As Total Hip Replacement (THR) rates increase healthcare providers have sought to reduce costs, while at the same time improving patient safety and satisfaction. Up to 50% of patients may be appropriate for Day Case THR, and in appropriately selected patients’ studies show no increase in complication rate while affording a significant cost saving and maintaining a high rate of patient satisfaction. Despite the potential benefits, levels of adoption of Day Case THR vary. A common cause for this is the perception that doing so would require the adoption of new surgical techniques, implants, or theatre equipment. We report on a Day-Case THR pathway in centres with an established and well-functioning Enhanced Recovery pathway, utilising the posterior approach and standard implants and positioning. We prospectively collected the data on consecutive THRs performed by a single surgeon between June 2018 and July 2021. A standardised anaesthetic regimen using short acting spinal was used. Surgical data included approach, implants, operative time, and estimated blood loss. Outcome data included time of discharge from hospital, post operative complications, readmissions, and unscheduled health service attendance. Data was gathered on 120 consecutive DCTHRs in 114 patients. 93% of patients were successfully discharged on the day of surgery. Four patients required re-admission: one infection treated with DAIR, one dislocation, one wound ooze admitted for a day of monitoring, one gastric ulcer. One patient had a short ED attendance for hypertension. Our incidence of infection, dislocation and wound problems were similar to those seen in inpatient THR. Out data show that the widely used posterior approach using standard positioning and implants can be used effectively in a Day Case THR pathway, with no increase in failure of same-day discharge or re-admission to hospital

Introduction. The hip hemiarthroplasty in posterior approach is a common surgical procedure at the femoral neck fractures in the elderly patients. However, the postoperative hip precautions to avoid the risk of dislocations are impeditive for early recovery after surgery. We used MIS posterior approach lately known as conjoined tendon preserving posterior (CPP) approach, considering its enhancement of joint stability, and examined the intraoperative and postoperative complications, retrospectively. Methods. We performed hip hemiarthroplasty using CPP approach in 30 patients, and hip hemiarthroplasty using conventional posterior approach in 30 patients, and both group using lateral position with the conventional posterior skin incision. The conjoined tendon (periformis, obturator internus, and superior/inferior gemellus tendon) was preserved and the obturator externus tendon was incised in CPP approach without any hip precautions postoperatively. The conjoined tendon was incised in conventional approach using hip abduction pillow postoperatively. Results. There was no difference between CPP approach group and conventional approach group in the mean age of patients (81.8 years, and 80.3 years, respectively), and in the mean operative time (68.8 minutes, and 64.9 minutes, respectively). In 4 cases of CPP approach, the avulsion fracture at femoral attachment of the conjoined tendon occured during hip reduction manoeuvres. No dislocations occured in both groups in the follow-up period (2 years). Discussion. Lately, the number of hip surgery in muscle sparing approach is increasing. However, in general, MIS approach induces the intraoperative complications, and requires the skillful procedure. The hip reduction manoeuvres would be more difficult in the CPP approach, than in conventional posterior approach, because the preserved conjoined tendon would inhibit hip reduction, considering those avulsion fractures of the femoral attachment. Nevertheless, CPP approach did not require no extended time compared to conventional approach, and no postoperative hip precautions. Due to these results, CPP approach could be a good MIS procedure including early recovery after surgery based on the enhancement of joint stability, excluding the difficulties in hip reduction manoeuvres. We could not show the difference in dislocation rate between two groups, because of small numbers. We are planning to increase the number of patients in the future study

The mini-incision posterior approach may appeal to surgeons comfortable with the standard posterior approach to the hip. We present the first systematic review and meta-analysis of these two approaches. Twelve randomised controlled trials and four non-randomised trials comprising of 1498 total hip arthroplasties were included. The mini-incision posterior approach was associated with an early improvement in Harris hip score of 1.8 points (P < 0.001), reduced operating time (5 minutes, P < 0.001), length of hospital stay (14 hours, P < 0.001), intraoperative and total blood loss (63 ml, P < 0.001 and 119 ml, P < 0.001 respectively). There were no statistically significant differences on the incidence of dislocation, nerve injury, infection or venous thromboembolic events. The minimally invasive posterior approach appears to provide a safe and acceptable alternative to the standard incision posterior approach

Background:. Modified posterior approach and its effect on stability and functional outcome in total hip arthroplasty. Material & Methods:. A retrospective comparative evaluation was done to assess the functional outcome and rate of dislocation in 233 hips (Group A) operated before 2007 by convention posterior approach and 567 hips (Group B) were operated by modified posterior approach.(2007–2011) In this modified posterior approach technique, 2–3 stay sutures (non-absorbale Nylon) are applied in the piriformis tendon, short external rotator and proximal part of Quadratous muscle. Then a conjoint- myocapsular sleeve is raised by starting cutting (with cautery) linearly over the capsule with adherent fibers of gluteus minimus to piriformis tendon, short rotators and part of quadratus to expose and dislocate the head. After inserting the definite prosthesis, upper part of sleeve (capsule, piriformis tendon) is sutured with same nonabsorbable Nylon at the lower part of tip of greater trochanter by passing through the bone with needle or by drilling the bone; lower part of the sleeve is tied with lateral trochanteric bone. Additional stability to repair was given by closing the tendinous part of the gluteus maximus by horizontal cross mattress sutures up its attachment to the proximal femoral shaft. Results:. All patients underwent cementless total hip arthroplasty; average Harris hip score at minimum 3.1 yr follow was 88.7 in Group B & 85.2 in Group B. Group B had only one dislocation while Group A had 12 dislocations (5%). Conclusion:. This technique provide enhanced stability and improve functional outcome

Introduction:. The routine use of posterior hip dislocation precautions is typically utilized postoperatively following total hip arthroplasty via a posterior surgical approach. This has included use of an abduction pillow and limiting adduction, internal rotation and flexion more than 90 degrees for a minimum of 6 weeks postoperatively. This may slow the course of rehabilitation, increase the length of hospital stay and the total cost of the procedure, and add additional anxiety to the patient. We conducted this study to see if posterior hip precautions are necessary after total hip arthroplasty via a posterior approach when the hip meets certain intraoperative criteria for stability. Methods and Materials:. All patients in our institute undergo routine hip stability testing during primary total hip arthroplasty via a posterior approach. Before October 2010, all of our primary total hip arthroplasty patients were placed on routine hip precautions. We stopped hip precautions in October 2010 for all the patients who were noted to meet hip stability criteria intraoperatively. We prospectively compared the consecutive patients who underwent this procedure without hip precautions with a retrospective control group of patients who had hip precautions. Results:. we had 650 patients in each group. In the case group, there was 1 postoperative dislocation (0.2%) within the first 3 months after surgery. In the control group (with hip precautions), 2 patients (0.3%) sustained hip dislocation within 3 months after surgery (p = 0.5). The mean hospital stay was 2.5 (0–11) days for the case group and 2.7 (1–9) days for the control group (p = 0.03). Patients in the case group were discharged to home more often compared to the control group (83.7% versus 83.4%), but the difference was not significant (p = 0.48). There was no difference in the Harris Hip score improvement between the two groups. Higher percentage of the patients in the case group received larger femoral head implant (35% versus 14%, p < 0.001) and elevated rim polyethylene liner (70% versus 57%, p < 0.001). Conclusion:. Intraoperative hip stability testing is necessary for all patients who undergo primary total hip arthroplasty via a posterior approach. If the hip is not stable intraoperatively, the surgeon should ensure that all sources of potential instability have been evaluated and managed. This may include implant sizing, implant position, and all sources of internal and external impingement. Use of a larger diameter head and elevated rim polyethylene may help with the stability of the hip. If the hip meets our stability criteria intraoperatively, we feel that formal hip precautions may not be necessary postoperatively

Introduction. Computer navigation systems are quite sophisticated intra-operative support systems for the precise placement of acetabular or femoral components in THA. However, few studies have addressed the clinical benefits derived from using a navigation system to achieve precise placement of the implants. The purpose of this study is to investigate the early dislocation rate of navigation-assisted primary THA through a posterior approach in order to clarify the short-term benefit of using a computer navigation system. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the early dislocation rate (within 12 months after surgery) of 475 consecutive primary cementless or hybrid THAs with femoral head sizes ≦32mm performed via posterior approach. There were 85 men and 390 women, with a mean age of 60 years (17 to 88) at operation. Preoperative diagnoses included osteoarthritis in 384 hips, osteonecrosis in 45 hips, and others in 46 hips (ex. RA, trauma, infection, congenital disease). All THAs were planned using a 3D templating system based on the combined anteversion theory, performed by single surgeon through a posterior approach with repair of the posterior capsule, assisted by a CT-based surface matching type computer navigation system for cup implantation. All patients were directly followed up at least 1 year after surgery. We classified all 475 joints into four groups: normal or mildly deformed hips (Group A; 308 joints, ex. primary OA, Crowe group 1, osteonecrosis), moderately deformed hips (Group B; 97 joints, ex. Crowe group 2, protrusio acetabuli, Perthes like deformity), severely deformed hips (Group C; 53 joints, ex. Crowe group 3 or 4, ankylosis, fused hip), and neuromuscular and cognitive disorders (Group D; 17 joints), and examined the dislocation rate for each group. Results. We had eleven early dislocations, for an overall dislocation rate of 2.3% (11/475). All dislocations occurred posteriorly within 6 weeks after surgery. Three joints were Crowe group 4 dislocated hips, three were Charcot joints, two were Girdlestone hips after pyogenic arthritis, two was a Crowe group 1 hip, and one was osteonecrosis. All 11 cups were implanted within 5 degree of error from the preoperative planning, and all were placed within the Lewinnek safe zone. The dislocation rates according to group were 0.6% for group A (2/308), 0% for B (0/97), 9.4% for C (5/53), and 23.5% for D (4/17). Discussion. The use of computer navigation system in patients undergoing THA improves the precision of acetabular cup placement by decreasing the number of outliers, which may result in reducing the risk of dislocation. In this series, most dislocations occurred in the highly risky or rare condition cases in groups C or D. In such cases, precise and appropriate cup implantation assisted by the navigation system could not completely prevent dislocation because of the patients' specific special backgrounds. On the other hand, early dislocation was prevented for the normal/mild to moderately deformed joints such as those in groups A or B. Computer navigation system was effective for prevent early dislocation in the normal or mild to moderately deformed joints

Introduction. Direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported to improve early outcomes as compared to posterior approach THA up to 6 weeks post-operatively. However, very few detailed results have been reported within the first 6 weeks. In this study we investigate the effect of surgical approach on THA outcome via weekly assessment. Methods. Patients undergoing THA for primary osteoarthritis were prospectively enrolled. Data was collected pre-operatively and post-operatively at weekly intervals for 6 weeks. Outcome scores and additional functional measures were compared using unpaired t-test, effect size, and Pearson correlation coefficients. Results. 111 patients (55 DAA and 56 posterior approach) were enrolled. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) in pre-surgical Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain interference and Physical Function scores, VAS Pain, and Modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS). Post-operatively, the DAA group had decreased length of stay [1.4 vs 2.2 days, p=0.0002] and increased distance walked on postoperative day 1 and 2 [95 vs 52 ft, p=0.011 and 251 vs. 163 ft, p=0.0004, respectively]. The DAA group had lower VAS pain scores [p<0.05] and required less day 1 and total narcotics [59 vs 80 morphine equivalents, p=0.029 and 138 vs 190, p=0.01, respectively]. The DAA cohort had improved PROMIS Physical Function scores and mHHS up to 5 weeks post- operatively. Anterior approach patients discontinued their assistive device 8 days earlier [p=0.01], left home 3 days earlier [p=0.001], and drove a car 5 days earlier [p=0.016] compared to posterior patients. Conclusion. Patients undergoing DAA THA had significantly shorter length of stay, improved mobilization, decreased narcotic requirements and improved inpatient VAS pain scores compared to mini-posterior THA. Furthermore, DAA patients discontinued their assistive device, left their home, and drove a car sooner than posterior approach patients. The significant improvement in physical function seen with DAA THA persisted up to 5 weeks post-operatively

Aim. To evaluate efficacy of a one stage posterior approach in decompression and eradication of infection in TB spine. Background. The classic operation for TB spine is anterior spine debridement. This involves a trans-thoracic, or retroperitoneal approach, thus increasing morbidity in an already compromised patient. The anterior procedure in the form of the Hong Kong operation is aimed at decompressing the spine, and debridement of necrotic tissue. If kyphosis is a major problem, its correction requires a posterior procedure, often not at the same sitting. Material and Method. A retrospective review of patients treated surgically for TB Spine during the time period 2009–2012. We examined the records of those patients that were treated by a posterior only approach. We took note of the demographics of the patients. We measured the efficacy of the decompression by measuring the pre op and post op neurologic status as measured by the Frankel grading. The efficacy of debridemide was assessed by measuring the preoperative and follow up ESR. Results. We identified 11 patients for review, 8 male and 3 females. 8 were HIV positive. The disease affected the thoracic spine. The average follow up was 12 months. There was good correction of the deformity and this was maintained throughout the follow up period. The ESR decreased in all the patients. Neurologic improvement was noted in 5 patients and no patients deteriorated. Statistical methods to quantify these changes were not significant because of the small numbers. Conclusion. In our environment a number of patients are immunocompromised by the HIV virus. A trans thoracic approach increases the morbidity in these patients. Effective decompression and debridement can be achieved by the posterior only approach. NO DISCLOSURES

Introduction. Traditionally the use of small diameter femoral head (22mm) with the posterior approach has been perceived as an increased risk of dislocation. We present this prospective study of 400 consecutive total hip replacements performed using a 22mm femoral head and the posterior approach. Materials/Methods. Between March 2000 and November 2005 364 patients underwent 400 total hip replacements with a small diameter 22mm head under the care of four different consultants, using a standard posterior approach. All of the femoral implants were cemented using modular C-stems (Depuy Ltd.) and all of the acetabular components were cemented flanged monobloc all-polyethylene components with long posterior wall with a third generation cementing technique. A standard posterior approach was used in all cases, with direct repair of the capsule and short external rotators. Results. There were 252 female and 112 male patients. The average age at the time of surgery was 71.3 years (range 25–92 years) and the average duration of follow-up for surviving patients is 98 months (58–127 months). The average acetabular abduction angle was 43.2 degrees (30–62) and the average femoral offset was 46mm (35–54). Five patients (1.25%) suffered dislocations. Four occurred on a single occasion and were stable on initial reduction and only one required further surgery for recurrent dislocations. Skirted femoral heads had been used in four of these cases, reducing the head/neck ratio (1.76). Conclusion. Total hip replacement using small diameter femoral heads and a posterior approach has provided excellent results and implant longevity, with a low complication rate. Dislocation was the most common complication, occurring in only 1.25% of cases and was associated with the use of a skirted head. This is the largest prospective series coming from single centre, using same approach and same implant design in total hip replacement with 22 mm head

Introduction. Numerous factors have been hypothesized as contributing to mechanically-assisted corrosion at the head-neck junction of total hip prostheses. While variables attributable to the implant and the patient are amenable to investigation, parameters describing assembly of the component parts can be difficult to determine. Nonetheless, increasing evidence suggests that the manner of intraoperative assembly of modular components plays a critical role in the fretting and corrosion of modular implants. This study was undertaken to measure the magnitude and direction of the impaction forces applied by surgeons in assembling modular head-neck junctions under operative conditions where both the access and visibility of the prosthesis may potentially compromise component fixation. Methods. A surrogate consisting of the lower limb with overlying soft tissue was developed to simulate THR performed via a 10cm incision using the posterior approach. The surrogate was modified to match the resistance of the body to retraction of the incision, mobilization of the femur and hammering of the implanted femoral component. An instrumented femoral stem (SL PLUS) was surgically implanted into the bone after attachment of 3 miniature accelerometers (Dytran Inc) in an orthogonal array to the proximal surface of the prosthesis. A 32mm cobalt chrome femoral head was mounted on the trunnion (12/14 taper, machined) of the femoral stem. 15 Board-certified and trainee surgeons replicated their surgical technique in exposing the femur and impacting the modular head on the tapered trunnion. Impaction was performed using an instrumented hammer (5000 Lbf Dytran impact hammer) that provided measurements of the magnitude and temporal variation of the impact force. The components of force acting along the axis aof the neck and in the AP and ML directions were continuously samples using the accelerometers. Results. For all surgeons, the average value of the peak impaction force was 3765±1094N (range: 2358 to 6225N). Head impact was delivered in an average direction of 24.4±7.5 degrees more vertical than the trunnion axis, though this value varies from 14 to 43 degrees between individual surgeons. On average, the off-axis force perpendicular to the trunnion axis was 1586±736N, however, this value ranged from 634 to 2895N with peak loading of both the head and the implant in varus. Almost all of the applied impact was directed within 10 degrees of the mid-plane of the stem (average deviation: 2.5±5.9 degrees of with only a small force directed anteriorly or posteriorly (average force: 140±396N, anterior). The variability in the magnitude and direction of the impaction force was not associated with the level of training or the surgical experience of the participants (p>0.05). Conclusions. This study shows that large off-axis forces are developed during manual impaction of modular heads onto stem trunnions via the posterior approach. The variation in magnitude and direction of these forces varies between individual surgeons and is not systematically related to the training or experience of each surgeon in joint replacement. This variability in intraoperative assembly of head-neck junctions may contribute to the severity and incidence of mechanically assisted corrosion in total hip replacement

Introduction:. The direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty has shown to improve multiple early outcome measures. However, criticisms suggest improved results may be due to selection bias and protocol changes. This study compares mini-incision posterior approach to direct anterior approach performed by one surgeon, controlling for influences other than the surgical approach itself. Methods:. An IRB approved retrospective review was conducted on 150 consecutive primary total hip arthroplasty patients; the first 50 from mini-incision posterior approach, followed by 50 during the learning curve for direct anterior approach, and 50 subsequent cases when the approach was routine. Peri-operative protocols were alike for all groups. Data collection included patient demographics, anesthesia, operative times, discharge disposition, length of stay, VAS pain scores, progression from assistive devices, and narcotic use at follow-up of two and six weeks. Statistical methods included Wilcoxon rank sum, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, chi-square, fisher exact and t-tests. P-value of <.05 was considered significant. Results:. The groups were well-matched for demographics. The anterior group trended towards higher age, BMI, ASA and pre-op VAS scores. Factors favoring the anterior group reaching statistical significance included: decreased length of stay of 1.02 (learning curve) and 1.26 (routine) days (p < .0001); discharge to home instead of a rehab facility, 80% and 84% anterior versus 56% posterior (p = 0.0028); VAS pain scores at two weeks 2.7 and 2.2 anterior versus 5.2 posterior (p < .0001); less narcotic pain medication use at two weeks, 44% and 30% versus 86% (p < .0001). In the anterior groups, walker use was less at two weeks, 20% and 12% versus 74% (p < .0001) and at six weeks, 4% and 2% versus 20% (p=.0018). Conclusion:. Primary total hip arthroplasty using the anterior approach versus the posterior approach allows for more rapid recovery in patients with no significant selection bias or protocol changes, even during the learning curve period

Introduction. The debate regarding the importance of preserving the blood supply to the femoral head (FH) and neck during hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) is ongoing. Several surgeons continue to advocate for the preservation of the blood supply to the resurfaced heads for both the current HRA techniques and more biologic approaches for FH resurfacing. Despite alternative blood-preserving approaches for HRA, many surgeons continue to use the posterior approach (PA) due to personal preference and comfort. It is commonly accepted that the PA inevitably damages the deep branch of the medial femoral circumflex artery (MFCA). This study seeks to evaluate and measure the anatomical course of the ascending and deep branch of the MFCA to better describe the area in danger during the posterior approach. Methods. In 20 fresh-frozen cadaveric hips, we cannulated the MFCA and injected a urethane compound. The Kocher-Langenbeck approach was used in all specimens. The deep branch of the MFCA was identified at the proximal border of the QF and measurements were taken. The QF was incised medially and elevated laterally, maintaining the relationship of the ascending branch and QF, and distances from the lesser trochanter were measured. The deep branch was dissected and followed to its capsular insertion to assess the course and relation to the obturatur externus (OE) tendon and the conjoint tendon (CT) of the short external rotators. Results. Gross dissection revealed that the transition point from transverse to ascending branch of the MFCA at the anterior surface of the QF was at an average distance of 2.2 cm (range 2–2.3 cm) proximal and 1.2 cm (range 0.5–1.9 cm) medial to the lesser trochanter. The ascending branch runs caudally within fat tissue that divides the QF and OE at an average distance of 1.5 cm (range 0.7–2.3 cm) from the QF greater trochanter insertion. At the superior border of the QF, the MFCA continues as the deep branch posterior to the OE tendon at an average distance of 1.3 cm (range 0.6–1.9 cm) from the OE femoral insertion. The deep branch was noted to enter the capsule at an average distance of 0.3 cm (range 0–0.5 cm) from the distal border of the CT and 1.2 cm (range 0.6–1.9 cm) from the CT femoral insertion. Discussion and Conclusion. The ascending branch of the MFCA runs in the anterior surface of the QF at a distance of 1.5 cm from the femoral insertion. When the QF myotomy is performed, commonly 0.5–0.8 cm from the insertion to the femur, the vessel get disrupted or stays medial to the myotomy and can stretch/disrupt when the femur is dislocated and translated anteriorly. Tenotomies of the OE and CT should stay at least 1.5 cm from the femoral insertion to preserve the deep branch of the MFCA. This study provides unreported topographic anatomy of the ascending and deep branch of the MFCA, which can help develop an improved blood-preserving posterior approach for HRA

Introduction. Total hip arthroplasty is considered to be one of the most successful orthopaedic interventions. Acetabular component positioning has been shown to affect dislocation rates, component impingement, bearing surface wear rates, and need for revision surgery. The safe zones of acetabular component positioning have previously been described by Lewinnek et al. as 5 to 25 degrees of cup version and 30 to 50 degrees of inclination. Callanan et al. later modified the inclination to 30 to 45 degrees. Our aim was to assess whether THA via robotic assisted posterior approach (PA) improves acetabular component positioning compared to fluoroscopic guided anterior approach THA (AA). Methods. Subjects. This study is a matched-pair case-control study using prospectively collected data from THAs done between January 2012 and December 2013. Patients who underwent primary THA using the PA or AA by the senior surgeons (MH and JAR) were included in the study. Ninety-six patients (of 176; 55%) underwent AA and 80 (of 176; 45%) underwent PA THAs. The matching process was performed by an observer blinded to the radiographic outcomes (EK). Patients were matched for sex and BMI +− 8 units. Seventy-nine patients who had AAs were manually matched to 79 patients who had PAs. Surgical Techniques. For the AA THAs, the patient is supine and the approach is performed through a modified smith Peterson approach. Acetabular cup positioning is assessed intraoperatively with fluoroscopy. For the PA THAs, the patient in the lateral position using the posterior approach. Acetabular cup positioning was guided by the MAKO robotic hip system using preoperative CT scans of the involved hip. Radiographic Measurements. The radiographic measurements were done manually using a standardized technique by two observers blinded to the type of arthroplasty performed. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to test user dependent variability. Means were used for final calculations. Statistical Analysis. The average cup inclination and anteversion angles were calculated. Calculation of the number of hips that were in the safe zones of Lewinnek (inclination, 30°–50°; anteversion, 5°–25°) and Callanan (inclination, 30°–45°; anteversion, 5°–25°) regarding inclination, anteversion, and a combination of both were done for both groups. Independent t-tests were performed to compare both groups for sex, BMI, and inclination and anteversion angles. Fisher's exact test was used to compare both groups regarding the number of hips in the safe zones of Lewinnek and Callanan. Relative risk and absolute risk reduction were calculated. Results. There was no significant difference in BMI between the two groups. Intraobserver agreement was found to be .92 and 0.82 for inclination and anteversion, respectively. Compared to fluoroscopic guided THAs, THAs performed with robot assistance were found to be more often in the safe zone of Lewinnek (90% vs. 75%, p=0.02, RR 0.40 [0.19–0.85] p=0.01). This pattern was observed in the zone of Callanan and approached statistical significance (80% vs. 68%, p=0.11, RR 0.64 [0.37–1.10] p=0.11). Conclusion. Compared to fluoroscopic assisted THA, robot assisted THAs are more likely to be within the safe zone of Callanan and Lewinnek

In 12 patients, we measured the oxygen concentration in the femoral head-neck junction during hip resurfacing through the anterolateral approach. This was compared with previous measurements made for the posterior approach. For the anterolateral approach, the oxygen concentration was found to be highly dependent upon the position of the leg, which was adjusted during surgery to provide exposure to the acetabulum and femoral head. Gross external rotation of the hip gave a significant decrease in oxygenation of the femoral head. Straightening the limb led to recovery in oxygen concentration, indicating that the blood supply was maintained. The oxygen concentration at the end of the procedure was not significantly different from that at the start. The anterolateral approach appears to produce less disruption to the blood flow in the femoral head-neck junction than the posterior approach for patients undergoing hip resurfacing. This may be reflected subsequently in a lower incidence of fracture of the femoral neck and avascular necrosis

Background: The direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has rapidly become popular, but there is little consensus regarding the risks and benefits of this approach in comparison with a modern posterior approach (PA). Methods: 2,147 patients who underwent DAA THA were propensity score matched with patients undergoing PA THA on the basis of age, gender, body-mass index (BMI) and American Society of Anaesthesia classification using data from a state joint replacement registry. Mean age of the matched cohort was 64.8 years, mean BMI was 29.1 kg/m2 and 53% were female. Multilevel logistic regression models using generalised estimating equations (GEEs) to control for grouping at the hospital level were utilised to identify differences in various outcomes. Results: There was no difference in the dislocation rate between patients undergoing DAA (0.84%) and PA (0.79%) THA. Trends indicating a slightly longer length of stay with the PA and a slightly greater risk of fracture, increased blood loss and hematoma with the DAA are consistent with previous studies. Conclusion: On the basis of short-term outcome and complication data, neither approach has a compelling advantage over each other, including no difference in the dislocation risk

Minimal invasive surgery (MIS) is accepted when the scar is 10 cm or less. The anterior and the antero-lateral approaches had gained recently interest in the total hip arthroplasty because they allow complete muscle sparing. The postero-lateral and lateral approaches were propsed to be less satisfactory from this point of view. The goal of this paper was to report an objective and carfull assessment of the advantages of the minimal invasive posterior approach in short stem (Nanos) total hip arthroplasty. Material and methods. From juli 2005 to march 2009 a total of 113 (70 males,53 female) uncemented Nanos-short-stem prothesis were implanted in 111 patients. The patiens average age was 53 years (33-73). The indication for this procedure was predominantly coxarthrosis. In all cases a minimal invasive posterior approach was used. The mean follow up period was 2,5 years (range 6 months- 4,5 years). The patients were assessed using Harris Hip Score and radiologically to detect any bone changes, the stand of the prothesis and peri-articular ossifications. Results. The perioperative Harris Hip Score was 53 (28-77), postoperative was 94 (86-100). Untill now we have not discovered any prothesis specific complications. Radiological follow up examinations showed the development of increasing trabecular reinforciment of the femoral neck and pertrachanteric regions. There is no evidence of any loosing or migration of the prothesis. No luxation. Calcification was noted in 8 cases (Grad 1), 4 cases(Grad 2), 1 case (Grad 3). In 3 cases we have to change the cup because of malposition. Conclusion. the stem design of Nanos-short-stem prothesis allowed a metaphyseal intertrochanteric multipoint primary fixation. The surgical technique using posterior approach give a good access to the femur and acetabulum. It allows intraoperative ROM as well as extention in the event of intraopertive complications. Long term studies still be needed

The accuracy of cup position in total hip arthroplasty is essential for a satisfactory result as malpositioning increases the risk of complications including dislocation, high wear rate, loosening, squeaking, edge loading, impingement and ultimately failure. We studied 173 patients in a single surgeon series of matched cohorts of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty. Four separate groups were identified comprising of posterior approach +/− navigation and direct anterior approach +/− navigation. We found a significant difference between the direct anterior navigated group and the posterior non-navigated group for both anteversion (p < 0.05, CI −3.86 to −1.73) and inclination (p < 0.05, CI −3.08 to −1.08). 72% of anterior navigated patients fell within 5° of the navigation software set target cup position of 45° inclination and 20° anteversion and 100% were within 10°. Only 30% of posterior non-navigated were within 5° of both anteversion and inclination and 73% were within 10°. There was also a significant difference between the direct anterior navigated and non-navigated group with respect to anteversion only (p < 0.05, CI 1.50 to 1.30). There were no other significant differences between approaches +/− navigation. The direct anterior approach allows ease of access to both anterior-superior iliac spines for navigation and a supine patient allows anteversion and inclination to be measured in the frontal plane. We conclude that the direct anterior approach with navigation improves accuracy of cup position compared to the conventional posterior approach without navigation

The ideal operative treatment of displaced sub capital femoral fractures in the elderly is controversial. Recently, randomised controlled trials have suggested a better outcome with the use of total hip arthroplasty (THA) to treat displaced intra capsular fractures of the femur for elderly patients in good health. More recently the concept of dual mobility cups is being promoted to avoid dislocations in this cohort of patients. However, overall there is limited evidence to support the choice between different types of arthroplasty. Dislocation remains a main concern with THA, especially when a posterior approach is used. We analysed the outcome of 115 primary THR (112 cements and 3 uncemented) THR using a posterior approach with soft tissue repair in active elderly patients presenting with displaced intra capsular femoral neck fractures. Size 28 mm head was used in 108 and a size 32 mm head in the rest. All surgery was performed by specialist hip surgeons. Satisfactory results were noted in terms of pain control, return to pre-morbid activity and radiological evidence of bone implant osteo-integration. The 30-day mortality was nil. There were two dislocations and only one needed revision surgery due to recurrent dislocation. In conclusion, with optimal patient selection, THA seems to provide a good functional outcome and pain relief in the management of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Excellent outcome can be achieved when done well using the standard cemented THR and with 28mm head. A good soft tissue repair and a specialist hip surgeon is preferable

The occurrence of impingement can lead to instability, accelerated wear, and unexplained pain after THA. While implant and bony impingement were widely investigated, importance of soft tissue impingement was unclear. In the THA through posterior approach, it is known that posterior soft tissue repair can decrease the risk of dislocation. However, it is not known whether anterior soft tissue impingement by anterior hip capsule will influence hip ROM. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively measure the effect of anterior capsule resection on hip ROM in vivo during posterior approach THA using hip navigation system. From June 2011, 26 hips (25 patients) that underwent primary THA using Stryker CT-based hip navigation system were the subjects. All were female osteoarthritis patients and the average age at the operation was 59 (47–76) years. Intraoperatively, acetabular cup and femoral stem placement were performed through posterior approach under the navigation system. After reduction of the joint, we measured hip ROM using the same navigation system. We measured them before and after the resection of anterior hip capsule and compared the difference. After the resection of anterior hip capsule, the average increases of ROM were 0.7±3.5 degrees for flexion, 2.3±2.3 degrees for extension, 1.1±2.3 degrees for abduction and 2.1±2.9 degrees for external rotation at flexion 0 degree compared with ROM before the resection. However, it significantly increased 7.5±5.1 degrees for internal rotation at flexion 90 degree (range; −3–20, paired t-test p<0.001) and 6.1±5.5 degrees for internal rotation at flexion 45 degree (range; −4–18, p<0.001). In this study, we used navigation system for assessment of soft tissue impingement. We found that during posterior approach THA, resection of anterior hip capsule brought about significant increase of ROM, especially in the direction of flexion with internal rotation. We also found that this procedure did not change ROM of flexion, extension, abduction and external rotation. These results indicated that, during THA through posterior approach, resection of anterior hip capsule could reduce the risk of posterior instability without increasing the risk of anterior instability

The direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become an extremely familiar concept over the last 8 to 10 years. There has been growing pressure to utilise this approach driven by the lay press, implant manufacturers looking for an edge, as well as from surgeons looking for a marketing advantage. This media and industry presence could leave many surgeons feeling that we delay adoption of the DAA at the risk of losing patients or at minimum must have a good explanation as to why we have chosen not to perform “that surgery where you come in from the front.”. The atmosphere of perceived superiority of DAA has occurred in spite of numerous publications identifying unique risks and complications, including steeply increased complication rates in the “learning curve”, while lacking data identifying its promised advantages when compared to the “modern posterior approach” to THA. It persists despite a recent prospective comparative study that failed to identify any clinical advantages for the anterior THA versus a “mini-posterior” THA and other evidence from state joint registries that has shown the dislocation rate of the DAA is not significantly different from posterior hip approaches. It essential to understand the considerations that differentiate traditional posterior THA from “modern” posterior-based THA. The advancements made in pain management, rapid rehabilitation and patient education all contribute substantially to the enhanced recovery of the “modern THA”. Furthermore, the extensile exposures such as the Moore, Gibson or Kocher Langenbeck approaches are no longer the type of “posterior” approach that is applied to routine primary THA. Many iterations of posterior-based approaches are now performed with a far more limited and soft tissue preserving approach. It is the purpose of this brief presentation to describe the clinical results of 1000 consecutive hips performed using one such “modern THA,” which has allowed us to obtain early recovery benefits, including the outpatient setting. This is achieved without the additional risk profile assumed with the DAA and with an easily extensile approach. Through these examples we can show that not only is “the back” back, but that for those who were paying attention, it is clear it never really went away