Vacuum orthoses are being applied in the care of patients with foot and lower leg conditions, as ankle fractures or sprains. The lower leg is protected and immobilized, which increases mobility. Due to the design, the orthoses lead to a difference in leg length, i.e. the side with the orthosis becomes longer, which changes the gait kinematics. To prevent or mitigate the unfavourable effects of altered gait kinematics, leg length-evening devices (shoe lifts) are offered that are worn under the shoe on the healthy side. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of such a device on the normality of gait kinematics. Gait analysis was conducted with 63 adult, healthy volunteers having signed an informed consent form that were asked to walk on a treadmill at a speed of 4.5km/h in three different conditions:. barefoot - as reference for establishing the normality score baseline. with a vacuum orthosis (VACOPed, OPED GmbH, Germany) and a sport shoe. with a vacuum orthosis and a shoe lift (EVENup, OPED GmbH, Germany). Data was sampled using the gait analysis system MCU 200 (LaiTronic GmbH, Austria). The positions of the joint markers were exported from the software and evaluated for the joint angles during the gait cycle using custom software (implemented in DIAdem 2017, National Instruments). A normality score using a modification of the Gait Profile Score (GPS) was calculated in every 1%-interval of the gait cycle and evaluated with a Wilcoxon signed rank test. The GPS value was reduced by 0.33° (0.66°) (median and IQR) while wearing the shoe lift. The effect was statistically significant, and very large (W = 1535.00, p < .001; r (rank biserial) = 0.52, 95% CI [0.29, 0.70]). The significant reduction of the GPS value indicates a more normal gait kinematics while using the leg length-evening device on the contralateral shoe. This rather simple and inexpensive device thus might improve patient comfort and balance while using the vacuum orthoses

Ponseti method has become the most common and validated initial non-operative and/or minimally invasive treatment modality of idiopathic clubfoot regardless of the severity of the deformity worldwide. Despite hundreds of publications in the literature favoring Ponseti method, the data about secondary procedures performed in the follow-up period of clubfoot and their incidence remains sparse and given as small details in the articles. The objective of this study was to analyse our incidence of secondary procedures performed in the midterm followup period of idiopathic clubfoot patients treated with Ponseti method and review of the relevant literature. For this purpose 86 feet of 60 patients with idiopathic clubfoot who were treated with original Ponseti method were enrolled in this retrospective case control study. Unilateral ankle foot orthosis (AFO) was used rather than standart bar-connected foot abduction orthosis varying from 12 months to 25 months in the follow-up period and 74 of 86 (86%) feet required percutaneous achilles tenotomy. The average age of initial cast treatment was 12.64 days (range 1 to 102 days). The mean follow-up time was 71 months (range 19 to 153 months). Thirty seven feet of 24 patients recieved secondary procedures (43%) consisting of; supramalleolary derotational osteotomy (SMDO) (1 patient/2 feet), complete subtalar release (3 patients/5 feet), medial opening lateral closing osteotomy (double osteotomy) (2 patients/3 feet), double osteotomy with transfer of tibialis anterior tendon (TTAT) (2 patients/3 feet), partial subtalar release (PSTR) (3 patients/5 feet), PSTR with SDO (1 patient/1 foot), posterior release (PR) with repeated achillotomy (1 patient/2 feet), TTAT (6 patients/10 feet), TTAT with PR (2 patients/2 feet), TTAT with Vulpius procedure (1 patient/1 foot) and TTAT with SMDO (2 patients/3 feet) respectively. The amount of percutaneous achilles tenotomy (86%) in our study correlated with the literature which ranged from 80 to 90 %. The transfer of tibialis anterior tendon continued to be the most performed secondary procedure both in our study (51%) and in the literature, but the amount of total secondary procedures in our study (43%) was determined to be higher than the literature data varying from 7 to 27 percent which may be due to unilateral AFO application after Ponseti method for idiopathic clubfoot deformity in our study

A complete design-manufacturing process for delivering customized foot orthoses by means of digital technologies is presented. Moreover, this feasibility study aims to combine a semi-automatic modelling approach with the use of low-cost devices for 3D scanning and 3D printing. In clinical practice, traditional methods for manufacturing customized foot orthoses are completely manual, mainly based on plaster casting plus hand fabrication, and are widely used among practitioners. Therefore, results depend on skills and expertise of individual orthoptists and podiatrists that need considerable training and practice in order to obtain optimal functional devices. On the other side, novel approaches for design and manufacturing customized foot orthoses by means of digital technologies (generally based on 3D scanning, 3D modelling and 3D printing) are recently reported as a valid alternative method to overcome these limitations. This study has been carried out in an interdisciplinary approach between the staff of Design and Methods in Industrial Engineering and the staff of Podology with the aim to assess the feasibility of a novel user-friendly and cost-effective solution for delivering customized functional foot orthoses. More specifically, a Generative Design (GD) workflow has been developed to enable practitioners without enough CAD skills to easily 3D modelling and interactively customize foot orthoses. Additionally, low-cost devices for 3D scanning and 3D printing that have been acquired by the Podology Lab, were also tested and compared with the high-cost ones of the Department of Industrial Engineering. The complete process is divided into three main steps. The first one regards the digitization of the patient's foot by means of 3D laser scanner devices. Then a user-friendly 3D modelling approach, developed for this purpose as GD workflow, allows interactively generating the customized foot orthosis, also adjusting several features and exporting the watertight mesh in STL format. Finally, the last step involves Additive Manufacturing systems to obtain the expected physical item ready to use. First, for what concerns the digitizing step, the acquired data resulting from 3D scanning by means of the low-cost system (Sense 3D scanner) appears accurate enough for the present practical purposes. Then, with respect to the 3D modelling step, the proposed GD workflow in Grasshopper is intuitive and allows easily and interactively customizing the final foot orthosis. Finally, regarding the Additive Manufacturing step, the low cost 3D printer (Wasp Delta 40 70) is capable to provide adequate results for the shell of the foot orthosis. Moreover, this system appears really versatile in reason of the capability to print in a wide range of different filaments. Therefore, since the market of 3D printing filaments is rapidly growing, building sessions with different materials (both flexible and rigid such, for example, PLA, AB and PETG) were completed. This study validated, in terms of feasibility, that the use of a GD modelling approach, in combination with low-cost devices for 3D scanning and 3D printing, is a real alternative to conventional processes for providing customized foot orthosis. Moreover, the interdisciplinary approach allowed the transfer of skills and knowledge to the practitioners involved and, also, the low-cost devices Sense 3D scanner and Wasp Delta 40 70 that have been acquired by the Podology Lab, were demonstrated suitable for this kind of applications

Summary. Pyogenic spondylodiscitis is an uncommon but severe spinal infection. In majority of cases treatment is based on intravenous antibiotics and rigid brace immobilization. Posterior percutaneous spinal instrumentation is a safe alternative procedure in relieving pain, preventing deformity and neurological compromise. Introduction. Pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PS) is an uncommon but severe spinal infection. Patients affected by a non-complicated PS and treatment is based on intravenous antibiotics and rigid brace immobilization with a thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) suffices in most cases in relieving pain, preventing deformity and neurological compromise. Since January 2010 we started offering patients percutaneous posterior screw-rod instrumentation as alternative approach to TLSO immobilization. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and effectiveness of posterior percutaneous spinal instrumentation for single level lower thoracic (T9-T12) or lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Materials and Methods. Retrospective cohort analysis on 27 patients diagnosed with PS who were offered to choose between 24/7 TLSO rigid bracing for 3 to 4 months and posterior percutaneous screw-rod instrumentation bridging the infection level followed by soft bracing for 4 weeks after surgery. All patients underwent antibiotic therapy. Fifteen patients chose conservative treatment, 12 patients chose surgical treatment. Patients were seen at 1, 3, 6, 9 months after diagnosis. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) and complete blood count were measured at each follow-up visit. Segmental kyphosis was measured at diagnosis and at 9 months. VAS, SF-12, and EQ-5D questionnaires were recorded at each follow-up visit. Baseline groups’ demographic characteristics were assessed using independent sample t-tests for continuous variables and χ2 tests for frequency variables. Results. Complete healing was achieved in all patients, no difference was observed in healing time between the two groups (77.3±7.2 days vs 80.2±4.4). Instrumentation failure and screw loosening was not observed in any patient. In both group CRP and ESR decreased accordingly with response to antibiotic therapy. Surgically treated patients had significantly lower VAS scores at 1 month (3.05±0.57 in surgery group vs 5.20±1.21 in TLSO group) and 3 months (2.31±0.54 in surgery group vs 2.85±0.55 in TLSO group) post-diagnosis. Both groups had similar trends toward fast recovery in both mental (MCS) and physical components (PCS) of SF-12 questionnaire, surgically treated patients showed steeper and statistically significative improvement at 1 month (37.83±4.57 MCS in surgery group vs 24.52±3.03 MCS in TLSO group and 35.46±4.43 PCS in surgery group vs 27.07±4.45 PCS in TLSO group, p<0.001), 3 months (52.94±3.82 MCS in surgery group vs 39.45±4.92 MCS in TLSO group and 44.93±3.73 PCS in surgery group vs 35.33±6.44 PCS in TLSO group, p<0.001), and 6 months (54.93±3.56 MCS in surgery group vs 49.99±5.82 MCS in TLSO group) post-diagnosis, no statistically significant differences were detected at the other time points (9 months post-diagnosis). EQ-5D index was significantly higher in surgery patients at 1 month (0.764±0.043 in surgery group vs 0.458±0.197 in TLSO group) and 3 months (0.890±0.116 in surgery group vs 0.688±0.142 in TLSO group); no statistically significant changes were observed in segmental kyphosis between the two groups. Conclusion. Posterior percutaneous spinal instrumentation is a safe, feasible, and effective procedure in relieving pain, preventing deformity and neurological compromise. Surgical stabilization was associated with faster recovery, lower pain scores, and improved quality of life compared with TLSO conservative treatment at 1 and 3 months after diagnosis

Objectives

The evidence base to inform the management of Achilles tendon rupture is sparse. The objectives of this research were to establish what current practice is in the United Kingdom and explore clinicians’ views on proposed further research in this area. This study was registered with the ISRCTN (ISRCTN68273773) as part of a larger programme of research.