The Exeter Stem (Howmedica, UK) has been in use for over 35 years. Over the years it has undergone several modifications with the most recent being a highly polished, tapered stem in 1986. The manufacturers quote a rate of 0.0006%. In the current literature there are 16 (or less) instances of fractures of the Orthinox stem. We present a case of fracture of an Orthinox Exeter Stem 9 years after insertion. Our patient, BB, presented, aged 62, with symptoms & signs consistent with OA right hip. THR was performed through a lateral approach utilising a trochanteric osteotomy. A size 0 37.5 stem was inserted. Radiographs were very satisfactory. She suffered a post operative DVT/PTE from which she recovered uneventfully. She was independently mobile at 6 month review and was discharged at the 2 year stage pain free. Aged 71, BB presented to outpatient clinic with a several month history of generalised groin pain. She had a Trendelenberg gait. Considerable pain was experienced on axial compression of the limb. Radiographs revealed a midstem fracture with cement loosening proximally. No trauma was reported. She underwent revision surgery through a posterior approach. Acetabular component was rigidly fixed. This was revised to a pressfit Trident (Zimmer, UK) cup with screws & polyethylene liner. An extended trochanteric osteotomy was used to remove the broken stem. An uncemented Restoration (Stryker, UK) stem was inserted with a 28mm head. Post-operative recovery was unremarkable and at 6 months osteotomy has healed. The stem was sent to Stryker UK Laboratories for analysis. They reported the stem broke in fatigue with the origin on the antero-lateral surface. No material or manufacturing defects seen. Dimensionally correct. Fracture may be due to abnormal bending stresses secondary to proximal loosening and firm distal fixation. Our case demonstrates a set of circumstances that led to inevitable fatigue and stem fracture. The method of failure should reinforce the radiograph appearances that may cause concern or be acted upon

We have tested the axial and torsional stability of femoral components after revision arthroplasty in a cadaver model, using impacted morsellised cancellous graft and cement. Each one of six matched pairs of fresh frozen human femora had either a primary or a revision prosthesis cemented in place. For the ‘revision’ experiments, all cancellous bone was removed from the proximal femur which was then over-reamed to create a smooth-walled cortical shell. An MTS servohydraulic test frame was used to apply axial and torsional loads to each specimen through the prosthetic femoral heads with the femur submerged in isotonic saline solution at 37°C. The mean subsidence was 0.27 ± 0.17 mm for the primary and 0.52 ± 0.30 mm for the revision groups. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.025), but the mean subsidence was < 1 mm in both groups. The mean maximum torque before failure was 42.9 ± 26.9 N-m for the primary and 34.8± 20.7 N-m for the revision groups. This difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.015). Based on our results we suggest that revision of the femoral component using morsellised cancellous graft followed by cementing with a collarless prosthesis with a polished tapered stem restores the integrity of the proximal femur and provides immediate stability of the implant

We have investigated the role of the penetration of saline on the shear strength of the cement-stem interface for stems inserted at room temperature and those preheated to 37°C using a variety of commercial bone cements. Immersion in saline for two weeks at 37°C reduced interfacial strength by 56% to 88% after insertion at room temperature and by 28% to 49% after preheating of the stem. The reduction in porosity as a result of preheating ranged from 71% to 100%. Increased porosity correlated with a reduction in shear strength after immersion in saline (r = 0.839, p < 0.01) indicating that interfacial porosity may act as a fluid conduit.