Aim. There is controversy regarding the use of Antibiotic-loaded cement (ALBC) as compared to non-antibiotic-loaded cement (NALBC) to reduce the overall infection rate without affecting implant survival or adding additional risks on fixation for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Method. To conduct the analysis, we utilized the Catalan Arthroplasty Registry (RACat) for the TKAs implanted between 2005 and 2017. The primary variable recorded was the use of cement with or without antibiotics. Other recorded variables included were age, sex, diabetes mellitus, obesity, Charlson index and type of hospital. We analyzed the effect of ALBC vs. NALBC in reducing the risk of prosthetic infection at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months as well as prosthetic survival due to mechanical causes at 1, 5, and 10 years. Univariate and multivariable analyses of risk factors were conducted. Thereby, an interactive predictive model that determines the risk of prosthetic infection based on each patient's characteristics was created. Results. A total of 28,287 TKAs from the RACat were analyzed. In that total, there were 19,788 NALBC and 8,499 ALBC. The infection rates for TKAs with NALBC vs. those with ALBC at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were respectively: 1.69% vs. 1.39% (p=0.132); 1.81% vs. 1.56% (p=0.147); 2.14% vs. 1.73% (p=0.030); 2.51% vs. 1.86% (p=0.001). A statistically significant reduction in periprosthetic infection rate was observed in the ALBC group at 12 and 24 months. No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of prosthetic mechanical survival. Being younger, male and having had previous knee surgery or having a high comorbidity index all led to a higher risk of prosthetic revision due to infection. Conclusions. The use of ALBC as a fixation method for TKA leads to a reduction in the risk of prosthetic infection without altering the mechanical survival of the implant. The creation of a predictive model helps determine the individualized risk of prosthetic infection based on the patient's characteristics

Background. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become one of the most commonly performed elective procedures. Today, there are nearly 50 000 annual hospitalizations for hip replacement surgery in Canada. This number is projected to increase significantly with the aging population. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the 3rd leading cause of failure following THA and is reported to occur at an incidence of 1–3%. A two-stage revision THA is the current gold standard treatment and this has a tremendous economic impact on the healthcare system. The purpose of this study is to create an accurate cost estimate of two-stage revision THA and, in turn, evaluate the economic burden of PJI as it compares to primary THA in a Canadian healthcare context. Methods. We conducted a retrospective review of primary THA cases and two-stage revision THA for PJI at our institution. Patients were matched for age and BMI. We recorded all costs associated with each procedure, including: OR time, equipment, length of hospital stay, readmission rates, and any other inpatient resource use. Unit costs were obtained using administrative data from the case costing department at London Health Sciences Centre. Billing fees associated with the procedure were obtained from the Ontario Schedule of Benefits. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic characteristics of patients, hospital costs and resource use data. Patients with PJI were compared to the matched cohort of primary THA using the t-test (for continuous variables), and the chi-square test (for categorical variables). Results. Fifty consecutive cases of revision THA were matched to 50 patients who underwent uncomplicated primary THA between 2006 and 2014. Periprosthetic infection was associated with a significant increase in hospital stay (26.5 vs. 2.0; t=4.95, p<0.001), clinic visits (9.5 vs. 3.8; T= 6.49, p<0.001), readmission rates (12 vs. 1; X. 2. 11.1, p<0.001) and overall cost ($39 953 vs. $7 460; T=73, p<0.001) in comparison to the primary arthroplasty cohort. Conclusion. Two-stage revision for infected THA is a significant economic burden to the healthcare system. Our data suggests a 5-fold increase in healthcare cost when compared to primary THA. This may be an important consideration when distributing resources among Canadian tertiary care centres

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become one of the most commonly performed elective procedures. Today, there are nearly 50 000 annual hospitalisations for hip replacement surgery in Canada. This number is projected to increase significantly with the aging population. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the 3rd leading cause of failure following THA and is reported to occur at an incidence of 1–3%. A two-stage re-vision THA is the current gold standard treatment and this has a tremendous economic impact on the healthcare system. The purpose of this study is to create an accurate cost estimate of two-stage revision THA and, in turn, evaluate the economic burden of PJI as it compares to primary THA in a Canadian healthcare context. We conducted a retrospective review of primary THA cases and two-stage revision THA for PJI at our institution. Patients were matched for age and BMI. We recorded all costs associated with each procedure, including: OR time, equipment, length of hospital stay, readmission rates, and any other inpatient resource use. Unit costs were obtained using administrative data from the case costing department at London Health Sciences Centre. Billing fees associated with the procedure were obtained from the Ontario Schedule of Benefits. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the demographic characteristics of patients, hospital costs and resource use data. Patients with PJI were compared to the matched cohort of primary THA using the t-test (for continuous variables), and the chi-square test (for categorical variables). Twenty consecutive cases of revision THA were matched to 20 patients who underwent uncomplicated primary THA between 2006 and 2014. Periprosthetic infection was associated with a significant increase in hospital stay (26.5 vs. 2.0; p<0.001), clinic visits (9.5 vs. 3.8; p<0.001), readmission rates (12 vs. 1; p<0.001) and overall cost ($39 953 vs. $7 460; p<0.001) in comparison to the primary arthroplasty cohort. Two-stage revision for infected THA is a significant economic burden to the healthcare system. Our data suggests a 5-fold increase in healthcare cost when compared to primary THA. This may be an important consideration when distributing resources among Canadian tertiary care centres

The number of arthroplasties being undertaken is expected to grow year on year, and periprosthetic joint infections will be an increasing socioeconomic burden. The challenge to prevent and eradicate these infections has resulted in the emergence of several new strategies, which are discussed in this review. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1162–9

Report of a case of migrating periprosthetic infection from a hip replacement to a contralateral knee joint undergoing a total knee replacement. We present a 74-year old female patient who underwent a total hip arthroplasty of the left hip after a subcapital fracture of the femur. Four months after the index procedure the patient presented with signs and symptoms of infection of the operated joint. Staph aureus and Enterococcus faecalis were recognized as the infecting bacteria. The implants were removed, cement spacers were placed and a total hip arthroplasty was performed again after three months. Unfortunately, infection ensued again and the patient underwent three more procedures until the joint was considered clean and t he hip remained flail without implants. The patient elected to undergo a total knee arthroplasty due to severe osteoarthritis of right knee. Intraoperatively tissue samples were taken and sent for cultures which identified Enterococcus faecalis present in the knee joint. Enterococcus migrated from the infected hip to nonoperated knee joint. Intravenous antibiotics were administered for three weeks but the knee presented with infection of the arthroplasty ten months after its insertion. The implants were removed the joint was debrided and cement spacers were inserted. The patient decided not to proceed with another procedure and she remains with the cement spacers in her knee. Rare report of migrating periprosthetic infection. Nosocomial enterococci acquired resistance cannot be ruled out. Unique characteristics in enterococci antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation

Background. Additive manufacturing (AM) has created many new avenues for material and manufacturing innovation. In orthopaedics, metal additive manufacturing is now widely used for production of joint replacements, spinal fusion devices, and cranial maxillofacial reconstruction. Plastic additive manufacturing on the other hand, has mostly been utilized for pre-surgical planning models and surgical cutting guides. The addition of pharmaceuticals to additively manufactured plastics is novel, particularly when done at the raw material level. The purpose of this study was to prove the concept of antibiotic elution from additively manufactured polymeric articles and demonstrate feasibility of application in orthopaedics. Methods. Using patented processes, three heat-stable antibiotics commonly used in orthopaedics were combined with six biocompatible polymers (2 bioresorbable) into filament and powder base materials for fused deposition modeling (FDM) and selective laser sintering (SLS) AM processes. Raw materials of 1%, 2%, and 5% antibiotic concentrations (by mass) were produced as well as a blend of all three antibiotics each at 1% concentration. Thin disks of 25 mm diameter were manufactured of each polymer with each antibiotic at all concentrations. Disks were applied to the center of circular petri dishes inoculated with a bacterium as per a standard zone of inhibition, or Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion tests. After 72 hours incubation, the zone of inhibited bacterial growth was measured. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee was selected as the proof-of-concept application in orthopaedics. A series of tibial inserts mimicking those of a common TKR system were manufactured via SLS using a bioresorbable base material (Figure 1). Three prototype inserts were tested on a knee wear simulator for 333,000 cycles following ISO 14242–1:2014 to approximate 2–4 months of in vivo use between surgeries of a 2-stage procedure for PJI. Gravimetric measurement and visual damage assessment was performed. Results. Bacterial growth was inhibited to a mean diameter of 32.3 mm (FDM) and 42.2 mm (SLS) for nearly all combinations of polymers and concentrations of antibiotics. Prototype tibial inserts experienced an average of 200 mg of wear during testing and demonstrated no evidence of cracking, delamination or significant deformation (Figure 2). Conclusion. Bench-level testing of these novel antibiotic-eluting polymers demonstrates feasibility for their application in orthopaedic medicine. In particular, treatment of stubborn PJI with potential for increased and sustained antibiotic elution, patient-specific cocktailing, and maintenance of knee joint structure and function compared to existing PJI products and practices. Subsequent testing for these novel polymers will determine static and dynamic (wear-induced) antibiotic elution rates. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Purpose:. Two-stage revision is the gold standard treatment for chronic periprosthetic infection of the hip or knee. Implantation of a functional antibiotic spacer allows patients the option of two stage revision or living with the spacer in place. Some patients may be satisfied with the activity level that they attain with the functional antibiotic spacer and may avoid the morbidity of a second surgery. Methods:. We retrospectively examined the outcomes of 30 joints in 27 patients treated for chronic periprosthetic infection of the hip or knee at a mean follow-up of 27 months (range 11–46 months). Comparing the patients treated with two-stage revision to those patients living with a functional antibiotic spacer, we used University of California Los Angeles activity scores, modified Harris hip scores, and patient satisfaction measures to answer two main questions: (1) Is there a significant difference in activity level? (2) Is there a significant difference in patient satisfaction? Patient satisfaction was measured on a 1–100 scale with 100 being completely satisfied. Results:. There were no statistically significant differences in the American Society of Anesthesiologists scores between the groups—mean 2.69 in the two-stage group and mean 3.00 in the spacer group (p value 0.255). Statistically significant differences were found between the groups for University of California Los Angeles activity scores—mean 5.3 in the two-stage group and mean 2.8 in the spacer group (p value 0.027). There were no statistically significant differences in modified Harris hip scores—mean 55.6 in the two-stage group and mean 41.6 in the spacer group (p value 0.34). In the subgroup analysis of the modified Harris hip score questions, there was a statistically significant difference in the need for support when ambulating—mean 4.21 in the two-stage group and mean 2.45 in the spacer group (p value 0.024)—and in the distance that can be walked—mean 6.15 in the two-stage group and mean 2.0 in the spacer group (p value 0.005). No statistically significant differences were found in patient satisfaction measures—mean 70.0 in the two-stage group and mean 76.6 in the spacer group (p value 0.65)—though the mean satisfaction measure was higher in the spacer group. Conclusion:. Patients living with a functional antibiotic spacer are less active than patients undergoing a two-stage revision for chronic periprosthetic infection of the hip or knee. Specifically, patients living with a functional antibiotic spacer need more support when ambulating and ambulate shorter distances than patients, who undergo two-stage revision surgery. Despite the decreased activity level, patients living with a functional antibiotic spacer are just as satisfied with the outcome of their joint as those patients treated with a two-stage revision. Patients with modest activity goals may be satisfied to live with a functional antibiotic spacer and to avoid a second surgery

Introduction:. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating diagnosis that carries a significant rate of associated mortality and places a large burden on health care systems. Treatment protocols often include combined intravenous antibiotics and staged revision surgery with locally-delivered antibiotics via PMMA cement spacers and/or beads. One disadvantage of PMMA is the need for later removal. Antibiotic releasing Calcium Sulphate beads (CaSO. 4. ) have had promising results in revision joint surgery and are absorbable, making later removal unnecessary. We report on use in a tertiary referral centre in the UK and present our initial findings. Methods & Results:. CaSO. 4. beads containing 1 gram of Vancomycin and 240 mg of tobramycin per 10 cc was implanted in 12 patients between August 2012 and December 2012, all having undergone revision joint surgery for PJI. Of these patients; 7 were men and 5 women, mean age was 57 years (range 39–72) with a mean ASA grade of 2 (1–4). Indications were infected Total Hip Replacement (n = 7), infected Total Knee Replacement (n = 4) and infected metal on metal hip resurfacing (n = 1). Three procedures were emergencies, with the remainder being semi-elective procedures. One patient had single-stage revision THR. At latest follow up 10 patients had made a full recovery, with normal function and inflammatory markers. Two patients were awaiting a second stage revision procedure. Mean follow up was 2 months (1–4). Conclusion:. Implantable calcium sulphate beads are a new therapeutic agent for use in periprosthetic infection, with improved drug eluting properties and total absorption radiographically within two to three weeks. This study is the first to report its use in the UK, with encouraging data supporting its use in revision arthroplasty surgery

Background. The diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) is a considerable challenge in total joint arthroplasty. The mainstay for diagnosis of PJI is a combination of serological markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP), along with joint aspirate for white cell count, differential and culture. The aim of this study was to examine the use of synovial fluid CRP in the diagnosis of PJI. Material & Methods. Synovial fluid samples were collected prospectively from patients undergoing primary and revision knee arthroplasty. Samples were assessed for CRP, cell count and differential. Three groups were analyzed; those undergoing primary knee arthroplasty, aseptic knee arthroplasties and infected arthroplasties. Demographic data, along with associated medical co-morbidities, were collected,. Statistical analysis was performed. Synovial fluid CRP was correlated with serum CRP values. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Results. 50 synovial fluid samples were collected from 50 patients. Synovial fluid CRP was 0.3 +/− 0.4 in native knees, 0.2 +/− 0.5 in aseptic knee arthroplasties, 4.3+/−4.1 in patients with infected knee arthroplasties. Synovial fluid CRP was significantly higher in septic total knee arthroplasties by comparison to both aseptic total knees (p< 0.001) and native knees (p=0.006). The specificity was 100% and the sensitivity was 89% at a CRP of 1. Conclusion. While this is preliminary data, synovial fluid CRP was found to be significantly elevated in patients with infected total knee arthroplasties. This test is easily performed under routine hospital laboratory conditions without specific, expensive assays. We believe synovial CRP assay holds great promise as a new, potentially low-cost, diagnostic marker for PJI

BACKGROUND. Periprosthetic infection is the most challenging complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Poor oral hygiene has been assumed as an important risk factor for TKA infection. We aimed to investigate whether the improvement of oral hygiene through dental scaling could reduce the risk of TKA infection. METHODS. A nested case control study was conducted and enrollees in the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) aged above 40 years who had received total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between 1999–2002 were included as the TKA cohort. The cases were patients who underwent resection arthroplasty for infected TKA, and each case was matched by 4 controls from the TKA cohort by gender, using incidence density sampling method. The frequency of dental scaling before the index date was analyzed and compared between the case and the control groups. Multiple conditional logistic regression was used to assess the frequency of dental scaling and the risk of TKA infection. RESULTS. The percentages of patients who ever received dental scaling before the end of follow-up were higher in the control group than that in the TKA infection group. As compared with patients never received dental scaling, there was a trend that patients who received dental scaling once within 2 years, may have 9% lower risk in TKA infection (adjusted odds ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.76–1.08). Moreover, the risk of TKA infection can be reduced significantly in patients who had dental scaling at least once per year, with an odds ratio of 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.53–0.95). CONCLUSIONS. Improvement of oral hygiene by more frequent and regular dental scaling (at least once per year) may reduce the risk of TKA infection. TKA Patients should be advised to check their oral hygiene regularly

Aim. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a pre-formulated irrigation solution. 1. (containing ethanol, acetic acid, sodium acetate, benzalkonium chloride, and sterile water) compared to saline solution in managing acute periprosthetic joint infections (A-PJI) during Debridement, Antibiotic, and Implant Retention (DAIR) surgeries. The primary objective is to assess the healing rate using this solution. 1. versus saline in A-PJI patients, with “cure” defined by a set of criteria including no recurrence, wound issues, or need for ongoing suppressive antibiotics after 1 year. Principio del formularioFinal del formulario. Method. This single-center, randomized controlled trial will involve patients with acute periprosthetic infections undergoing standard DAIR surgery, divided into two groups: one receiving saline solution and the other receiving pre-formulated solution. 1. The study is single-blinded, with patients unaware of their group assignment. The study is registered at ISRCTN: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10873696. Inclusion criteria include patients over 18 with hip or knee prostheses suffering from acute or hematogenous periprosthetic infections, while exclusion criteria include a history of prior debridement or multiple infected implants, among others. Principio del formularioFinal del formulario A total of 50 subjects are needed for statistical significance, with a 5% dropout rate anticipated. An interim safety analysis will assess early effectiveness and adverse effects, and the results are presented in this study. Data will be managed in online databases and analyzed using SPSS software, with a significance level of p<0.05. Results. Twenty-four patients were eligible for analysis, twelve in each group. The overall average age was 75 years, and the gender distribution was predominantly female (9 F and 3 M in each group). No significant differences were found at the baseline characteristics level between the two groups (p>0.05). The minimum follow-up of 1 year was achieved in all cases except three due to deaths not related to periprosthetic infection. Regarding efficacy, a non-statistically significant difference was observed (p>0.05), with 58% in the serum group and 42% in the pre-formulated irrigation solution. 1. group (X. 2. = 0.17, p=0.683). The average hospital stay was 38.42 days (SD 26.32) in the pre-formulated irrigation solution group. 1. and 24.42 days (SD 18.72) in the serum group, with this difference being not significant (t=1.5, p=0.148). Conclusions. While the current analysis indicates no significant differences between both groups in terms of efficacy, the study's ongoing progress and the inclusion of a larger sample size could potentially yield more definitive results

Introduction. Serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), and synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count and differential are effective in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PPJI); however their utility in patients with inflammatory arthritis is unknown. The purpose of this study is to determine the utility of these tests in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Methods. 934 Consecutive revision hip and knee arthroplasties were prospectively evaluated for PPJI. 202 Cases were excluded due to acute post-operative or hematogenous infection. 690 Patients had non-inflammatory and 42 had inflammatory arthritis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to establish optimal ESR, CRP, WBC, and % neutrophil values for diagnosis of PPJI, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to determine the overall accuracy. Results. The optimal thresholds for predicting PPJI were ESR 30mm/hr, CRP 17mg/L, WBC 2667, and differential 75% neutrophils in inflammatory arthritis, and ESR 32mm/hr, CRP 15mg/L, WBC 4000, and 78% neutrophils in non-inflammatory arthritis. The efficacy of these tests was similar in both populations (AUC for inflammatory ESR=86.2%, CRP=86.2%, WBC=93.8, 93.6% neutrophils; AUC for non-inflammatory ESR=85.2%, CRP=90.2%, WBC=94.5, 95% neutrophils); there was no significant difference between groups (ESR p = 0.861, CRP p= 0.549, WBC p=0.8315, % neutrophils p=0.7021). The rate of PPJI was significantly higher in patients with inflammatory (33.3%) than non-inflammatory (18.8%) arthritis (p-value=0.013). Conclusions. These results suggest that the ESR and CRP are useful in diagnosing PPJI in patients with inflammatory as well as non-inflammatory arthritis with similar optimal cut-off values

Introduction

Radiation cross-linking of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) has reduced the in vivo wear and osteolysis associated with bearing surface wear (1), significantly reducing revisions associated with this complication (2). Currently, one of the major and most morbid complications of joint arthroplasty is peri-prosthetic infection (3). In this presentation, we will present the guiding principles in using the UHMWPE bearing surface as a delivery device for therapeutic agents and specifically antibiotics. We will also demonstrate efficacy in a clinically relevant intra-articular model.

Introduction

Accurate diagnosis of peri-prosthetic joint infection is critical to allow adequate treatment. Currently, the criteria of the Musculo-Skeletal Infection Society (MSIS) serve as a validated reference tool. More recently, these criteria have been modified for better accuracy. The goal of this study was to compare retrospectively the diagnostic accuracy of these two different tools in cases of known peri-prosthetic hip or knee infection or in aseptic cases and to analyze one additional criterion: presence of an early loosening (prior to 2 years after implantation).

Background. Increasing evidence suggests a link between the bearing surface used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the occurrence of infection. It is postulated that polyethylene has immunomodulatory effects and may influence bacterial function and survival, thereby impacting the development of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study aimed to investigate the association between polyethylene type and revision surgery for PJI in THA using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). We hypothesized that the use of XLPE would demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in revision rates due to PJI compared to N-XLPE. Methods. Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) spanning September 1, 1999, to December 31, 2021, were used to compare the infection revision rates between THA using N-XLPE and XLPE. We calculated the Cumulative Percentage Revision rate (CPR) and Hazard Ratio (HR) while controlling for factors like age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists’ (ASA) grade, and head size. Results. From the total 361,083 primary THAs, 26,827 used N-XLPE and 334,256 used XLPE. Excluding data from the first 6 months post-surgery, 220 revisions occurred in the N-XLPE group and 1,055 in the XLPE group for PJI. The HR for infection revision was significantly higher in N-XLPE compared to XLPE, at 1.64 (95% CI, 1.41–1.90, p<0.001). Conclusions. This analysis provides evidence of an association between N-XLPE and revision for infection in THA. We suspect that polyethylene wear particles contribute to the susceptibility of THA to PJI, resulting in a significantly higher risk of revision for infection in N-XLPE hips compared to those with XLPE. Level of Evidence. Therapeutic Level III

Aim. A substantial portion of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) literature is comprised of observational studies. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines emphasize the importance of clearly defining variables and providing diagnostic criteria. Well-defined variables in these studies play a crucial role in ensuring data consistency, fostering comparability among studies, and laying a robust foundation for evidence-based decision-making. We aimed to determine the definition of these variables and determine the objectivity of the definitions. Method. We reviewed observational studies on hip or knee PJI that focused on variables and their association with treatment outcomes. The inclusion criteria comprised studies from Jan 2017 to Jan 2023. We focused on 13 variables that were possibly subjective. These were smoking, alcohol use, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, lung disease, rheumatoid arthritis, liver diseases, kidney diseases, cardiovascular diseases, malignancy, immunosuppression, use of antibiotics, and type of infection. The reviewers examined the text of the articles, along with any available online supplements or protocols, for definitions of the selected variables. We classified a definition as objective if there was the presence of time element, severity, staging, frequencies, laboratory cut-off, medication dependence, among others. Chart review was deemed subjective. Results. We included 75 studies in the analysis. The most common factors studied were diabetes mellitus (79%), cardiovascular disease, smoking history, and rheumatoid arthritis (47% each). The variables that were objectively defined most often were antibiotic use (100%) and type of infection (95%). Smoking history (16%) and alcohol use (20%) were the least frequently objectively defined variables. Further analysis revealed that a considerable number of studies incorporated variables into their primary analyses without clear definitions. For instance, out of the 59 studies where diabetes was considered a variable, 41 studies (70%) included diabetes in their main analyses as a factor for PJI treatment outcomes, despite only 34 studies having defined this variable. Moreover, of the 34 provided definitions of diabetes mellitus, only 12 provided objective criteria for diagnosis. The rest of the provided definitions relied on “chart review” without further specification. Table 1 outlines the proportion of studies with variables defined and included in their analysis. Conclusions. Study variables were not clearly defined in most of the observational studies raising concerns about the reproducibility and reliability of findings. Our study underscores the vital need for standardized variable definitions in PJI research. Professional societies may play a crucial role in setting standards for the definition of variables. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aim. Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty is often challenging. The alpha defensin test has been recently reported as a promising diagnostic test for periprosthetic joint infection. The goal of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of alpha defensin testing. Method. One hundred and eighty-three synovial alpha defensin and synovial fluid C-reactive protein (CRP) tests performed in 183 patients undergoing evaluation for periprosthetic joint infection were reviewed. Results were compared with the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for periprosthetic joint infection. Results. Alpha defensin tests were performed prior to surgical treatment for infection, and 37 of these patients who had these tests were diagnosed by MSIS criteria as having infections. Among this group, the alpha defensin test had a sensitivity of 81.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.8% to 92.0%) and a specificity of 95.9% (95% CI, 91.3% to 98.5%). There were 6 false-positive results, 4 of which were associated with metallosis. There were 7 false negatives, all of which were associated with either draining sinuses (n = 3) or low-virulence organisms (n = 4). A combined analysis of alpha defensin and synovial fluid CRP tests was performed in which a positive result was represented by a positive alpha defensin test and a positive synovial fluid CRP test (n = 28). Among this group, the sensitivity was calculated to be 73.0% (95% CI, 55.9% to 86.2%) and the specificity was calculated to be 99.3% (95% CI, 96.2% to 99.9%). An additional combined analysis was performed where a positive result was represented by a positive alpha defensin test or positive synovial fluid CRP test (n = 64). Among this group, the sensitivity was calculated tobe91.9%(95%CI, 78.1%to98.3%) andthe specificitywas calculated tobe79.5%(95%CI, 72.0%to85.7%). Conclusions. Alpha defensin in combination with synovial fluid CRP demonstrates very high sensitivity for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection, but may yield false-positive results in the presence of metallosis or false-negative results in the presence of low-virulence organisms. When both alpha defensin and synovial fluid CRP tests are positive, there is a very high specificity for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection

Aims. Despite numerous studies on periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), there are no robust data on the risk factors and timing of metachronous infections. This study was performed to answer the following questions: 1) Is there any difference of manifestation time of metachronous PJIs between different localizations of multiple artificial joints? 2) Can we identify any specific risk factor for metachronous PJIs for different localizations of multiple artificial joints?. Methods. Between January 2010 and December 2018, 661 patients with more than one prosthetic joint at the time of PJI surgical treatment were recruited. Seventy-one developed metachronous PJI after a mean time interval of 101.4 months (range 37.5 to 161.5 months). The remaining patients were chosen as control group. The diagnosis of the PJI, including the metachronous PJI, was made according to the Muscoloskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. The metachronous infections were divided in group 1: metachronous infections in the same extremity (e.g. right hip and right knee); group 2: metachronous infections of the other extremity (e.g. right knee and left hip); group 3: metachronous infections of the lower extremity and upper extremity (e.g. right knee and left shoulder). Results. We identified 32 PJI cases in group 1, 38 in group 2 and 1 in group 3. Diabetes mellitus was found higher in the metachronous infections (p<0.05). Rate of same side infection was significantly higher compared to contralateral and upper and lower infection (p<0.05). Time interval of metachrononous infection development was faster in same-side infections. Same bacteria sample rate between primary PJI and metachronous PJI in same side infections (21/32) was significantly higher than in the contralateral PJI group (13/38, p<0.05). Conclusions. The current study underlined that the risk of metachronous infections are relatively high, particularly in the cases of prostheses on the same side

Background. The identification of novel biomarker which is highly specific and sensitive for periprosthetic joint (PJI) have the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and ultimately improve patient outcomes. Thus, the aim of this systemic review is to identify and evaluate novel biomarkers for the preoperative diagnostics of PJI. Methods. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases identified from 1. st. of January 2018 to 30. th. of September. 2022. We used “periprosthetic joint infection” OR “prosthetic joint infection” OR “periprosthetic infection” as the diagnosis of interest and the target index applied AND “marker”. To focus on novel biomarkers already used biomarkers of the established PJI diagnostic criteria of MSIS, ICM and EBJIS were not included in the analysis. These three criteria were considered the reference standard during quality assessment. Results. A total of 19 studies were included. In these, fourteen different novel biomarkers were analyzed. Fifteen studies (79%) had prospective designs and the other four (22%) were retrospective studies. Six studies (33%) included only periprosthetic knee infections and thirteen (67%) included periprosthetic knee and hip infections. Proteins were analyzed in most cases (nine studies), followed by molecules (three studies), exosome (two studies) as well as DNA (two studies), interleukin (one study) and lysosome (one study). One novel and promising marker that had been frequently analyzed is calprotectin. Conclusion. No marker demonstrated higher sensitivity and specificity than already known parameters used for standardized treatment based on established PJI definitions. Further studies are needed to elucidate the benefit and usefulness of implementing new biomarkers in diagnostic PJI settings

Aims. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) when adequate methods of culture are used, and to evaluate the outcome in patients who were treated with antibiotics for a culture-negative PJI compared with those in whom antibiotics were withheld. Methods. A multicentre observational study was undertaken: 1,553 acute and 1,556 chronic PJIs, diagnosed between 2013 and 2018, were retrospectively analyzed. Culture-negative PJIs were diagnosed according to the Muskuloskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), International Consensus Meeting (ICM), and European Bone and Joint Society (EBJIS) definitions. The primary outcome was recurrent infection, and the secondary outcome was removal of the prosthetic components for any indication, both during a follow-up period of two years. Results. None of the acute PJIs and 70 of the chronic PJIs (4.7%) were culture-negative; a total of 36 culture-negative PJIs (51%) were treated with antibiotics, particularly those with histological signs of infection. After two years of follow-up, no recurrent infections occurred in patients in whom antibiotics were withheld. The requirement for removal of the components for any indication during follow-up was not significantly different in those who received antibiotics compared with those in whom antibiotics were withheld (7.1% vs 2.9%; p = 0.431). Conclusion. When adequate methods of culture are used, the incidence of culture-negative PJIs is low. In patients with culture-negative PJI, antibiotic treatment can probably be withheld if there are no histological signs of infection. In all other patients, diagnostic efforts should be made to identify the causative microorganism by means of serology or molecular techniques. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(1):183–188