Aims. Anchorage of
Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether, after correction of an adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), leaving out the subfascial drain gives results that are no worse than using a drain in terms of total blood loss, drop in haemoglobin level, and opioid consumption. Methods. Adolescents (aged between 10 and 21 years) with an idiopathic scoliosis (major curve ≥ 45°) were eligible for inclusion in this randomized controlled noninferiority trial (n = 125). A total of 90 adolescents who had undergone segmental
Summary. Optimum position of
Objectives. To employ a simple and fast method to evaluate those patients with neurological deficits and misplaced screws in relatively safe lumbosacral spine, and to determine if it is necessary to undertake revision surgery. Methods. A total of 316 patients were treated by fixation of lumbar and lumbosacral transpedicle screws at our institution from January 2011 to December 2012. We designed the criteria for post-operative revision scores of
Aims. The aim of this study was to systematically compare the safety and accuracy of robot-assisted (RA) technique with conventional freehand with/without fluoroscopy-assisted (CT)
INTRODUCTION. The correct placement of
Aims. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the correction achieved using a convex
Objectives. Cement augmentation of
Objectives. This presentation discusses the experience at our Centre with treating traumatic thoracolumbar fractures using percutaneous
We reviewed 212 consecutive patients with adolescent
idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis
using all
We present an analysis of manual and computer-assisted preoperative
Study design. Literature review of the best available evidence on the accuracy of computer assisted
We compared the clinical, radiological and quality-of-life
outcomes between hybrid and total
We undertook a retrospective study investigating
the accuracy and safety of percutaneous
Aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of instrumentation using only segmental
A prospective cohort outcome evaluation of unstable thoracic spine fractures treated with posterior
Aims. The aim of this study was to compare the peak pull-out force
(PPF) of pedicle-lengthening screws (PLS) and traditional pedicle
screws (TPS) using instant and cyclic fatigue testing. Materials and Methods. A total of 60 lumbar vertebrae were divided into six groups:
PLS submitted to instant pull-out and fatigue-resistance testing
(groups A1 and A2, respectively), TPS submitted to instant pull-out
and fatigue-resistance testing (groups B1 and B2, respectively)
and PLS augmented with 2 ml polymethylmethacrylate, submitted to
instant pull-out and fatigue-resistance testing (groups C1 and C2,
respectively). The PPF and normalized PPF (PPFn) for bone mineral density
(BMD) were compared within and between all groups. Results. In all groups, BMD was significantly correlated with PPF (r =
0.83, p < 0.001). The PPFn in A1 was significantly less than
in B1 (p = 0.006) and C1 (p = 0.002). The PPFn of A2 was significantly
less than in B2 (p < 0.001) and C2 (p < 0.001). The PPFn in
A1, B1, and C1 was significantly greater than in A2 (p = 0.002),
B2 (p = 0.027), and C2 (p = 0.003). There were no significant differences
in PPFn between B1 and C1, or between B2 and C2. Conclusion.
The accuracy of
Aims. We present the results of correcting a double or triple curve
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a convex segmental pedicle
screw technique. Patients and Methods. We reviewed 191 patients with a mean age at surgery of 15 years
(11 to 23.3).