The Cochrane Collaboration has produced three new reviews relevant to bone and joint surgery since the publication of the last Cochrane Corner. These are relevant to a wide range of musculoskeletal specialists, and include reviews in lateral elbow pain, osteoarthritis of the big toe joint, and cervical spine injury in paediatric trauma patients.

Vacuum orthoses are being applied in the care of patients with foot and lower leg conditions, as ankle fractures or sprains. The lower leg is protected and immobilized, which increases mobility. Due to the design, the orthoses lead to a difference in leg length, i.e. the side with the orthosis becomes longer, which changes the gait kinematics. To prevent or mitigate the unfavourable effects of altered gait kinematics, leg length-evening devices (shoe lifts) are offered that are worn under the shoe on the healthy side. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of such a device on the normality of gait kinematics. Gait analysis was conducted with 63 adult, healthy volunteers having signed an informed consent form that were asked to walk on a treadmill at a speed of 4.5km/h in three different conditions:. barefoot - as reference for establishing the normality score baseline. with a vacuum orthosis (VACOPed, OPED GmbH, Germany) and a sport shoe. with a vacuum orthosis and a shoe lift (EVENup, OPED GmbH, Germany). Data was sampled using the gait analysis system MCU 200 (LaiTronic GmbH, Austria). The positions of the joint markers were exported from the software and evaluated for the joint angles during the gait cycle using custom software (implemented in DIAdem 2017, National Instruments). A normality score using a modification of the Gait Profile Score (GPS) was calculated in every 1%-interval of the gait cycle and evaluated with a Wilcoxon signed rank test. The GPS value was reduced by 0.33° (0.66°) (median and IQR) while wearing the shoe lift. The effect was statistically significant, and very large (W = 1535.00, p < .001; r (rank biserial) = 0.52, 95% CI [0.29, 0.70]). The significant reduction of the GPS value indicates a more normal gait kinematics while using the leg length-evening device on the contralateral shoe. This rather simple and inexpensive device thus might improve patient comfort and balance while using the vacuum orthoses

Objectives. The evidence base to inform the management of Achilles tendon rupture is sparse. The objectives of this research were to establish what current practice is in the United Kingdom and explore clinicians’ views on proposed further research in this area. This study was registered with the ISRCTN (ISRCTN68273773) as part of a larger programme of research. Methods. We report an online survey of current practice in the United Kingdom, approved by the British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society and completed by 181 of its members. A total of ten of these respondents were invited for a subsequent one-to-one interview to explore clinician views on proposed further research in this area. Results. The survey showed wide variations in practice, with patients being managed in plaster cast alone (13%), plaster cast followed by orthoses management (68%), and orthoses alone (19%). Within these categories, further variation existed regarding the individual rehabilitation facets, such as the length of time worn, the foot position within them and weight-bearing status. The subsequent interviews reflected this clinical uncertainty and the pressing need for definitive research. Conclusions. The gap in evidence in this area has resulted in practice in the United Kingdom becoming varied and based on individual opinion. Future high-quality randomised trials on this subject are supported by the clinical community. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2015;4:65–9

A complete design-manufacturing process for delivering customized foot orthoses by means of digital technologies is presented. Moreover, this feasibility study aims to combine a semi-automatic modelling approach with the use of low-cost devices for 3D scanning and 3D printing. In clinical practice, traditional methods for manufacturing customized foot orthoses are completely manual, mainly based on plaster casting plus hand fabrication, and are widely used among practitioners. Therefore, results depend on skills and expertise of individual orthoptists and podiatrists that need considerable training and practice in order to obtain optimal functional devices. On the other side, novel approaches for design and manufacturing customized foot orthoses by means of digital technologies (generally based on 3D scanning, 3D modelling and 3D printing) are recently reported as a valid alternative method to overcome these limitations. This study has been carried out in an interdisciplinary approach between the staff of Design and Methods in Industrial Engineering and the staff of Podology with the aim to assess the feasibility of a novel user-friendly and cost-effective solution for delivering customized functional foot orthoses. More specifically, a Generative Design (GD) workflow has been developed to enable practitioners without enough CAD skills to easily 3D modelling and interactively customize foot orthoses. Additionally, low-cost devices for 3D scanning and 3D printing that have been acquired by the Podology Lab, were also tested and compared with the high-cost ones of the Department of Industrial Engineering. The complete process is divided into three main steps. The first one regards the digitization of the patient's foot by means of 3D laser scanner devices. Then a user-friendly 3D modelling approach, developed for this purpose as GD workflow, allows interactively generating the customized foot orthosis, also adjusting several features and exporting the watertight mesh in STL format. Finally, the last step involves Additive Manufacturing systems to obtain the expected physical item ready to use. First, for what concerns the digitizing step, the acquired data resulting from 3D scanning by means of the low-cost system (Sense 3D scanner) appears accurate enough for the present practical purposes. Then, with respect to the 3D modelling step, the proposed GD workflow in Grasshopper is intuitive and allows easily and interactively customizing the final foot orthosis. Finally, regarding the Additive Manufacturing step, the low cost 3D printer (Wasp Delta 40 70) is capable to provide adequate results for the shell of the foot orthosis. Moreover, this system appears really versatile in reason of the capability to print in a wide range of different filaments. Therefore, since the market of 3D printing filaments is rapidly growing, building sessions with different materials (both flexible and rigid such, for example, PLA, AB and PETG) were completed. This study validated, in terms of feasibility, that the use of a GD modelling approach, in combination with low-cost devices for 3D scanning and 3D printing, is a real alternative to conventional processes for providing customized foot orthosis. Moreover, the interdisciplinary approach allowed the transfer of skills and knowledge to the practitioners involved and, also, the low-cost devices Sense 3D scanner and Wasp Delta 40 70 that have been acquired by the Podology Lab, were demonstrated suitable for this kind of applications

Summary. Bi-plane Image matching method is very useful technique to evaluate the loaded 3D motion of each cervical level. Introduction. Cervical orthoses are commonly used to regulate the motion of cervical spines for conservative treatment of injuries and for post-operative immobilization. Previous studies have reported the efficacy of orthoses for 2D flex-extension or 3D motions of the entire cervical spine. However, the ability of cervical orthoses to reduce motion might be different at each intervertebral level and for different types of motion (flexion-extension, rotation, lateral bending). The effectiveness of immobilizing orthoses at each cervical intervertebral level for 3D motions has not been reported. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Philadelphia collar to each level of cervical spines with 3D motion analysis under loading condition. Patients & Methods. Patient Sample: Four asymptomatic volunteer subjects were recruited and provided informed consent. Approval of the experimental design by the institutional review board was obtained. These 4 individuals were without any history of cervical diseases or procedures. The presence of any symptoms, spinal disorders and anatomical abnormalities in fluoroscopic images or CT was a criterion of exclusion from this study. Outcome Measures: To evaluate the efficacy of the Philadelphia collar, ANOVA was used to compare the range of motion with and without collar at the C3/4, C4/5, C5/6 and C6/7 intervertebral levels for each motion. The level of statistical significance was set at p<0.05. When a statistical difference was detected, post hoc Tukey tests were performed. Methods. Three-dimensional models of the C3-C7 vertebrae were developed from CT scans of each subject using commercial software. Two fluoroscopy systems were positioned to acquire orthogonal images of the cervical spine. The subject was seated within the view of the dual fluoroscopic imaging system. Pairs of images were taken in each of 7 positions: neutral posture, maximum flexion and extension, maximum left and right lateral bending, and maximum left and right rotation. The images and 3D vertebral models were imported into biplane 2D-3D registration software, where the vertebral models were projected onto the pair of digitised images and the 3D bone pose was adjusted to match its radiographic projection in each image. Relative motions between each vertebral body were calculated from body-fixed coordinate systems using a flexion-lateral bending-axial rotation Cardan angle sequence. Results. Flexion range was significantly reduced with the collar at each cervical level. Extension range was significantly reduced at the C3/4 level. Rotation and lateral bending were reduced for C3/4, C4/5, C5/6 levels with the collar. Discussion/Conclusion. The Philadelphia Collar significantly reduces cervical motion at C3/4, C4/5 and C5/6 levels in almost all motions (except for extension). At the C6/7 level, this type of collar has limited effectiveness reducing cervical motion. We used 3D radiographic measurements to quantify the effectiveness of the Philadelphia collar for reducing cervical motion. Bi-plane 2D-3D registration method is useful technique to evaluate 3D motion of cervical spines

Assessing the efficacy of cervical orthoses in restricting spinal motion has historically proved challenging due to a poor understanding of spinal kinematics and the difficulty in accurately measuring spinal motion. This study is the first to use an 8 camera optoelectronic, passive marker, motion analysis system with a novel marker protocol to compare the effectiveness of the Aspen, Aspen Vista, Philadelphia, Miami-J and Miami-J Advanced collars. Restriction of cervical spine motion was assessed for physiological and functional range of motion (ROM). Nineteen healthy volunteers (12 female, 7 male) were fitted with collars by an approved physiotherapist. ProReflex (Qualisys, Sweden) infra-red cameras were used to track the movement of retro-reflective marker clusters attached to the head and trunk. 3-D kinematic data was collected from uncollared and collared subjects during forward flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation for physiological ROM and during five activities of daily living (ADLs). ROM in the three clinical planes was analysed using the Qualisys Track Manager (Qualisys, Sweden) 6 Degree of Freedom calculation to determine head orientation relative to the trunk. For physiological ROM, the Aspen and Philadelphia were more effective at restricting flexion/extension than the Vista (p<0.001), Miami-J (p<0.001 and p<0.01) and Miami-J Advanced (p<0.01 and p<0.05). The Aspen was more effective at restricting rotation compared to the Vista (p<0.001) and Miami-J (p<0.05). The Vista was least effective at restricting lateral bending (p<0.001). Through functional ROM, the Vista was less effective than the Aspen (p<0.001) and other collars (p<0.01) at restricting flexion/extension. The Aspen and Miami-J Advanced were more effective at restricting rotation than the Vista (p<0.01 and p<0.05) and Miami-J (p<0.05). All the collars were comparable when restricting lateral bending. The Aspen is superior to, and the Aspen Vista inferior to, the other collars at restricting cervical spine motion through physiological ROM. Functional ROM observed during ADLs are less than those observed through physiological ROM. The Aspen Vista is inferior to the other collars at restricting motion through functional ROM. The Aspen collar again performs well, particularly at restricting rotation, but is otherwise comparable to the other collars at restricting motion through functional ranges