Aims. Pneumatic tourniquets are often used during the surgical treatment of unstable traumatic ankle fractures. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of reoperation after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures with and without the use of pneumatic tourniquets. Methods. This was a population-based cohort study using data from the Danish Fracture Database with a follow-up period of 24 months. Data were linked to the Danish National Patient Registry to ensure complete information regarding reoperations due to complications, which were divided into major and minor. The relative risk of reoperations for the tourniquet group compared with the non-tourniquet group was estimated using Cox proportional hazards modelling. Results. A total of 4,050 ankle fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation between 15 March 2012 and 31 December 2016 were included, with 669 (16.5%) undergoing surgery with a tourniquet and 3,381 (83.5%) without a tourniquet. The overall reoperation risk was 28.2% with an adjusted relative risk of 1.46 (95% CI 0.91 to 2.32) for group comparison. The reoperation risk due to major complications was 3.1% with a tourniquet and 4.4% without a tourniquet, resulting in an adjusted relative risk of 1.45 (95% CI 0.91 to 2.32). For minor complications, there were 24.7% and 23.9% reoperations, resulting in an adjusted relative risk of 0.99 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.17). Conclusion. We found no significant difference in the reoperation rate when comparing ankle fractures treated surgically with and without the use of pneumatic tourniquets. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(9):994–999

The effect of the pneumatic tourniquet on the incidence of postoperative deep venous thrombosis is uncertain. We carried out a controlled study comparing the incidence of deep venous thrombosis when a tourniquet was used with the incidence when a tourniquet was not used. Thrombosis was detected by radioisotope venography. The results of the study showed no difference in incidence and we concluded that the pneumatic tourniquet has no influence on the formation of a thrombus in a deep vein

Experiments have been carried out on rhesus monkeys to determine the effect of the application of a pneumatic tourniquet on the ultrastructure of the muscles of the lower limb. Tourniquets were applied for periods lasting between one and five hours. The changes in the muscle lying immediately under the cuff of the tourniquet were more marked than those observed in muscle distal to the cuff. Three hours appears to be close to the limit of the time that a muscle can resist the sustained compression of a tourniquet

We describe a 31-year-old man in whom a paresis and sensory defect of the left arm developed after amputation of the index finger. The operation was performed in a bloodless field, using a pneumatic tourniquet. The sensory defect resolved in two months and the paresis in five and a half months. We consider that direct pressure produced by the tourniquet caused the nerve lesion. It is probable that the tourniquet was inflated to a pressure of 500 millimetres of mercury instead of the intended 250 millimetres of mercury because of a faulty gauge. In order to avoid this rare complication, it is advisable to check the tourniquet gauge each time before use

Introduction: There are no guidelines for the use of any particular tourniquet in foot surgery. We undertook this prospective randomised study to assess the efficacy of the S-MART . TM. tourniquet in foot surgery as compared to the pneumatic tourniquet. A literature review confirms this is the first randomised controlled study objectively measuring the outcomes of this tourniquet system. Material and Methods: We included 40 consecutive patients who had foot surgery from May 2006 to August 2006. Informed consent with local medical ethics committee approval was obtained. We excluded patients with history of diabetes mellitus, deep vein thrombosis, fractures, limb circumference more than 40 centimetres and smokers. The ease of application of tourniquet, intraoperative bloodless field and ease of removal was scored on a scale of 1–10. Patients were followed up at 2 weeks. Results: 20 patients were randomised into group one with pneumatic tourniquet (average age 63.36) and 20 patients in group two with S-MART . TM. tourniquet (average age 61.25). The average tourniquet placement time in-group one was 144.36 seconds as compared to 12 seconds ingroup two. The mean ease of application scores was 4.27 in-group one as compared to 1.46 in-group two. Total tourniquet time was more in-group one. Intraoperative haemostasis was rated higher in-group two. Discussion: SMART . TM. tourniquet provides a good intraoperative haemostasis and is easy to apply. This tourniquet helps to exsanguinate; this frees up theatre personnel, saves resources and decreases tourniquet time for surgery. The limitation is it cannot be reinflated and cannot be used in patients with fractures. Conclusion: S-MART tourniquet is a good for foot surgery, provides a good operative field, is easy to apply and saves precious theatre time and resources

Background: Tourniquet provides a blood less field for surgery, but it has few complications and contraindications. There are several studies identifying the tourniquet as a factor for increased risk of complications in knee arthroscopy, we reviewed 200 consecutive knee arthroscopies done in our hospital with out tourniquet to analyse the outcome.

Aim: To analyse the out come of 200 knee arthroscopies with out use of tourniquet; with respect to visualisation, time of surgery, bleeding, analgesia and post operative complications.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analysed 200 consecutive knee arthroscopies with out tourniquet done in our institute. Average age of these patients was 39 (21–81). All patients underwent soft tissue procedures under general anaesthesia, supine, with sole support, no antibiotics and was done by same surgeon as day case. Same arthroscopic kit with pump was used for all patients, using 2 litre saline bag and pump set at 65 mm Hg pressure. First few cases had tourniquet applied but not inflated, but later even this was avoided. Procedures included were diagnostic arthroscopies, arthroscopic debridements, meniscal repairs and partial or complete meniscal resections. Procedures like arthroscopic ACL reconstruction and other bony procedures were excluded. We looked at any visualisation problems, time of surgery, bleeding, analgesia and post operative complications. We also looked weather any of these patients visited the consultant or GP for any wound related problem or pain before the usual review at 2 weeks.

Results: There was no problem with visualisation noted in any of the cases, or any incidence where arthroscopy was unduly prolonged. There was no incidence of bleeding, stiffness or increased need for analgesia in any of these patients. None of the patients had any wound problem or haemathrosis requiring intervention. There was no record of any patients reattending the clinic or their GP for pain or bleeding.

Conclusions: Many orthopaedic units continue to use a tourniquet routinely for soft tissue procedures in knee arthroscopy, probably in the belief that a clear operative view can only be achieved with one. However, the findings in our study indicate that knee arthroscopy for soft tissue procedures may be performed adequately without the use of a tourniquet provided a pump system is used and the pressure maintained above venous pressure. Therefore we recommend that its use for routine soft tissue arthroscopic procedures be discontinued.

Background: Tourniquet provides a blood less field for surgery, but it has few complications and contraindications. There are several studies identifying the tourniquet as a factor for increased risk of complications in knee arthroscopy, we reviewed 200 consecutive knee arthroscopies done in our hospital with out tourniquet to analyse the outcome.

Aim: To analyse the out come of 200 knee arthroscopies done with out use of tourniquet; with respect to visualisation, time of surgery, bleeding, analgesia and post operative complications.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analysed 200 consecutive knee arthroscopies with out tourniquet done in our institute. Average age of these patients was 39 (21–81). All patients underwent soft tissue procedures under general anaesthesia, supine, with sole support, no antibiotics and were done by same surgeon as day case. Same arthroscopic kit (Dyonics) with pump was used for all patients, using 2 litre saline bag and pump set at 65 mm Hg pressure. First few cases had tourniquet applied but not inflated, but later even this was avoided. Procedures included were diagnostic arthroscopies, arthroscopic debridements, meniscal repairs and partial or complete meniscal resections. Procedures like arthroscopic ACL reconstruction and other bony procedures were excluded. We looked at any visualisation problems, time of surgery, bleeding, analgesia and post operative complications. We also looked weather any of these patients visited the consultant or GP for any wound related problem or pain before the usual review at 2 weeks.

Results: There was no problem with visualisation noted in any of the cases, or any incidence where arthroscopy was unduly prolonged. There was no incidence of bleeding, stiffness or increased need for analgesia in any of these patients. None of the patients had any wound problem or haemathrosis requiring intervention. There was no record of any patients reattending the clinic or their GP for pain or bleeding.

Conclusions: Many orthopaedic units continue to use a tourniquet routinely for soft tissue procedures in knee arthroscopy, probably in the belief that a clear operative view can only be achieved with one. However, the findings in our study indicate that knee arthroscopy for soft tissue procedures may be performed adequately without the use of a tourniquet provided a pump system is used and the pressure maintained above venous pressure. Therefore we recommend that its use for routine soft tissue arthroscopic procedures be discontinued.

About 81,000 total knee replacements are implanted in the United Kingdom annually. Conventionally pneumatic tourniquet and surgical drains have been used in total knee arthroplasty. However, no definite evidence or guidelines exist to support their use. The present study aims to look for any difference in perioperative recovery and complications following use of pneumatic tourniquet and surgical drains in knee replacement surgery. We retrospectively analysed 60 total knee arthroplasties performed by 3 different surgeons at our hospital during January 2007 to June 2010. A sample size of 20 patients in each group was evaluated. Group 1: used tourniquet and drain; Group 2: used tourniquet but no drain; Group 3: didn't use tourniquet but used drain. Data was collected and analysed using statistical means, t-test & analysis of variance. Parameters compared were surgical (anaesthetic) time, mean postoperative haemoglobin at 24 hrs, blood transfusion rate, haematoma formation, wound infection, pain, deep vein thrombosis and infection at discharge. At 6 weeks clinical follow up letters were analysed. Our results reveal that there is no significant difference in duration of surgery in either group. Use of tourniquets didn't improve on surgical time (123–133 minutes). Our Local Hospital Pain Score was used (1 no pain, 2 mild, 3 moderate, 4 severe and 5 worst imaginable pain). No difference at discharge was seen in either group. Similarly no difference was seen in either group with postoperative haematoma formation with one case (5%) in Group 1 and 3 respectively. Although the immediate postoperative haemoglobin (Hb%) was comparable in all 3 groups, Group 3 patients received more blood transfusion compared to other groups based on clinical grounds. About 50 % of Group 3 needed blood transfusion compared to 10% in Group 1 and 5% in Group 2. There was only one proven case of superficial infection at 6 weeks (Group 2) which responded well to antibiotics. There were 4 cases of cellulitis noted at 6 weeks (3 in Group 2 and 1 in Group 3) which responded to oral antibiotics. No deep infection was noted. The mean hospital stay in hospital was 6.5 days in Group 1, 5.5 days in Group 2 and 8 days in Group 3. There was no difference in rate of post-operative deep vein thrombosis (5% in Group 1 and 3). The present study with the use of tourniquet and surgical drain in total knee arthroplasty showed no significant difference in surgical time and incidence of postoperative haematoma, deep vein thrombosis. Pain score at discharge was comparable and so was the infection rate. Patients in Group 2 (used tourniquet but no surgical drain) had least hospital stay (mean 5.5 days) and least blood transfusion rate (5%). Decision to use pneumatic tourniquet & drain still lies with the operating surgeon. We recommend a randomised control study for further evidence

Introduction. Pneumatic tourniquets (PTs) are commonly used in local anaesthetic cases in the upper limb to provide a bloodless operating field. They give excellent efficacy however their limitations have prompted the introduction of a new single-use sterile silicone ring tourniquet (SRT). The evidence of use of the SRT over the standard PT is limited. Aim. To compare the level of perceived pain, and therefore tolerance, of the Silicone Ring and Pneumatic tourniquets when applied to the upper arm and to evaluate whether there was a clear benefit of use of either tourniquet in local anaesthetic procedures of the upper limb. Materials and methods. 30 volunteers, 15 male and 15 female, with a median age of 42 were recruited to compare the two tourniquets. Pain was measured using a VAS pain scale on application and at 1, 5 and 10 minutes. Results. Volunteers experienced significantly more pain on application and at 1 and 5 minutes with the SRT. This difference in pain perceived was most marked upon application. Two volunteers could not tolerate application of the SRT. Three volunteers experienced bruising of the arm and/or forearm following use of the SRT. There was no difference in pain scores at 10 minutes. Conclusion. Due to the severe pain experienced on application of the SRT it would not be suitable for local anaesthetic procedures in the upper limb. In addition the degree of pain may reduce the patients confidence and adversely affect their experience of the procedure. The PT is more suitable for local procedures. However the SRT may have a role in procedures performed under general anaesthetic

For as long as surgeons have been performing total and partial knee arthroplasty, surgeons have debated the efficacy, safety, and requirement of a pneumatic tourniquet. Advocates claim that blood loss is less, visualization is improved, and the cement technique is better with the use of a tourniquet. Others would argue that the use of the tourniquet or limited tourniquet use is safer, does not increase blood loss, and does not compromise visualization and cementing technique. Multiple meta-analyses have been performed that provide very little true evidence of superiority. One such study from Yi et al, concludes that the use of the tourniquet reduces surgical time, intraoperative and total blood loss, but increases postoperative total blood loss. They also conclude that DVT and SSI are “relatively augmented” with use. There may be issues with the timing of tourniquet release in these pooled studies, with others stating that releasing the tourniquet prior to wound closure, supposedly for hemostasis, significantly increases the total and calculated blood loss. Huang et al report that with proper control in the amount of pressure, a debatable topic in and of itself, and shorter duration of inflation, release after closure can reduce blood loss without increased complications. One additional issue is patellar tracking, and the need to lateral release. The tourniquet significantly affects assessment of tracking and the need for lateral release, potentially causing the surgeon to unnecessarily perform a lateral release with the tourniquet inflated. Lastly, research has suggested that using a tourniquet may affect recovery of lower extremity strength and function. Dennis et al compared quadriceps strength and found that use of the tourniquet resulted in “slightly” lower strength postoperatively out to 3 months. The fatal flaw in this study and others is that there is no accepted minimal clinically important difference for quad function, and thus they powered their study to detect a difference of 12 Nm, and the actual difference, while statistically significant, did not even meet their arbitrary power set point. Thus, while strength may be slightly impaired by the use of a tourniquet, it was not different enough to meet their criteria. Additionally, in their study, 64% of the “no-tourniquet” knees actually had a tourniquet used for cementation to “minimise blood at the bone-cement interface and maximise fixation”. Clearly, even these authors are concerned with the results of not using a tourniquet. These authors utilise a pneumatic tourniquet in all cases of primary TKA and release the tourniquet prior to closure to ensure hemostasis and accurately assess patellar tracking. In doing so, we use the methodology of limb occlusion pressure to minimise the pressure to that necessary for ensuring a clear field. Additionally, these authors emphasise the ultimate in surgical efficiency allowing for extremely short tourniquet times, even in the most difficult cases. As an example, in 1300 consecutive obese patients with BMI equal or greater than 35, the average tourniquet time for primary TKA was 49 minutes. These short times, with the minimum pressure allow for the best of both worlds and little to no downside

The protective effect of local hypothermia was studied in pig's limbs made ischaemic by long, repeated application of a pneumatic tourniquet. Twenty-one Landrace pigs were anaesthetised on two separate occasions six days apart and a pneumatic tourniquet at 500 mmHg pressure was applied to the same forelimb for three and two hours respectively. Ten of the pigs had local hypothermia from cold gel packs placed around the limb during the first tourniquet application; the other 11 had the ischaemic limb exposed to room temperature. In comparison with the normothermic limbs, the hypothermic ischaemic limbs had significant slowing of metabolism. The hypothermic limbs also showed less inflammatory response and a faster rate of recovery, both immediately after removal of the tourniquet, and by the end of the experiment, 10 days after the first tourniquet. Local hypothermia produced by this technique was shown to be safe and effective, while appearing to protect muscles exposed to prolonged tourniquet-induced ischaemia

We report the effect of padding on the efficiency of the pneumatic tourniquet for the upper limb. Varying thicknesses of two commercially-available types of orthopaedic padding (Cellona and Velband) were applied to the arms of 20 volunteers, with three pressure transducers placed directly beneath the padding. A tourniquet was positioned over the padding and inflated to 220 mmHg. Significant reductions in the transmitted pressure were recorded from the transducers with both padding materials. With eight layers of padding, reductions in pressure of 13% (1% to 26%) and 18% (7% to 35%) were seen with Cellona and Velband, respectively. The reduction in pressure with Velband padding correlated with increasing arm circumference (Pearson’s correlation coefficient 0.711, p < 0.001). Studies to date have examined how arm circumference affects the required tourniquet inflation pressure. Our study is the first to investigate the effect of the padding and the findings suggest that using more than two layers results in a significant reduction in the transmitted pressure

Background. There are multiple documented advantages of undertaking total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without tourniquet, however, increased rates of blood loss and transfusion are often cited as contraindications to this approach. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of intra-operative TA administration on blood loss and transfusion rates in TKA without pneumatic tourniquet, using Rivaroxaban as thrombo-embolic prophylaxis. Method. 120 patients split into two continuous data sets, (A+B), underwent TKA without application of above knee tourniquet, receiving a post operative dose of oral Rivaroxaban within 8 hours. Group B patients received an intra-operative dose of 1 gram of Tranexamic Acid intravenously before the first cut, whilst those in group A did not. Haemoglobin and haematocrit levels were recorded peri-operatively. A revised Gross formula was used to calculate blood loss. Four patients were excluded from the study for incomplete data. Results. 58 patients (M34F24) in Group A, average age 6, had a mean haemoglobin drop of 33gram/litre, haematocrit drop of 0.097litre/litre (9.7%), with an average calculated blood loss of 1393ml. 58 (M34, F24) patients in group B, average age 67, had a haemoglobin drop of 25.2gram/litre, haemotocrit drop of 0.076litre/litre (7.6%) with an average calculated blood loss of1079ml. Thus Group A patients were seen to sustain significantly more blood loss without TA administration, with a 29.1% larger calculated blood loss, a 25.5% larger drop in haemoglobin and a 27.6% larger fall in haematocrit. Transfusion rate was 5.2% (3 patients) per group. Conclusion. TA was shown to be effective in reducing blood loss in TKA without tourniquet using Rivaroxaban. Transfusion rates of 5.2% across both groups is close to 1/10th of the transfusion rate reported for some major studies of TKA using Rivaroxaban with tourniquet application, and 1/8th of the transfusion rate in studies of TKA with administration of TA and use of tourniquet. Level of Evidence. Level-III. The authors report there are no relevant disclosures to make. Ethical approval was granted for the study

The history of surgery is to a large extent written around the record of its technical advances. A pneumatic tourniquet is a humble instrument, when compared with many of the more complicated mechanical devices in the modern operation theatre. Nevertheless, it has played a significant role in making possible the precise operations of present-day orthopaedics. Simple tool though the tourniquet may be, its application carries many potential dangers, and it should only he entrusted to skilled hands

An unusually wide pneumatic tourniquet has recently become available; we provide a simple formula for its use with a low but effective inflation pressure. A prospective, randomised and controlled trial in 600 lower limb and 150 upper limb operations is reported. The wide tourniquet (12.5 cm) was as effective at low pressure as was a conventional tourniquet (9 cm) inflated to significantly higher pressures. Fewer patients suffered from painful paraesthesiae after operation using the broad, low-pressure tourniquet

The effect of the application of a tourniquet to a limb and the release of the accumulated metabolites have been investigated with reference to the acid-base level in the blood from the limb and in the right atrium. Investigations have been carried out experimentally in rhesus monkeys and observations have been made on patients undergoing reconstructive operations on the knee. The acidotic blood from the ischaemic limb produces little systemic effect. The limb recovers in approximately 40 minutes after a tourniquet has been in place for four hours. Three hours is recommended as a reasonable upper limit for the safe application of a pneumatic tourniquet

In modern orthopaedics surgery, the pneumatic tourniquet has become an essential tool that paved the way to many of the advances in trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Tourniquet slippage is one of the challenging disadvantages of it use. This study examines the possibility of reducing tourniquet slippage by comparing two different tourniquet application techniques. Twenty two patients were included in the study. Thirteen were males and eight were females. The average age was fifty five years. The patients were randomized into two groups, a controlled, and a modified tourniquet application technique groups. There were eleven patients in the control group and ten in the modified group. A standard tourniquet application technique was used as a control by applying Softband (Orthoband) alone to skin prior to application of tourniquet; this was compared to a modified version where a drape (Steridrape) was used as an interval layer. There was a strong statistical significant difference in tourniquet slippage between the two groups, p< 0.0001 the control group being the better performer. We concluded that steridrape interval makes tourniquet slippage more likely to occur

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of a multi-modal blood conservation protocol that involved pre–operative autologous blood donations (2 units) in conjunction with erythropoietin supplementation as well as intra-operative conservation modalities. Methods. A retrospective chart review of 90 patients with simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty done between 2006–2009 by one of the 3 senior authors was performed. Patients donated two units of blood 4 weeks prior to surgery and also received erythropoietin injections (40,000 units: 3 weeks, 2 weeks and 1 week prior to surgery). Intra- operative blood management included use of pneumatic tourniquet, re-infusion drains, local epinephrine injections and fibrin spray. Post-operatively, autologous transfusions were provided based on symptoms. Pre-donation blood levels, peri-operative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels along with transfusion records were assessed. Results. The mean pre-donation hemoglobin was 13.1 g/dL. After 2 units of autologous blood donation and procrit injections, the mean preoperative hemoglobin was 13.0 g/dL. The mean hemoglobin dropped to 9.8 g/dL on postoperative day 3. The mean drop in hemoglobin from preadmission testing was 3.3 g/dl. Overall, 30% patients required autologous blood transfusion and no patients required allogenic transfusion. Conclusion. This multi-modal protocol was effective in not only avoiding allogeneic transfusions following bilateral TKA but also resulted in high blood levels at the time of discharge. This protocol was effective in eliminating allogenic transfusions and maintaining blood levels

Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty [TKA] is a common procedure to relieve painful disability from advanced knee arthritis. However, related blood loss, ranging from 800 to 1200 ml, increase risk and disruption of recovery in anemic patients following TKA. Various methods for blood conservation had been proposed and examined. In the literature, the intra-articular administration of a solution mixing bupivacaine and epinephrine was commonly used after knee surgeries. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective, case controlled review of our primary TKAs to determine the hemostatic efficacy of this regimen following TKAs. Material and Methods. Over a period of 12 months, 135 eligible patients were divided two groups simply according to the intra-articular injection or not: a control group (N=63) and a treatment group (N=72). In the treatment group, a 40 ml vial of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1: 200000 was given prior to the deflation of pneumatic tourniquet. No drainage was used in all TKAs. Without recordable drainage, a Gross formula, considering gender and body composition, was used for estimate blood loss following TKAs. In addition, serial changes in hemoglobin as well as the requirement of allogenic transfusion were also compared between groups. Results. The mean calculated blood loss in the treatment group was 650.4 +/− 257.1 ml, compared to 648.8+/− 222.1 ml in the control group (p=0.9). Similar decrease in hemoglobin as well as rates of allogenic transfusion needs were observed between groups.[2.5+/− 0.9 g/dl vs. 2.4+/− 0.8 g/dl; 13.9% vs. 12.7%, respectively]. Discussion and Conclusion. Although local analgesics mixing vasoconstrictive agents seem a logic solution to save blood loss and relieve pain simultaneously, the hypothesis that intra-articular injection of bupivacaine and epinephrine would save blood and even transfusion needs following TKAs is not supported by various bleeding parameters in this study. In addition to temporary benefit in pain relief, this regimen only has little effect on blood conservation. Therefore, new regimen as well as hemostatic means are still required and explored to reduce blood loss following TKAs

UK personnel have been deployed in Afghanistan since 2001 and over this time a wealth of experience in contemporary war surgery has been developed. Of particular note in the latter Herrick operations the injury pattern suffered by personnel is largely blast wounds, primarily from improvised explosive devices. With the development of improved body armour, previously unsurvivable blasts now result in a large number of traumatic amputations, predominantly affecting the lower limb. Faced with this, deployed medical personnel in the Role 3 facility, Camp Bastion, have developed, by a process of evolution, a standard process for timely management of these injuries. We present a documented schema and photographic record of the ‘Bastion’ process of management of traumatic amputation through the resuscitation department, radiology, theatres and post-operatively. In resuscitation the priority is control of catastrophic haemorrhage with exchange of CAT tourniquets to Pneumatic tourniquets. While undergoing a CT, time can be used to complete documentation. In theatre a process of social debridement & wash then sterile prep followed by formal debridement allows rapid management of the amputated limbs. This work provides a record of current best practice that generates maximum efficiency of personnel and time developed over a large number of procedures. This allows reflection both now in relation to continuing Herrick operations and when military medical services are faced with a future conflict and an inevitable change in injury patterns