The C-Stem in its design as a triple tapered stem, is the logical development of the original Charnley flat-back polished stem. The concept, design and the surgical technique cater for a limited slip of the stem within the cement mantle transferring the load more proximally. Five thousand two hundred and thirty three primary procedures using a C-stem have been carried out since 1993. We reviewed all 621 cases that had their total hip arthroplasty before 1998. Sixty nine patients (70 hips) had died and 101 hips had not reached a ten-year clinical and radiological follow-up and had not been revised. Thirty-two hips had been revised before 10 years, none were revised for aseptic stem loosening and no stems. The indications for revision were Infection in 4, dislocation in 3, aseptic cup loosening in 24 and unexplained pain in 1. The remaining 418 hips had a mean follow-up of 12 years (range 10–15 years). There were 216 women and 173 men, and 34 patients had bilateral LFAs. The patients' mean age at surgery was 53 years (range 16–83 years). Thirty four hips had been revised at the time of review. The reasons for revision were infection in 5, dislocation in 2, aseptic cup loosening in 24 and 1 for neuralgia paraesthetica where the stem was well fixed. Two hips were revised for stem fracture. There were no revisions for stem loosening but 2 stems were revised for fracture - both with a defective cement mantle proximally. The clinical results are very encouraging and they support the concept of the Charnley cemented low friction arthroplasty, but place a demand on the understanding of the technique and its execution at surgery

Introduction. Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been one of the most successful, reliable and common prosthetic techniques since the introduction of cemented low-friction arthroplasty by Charnley in the early 1960s, aseptic loosening due to stem-cement and cement-bone interface failures as well as cement fractures have been known to occur. To overcome this loosening, the stem should be mechanically retentive and stable for long term repetitive loading. Migration studies have shown that all stems migrate within their cement mantle, sometimes leading to the stem being debonded from the cement [1]. If we adopt the hypothesis that the stems debond from the cement mantle, the stem surface should be polished. For the polished stem, the concept of a double taper design, which is tapered in the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) planes, and a triple-tapered design, which has trapezoidal cross-section with the double tapered, have been popularized. Both concepts performed equally well clinically [2]. In this study, we aimed to analyze stress patterns for both models in detail using the finite element (FE) method. Methods. An ideal cemented stem with bone was made using three dimensional FE analyses (ANSYS 13). The cortical bone was 105 mm long and 7 mm thick and the PMMA cement mantle was 5 mm in thickness surrounding the stem. Young's modulus was set at 200 GPa for the bone and 2.2 GPa for the cement. Poisson's ratio was 0.3 for both materials. The bone-cement interface was completely bonded and cement-stem interface was not bonded in cases where a polished stem surface was used. The two types of stems were compared. One being the double tapered (Fig 1 left) and the other the triple tapered (Fig 1 right). The coefficient of friction (μ) at the stem-cement interface was set at 0 for both models. The distal ends of the stems were not capsulated by the PMMA and therefore the stems were free to subside. All materials were assumed to be linearly isotropic and homogeneous. The distal ends of the bone were completely constrained against any movements and rotations. An axial load of 1200 N and a transverse load of 600 N were applied at the same time simulating the bending condition [3]. Results. Although the stress distribution differences between the designs were minor, the positions where higher stresses and absolute values in the cement were observed varied. For double tapered model, the highest maximum principal stress was 1.98 MPa observed around the corner of the stem at the proximal region. For the triple tapered model, the highest maximum principal stress was 1.67 MPa observed at more medial side than the double tapered model

Femoral revision in cemented THA might include some technical difficulties, based on loss of bone stock and cement removal, which might lead to further loss of bone stock, inadequate fixation, cortical perforation or consequent fractures. Cemented THA has become an extremely successful operation with excellent long-term results. Although showing decreasing popularity in North America, it always remained a popular choice for the elderly patients in Europe and other parts of the world. Various older and recent studies presented excellent long-term results, for cemented fixation of the cup as well as the stem. Besides optimal component orientation, a proper cementing technique is of major importance to assure longevity of implant fixation. Consequently a meticulous bone bed preparation assures the mechanical interlock between the implant component, cement and the final bone bed. Pre-operative steps as proper implant sizing/ templating, ensuring an adequate cement mantle thickness, and hypotensive anaesthesia, minimizing bleeding at the bone cement interface, are of major importance. Additionally, femoral impaction grafting, in combination with a primary cemented stem, allows for femoral bone restoration due to incorporation and remodeling of the allograft bone by the host skeleton. Historically, it has been first performed and described in Exeter in 1987, utilizing a cemented tapered polished stem in combination with morselised fresh frozen bone grafts. The technique was refined by the development of designated instruments, which have been implemented by the Nijmegen group from Holland. Indications might include all femoral revisions with bone stock loss, while the Endo-Clinic experience is mainly based on revision of cemented stems. Cavitary bone defects affecting meta- and diaphysis leading to a wide or so called “drain pipe” femora, are optimal indications for this technique, especially in young patients. Contraindications are mainly: septical revisions, extensive circumferential cortical bone loss and noncompliance of the patient. The cement mantle is of importance, as it acts as the distributor of force between the stem and bone graft and seals the stem. A cement mantle of at least 2 mm has shown favorable results. Originally the technique is described with a polished stem. We use standard brushed stems with comparable results. Relevant complications include mainly femoral fractures due to the hardly impacted allograft bone. Subsidence of tapered polished implants might be related to cold flow within the cement mantle, however, could also be related to micro cement mantle fractures, leading to early failure. Subsidence should be less than 5 mm. Impaction grafting might technically be more challenging and more time consuming than cement-free distal fixation techniques. It, however, enables a reliable restoration of bone stock which might especially become important in further revision scenarios in younger patients

Femoral revision in cemented THA might include some technical difficulties, based on loss of bone stock and cement removal, which might lead to further loss of bone stock, inadequate fixation, cortical perforation or consequent fractures. Femoral impaction grafting, in combination with a primary cemented stem, allows for femoral bone restoration due to incorporation and remodeling of the allograft bone by the host skeleton. Historically, it has been first performed and described in Exeter in 1987, utilizing a cemented tapered polished stem in combination with morselised fresh frozen bone grafts. The technique was refined by the development of designated instruments, which have been implemented by the Nijmegen group from Holland. Indications might include all femoral revisions with bone stock loss, while the ENDO-Klinik experience is mainly based on revision of cemented stems. Cavitary bone defects affecting meta- and diaphysis leading to a wide or so called “drain pipe” femora, are optimal indications for this technique, especially in young patients. Contraindications are mainly: septical revisions, extensive circumferential cortical bone loss and noncompliance of the patient. Generally the technique creates a new endosteal surface to host the cemented stem by reconstruction of the cavitary defects with impacted morselised bone graft. This achieves primary stability and restoration of the bone stock. It has been shown, that fresh frozen allograft shows superior mechanical stability than freeze-dried allografts. Incorporation of these grafts has been described in 89%. Technical steps include: removal of failed stem and all cement, reconstruction of segmental bone defects with metal mesh (if necessary), preparation of fresh frozen femoral head allografts with bone mill, optimal bone chip diameter 2 – 5 mm, larger chips for the calcar area (6 – 8 mm), insertion of an intramedullary plug including central wire, 2 cm distal to the stem tip, introduction of bone chips from proximal to distal, impaction started by distal impactors over central wire, then progressively larger impactors proximal, insertion of a stem “dummy” as proximal impactor and space filler, removal of central wire, retrograde insertion of low viscosity cement (0.5 Gentamycin) with small nozzle syringe, including pressurization, insertion of standard cemented stem. The cement mantle is of importance, as it acts as the distributor of force between the stem and bone graft and seals the stem. A cement mantle of at least 2 mm has shown favorable results. Originally the technique is described with a polished stem. We use standard brushed stems with comparable results. Postoperative care includes usually touch down weight bearing for 6–8 weeks, followed by 4–6 weeks of gradually increased weightbearing with a total of 12 weeks on crutches. Survivorship with a defined endpoint as any femoral revision after 10 year follow up has been reported by the Exeter group being over 90%. While survivorship for revision related to aseptic loosening being above 98%. Within the last years various other authors and institutions reported similar excellent survivorships, above 90%. In addition a long term follow up by the Swedish arthroplasty registry in more than 1180 patients reported a cumulative survival rate of 94% after 15 years. Impaction grafting might technically be more challenging and more time consuming than cement free distal fixation techniques. It, however, enables a reliable restoration of bone stock which might become important in further revision scenarios in younger patients

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes and and radiological findings of primary total hip arthroplasty(THA) performed by using cemented polished femoral stem. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 91 hips (84 patients) that had undergone primary THA with cemented polished femoral stem after follow-up more than 10 years. The mean age at surgery was 57 years old (47 to 75). Mean follow up period was 12. 8 years(10.1 to 14). Clinical evaluation was performed using Harris hip score. The radiographic evaluation was performed in terms of the cementing technique, including of subsidence within the cement mantle, radiolucent lines at the cement-bone or cement-stem interface, cortical hypertrophy, and calcar resorption. Results. At the final follow-up, mean Harris hip score had improved from 55.2 points to 93.2 points. Barrack classification was 50 cases in A grade, 32 cases in B grade, 9 cases in C grade. Except only one case, subsidence of femoral stem was observed less than 2mm. There were no progressing radiolucent line and loosening of femoral stem. Conclusion. Our results in this study show good outcome for cemented polished femoral stem at follow-up more than 10 years

Background. We occasionally came across cortical atrophy of femurs with cemented collarless polished triple-taper stem in a short term period. This study aimed to estimate radiographs of cemented collarless polished triple-taper stem taken 6 months after the initial operation. Methods. Between May 2009 and April 2011, 97 consecutive patients underwent primary total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty using SC-stem or C-stem implants. At the 6 month follow-up, a radiographic examination was performed on 70 patients (71 hips). 44 hips had Total Hip Arthoplasty, 35 had osteoarthritis, 5 had idiopathic osteonecrosis, 2 had other diseases and 27 hips had hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. The postoperative radiographs were used to estimate the cementing grade. Then the 6 month postoperative radiographs were analyzed for changes in stem subsidence, cortical atrophy and cortical hypertrophy. According to the system of Gruen- cortical atrophy and cortical hypertrophy were classified on the femoral side. We defined no cortical atrophy as grade 0, cortical atrophy less than 1 mm as grade 1, more than 1 mm and less than 2 mm as grade 2, more than 2 mm as grade 3. Result. A cortical atrophy adjacent to the stem was found in zone II according to Gruen on grade 0 thirty-five radiographs (49%), grade 1 twenty (28%), grade 2 eleven (16%), grade 3 five (7%). in zone III grade 0 twenty-seven (38%), grade 1 thirty (42%), grade 2 ten (14%), grade 3 four (6%), in zone V grade 0 fifty (70%), grade 1 twenty (28%), grade 2 one (1%), grade 3 zero (0%), in zone VI grade 0 forty-nine (69%), grade 1 twenty (28%), grade 2 two (3%), grade 3 zero (0%). Cortical hypertrophy was only demonstrated in zone V in one case. In all cases the stem subsidence was less than 1 mm. Cortical atrophy including grade 1 was recognized in 38% of THA, and in 52% of femoral neck fractures. In one case the slight radiolucent line of the postoperative X-ray disappeared after 6 months. Discussion. Cortical atrophy was recognized more in the femoral neck fracture group than in the THA group. And Cortical atrophy was recognized in zone 2 and zone 3 more frequently than in zone 5 and zone 6. According to the finite element analysis of SC-stem more stress is received on the medial aspect of the stem during weight bearing, so it is suspected that more cortical atrophy on the lateral aspect is associated with stem design. This is compatible with the cortical hypertrophy reported with Exeter stem in zone 5. Conclusion. Cortical atrophy, including minor degree atrophy, occurred in 65% of cemented collarless polished triple-taper stem in short term periods after implantation. Cortical atrophy occurred in the lateral aspect of the stem more severely and more frequently than in the medial aspect. Cortical atrophy was also recognized in the femoral neck fracture group more more severely and more frequently than in the THA group

Introduction. There have been many attempts to reduce the risk of femoral component loosening. Using a tapered stem having a highly polished stem surface results in stem stabilization subsequent to debonding and stem-cement taper-lock and is consistent with force-closed fixation design. Purpose. In this study, we assessed the subsidence of two different polished triple tapered stems and two different cements in primary THA. Materials and methods. From March 2013 to March 2014, two kinds of polished triple tapered cemented stem were applied in 74 primary THA. 12 male, 62 female, mean age at surgery was 68 years old, mean F/U time was 12months. When they were compared by stems, this study comprises 35 THA with Trilliance stem(Aesculap, Germany) and 39 THA with SC stem (Kyocera, Japan), and when they were compared by cements, this study comprises 36 Simplex cement (Stryker, USA) cases and 38 Cobalt cement(Biomet, USA) cases. Using digitized x-ray, we measured the subsidence of each implants. Measurements were taken from initial postoperative radiographs to the final follow-up. We also evaluated the existence of radiolucent line between cement and stem and also evaluated calcar resorption. Results. The mean subsidence of Trilliance stem was 0.26mm and of SC stem was 0.44mm at 12months.(P<0.0001) Statistic significance was observed between the stems. When compared between 2 cements, the mean subsidence of Simplex cement was 0.25mm and of Cobalt cement was 0.48mm.(P=0.0563). No statistic significance was observed. There was no case of stem loosening and calcar resorption. Conclusion. 2 different designed cemented triple taper stems showed significantly different degree of subsidence after THA. No difference of subsidence was observed between two cements

Introduction. The cement mantle thickness for cemented stem during total hip arthroplasty (THA) is different between the complete cement mantle technique and the line-to-line technique. In the line-to-line technique, the size of the rasp is same as that of the stem. We performed THA in321 hipsof 289 patientsusing a new designed triple-tapered polished cemented stem. We investigated the short-term result of these 321 hips clinically and radiographically. Materials and Methods. From February 2002 to December 2012, 321 THAs were performed in 289 patients with the use oftriple-tapered polished cemented stem (Trilliance). Of these, 306 hips in 274 patients who were followed over 6 months, were evaluated. All THAs were undergone with direct anterior approach in supine position. The third generation cementing technique was standardized. The mean age at surgery was 65.3 years and the mean follow-up period was 24.6 months. Clinical results were evaluated by Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip score. Intra-postoperative complications were investigated. Radiographic examinations were performed to investigate the findings of stem loosening, stress shielding, radiolucent line, osteolysis, stem subsidence, stem alignmentand cementing grade on plain radiograph. Results. The mean JOA hip score improved from 40.7 pointspreoperatively to 93.2 points at the final follow-up. As complication, 1 late onset deep infection, 2 postoperative dislocations and 1 intraoperative fracture occurred. The mean stem subsidence was 0.22mm at 6 months, 0.33mm at 1year, 0.42mm at 2 years, 0.48mm at 3 years, and 0.53mm at 4 years

Background. We occasionally come across cortical atrophy of the femur with cemented collarless polished triple-taper stem, a short time after the operation. This study aimed to estimate the radiographs of cemented collarless polished triple-taper stem taken at three, six, twelve, and twenty-four months after the initial operation. Methods. Between May 2009 and April 2011, 97 consecutive patients underwent primary total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty using a SC-stem or C-stem implant. During the 24 month follow-up, radiographic examination was performed on a total of 95 patients (98 hips). Out of those 95 patients, 52 hips had total hip arthroplasty, 45 had osteoarthritis, 5 had idiopathic osteonecrosis, there were two 2 other cases and 46 hips had hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. The cementing grade was estimated on the postoperative radiographs. The 24 month postoperative radiographs were analyzed for changes in stem subsidence, cortical atrophy and cortical hypertrophy. According to the Gruen zone, cortical atrophy and cortical hypertrophy were classified on the femoral side. We defined no cortical atrophy as grade 0, cortical atrophy less than 1 mm as grade 1, more than 1 mm and less than 2 mm as grade 2, and more than 2 mm as grade 3. We defined Grade 1 as 1 point, Grade 2 as 2 points, and Grade 3 as 3 points. The points in every zone were calculated, and the average per zone was determined. Result. The mean points of the cortical atrophy adjacent to the stem was 1.19 in THA, and 1.58 in BHA in zone II, 0.98 in THA, and 1.15 in BHA in zone III, 0.34 in THA, and 0.6 in BHA in zone V, and 0.63 in THA, and 0.93 in BHA in zone VI. Statistical significance was found between the two groups (THA and BHA). Stem subsidence slightly increased with time. During the following 2 years there was not a single case with over 1.5mm of stem subsidence. The average stem subsidence after 24 months was 0.72 in THA, and 0.78 in BHA. Cortical hypertrophy was only demonstrated in 5 cases. Discussion. Cortical atrophy was recognized more in the femoral neck fracture group than in the THA group, and cortical atrophy was recognized in zone 2 and zone 3 more frequently than in zone 5 and zone 6. According to the finite element analysis of the SC-stem, more stress is received on the medial aspect of the stem during weight bearing, so it is suspected that more cortical atrophy on the lateral aspect is associated with stem design. These findings are compatible with the cortical hypertrophy reported with Exeter stem in zone 5. Conclusion. Cortical atrophy (cancellizaton) was recognized in 70% of THA group, and in 80% of BHA group, 2 years after the operation. Cortical atrophy in most cases was recognized in Gruen Zones 2 & 3 (P<0.01). Cortical atrophy was found more severely and more frequently in the femoral neck fracture group than the THA group (P<0.01)

We report the outcome at a minimum of 10 years follow-up for 80 polished tapered stems performed in 53 patients less than 35-years-old with a high risk profile for aseptic loosening. Forty-six prosthesis were inserted for inflammatory hip arthritis and 34 for avascular necrosis. The mean age at surgery was 28 years in the inflammatory arthritis (17–35) and 27 years in the avascular necrosis (15–35) patients. At a mean follow-up of 14.5 years in the inflammatory arthritis group and 14 years in the avascular necrosis group respectively, survivorship of the 80 stems with revision of the femoral component for any reason as an endpoint was 100 % (95 % CI). Re-operation was because of failure of four metal-backed cups, 3 all polyethylene cups and one cementless cup. None of the stems were radiographically loose. All but two femoral components subsided within the cement mantle to a mean of 1.2 mm (0 tot 2.5) at final follow-up. Periarticular osteolysis was noted in 4 femurs in zone 7. This finding was associated with polyethylene wear and was only seen in those hips that needed revision for a metal backed cup loosening. Our findings show that the polished tapered stem has excellent medium-term results when implanted in young patients with high risk factors for aseptic loosening

Femoral revision in cemented THA might include some technical difficulties, based on loss of bone stock and cement removal, which might lead to further loss of bone stock, inadequate fixation, cortical perforation or consequent fractures. Femoral impaction grafting, in combination with a primary cemented stem, allows for femoral bone restoration due to incorporation and remodelling of the allograft bone by the host skeleton. Historically it has been first performed and described in Exeter in 1987, utilizing a cemented tapered polished stem in combination with morselised fresh frozen bone grafts. The technique was refined by the development of designated instruments, which have been implemented by the Nijmegen group from Holland. Indications might include all femoral revisions with bone stock loss, while the Endo-Clinic experience is mainly based on revision of cemented stems. Cavitary bone defects affecting meta- and diaphysis leading to a wide or so called “drain pipe” femora, are optimal indications for this technique, especially in young patients. Contraindications are mainly: septical revisions, extensive circumferential cortical bone loss and noncompliance of the patient. Generally, the technique creates a new endosteal surface to host the cemented stem by reconstruction of the cavitary defects with impacted morselised bone graft. This achieves primary stability and restoration of the bone stock. It has been shown, that fresh frozen allograft shows superior mechanical stability than freeze-dried allografts. Incorporation of these grafts has been described in 89%. Technical steps include: removal of failed stem and all cement, reconstruction of segmental bone defects with metal mesh (if necessary), preparation of fresh frozen femoral head allografts with bone mill, optimal bone chip diameter 2–5 mm, larger chips for the calcar area (6–8 mm), insertion of an intramedullary plug including central wire, 2 cm distal the stem tip, introduction of bone chips from proximal to distal, impaction started by distal impactors over central wire, then progressive larger impactors proximal, insertion of a stem “dummy” as proximal impactor and space filler, removal of central wire, retrograde insertion of low viscosity cement (0.5 Gentamycin) with small nozzle syringe, including pressurization, and insertion of standard cemented stem. The cement mantle is of importance, as it acts as the distributor of force between the stem and bone graft and seals the stem. A cement mantle of at least 2 mm has shown favorable results. Post-operative care includes usually touch down weightbearing for 6–8 weeks, followed by 4–6 weeks of gradually increased weightbearing with a total of 12 weeks on crutches. Relevant complications include mainly femoral fractures due to the hardly impacted allograft bone. Subsidence of tapered polished implants might be related to cold flow within the cement mantle, however, could also be related to micro cement mantle fractures, leading to early failure. Subsidence should be less than 5 mm. Survivorship with a defined endpoint as any femoral revision after 10-year follow up has been reported by the Exeter group being over 90%, while survivorship for revision as aseptic loosening being above 98%. Within the last years various other authors and institutions reported about similar excellent survivorships, above 90%. In addition, a long-term follow up by the Swedish arthroplasty registry in more than 1180 patients reported a cumulative survival rate of 94% after 15 years. Impaction grafting might technically be more challenging and more time consuming than cement-free distal fixation techniques. It, however, enables a reliable restoration of bone stock which might especially become important in further revision scenarios in younger patients

Introduction. The success of total hip replacement in the young has consistently been worse both radiologically and clinically when compared to the standard hip replacement population. Methods. We describe the clinical and radiological outcome of 58 consecutive polished tapered stems (PTS) in 47 patients with a minimum of 10 years follow-up (mean 12 years 6 months) and compared this to our cohort of standard patients. There were 22 CPT stems and 36 Exeter stems. Results. Three patients with 4 hips died before 10 years and one hip was removed as part of a hindquarter amputation due to vascular disease. None of these stems had been revised or shown any signs of failure at their last follow-up. No stems were lost to follow-up and the fate of all stems is known. Survivorship with revision of the femoral component for aseptic loosening as the endpoint was zero and 4% (2 stems) for potential revision. The Harris hip scores were good or excellent in 81% of the patients (mean score 86). All the stems subsided within the cement to a mean total of 1.8mm (0.2-8) at final review. There was excellent preservation of proximal bone and an extremely low incidence of loosening at the cement bone interface. Cup failure and cup wear with an associated periarticular osteolysis was a serious problem. 19% of the cups (10) were revised and 25% of the hips (13) had significant periarticular osteolysis associated with excessive polyethylene wear. Discussion. The outcome of polished tapered stems in this age group is as good as in the standard age group and superior to other non PTS designs in young patients. This is despite higher weight and frequent previous surgery. Cup wear and cup failure were significantly worse in this group, with a higher incidence of periarticular osteolysis

Introduction:. The reconstructive hip surgeon is commonly faced with complex cases where severe bone loss makes conventional revision techniques difficult or impossible. This problem is likely to increase in future, as there is a good correlation between the degree of bone loss seen and number of previous total hip operations. In such situations, one alternative is the use of impaction allografting with cement. History:. The first clinical reports of impaction allografting on the femoral side were in relation to revision with cementless stems. The use of morselised bone with cement on the femoral side was first reported by the Exeter group. Biology:. The great enthusiasm with which this technique has been received is related to its biological potential to increase bone stock. The rapid revascularization, incorporation and remodeling of morselised compacted cancellous allograft differs dramatically from structural allografting where bone ingrowth usually is limited to 2mm to 3mm. Histological evidence for bony reconstitution has been presented from postmortem retrievals, and from biopsies at the time of trochanteric wire removal. Type of bone:. The size of the bone chips used as morselised allograft is important. The graft behaves as a friable aggregate and its resistance to complex forces depends on grading, normal load and compaction. It is recommended that particles of 3–5mm in diameter make up the bulk of the graft. A bone slurry, such as that produced by blunted bone mills, or by the use of acetabular reamers or high speed burrs would not give satisfactory stability. A wide range of particle sizes is recommended in order to achieve the greatest stability. The cement mantle:. A satisfactory cement mantle is required to ensure the longevity of any cemented stem. The primary determinant of cement mantle thickness is the differential between the graft impactors and the final stem. All femoral impaction systems require careful design to achieve a cement mantle that is uninterrupted in its length and adequate in its thickness. Stem design:. The technique of impaction allografting on the femoral side was first and most successfully reported using a highly polished stem with a double tapered geometry and no collar. It is thought to be ideal for this technique as it can subside within the cement mantle, thus generating hoop stresses on the cement which creeps, potentially maintaining physiological loads on the supporting bone. The extension of this technique to other stems has led to some controversy. Confounding factors such as surgical technique, the impaction system available, the type and size of allograft bone used, and the extent of the preoperative bone loss, will undoubtedly continue to influence such comparisons. It appears that the exact stem configuration may not be as critical as its surface finish, the amount of graft impaction possible and the cement mantle produced. The introduction of longer stems and impactors in the last decade has undoubtedly further increased the scope of this technique. Conclusion:. Impaction allografting is the only technique currently available that reverses the loss of bone stock seen in a revision hip arthroplasty. Moreover, this technique does not sacrifice host tissue, and could facilitate further surgery. Impaction allografting, performed with great attention to detail using appropriate equipment, represents an exciting reconstructive solution for contained femoral defects

Introduction:. Cemented femoral components have been used in hip replacement surgery since its inception. For many patients this works well, but recent retrieval studies. 1–4. and more fundamental studies. 5, 6. have highlighted the issues of damage and material loss from the both matt and polished cemented stems. Materials and methods:. This study will focus on a cohort of retrievals from the Southampton Orthopaedics Centre for Arthroplasty Retrieval Surgery (SOCARS). The cohort consisted of a number of hybrid modular total hip replacements with cemented femoral components, both from mixed and matched manufacturer stem and head combinations. Femoral stems were polished, collarless, tapered designs; head sizes ranged from 28–54 mm. For each femoral stem, samples of Palacos R + G cement (Heraeus Medical GmbH, Hanau, Germany) were retrieved from the proximal region of the cement mantle (Gruen zones 1 and 7), corresponding to both macroscopically damaged and undamaged surfaces of the stem. The areas of damage were determined using calibrated digital photography; damaged surfaces were then imaged in detail using an Alicona InfiniteFocus microscope (Alicona Imaging GmbH, Graz, Austria). The technique uses optical microscopy and focus variation technology to extract 3D morphology and depth information from the surface with a resolution of 10 nm. A series of measurements were made and two different analysis routes were used to provide volumetric material loss measurements from the stem surface. High-resolution microscopy and elemental analysis of the cement and stem surfaces was conducted via SEM and EDX to identify the mechanisms leading to material loss at the cement-stem interface. Results:. The results demonstrate that material loss from polished femoral stems results from a progressive tribocorrosion process; the major damage mechanism is thought to be the micro-motion between the femoral stem surface and zirconium dioxide radiopacifier agglomerates originating from the cement. No significant link was found between the extent of damage to the femoral stem and either the head size or the amount of wear occurring at the head-cup bearing surface. The scale of stem damage varied between implants but often exceeded the volumetric material loss measured at the bearing surfaces. Conclusions:. Tribo-corrosive damage to the femoral stems of cemented total hip prostheses is a major potential source of material loss in vivo; in severely affected arthroplasties, measurements of volumetric wear of the stem at the cement-stem interface were greater than at either the head-cup bearing surface or the taper junction. The mechanism of material loss in this study was identified as a wear-dominated tribocorrosion interaction between the cement and stem, with zirconium dioxide radiopacifier agglomerates within the cement providing the hard particles which damaged the surface of cobalt-chrome femoral stems

Introduction. The reconstructive hip surgeon is commonly faced with complex cases where severe bone loss makes conventional revision techniques difficult or impossible. This problem is likely to increase in future, as there is a good correlation between the degree of bone loss seen and number of previous total hip operations. In such situations, one alternative is the use impaction allografting with cement. This has captured the attention of the orthopaedic community because of its potential for reconstituting femoral bone stock. History. The first clinical reports of impaction allografting on the femoral side were in relation to revision with cementless stems. The use of morselised bone with cement on the femoral side was first reported by the Exeter group. Biology. The great enthusiasm with which this technique has been received is related to its biological potential to increase bone stock. The rapid revascularisation, incorporation and remodelling of morselised compacted cancellous allograft differs dramatically from structural allografting where bone ingrowth usually is limited to 2–3mm. Histological evidence for bony reconstitution has been presented from postmortem retrievals, and from biopsies at the time of trochanteric wire removal. The Technique of Impaction Allografting. Type of bone: The size of the bone chips used as morselised allograft is important. The graft behaves as a friable aggregate and its resistance to complex forces depends on grading, normal load and compaction. It is recommended that particles of 3–5mm in diameter make up the bulk of the graft. A bone slurry, such as that produced by blunted bone mills, or by the use of acetabular reamers or high speed burrs would not give satisfactory stability. A wide range of particles sizes is recommended in order to achieve the greatest stability. Future considerations will include the potential for either adding biomaterials to the allograft, or ultimately substituting it completely. The cement mantle: A satisfactory cement mantle is required to ensure the longevity of any cemented stem. The primary determinant of cement mantle thickness is the differential between the graft impactors and the final stem. All femoral impaction systems require careful design to achieve a cement mantle that is uninterrupted in its length and adequate in its thickness. Stem design: The technique of impaction allografting on the femoral side was first and most successfully reported using a highly polished stem with a double tapered geometry and no collar. It is thought to be ideal for this technique as it can subside within the cement mantle, thus generating hoop stresses on the cement which creeps, potentially maintaining physiological loads on the supporting bone. The extension of this technique to other stems has led to some controversy. Confounding factors such as surgical technique, the impaction system available, the type and size of allograft bone used, and the extent of the pre-operative bone loss, will undoubtedly continue to influence such comparisons. It appears that the exact stem configuration may not be as critical as its surface finish, the amount of graft impaction possible and the cement mantle produced. The introduction of longer stems and impactors in the last decade has undoubtedly further increased the scope of this technique. Conclusion. Impaction allografting is the only technique currently available that reverses the loss of bone stock seen in a revision hip arthroplasty. Moreover, this technique does not sacrifice host tissue, and could facilitate further surgery

The reconstructive hip surgeon is commonly faced with complex cases where severe bone loss makes conventional revision techniques difficult or impossible. This problem is likely to increase in future, as there is a good correlation between the degree of bone loss seen and number of previous total hip operations. In such situations, one alternative is the use impaction allografting with cement. This has captured the attention of the orthopaedic community because of its potential for reconstituting femoral bone stock. The first clinical reports of impaction allografting on the femoral side were in relation to revision with cementless stems. The use of morsellised bone with cement on the femoral side was first reported by the Exeter group. The great enthusiasm with which this technique has been received is related to its biological potential to increase bone stock. The rapid revascularisation, incorporation and remodelling of morsellised compacted cancellous allograft differs dramatically from structural allografting where bone ingrowth usually is limited to 2–3mm. Histological evidence for bony reconstitution has been presented from postmortem retrievals, and from biopsies at the time of trochanteric wire removal. The size of the bone chips used as morsellised allograft is important. The graft behaves as a friable aggregate and its resistance to complex forces depends on grading, normal load and compaction. It is recommended that particles of 3–5mm in diameter make up the bulk of the graft. A bone slurry, such as that produced by blunted bone mills, or by the use of acetabular reamers or high speed burrs would not give satisfactory stability. A wide range of particle sizes is recommended in order to achieve the greatest stability. Future considerations will include the potential for either adding biomaterials to the allograft, or ultimately substituting it completely. A satisfactory cement mantle is required to ensure the longevity of any cemented stem. The primary determinant of cement mantle thickness is the differential between the graft impactors and the final stem. All femoral impaction systems require careful design to achieve a cement mantle that is uninterrupted in its length and adequate in its thickness. The technique of impaction allografting on the femoral side was first and most successfully reported using a highly polished stem with a double tapered geometry and no collar. It is thought to be ideal for this technique as it can subside within the cement mantle, thus generating hoop stresses on the cement which creeps, potentially maintaining physiological loads on the supporting bone. The extension of this technique to other stems has led to some controversy. Confounding factors such as surgical technique, the impaction system available, the type and size of allograft bone used, and the extent of the pre-operative bone loss, will undoubtedly continue to influence such comparisons. It appears that the exact stem configuration may not be as critical as its surface finish, the amount of graft impaction possible and the cement mantle produced. Impaction allografting is the only technique currently available that reverses the loss of bone stock seen in a revision hip arthroplasty. Moreover, this technique does not sacrifice host tissue, and could facilitate further surgery. Impaction allografting, performed with great attention to detail using appropriate equipment, represents an exciting reconstructive solution for contained femoral defects. Its role in larger and combined defects remains open to scrutiny. Careful observation and cautious optimism are necessary as further refinements may well improve the predictability of the clinical results and expand the indications for this important addition to the armamentarium of the revision surgeon

The clinical results of the cemented Exeter stem in primary hip surgery have been excellent. The Exeter ‘philosophy’ has also been extended into the treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures with ‘cemented bipolars’ and the Exeter Trauma Stem (Howmedica). We have identified an increase in the number of periprosthetic fractures that we see around the Exeter stem. We have also identified a particular group of patients with comminuted fractures around ‘well fixed’ Exeter stems after primary hip surgery that present a particular difficult clinical problem. Prior to fracture, the stems are not loose, the cement mantle remains sound and bone quality surrounding the reconstruction is good, i.e. classifying it as a Vancouver B1. However the comminuted nature of the fracture makes reduction and fixation with traditional methods difficult. Therefore in these particular circumstances it is often better to manage these as B2 or even B3 fractures, with distal bypass and uncemented reconstruction. Over an eleven-year period since 1999, 185 patients have been admitted to Nottingham University Hospitals with a periprosthetic femoral fracture around a hip replacement. These patients were identified from a prospective database of all trauma patients admitted to the institution. Of these patients we have identified a cohort of 21 patients (11%) with a periprosthetic fracture around an Exeter polished stem. Hospital notes were independently reviewed and data retrieved. Outcome data was collected with end points of fracture union, re-revision surgery and death. Data was also collected on immediate and long term post-operative complications. The mean age was 76 years at time of fracture, and 52% were male. The mean duration between primary index surgery and fracture was 18 months (median 11 months). 15 patients were classified as Vancouver B1, and six as B2 fractures. Of the B1 fractures, 14 underwent fixation and one was treated non-operatively. Of the B2 fractures, four were revised, one was revised and fixed using a plate, and one was fixed using a double-plating technique. Prior to fracture, none of the implants were deemed loose although one patient was under review of a stress fracture which subsequently displaced. One patient died prior to fracture union. All the other patients subsequently went onto unite at a mean of 4 months. There were no deep infections, non- or malunions. No patient underwent further surgery. Dislocation occurred in one patient and a superficial wound infection occurred in one patient which responded to antibiotic treatment. Three other patients have subsequently died at seven, twelve and fifty-three months post fracture due to unrelated causes. In our series of patients, in addition to the more standard fracture patterns, we have identified a very much more comminuted fracture. Indeed, we have described the appearance as if the tapered stem behaves like an axe, splitting the proximal femur as a consequence of a direct axial load. As a consequence of the injury, the cement mantle itself is severely disrupted. There is significant comminution and soft tissue stripping, calling into question the viability of the residual fragments. Treatment of this type of fracture using a combination of plates, screws and cables is unlikely to provide a sufficiently sound reconstruction. In our experience we believe these fractures around previously ‘well fixed’ Exeter stems should be treated as B2/B3 injuries

There has been an evolution in revision hip arthroplasty towards cementless reconstruction. Whilst cemented arthroplasty works well in the primary setting, the difficulty with achieving cement fixation in femoral revisions has led to a move towards removal of cement, where it was present, and the use of ingrowth components. These have included proximally loading or, more commonly, distally fixed stems. We have been through various iterations of these, notably with extensively porous coated cobalt chrome stems and recently with taper-fluted titanium stems. As a result of this, cemented stems have become much less popular in the revision setting. Allied to concerns about fixation and longevity of cemented fixation revision, there were also worries in relation to bone cement implantation syndrome when large cement loads were pressurised into the femoral canal at the time of stem cementation. This was particularly the case with longer stems. Technical measures are available to reduce that risk but the fear is nevertheless there. In spite of this direction of travel and these concerns, there is, however, still a role for cemented stems in revision hip arthroplasty. This role is indeed expanding. First and foremost, the use of cement allows for local antibiotic delivery using a variety of drugs both instilled in the cement at the time of manufacture or added by the surgeon when the cement is mixed. This has advantages when dealing with periprosthetic infection. Thus, cement can be used both as interval spacers but also for definitive fixation when dealing with periprosthetic hip infection. The reconstitution of bone stock is always attractive, particularly in younger patients or those with stove pipe canals. This is achieved well using impaction grafting with cement and is another extremely good use of cement. In the very elderly or those in whom proximal femoral resection is needed at the time of revision surgery, distal fixation with cement provides a good solution for immediate weight bearing and does not have the high a risk of fracture seen with large cementless stems. Cement is also useful in cases of proximal femoral deformity or where cement has been used in a primary arthroplasty previously. We have learnt that if the cement is well-fixed then the bond of cement-to-cement is excellent and therefore retention of the cement mantle and recementation into that previous mantle is a great advantage. This avoids the risks of cement removal and allows for much easier fixation. Stems have been designed specifically to allow this cement-in-cement technique. It can be used most readily with polished tapered stems - tap out a stem, gain access at the time of revision surgery and reinsert it. It is, however, now increasingly used when any cemented stems are removed provided that the cement mantle is well fixed. The existing mantle is either wide enough to accommodate the cement-in-cement revision or can be expanded using manual instruments or ultrasonic tools. The cement interface is then dried and a new stem cemented in place. Whilst the direction of travel in revision hip arthroplasty has been towards cementless fixation, particularly with tapered distally fixed designs, the reality is that there is still a role for cement for its properties of immediate fixation, reduced fracture risk, local antibiotic delivery, impaction grafting and cement-in-cement revision

In the 1960's Sir John Charnley introduced to clinical practice his low friction arthroplasty with a highly polished cemented femoral stem. The satisfactory long term results of this and other cemented stems support the use of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) for fixation. The constituents of PMMA remain virtually unchanged since the 1960s. However, in the last three decades, advances in the understanding of cement fixation, mixing techniques, application, pressurization, stem materials and design provided further improvements to the clinical results. The beneficial changes in cementing technique include femoral preparation to diminish interface bleeding, pulsatile lavage, reduced cement porosity by vacuum mixing, the use of a cement restrictor, pre-heating of the stem and polymer, retrograde canal filling and pressurization with a cement gun, stem centralization and stem geometries that increase the intramedullary pressure and penetration of PMMA into the cancellous structure of bone. Some other changes in cementing technique proved to be detrimental and were abandoned, such as the use of Boneloc cement that polymerised at a low temperature, and roughening and pre-coating of the stem surface. In the last two decades there has been a tendency towards an increased use of cementless femoral fixation for primary hip arthroplasty. The shift in the type of fixation followed the consistent, durable fixation obtained with uncemented acetabular cups, ease of implantation and the poor results of cemented femoral fixation of rough and pre-coated stems. Unlike cementless femoral fixation, modern cemented femoral fixation has numerous advantages: it is versatile, durable and can be used regardless of the diagnosis, proximal femoral geometry, natural neck version, and bone quality. It can be used in combination with antibiotics in patients with a history or predisposition for infection. Intra-operative femoral fractures are rare. However, the risk may be increased in collarless polished tapered stems. Post-operative thigh pain is extremely rare. Survivorship has not been surpassed by uncemented femoral fixation and it continues to be my preferred form of fixation. However, heavy, young, male patients may exhibit a slightly higher aseptic loosening rate

The technique involves impaction of cancellous bone into a cavitary femur. If segmental defects are present, the defects can be closed with stainless steel mesh. The technique requires retrograde fill of the femoral cavity with cancellous chips of appropriate size to create a new endomedullary canal. By using a set of trial impactors that are slightly larger than the real implants the cancellous bone is impacted into the tube. Subsequent proximal impaction of bone is performed with square tip or half moon impactors. A key part of the technique is to impact the bone tightly into the tube especially around the calcar to provide optimal stability. Finally a polished tapered stem is cemented using almost liquid cement in order to achieve interdigitation of the implant to the cancellous bone. The technique as described is rarely performed today in many centers around the world. In the US, the technique lost its interest because of the lengthy operative times, unacceptable rate of peri-operative and post-operative fractures and most importantly, owing to the success of tapered fluted modular stems. In centers such as Exeter where the technique was popularised, it is rarely performed today as well, as the primary cemented stems used there, rarely require revision. There is ample experience from around the globe, however, with the technique. Much has been learned about the best size and choice of cancellous graft, force of impaction, surface finish of the cemented stem, importance of stem length, and the limitations and complications of the technique. There are also good histology data that demonstrate successful vascularization and incorporation of the impacted cancellous bone chips and host bone. Our experience at the clinic was excellent with the technique as reported in CORR in 2003 by M Cabanela. The results at mid-term demonstrated minimal subsidence and good graft incorporation. Six of 54 hips, however, had a post-operative distal femoral fracture requiring ORIF. The use of longer cemented stems may decrease the risk of distal fracture and was subsequently reported by the author after reviewing a case series from Exeter. Today, I perform this technique once or twice per year. It is an option in the younger patient, where bone restoration is desired. Usually in a Paprosky Type IV femur, where a closed tube can be recreated and the proximal bone is reasonable. If the proximal bone is of poor quality, then I prefer to perform a transfemoral osteotomy, and perform an allograft prosthetic composite instead of impaction grafting, and wrap the proximal bone around the structural allograft. I prefer this technique as I can maintain the soft tissues over the bone and avoid the stripping that would be required to reinforce the bone with struts or mesh. Another indication for its use in the primary setting is in the patient with fibrous dysplasia