically and by histological examination of the explanted specimens.

There was no statistically significant difference between the four groups after 18 months of unrestricted functional loading for all outcome measures.

Critical size defects in ovine tibiae, stabilised with intramedullary interlocking nails, were used to assess whether the addition of carboxymethylcellulose to the standard osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1/BMP-7) implant would affect the implant’s efficacy for bone regeneration. The biomaterial carriers were a ‘putty’ carrier of carboxymethylcellulose and bovine-derived type-I collagen (OPP) or the standard with collagen alone (OPC). These two treatments were also compared to “ungrafted” negative controls. Efficacy of regeneration was determined using radiological, biomechanical and histological evaluations after four months of healing. The defects, filled with OPP and OPC, demonstrated radiodense material spanning the defect after one month of healing, with radiographic evidence of recorticalisation and remodelling by two months. The OPP and OPC treatment groups had equivalent structural and material properties that were significantly greater than those in the ungrafted controls. The structural properties of the OPP- and OPC-treated limbs were equivalent to those of the contralateral untreated limb (p > 0.05), yet material properties were inferior (p < 0.05). Histopathology revealed no residual inflammatory response to the biomaterial carriers or OP-1. The OPP- and OPC-treated animals had 60% to 85% lamellar bone within the defect, and less than 25% of the regenerate was composed of fibrous tissue. The defects in the untreated control animals contained less than 40% lamellar bone and more than 60% was fibrous tissue, creating full cortical thickness defects. In our studies carboxymethylcellulose did not adversely affect the capacity of the standard OP-1 implant for regenerating bone.