Introduction. Patella implant research is often overlooked despite its importance as the third compartment in a total knee replacement. Wear and fracture of resurfaced patellae can lead to implant failure and revision surgeries. New simulation techniques have been developed to analyze the performance of patella designs as they interact with the trochlear groove in total knee components, and clinical validation is sought to ensure that these simulations are appropriate. The objective of this work was to subject several patellar designs to patient-derived deep knee bend (DKB) inputs on a 6 degree of freedom (DOF) simulator and compare the resultant wear scars to clinical retrievals. Materials and Methods. Previously reported DKB profiles were developed based on in vivo patellofemoral data and include a wide range of patient variability. The profiles chosen for this body of work were based on the stress in the patellar lateral facet; maximizing this stress whilst maintaining the ability to run the profile stably on the simulator. Load/kinematic profiles were run on three patellar designs (n=3 per group) for 220,000 cycles at 0.8Hz on an AMTI VIVO joint simulator. A comparison cohort of clinically retrieved devices of the same design was identified in an IRB-approved database. Exclusion criteria included gross delamination, cracking secondary to oxidation, and surgeon-reported evidence of malalignment leading to mal-tracking. 29 Patellae were included for analysis: PFC. ®. All Poly (n=14), ATTUNE. ®. Anatomic (n=6), and ATTUNE. ®. Medialized Dome (n=9). Mean in vivo duration was 70.1 months. Patellae were analyzed under optical microscope in large-depth-of-field mode to map the surface damage profile. Burnishing ‘heat-maps’ were generated for retrievals and simulated patellae by normalizing the patellar size and overlaying silhouettes from each component of the same type using a custom-developed MatLAB code. Results. Burnishing heat-map comparisons between retrievals and simulator specimens for each of the three designs were compared. Retrievals show more variation than simulator devices, however the general loci and relative area of burnished regions is closely aligned for each of the three designs. The retrieved and simulated burnishing scar heat-maps on all-poly PFC. ®. patellae are centered medio-laterally with a wider profile on the lateral aspect. The burnishing marks are continuous. A similar observation may be made of the ATTUNE. ®. medialized dome, retrievals and simulator specimens, though the contact areas appear to be more concentrated away from the apex. The anatomic patellae show two primary regions of contact, and minimal burnishing at the apex. The simulator specimens likewise show two principal regions of contact. Discussion. Wear scar analysis shows that joint simulation on AMTI VIVO yields clinically relevant wear patterns across a variety of device types. Clinically relevant damage provides insight that load and motion inputs to the simulator deliver results that may be used to interpret in vivo performance or analyze future designs and/or materials. This qualitative surface contact analysis will help to inform future quantitative mass loss and fatigue failure studies. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Experimental wear simulation of an all-polymer knee implant has shown an equivalent rate of wear of UHMWPE tibial components against PEEK-OPTIMA™ and cobalt chrome femoral components of a similar initial geometry and surface topography. However, when the patella is resurfaced with an UHMWPE patella button, it is important to also ascertain the wear of the patella. Wear debris from the patella contributes to the total volume of wear debris produced by the implant which should be minimised to reduce the potential for osteolysis and subsequent implant loosening. The aim of this study was to investigate the wear of the patellofemoral joint in an all-polymer knee implant. The wear of UHMWPE patellae articulating against PEEK-OPTIMA™ femoral components was compared to UHMWPE articulating against cobalt chrome femoral components. Materials and Methods. Six mid-size (size C) PEEK-OPTIMA™ femoral components (Invibio Knee Ltd., UK) and six cobalt chrome femoral components of similar initial surface topography and geometry were coupled with 28mm all-polyethylene GUR1020 patellae (conventional, EO sterile) (Maxx Orthopaedics, USA). The implants were set up in a ProSim 6 station electromechanical knee simulator (Simulation Solutions, UK) which was modified for testing the patellofemoral joint. 3 million cycles (MC) of wear simulation was carried out under kinematics aiming to replicate a gait cycle adapted for an electromechanical simulator from previous work by Maiti et al. The simulator used has six degrees of freedom of which four were controlled; axial force up to 1200N, flexion/extension 22°, superior-inferior (SI) displacement (22mm) and Abduction-adduction (AA) (4°). The SI and AA were displacement controlled and driven through the patella. The medial-lateral displacement and tilt (internal/external rotation) of the patella were passive so the patella button was free to track the trochlear groove. The lubricant used was 25% bovine serum supplemented with 0.03% sodium azide to retard bacterial growth. The wear of patellae was determined gravimetrically with unloaded soak controls used to compensate for the uptake of moisture by the UHMWPE. The mean wear rate ± 95% confidence limits were calculated and statistical analysis was carried out using ANOVA with significance taken at p<0.05. Results. The mean wear rates of the UHMWPE patellae were 0.26±0.21 mm. 3. /MC and 0.35±0.17 mm. 3. /MC against PEEK-OPTIMA™ and cobalt chrome femoral components respectively. There was no significant difference in wear rate against the different femoral component materials (P=0.38). Against both femoral component materials, a ‘bow tie’ shaped wear scar was evident on the patellae typical of that seen in retrieval studies and reported in previous experimental wear simulation of the patellofemoral joint. Conclusion. The wear rate of the UHMWPE patellae was low against both PEEK-OPTIMA™ and cobalt chrome femoral components and comparable to previous work by Vanbiervliet et al. This study further shows that in terms of its wear performance, PEEK-OPTIMA™ has promise as an alternative bearing material to cobalt chrome in the femoral component of total knee replacements

Introduction. The trochlea of a typical patellofemoral replacement or anterior flange of a total knee replacement usually extends past the natural trochlea and continues onto the femoral anterior cortex. One reason for this is that it allows a simple patella button to be permanently engaged in the trochlea groove in an attempt to ensure stability. On the natural patella, the apex helps to guide it into the trochlea groove as the knee moves from full extension into flexion. The aim is to study whether a generalised patella can be created that is close in form to a healthy patella. Method. MRI scans were taken of 30 patellae. Characteristics of these patellae (height, width, thickness, apex angle) were measured. The apex angle was found to be similar between patellae (mean=126 degrees, sd = 8.8), as were the ratios between height and width (mean width/height = 1.05, sd = 0.07) and between thickness and width (mean width/thickness = 1.8, sd = 0.19). These patellae were then segmented to create a surface including cartilage, resulting in 30 STL (stereolithography) files in which the surfaces are represented by triangle meshes. To design the average patella the individual patellae were aligned to a standard frame of reference by placing a set of landmarks on the proximal/distal, medial/lateral and anterior/posterior extents of each (fig.1). The vertical axis was defined as passing parallel to the proximal/distal points and the horizontal as passing parallel to the medial/lateral points when looking along the computed vertical axis. The origin centre of the frame of reference was chosen to be mid-way between these points. The mean width was then computed and each patella scaled linearly around the origin to give them all equal width. All the aligned patellae were then averaged together to provide a composite cartilaginous patella. The averaging process was achieved by taking one patella as a seed. The patella chosen for seed was that whose parameters were closest to the average width, height and thickness. An approximately normal vector was passed a point ‘P’ on the seeds, and the points at which these intersected the other models were then determined. The closest intersection point to ‘P’ on each model was chosen and these averaged together. ‘P’ is then replaced in the model with this average point. The averaging process then continues with all the remaining points on the seed model in the same manner to build the average models. Results and Discussion. The mean patella was compared with individual patellae. This comparison was performed by taking each point on the mean patella and finding the closest point on individual patellae - a colour coded map of differences was obtained (fig.2) along with a mean of the absolute difference for each patella. The absolute mean difference ranged from 0.56mm to 1.33mm, averaging at 0.85mm. This shows a reasonable fit between the average patella and each individual example, raising the possibility of using the average shape in future research to develop anatomical patellofemoral replacements and for planning patella resurfacing

Joint registries suggest a downward trend in the use of uncemented Total Knee Replacements (TKR) since 2003, largely related to reports of early failures of uncemented tibial and patella components. Advancements in uncemented design such as trabecular metal may improve outcomes, but there is a scarcity of high-quality data from randomised trials. 319 patients <75 years of age were randomised to either cemented or uncemented TKR implanted using computer navigation. Patellae were resurfaced in all patients. Patient outcome scores, re-operations and radiographic analysis of radiolucent lines were compared. Two year follow up was available for 287 patients (144 cemented vs 143 uncemented). There was no difference in operative time between groups, 73.7 v 71.1 mins (p= 0.08). There were no statistical differences in outcome scores at 2 years, Oxford knee score 42.5 vs 41.8 (p=0.35), International Knee Society 84.6 vs 84.0 (p=0.76), Forgotten Joint Score 66.7 vs 66.4 (p=0.91). There were two revisions, both for infection one in each group (0.33%). 13 cemented and 8 uncemented knees underwent re-operation, the majority of these being manipulation under anaesthetic (85.7%), with no difference (8.3% vs 5.3%, 95% CI -2.81% to 8.89%, p = 0.31). No difference was found in radiographic analysis at 2 years, 1 lucent line was seen in the cemented group and 3 in the uncemented group (0.67% v 2.09%, 95%CI -4.1% to 1.24%, p = 0.29). We found no difference in clinical or radiographic outcomes between cemented and uncemented TKR including routine patella resurfacing at two years. Early results suggest there is no difference between cemented and uncemented TKR at 2 years with reference to survivorship, patient outcomes and radiological parameters

Introduction. The metal-backed patella was originally designed to address shortcomings found with cemented, all-polyethylene patellae. However, complications relating to an all-polyethylene patella were reported to account for up to half of all knee revisions. At the same time, good fixation with bone ingrowth was observed in both titanium and cobalt chromium porous-coated patellae. The advantages provided by using a metal-backed patella, such as uniform load sharing, decreased polyethylene deformation, and potential for biological fixation, may be unjustly outweighed by the fear of patellar component failure; high rates of failure have not been inherent to all metal-backed patella designs. Over the past decade, we have used a metal-backed patella design with excellent results that may be due largely to the design features of the component. Also, we believe there are certain selection criteria that should be strictly adhered to when implanting metal-backed patellae. Correct selection criteria and improved component design strongly indicate the use of press-fit metal-backed patellae. Methods. This single-center study was designed to conduct clinical and independent radiographic review of primary metal-backed, press-fit patella patients with a minimum five-year follow-up. Potential patients were recruited from a group of existing metal-backed patella patients within the principal investigator's medical practice. All patients recruited for this study were required to have undergone primary knee replacement surgery at least five years prior to clinical and radiographic evaluation. Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of noninflammatory degenerative joint disease. Patients with a BMI >40 were excluded from this study. Radiographic analysis was conducted by an independent reviewer according to the current Knee Society Total Knee Arthroplasty Roentgenographic Evaluation and Scoring System. Any radiographs that the reviewer deemed questionable were shown to a second independent orthopaedic surgeon for review, comment, and validation of observations. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was determined for all metal-backed patellae. For survival analysis, only knees with radiographic data were included (74 knees). KSS, WOMAC, and SF-36 scores were calculated also. Results. Seventy-four patients (88 knees) were enrolled in the study, 31 women (41.2%) and 43 men (58.1%). At the time of surgery, the average age was 59.7 years (range, 40–86 years), and the average BMI was 30.6 (range, 19.1–39.6). The breakdown of patients who completed the study and those who were lost to follow-up is shown in Table 1. One metal-backed patella was revised at 49 months for loosening at the bone/implant interface. Survivorship of the metal-backed patellae at minimum five-year follow-up was estimated to be 93.95% with bounds of 73.61% and 98.74%. No radiolucencies greater than 1 mm were observed in any radiographs (Fig. 1), with the exception of the one revision case. Conclusion. Our experience with this metal-backed patella design has been excellent. Failure does not occur due to dissociation of the plastic. As the porous coating is almost under constant compression, biological fixation is assured in most instances, as confirmed by our minimum five-year radiological results. Improved component design and adherence to the correct patient selection criteria absolutely indicate the use of press-fit metal-backed patellae

Total knee replacements are being more commonly performed in active younger and obese patients. Fifteen-year survivorship studies demonstrate that cemented total knee replacements have excellent survivorship, with reports of 85 to 97%. Cemented knee arthroplasties are doomed to failure due to loss of cement-bone interlock over time. Inferior survivorship occurs in younger patients and obese patients who would be expected to place increased stress on the bone-cement interfaces. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) studies have indicated that cementless fixation should perform better than cemented fixation. However, cementless fixation for total knee replacement has not gained widespread utilization due to the plethora of poor results reported in early series. The poor initial results with cementless total knee replacement have occurred due to poor implant designs such as cobalt chrome porous interfaces, poor initial tibial component stability, lack of continuous porous coating, poor polyethylene, and use of metal-backed patellae. I have used cementless fixation for total knee replacements for young, active, and heavy patients since 1986 when durability over 20 years is desirable. My series of over 1,300 cementless TKAs represents about 20% of the 6,500 total knees I have performed from 1986 to 2017. I have seen initial failures in my series due to the use of metal-backed patellae with thin polyethylene, older generation polyethylene, and use of screws with the tibial components which provide access to the metaphyseal bone for polyethylene wear debris. Overall implant fixation failures were still significantly low due to the use of a highly porous titanium surface on both the tibial and femoral components. With the advent of utilizing implants with continuous porous surfaces and highly crosslinked polyethylene, and elimination of use of metal-backed patellae and tibial screws, I have only had one revision due to aseptic loosening or osteolysis in the last 1,071 cases performed since 2002. Almost 50% of total knees are now performed on patients under the age of 65. A 55-year-old patient has a 30 year life expectancy. Modern total knee replacement design has made biological fixation predictable for young and heavy patients. Because it is a biological interface, it should respond better than cement to the increased stresses that will be applied over many years by our younger, more active and heavier total knee population

Total knee replacements (TKRs) are being more commonly performed in active younger and obese patients. Fifteen year survivorship studies demonstrate that cemented total knee replacements have excellent survivorship, with reports of 85% to 97%. However, inferior survivorship occurs in younger patients and obese patients who would be expected to place increased stress on the bone cement interfaces. Cementless fixation for total knee replacement has not gained widespread utilization due to the plethora of poor results reported in early series. These poor results do not reflect that cementless fixation is not obtainable, since an almost universal acceptance of cementless fixation for total hip replacement has shown. A Cochrane database study of total knees with roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) demonstrated that the risk of future aseptic loosening should be 50% less with cementless fixation. The poor initial results with cementless total knee replacement have occurred due to poor implant designs such as cobalt chrome porous interfaces, poor initial tibial component fixation, lack of continuous porous coating, poor polyethylene, and use of metal-backed patellae. I have used cementless fixation for total knee replacements for young, active, and heavy patients since 1986 when durability over 20 years is desirable. My series of over 1,000 cementless TKRs represents about 20% of the total knees I have performed from 1986 to 2015. I have seen failures in my series due to the initial use of metal-backed patellae with thin polyethylene and use of screws and femoral and tibial components which provide access to the metaphyseal bone for polyethylene wear debris. Overall failures were still significantly low due to the use of highly porous titanium surfaces on the tibial and femoral components. Isolated aseptic loosening only occurred on one tibial component in my entire series. With the advent of utilizing implants with continuous porous surfaces and highly cross-linked polyethylene, and elimination of use of metal-backed patellae and tibial screws, I have only had one revision due to aseptic loosening or osteolysis in the last 760 cases performed since 2002. Almost 50% of total knees are now performed on patients under the age of 65. A 55-year-old patient has a 30-year life expectancy. Modern total knee replacement design has made biological fixation predictable for young and heavy patients. Because it is a biological interface, it should respond better than cement to the increased stresses that will be applied over many years by our younger, more active and heavier total knee population

Resurfacing the patella is performed the majority of the time in the United States and in many regions it is considered standard practice. In many countries, however, the patella is left un-resurfaced an equal amount of the time or even rarely ever resurfaced. Patella resurfacing is not a simple or benign procedure. There are numerous negative sequelae of resurfacing including loosening, fragmentation, avascular necrosis, lateral facet pain, stress fracture, acute fracture, late fracture, and restricted motion. In a study by Berend, Ritter, et al, failures of the patella component were reported 4.2% of the time at an average of only 2.6 years. A study was undertaken at Washington University in recent years to determine rather more clinical problems were observed following total knee replacement with or without patella resurfacing. Records were maintained on all problem total knees cases with well localised anterior knee pain. The referral area for this clinic is St. Louis which is among the largest American cities, with the highest percentage of total knees that are performed without patella resurfacing. During 4 years of referrals of total knee patients with anterior knee pain, 47 cases were identified of which 36 had a resurfaced patella and 11 had a non-resurfaced patella. Eight of 36 resurfaced patellae underwent surgery while only 2 of 11 non-resurfaced patellae underwent subsequent surgery. More than 3 times as many painful total knees that were referred for evaluation had already had their patella resurfaced. In spite of the fact that approximately equal number of total knees were performed in this area without patella resurfacing, far more patients presented to clinic with painful total knee in which the patella had been resurfaced. The numerous pathologies requiring a treatment following patella resurfacing included patella loosening, fragmentation of the patella, avascular necrosis patella, late stress fracture, lateral facet pain, oblique resurfacing, and too thick of a patellar composite. In a large multi-center randomised clinical trial at 5 years from the United Kingdom in over 1700 knees from 34 centers and 116 surgeons, there was no difference in the Oxford Score, SF-12, EQ-5D, or need for further surgery or complications. The authors concluded, “We see no difference in any score, if there is a difference, it is too small to be of any clinical significance”. In a prospective of randomised clinical trial performed at Tulane University over 20 years ago, no differences were observed in knee score, a functional patella questionnaire, or the incidence of anterior knee pain between resurfaced and un-resurfaced patellae at time intervals of 2–4 years, 5–7 years, or greater than 10 years. Beyond 10 years the knee scores of total knee patients with a resurfaced patella had declined significantly greater than those with a non-resurfaced patella. There are numerous advantages of not resurfacing the patella including less surgical time, less expense, a lower risk of “major” complications (especially late complications), and if symptoms develop in an un-resurfaced patella, it is an easier salvage situation with more options available. A small percentage of total knee patients will be symptomatic whether or not their patella is resurfaced. Not resurfacing the patella retains more options and has fewer complications. The major determinant of clinical result and the presence of anterior knee pain after knee replacement is surgical technique and component design not whether or not the patella is resurfaced. Patella resurfacing is occasionally necessary for patients with inflammatory arthritis, a deformed or maltracking patella, or symptoms and pathology that are virtually restricted to the patellofemoral joint. For the vast majority of patients, however, patella resurfacing is not necessary

Resurfacing the patella is performed the majority of the time in the US and in many regions it is considered standard practice. In many countries, however, the patella is left unresurfaced an equal amount of the time or even rarely ever resurfaced. Patella resurfacing is not a simple or benign procedure. There are numerous negative sequelae of resurfacing including loosening, fragmentation, avascular necrosis, lateral facet pain, stress fracture, acute fracture, late fracture, and restricted motion. In a study by Berend, Ritter, et al, failures of the patella component were reported 4.2% of the time at an average of only 2.6 years. A study was undertaken at Washington University in recent years to determine whether more clinical problems were observed following total knee replacement with or without patella resurfacing. Records were maintained on all problem total knees cases with well localised anterior knee pain. The referral area for this clinic is St. Louis which is among the largest American cities, with the highest percentage of total knees that are performed without patella resurfacing. During 4 years of referrals of total knee patients with anterior knee pain, 47 cases were identified of which 36 had a resurfaced patella and 11 had a non-resurfaced patella. Eight of 36 resurfaced patellae underwent surgery while only 2 of 11 non-resurfaced patellae underwent subsequent surgery. More than 3 times as many painful total knees that were referred for evaluation had already had their patella resurfaced. In spite of the fact that approximately equal number of total knees were performed in this area without patella resurfacing, far more patients presented to clinic with painful total knee in which the patella had been resurfaced. The numerous pathologies requiring a treatment following patella resurfacing included patella loosening, fragmentation of the patella, avascular necrosis patella, late stress fracture, lateral facet pain, oblique resurfacing, and too thick of a patellar composite. In a large multi-center randomised clinical trial at 5 years from the United Kingdom in over 1700 knees from 34 centers and 116 surgeons, there was no difference in the Oxford Score, SF-12, EQ-5D, or need for further surgery or complications. The authors concluded, “We see no difference in any score, if there is a difference, it is too small to be of any clinical significance”. In a prospective randomised clinical trial performed at Tulane University over 20 years ago, no differences were observed in knee score, a functional patella questionnaire, or the incidence of anterior knee pain between resurfaced and unresurfaced patellae at time intervals of 2–4 years, 5–7 years, or greater than 10 years. Beyond 10 years the knee scores of total knee patients with a resurfaced patella had declined significantly greater than those with a non-resurfaced patella. There are numerous advantages of not resurfacing the patella including less surgical time, less expense, a lower risk of “major” complications (especially late complications), and if symptoms develop in an unresurfaced patella, it is an easier salvage situation with more options available. A small percentage of total knee patients will be symptomatic whether or not their patella is resurfaced. Not resurfacing the patella retains more options and has fewer complications. The major determinant of clinical result and the presence of anterior knee pain after knee replacement is surgical technique and component design not whether or not the patella is resurfaced. Patella resurfacing is occasionally necessary for patients with inflammatory arthritis, a deformed or maltracking patella, or symptoms and pathology that are virtually restricted to the patellofemoral joint. For the vast majority of patients, however, patella resurfacing is not necessary

Introduction. Patients ≤ 55 years have a high primary TKA revision rate compared to patients >55 years. Guided motion knee devices are commonly used in younger patients yet outcomes remain unknown. Materials and Methods. In this sub-group analysis of a large multicenter study, 254 TKAs with a second-generation guided motion knee implant (Journey II Bi-Cruciate Stabilized Knee System, Smith & Nephew, Inc., Memphis) were performed between 2011–2017 in 202 patients ≤ 55 years at seven US and three European sites. Revision rates were compared with Australian Joint Registry (AOANJRR) 2017 data. Results. Average age 49.7 (range 18–54); 56.4% females; average BMI 34 kg/m. 2. ; 67.1% obese; patellae resurfaced in 98.4%. Average follow-up 4.2 years; longest follow-up six years; 27.5% followed-up for ≥ five years. Of eight revisions: total revision (one), tibial plate replacements (three), tibial insert exchanges (four). One tibial plate revision re-revised to total revision. Revision indications were mechanical loosening (n=2), infection (n=3), peri-prosthetic fracture (n=1), and instability (n=2). The Kaplan-Meier revision estimate was 3.4% (95% C.I. 1.7% to 6.7%) at five years compared to AOANJRR rate of 6.9%. There was no differential risk by sex. Discussion. Reasons for high TKA revision rates in younger patients remain unknown. Conclusion. The revision rate of the second-generation guided motion knee system is lower in younger patients compared to registry controls

Introduction. Patella femoral joint bearings in total knee replacements have shown low wear (3.1 mm. 3. /MC) under standard gait simulator conditions. 1. However, the wear in retrieval studies have shown large variations between 1.3 to 45.2 mm. 3. /year. 2. Previous in vitro studies on the tibial femoral joint have shown wear is dependent on design, materials and kinematics. 3. . The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the design (geometry) and shape on the wear rate of patella femoral joints in total knee replacements. Materials and Methods. The Leeds/Prosim knee simulator was used to investigate the wear of two types of commercially available patellae. The PFC Sigma cobalt chrome femoral component was coupled with 2 types of patellae buttons: round and oval dome. The UHMWPE was the same for the both types – GUR1020 GVF (gamma irradiated in vacuum and foiled packed). 25% bovine serum was used as the lubricant. The test were carried out at three conditions – high medial lateral (ML) rotations (<4°) and uncontrolled ML displacement (<4 mm), low ML rotation (<1°) and uncontrolled ML displacement (<4 mm); the physiological gait cycle; and low ML rotation and controlled ML displacement (<1.5 mm). In this abstract the two designs were tested in physiological gait condition (Figure 1). Patella ML displacement and tilt were passively controlled and measured after every 300,000 cycles. A ligament resisting force equivalent to 10 N4 was applied on the lateral side of the patella to avoid patella slip. Five samples of each design were tested for 3 million cycles at a cycle rate of 1 Hz. The wear volume was obtained gravimetrically every million cycles and presented with 95% confidence limits. Statistical significance was taken at p<0.05. Results and Discussions. The wear rate of PFC sigma round dome patella was higher (8.63 ± 3.44 mm. 3. /million cycles) compared to the PFC sigma oval dome patella (6.28 ± 3.89 mm. 3. /million cycles) (Figure 2). However, no significant difference in the wear rates was found between the two shapes (P=0.2). The low area of contact of oval dome patella (31.2% of total surface area) as compared to round dome patella (39.9%) led to low wear. 5. . The wear volume and the patellar tilt were positively correlated for oval dome and round dome patella, R. 2. > 0.9 (Figure 3). Increase in the patellar tilt resulted increase in sliding distance in perpendicular direction of polymer orientation. This led to higher wear volume. Conclusions. Wear rate decreased with change of patella shape from round dome to oval dome although not significantly. Increase in the patellar tilt resulted in increase in the wear volume. Acknowledgement. This research was supported in part by the DePuy and EPSRC. In addition, it was partially funded through WELMEC, a Centre of Excellence in Medical Engineering funded by the Wellcome Trust, under grant number WT 088908/Z/09/Z and additionally supported by the NIHR (National Institute for Health Research) as part of collaboration with the LMBRU (Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit)

Introduction. We have been re-evaluating patellofemoral alignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by using a weight- bearing axial radiographic view after detecting patellar maltracking (lateral tilt > 5° or lateral subluxation > 5 mm) on standard non-weight-bearing axial radiographs. However, it is unclear whether the patellar component shape affects this evaluation method. Therefore, we compared 2 differently shaped components on weight-bearing axial radiographs. Methods. From 2004 to 2013, 408 TKAs were performed with the same type of posterior-stabilized total knee implant at our hospital. All patellae were resurfaced with an all-polyethylene, three-pegged component to restore original thickness. Regarding patellar component type, an 8-mm domed component was used when the patella was so thin that a 10-mm bone cut could not be performed. Otherwise, a 10-mm medialized patellar component was selected. Twenty-five knees of 25 patients, in whom patellar maltracking was noted on standard axial radiographs at the latest follow-up, were included in this study. Knees were divided into 2 groups: 15 knees received a medialized patella (group M) while 10 received a domed patella (group D). Weight-bearing axial radiographs with patients in the semi-squatting position were recorded with the method of Baldini et al. Patellar alignment (tilt and subluxation) was measured according to the method described by Gomes et al. using both standard and weight-bearing axial views. Results. Patients’ demographic data, such as age at surgery, sex, and disease were similar for both groups. The average follow-up period was significantly longer in group D than group M (5.4 years vs. 2.5 years, respectively; p = 0.0045, Mann- Whitney U-test). The lateral tilt angle decreased significantly (p < 0.0001, paired t-test) from 6.5° ± 2.8° to 1.0° ± 1.2° with weight bearing in group M. However, this parameter in group D changed from 6.7° ± 2.7° to 4.7° ± 3.0° with weight bearing; the difference was not significant. Lateral subluxation also decreased significantly (p < 0.0001, paired t-test) from 5.1 mm ± 2.4 mm to 2.5 mm ± 1.4 mm with weight bearing in group M. However, that in group D changed from 2.8 mm ± 2.7 mm to 2.4 mm ± 2.8 mm with weight bearing, and the difference was not significant. On weight-bearing views, patellar maltracking was noted in 4 knees in group D but no knees in group M. The difference was significant (p = 0.017, Fisher's exact test). One of the 21 patients with adequate patellar tracking (4.8%) and 1 of 4 patients with maltracking (25%) complained of mild anterior knee pain. Discussion. Patellar tracking on axial radiographic views improved better in group M than in group D with weight bearing. The patellofemoral contact area was maintained with a domed patella despite tilting, but not with a medialized patella. Our results indicate that the shape difference affected the degree of radiographic improvement. Thus, the weight-bearing axial radiographic view devised by Baldini et al. is useful for evaluating patellofemoral alignment after TKA, but the shape of the patellar component should be considered for result interpretation

INTRODUCTION. Wear and fracture of patellar components has been frequently reported as a failure mode for cemented and press-fit patellar components. Malalignment of the patellar components may cause higher contact stresses, which may lead to excessive wear, delamination, and/or component fracture. In vitro testing of the patella in a clinically relevant malaligned condition is necessary to demonstrate adequate performance of the patellar component and assess the endurance of its fixation features under severe loading conditions. The purpose of this study was to test in vitro the patellar components under malaligned conditions using a knee joint simulator. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A 6 station MTS (Eden Prairie, MN) knee joint wear simulator and Alpha Calf Fraction serum (Hyclone Labs, Logan, UT) diluted to 50% with a pH-balanced 20-mMole solution of deionized water and EDTA was used (protein level = 20 g/l) for testing. Asymmetric, all-polyethylene, patellar components with an overall construct thickness of 11 mm (Duracon®, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ) were used. Appropriately sized cobalt-chrome femoral components articulated against the patellae. The patellae were cemented (Simplex, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ) to delrin fixtures, which placed the patella in 10° of lateral tilt (Figure 1). This angle was chosen based off the work of Huang et al, which was one of the larger average tilt angles reported in vivo. Replicating this scenario in vitro allows for observation of the potential scenario that may occur as the femoral component maintains contact strictly on the thinner lateral edge of the patella, concentrating both the axial and shear loads on a small area of polyethylene. The loading and kinematic profiles used for testing were published previously (maximum axial load: 2450N and maximum patellofemoral angle: 54°. Variations of the loading profile were studied by evaluating the effects of heavier patients, which increased the maximum axial load to 3100N(250lb patient) and 3750N(300lb patient) (Figure 2). Lateral offset was tested to evaluate the effect of malalignment. Increments of 1mm were analyzed starting from the neutral position, eventually reaching a maximum lateral offset of 5mm. A 6-dof load cell was placed beneath the patella fixturing to capture dynamic loads (ATI, Apex, NC). The axial and medial/lateral shear loads where used to calculate the resultant medial/lateral shear force being applied to the patellar pegs. RESULTS. The results of using a heavier loading profile and increasing lateral offset are shown in Figure 3. At neutral alignment, the effect of increasing the axial load caused an increase of 10% in resultant shear force. At 5 mm of lateral offset, the increase in loading caused the shear force to increase by 16%. With each loading profile, increasing the lateral offset from 0 to 5 mm caused the resultant shear force to increase two-fold. DISCUSSION. This test model allows for an aggressive method of testing patellar implants and it includes variables to adjust for severity (lateral offset and joint reaction force). Although increasing the amount of lateral patellar offset increases the resultant shear forces, the patellar wear rates remained minimal and constant. Hence, a femoral component that has a forgiving patellar tracking may demonstrate minimal wear, even when evaluated in extremely aggressive test conditions. Note: These results are specific to the device used since the results will be dependant on the function and design of the patellar implant and patella/femur track

For the management of displaced patellar fractures, surgical fixation using cannulated screws along with anterior tension band wiring is getting popular. Clinical and biomechanical studies have reported that using cannulated screws and a wire instead of the modified tension band with Kirschner wires improves the stability of fractured patellae. However, the biomechanical effect of screw proximity on the fixed construction remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical behaviors of the fractured patella fixed with two cannulated screws and tension band at different depths of the patella using finite element method. A patella model with simple transverse fracture [AO 34-C1] was developed; the surgical fixation consisted of two 4.0-mm parallel partial-threaded cannulated screws with a figure-of-eight anterior tension band wiring using a 1.25-mm stainless steel cable. Two different locations, including the screws 5-mm and 10-mm away from the leading edge of the patella, were used. A tension force of 850 N was applied on the patellar apexes at two loading angles (45° and 0° [parallel] to the long axis) to simulate different loading conditions while knee ambulation. The proximal side (base) of the patella was fixed, and the inferior articular surface was defined as a compression-only support in ANSYS to simulate the support from distal femur condyles. Compression-only support enables the articular surfaces of the present patella to only bear compression and no tension forces. Under different loading conditions, the fixed fractured patella yielded higher stability during 0° loading of tension force than during 45° loading. When the screws were parallel placed at the depth of 5 mm away from the patellar surface, the deformation of patellar fragment and maximum gap opening at the fracture site were smaller than those obtained by screws placed at the depth of 10 mm away from the patellar surface. Compared to the superficial screw placement, the deeper placement (10 mm) increased the maximum gap opening at the fracture site by 1.56 times under 45° loading, and 1.58 times under 0° loading. The load on the tension band wire of the 10-mm screw placement was 3.12 times (from 230 to 717 N) higher than that of the 5-mm placement. Under the wire, the contact pressure on the patellar surface was higher with the 10-mm screw placement than the 5-mm screw placement. The peak bone contact pressures with the 10-mm placement were 7.7 times (99.5 to 764 MPa) higher. This is the first numerical study to examine the biomechanical effects of different screw locations on the fixation of a fractured patella using screws and tension band. Based on a higher stability and lower cable tension obtained by the superficial screws placement, the authors recommended the superficial screw placement (5 mm below the leading edge of the patella) rather than the deep screws while fixing the transverse patellar fracture with cannulated screws and cable

It is a not so uncommon clinical scenario: well-fixed, well-aligned, balanced total knee arthroplasty with continued pain. However, radiographs also demonstrate an unresurfaced patella. The debate continues and the controversy remains as whether or not to routinely resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty. In perhaps the most widely referenced article on the topic, the overall revision rates were no different between the resurfaced (9%) and the unresurfaced (12%) groups and thus their conclusion was that similar results can be obtained with and without resurfacing. However, a deeper look in to the data in this study shows that 4 times more knees in the unresurfaced group were revised for patellofemoral problems. A more recent study concluded that selectively not resurfacing the patella provided similar results when compared to routinely resurfacing. The study does emphasise however, that this conclusion depends greatly on femoral component design and operative diagnoses. This suggests that selective resurfacing with a so-called “patella friendly” femoral component in cases of tibio-femoral osteoarthritis, is a safe and effective strategy. Finally, registry data would support routine resurfacing with a 2.3 times higher relative risk of revision seen in the unresurfaced TKA. Regardless of which side of the debate one lies, the not so uncommon clinical scenario remains; what do we do with the painful TKA with an unresurfaced patella. Precise and accurate diagnosis of the etiology of a painful TKA can be very difficult, and there is likely a strong bias towards early revision with secondary patellar resurfacing in the painful TKA with an unresurfaced TKA. At first glance, secondary resurfacing is associated with relatively poor outcomes. Correia, et al. reported that only half the patients underwent revision TKA with secondary resurfacing had resolution of their complaints. Similarly, only 53% of patients in another series were satisfied with the procedure and pain relief. The conclusions that can be drawn from these studies and others are that either routine patellar resurfacing should be performed in all TKA or, perhaps more importantly, we need to better understand the etiology of pain in an otherwise well-aligned, well-balanced, well-fixed TKA. It is this author's contingency that the presence of an unresurfaced patella leads surgeons to reoperate earlier, without truly identifying the etiology of pain or dissatisfaction. This strong bias; basically there is something more that can be done, therefore we should do it, is the same bias that leads to early revision of partial knee arthroplasty. While very difficult, we as knee surgeons should not revise a partial knee or secondarily resurface a patella due to pain or dissatisfaction. Doing so, unfortunately, only works about half the time. The diagnostic algorithm for evaluating the painful, uresurfaced TKA includes routinely ruling out infection with serum markers and an aspiration. Pre-arthroplasty radiographs should be obtained to confirm suitability and severity of disease for an arthroplasty. An intra-articular diagnostic injection with Marcaine +/− corticosteroid should provide significant pain relief. MARS MRI may be beneficial to evaluate edema within the patella. Lastly, operative implant stickers to confirm implant manufacturer and type are critical as some implants perform less favorably with unresurfaced patellae. To date, no studies of secondary resurfacing describe the results of this, or similar, algorithms for defining patellofemoral problems in the unresurfaced TKA and therefore it is still difficult to conclude that poor results are not simply due to our inherent bias towards early revision and secondary resurfacing of the unresurfaced patella

Introduction. Presentation of our outcome in implant survival and clinical function using rotating-hinge knee prosthesis in revision total knee arthroplasty. Method. A retrospective review of 44 revision TKA containing 21 RHK (Biomet) and 23 MRH (Stryker). The patient population consisted of 27 women and 17 men with an average age of 75 years at the time of the revision. The mean follow-up period was 13 months. The clinical and functional results were evaluated according to the Knee-Society-Score (KSS) after 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months together with a x-ray. Results. The indication for the revision included aseptic loosening and ligamentous instability, 6 times as primary total knee replacement, an infected total knee in 6 cases and fractures with severe bone defect in 4 cases. The KSS pain improved from 49 (range 23–70) to 76 (range 34–98). The KSS function did not show any significant improvement of 60 (range 10–55) to 65 (range 20–100). The ROM improved with 53% from 74 (range 50–110) to 113 (range 65–130). Our complications have been revisions of hematoma in 4 cases, an infection/recurrence of infection in 2 cases with following explantation. There were 3 ligamentum patellae ruptures, 2 times due to rheumatoid arthritis, once due to Mb. Parkinson. We noticed 2 cases with peronaeus paresis (once temporarily) and one Guillain-Barre-Syndrom. With our x-rays we observed radiolucent lines without any progression or loosening factor for the prosthesis. Conclusion. We have seen good results using RHK and MRH in function and particularly a very good stability even for loss of collateral ligaments or massive bone loss. We evaluated a reduction of pain and an improvement of ROM although we had a number of revisions because of infection and co-morbidities

Introduction. Patellar resurfacing is performed in more than 90% of primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) in the United States, yet far fewer patellae are resurfaced internationally. Multiple randomized controlled trials have shown decreased revision rates in patients with resurfaced patellas (RP) vs. non-resurfaced (NR). However, most of these studies showed no difference in patient satisfaction, anterior knee pain, or knee society scores. (Figure 1) Given uncertain benefits, the purpose of this study was to determine if the rates of patellar resurfacing have changed over the past 10 years worldwide. Methods. Data was obtained via direct correspondence with registry administrators or abstracted from the annual reports of six national joint registries: Australia, Denmark, England, New Zealand, Norway, and Sweden. Rates of patellar resurfacing between 2003 and 2013 were collected. Where data was available, subgroup analysis was performed to examine revision rates among RP and NR TKAs. Results. The average rates of patellar resurfacing from 2003 to 2013 ranged from 5% (Norway) to 71% (Denmark). Three countries showed a decreased rate of patellar resurfacing over this time period while two demonstrated an increase. The largest decrease in resurfacing rates was in Sweden (15% to 2%), while the biggest increase was in Australia (44% to 53%). (Figure 2) In 2010, 48,367 of 137,813 (35%) primary TKAs from all six countries were resurfaced. (Figure 3) Among RP and NR TKAs, Australia documented a 10-year cumulative revision rate (CRR) of 4.9% and 6.0%, respectively. Sweden showed a 10-year CRR of 4% in both groups. Conclusion. While not all national joint registries report rates of patellar resurfacing, it is clear that most countries outside of the US continue to resurface a much smaller proportion of patellas in primary TKA. Worldwide, the rates of patellar resurfacing have changed little in the past decade

BACKGROUND. Patella resurfacing in TKA remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term clinical outcome in TKA in patients undergoing bilateral TKAs with one patella resurfaced and the other patella nonresurfaced. METHODS. Twenty-nine patients (58 knees) underwent primary bilateral TKA for osteoarthritis. These patients were enrolled in a prospective randomised double blinded study and represent a subset of a larger study of patella resurfacing. All patients received the same posterior cruciate sparing TKA. Patients each had one knee randomised to treatment with or without patella resurfacing. The contralateral knee then received the alternative patellar treatment, such that all patients had one knee with a resurfaced patella and the other nonresurfaced. Clinical evaluations consisted of routine radiographic and clinical follow-up and included with a Knee Society Score patellofemoral specific patient questionnaire. Twenty-eight patients (56 knees) participated and were followed for a mean of 118 months (range, 69–146 months). RESULTS. There were no significant differences between the knees treated with and without patellar resurfacing with regard to range of motion, KSCRS, or the pain and function scores. Forty-six percent (13/28 patients) of patients preferred the resurfaced knee, 36% (10/28) the nonresurfaced knee, and 18% (5/28) had no preference. Two patients (7%) in the nonresurfaced group required revision for a patellofemoral related complication, compared to one patient (3.5%) in the group with a resurfaced patella. CONCLUSIONS. Ten year follow-up reveals equivalent results for resurfaced and nonresurfaced patellae in TKA with regards to ROM, KSCRS, pain and function, or patellofemoral symptoms. In this large series of bilateral TKAs, 64% of patients either preferred the unresurfaced knee or had no preference

Introduction. The success of knee replacement surgery depends, in part, on restoration of the correct alignment of the leg with respect to the load-bearing vector passing from the hip to the ankle (the mechanical axis). Conventional thinking is that the correct angle of resection of the distal femur (Valgus Cut Angle, VCA) depends on femoral length or femoral offset, though femoral bowing, in addition to length and medial offset, may also have a significant influence on the VCA. We hypothesized that femoral bowing has a strong effect on the VCA necessary to restore physiologic alignment after arthroplasty or osteotomy. Methods. A total of 102 long-leg radiographs were obtained from patients scheduled for primary total knee arthroplasty. The patients on average were 41% male 59% female, 67.9 ± 11.1 years, 67.0 ± 4.7 in, 192 ± 43 lbs, and had a BMI of 29.7 ± 4.8. All radiographs were prepared with the feet placed in identical rotation and the patellae pointing forward, and were excluded if there was evidence of malrotation, as defined by (i) a difference in the medial head offsets of the right and left femur of >3mm, (ii) a difference in the width of the tibiofibular syndesmoses, or (iii) a difference in the rotation of one foot compared to the other. The following anatomic variables were measured on each radiograph: (i) the neck shaft angle (NSA) of the femur, (ii) the length of the femur, (iii) the length of the femoral shaft, (iv) the medial head offset, (v) the medial-lateral bow of the distal femur, (vi) the hip- knee axis angle, (vii) the mechanical axis deviation of the extremity at the knee, (viii) the medio-lateral bow of the tibia, and (ix) the valgus cut angle required to restore the mechanical axis to the center of the knee during surgery (VCA). Bivariate plots were constructed using the measurements thought to influence the VCA: femoral bowing, femoral offset, and length of femur. Multivariate regression was then used to find the variable that had the strongest effect on the VCA. Results. The bivariate plot of offset and VCA yielded an R2 of 0.02544 (p = 0.11) was not statistically significant. However, the bivariate plot of femoral length and VCA yielded an R2 of 0.1294 (p = 0.0002) showing significant correlation. Lastly, the bivariate plot of femoral bowing and VCA yielded an R2 of 0.59136 (p < 0.00001) demonstrating significant correlation (Figure 3). Multivariate analysis revealed that femoral bowing was the best predictor of VCA: VCA = 5.46–0.363 femoral bowing (°) + 0.106 Femoral offset (mm) − 0.010 femoral length (mm). Discussion. While clinicians performing knee replacements typically do not consider femoral bowing when selecting the valgus angle appropriate for each patient, our findings demonstrate that femoral bowing has a potent effect on VCA. The multivariate regression indicated that femoral bowing had the highest effect on VCA followed by offset and femoral length. These findings suggest that surgeons should consider measuring long alignment radiographs before performing a total knee arthroplasty

Purpose of Study:. Various techniques have been described and are still used for treating recurrent dislocation of the patella when conservative measures fail. Among them are distal, proximal and combined realignment techniques and lateral releases. Since being shown proof of the biomechanical importance of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) in patellofemoral instability, the reconstruction of the MPFL has gained in popularity. The objective of this paper is to present a case series with preliminary clinical results using the gracilis tendon to reconstruct the MPFL. Method:. Between 01/07 and 03/11 23 knees in 21 patients underwent reconstruction of the MPFL.4 of these patients had had previous surgery. Preoperatively the Caton Deschamps ratio using plain x-rays was worked out and the TT/TG distance was measured using CT scanning. Using these measurements as a guideline, 7 cases underwent a tibial tubercle transfer as an additional procedure. In 6 of the cases an additional cartilage procedure was required. The technique was simplified using intra-operative x-rays to achieve anatomical tunnel placement. Results:. The Tegner Activity Score was used to evaluate the patients preoperatively and at a minimum of 6 months postoperatively. The scores improved on average from 3,6 to 7,4. One patient had an extensor lag of 10 degrees at 3 months. This had normalised by 6 months. One patient had recurrence of her instability and required a revision MPFL reconstruction using an allograft. One patient had recurrent episodes of patella subluxation but no overt dislocation. Conclusion:. This case series gave good functional results using the Tegner Activity score. The procedure of MPFL reconstruction was effective in stabilising the patellae and in improving the symptoms of patellofemoral instability