Abstract
Aim
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a pre-formulated irrigation solution1 (containing ethanol, acetic acid, sodium acetate, benzalkonium chloride, and sterile water) compared to saline solution in managing acute periprosthetic joint infections (A-PJI) during Debridement, Antibiotic, and Implant Retention (DAIR) surgeries. The primary objective is to assess the healing rate using this solution1 versus saline in A-PJI patients, with “cure” defined by a set of criteria including no recurrence, wound issues, or need for ongoing suppressive antibiotics after 1 year. Principio del formularioFinal del formulario
Method
This single-center, randomized controlled trial will involve patients with acute periprosthetic infections undergoing standard DAIR surgery, divided into two groups: one receiving saline solution and the other receiving pre-formulated solution1. The study is single-blinded, with patients unaware of their group assignment. The study is registered at ISRCTN: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10873696. Inclusion criteria include patients over 18 with hip or knee prostheses suffering from acute or hematogenous periprosthetic infections, while exclusion criteria include a history of prior debridement or multiple infected implants, among others. Principio del formularioFinal del formulario A total of 50 subjects are needed for statistical significance, with a 5% dropout rate anticipated. An interim safety analysis will assess early effectiveness and adverse effects, and the results are presented in this study. Data will be managed in online databases and analyzed using SPSS software, with a significance level of p<0.05
Results
Twenty-four patients were eligible for analysis, twelve in each group. The overall average age was 75 years, and the gender distribution was predominantly female (9 F and 3 M in each group). No significant differences were found at the baseline characteristics level between the two groups (p>0.05). The minimum follow-up of 1 year was achieved in all cases except three due to deaths not related to periprosthetic infection. Regarding efficacy, a non-statistically significant difference was observed (p>0.05), with 58% in the serum group and 42% in the pre-formulated irrigation solution1 group (X2= 0.17, p=0.683). The average hospital stay was 38.42 days (SD 26.32) in the pre-formulated irrigation solution group1 and 24.42 days (SD 18.72) in the serum group, with this difference being not significant (t=1.5, p=0.148).
Conclusions
While the current analysis indicates no significant differences between both groups in terms of efficacy, the study's ongoing progress and the inclusion of a larger sample size could potentially yield more definitive results.
