Orthopaedic surgery is a practical surgical specialization field, the exit exam for registrars remains written and oral. Despite logbook evaluation and surgical work-based assessments, the question remains: can registrars perform elective surgery upon qualification? In South Africa, obstacles to elective surgical training include the trauma workload, financial constraints, fellowships and the Covid pandemic. In hip and knee arthroplasty, new approaches like the direct anterior approach (DAA) and robotic-assisted knee surgery also contributed to the dilution of cases available for registrar training. There are concerns that orthopaedic registrars do not perform enough cases to achieve surgical proficiency. Review of the last 4 years of registrar logbooks in hip and knee arthroplasty surgery performed in a single tertiary academic hospital in South Africa. We included all primary total hip replacements (THR), total knee replacements (TKR) and hemiarthroplasties (HA) done for neck of femur (NOF) fractures between 1 April 2019 and 30 March 2023. Differentiation between registrar assisting, registrar performing with consultant supervision and registrar performing independent surgery was done. 990 hip arthroplasties (472 Primary THR, 216 NOF THR, 302 NOF HA) and 316 Primary TKR were performed during the study period. In primary elective THR the posterior approach was dominant and used in 76% of cases. In NOF THA the DAA was dominant used in 98% of cases. Primary TKR robotic-assisted technologies was used in 27% (n=94) cases. Registrars as the primary surgeon were the highest in NOF THA at 70% of cases and the lowest performing TKR at 25%. During 3-month rotations, an average registrar performed 12 (2 TKR and 10 THR) and assisted in 35 (10 TKR and 25 THR) cases. Despite the large number of arthroplasties operations being performed over the last 4-year period, the surgical cases done by registrars are below, the proposed minimal cases to provide surgical proficiency during their training period

Frequently, radiological data is transferred verbally between ED/GP/LMO to the Orthopaedic registrar. Given the different medical backgrounds and presentation skills there is often a limit to the verbal description of the radiographs. The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility and benefits of concurrently using picture messaging of X-rays to enhance communication between ED and Orthopaedic Registrars to optimise patient care. The X-rays of 40 patients referred to orthopaedics OPD or admitted from the ED were photographed and retrospectively reviewed on a mobile phone screen (240 × 320) by an orthopaedic registrar along with a printout of the patient history and verbal description of the x-ray as interpreted by the ED staff. No further information was provided to the registrar. A questionnaire was completed to subjectively and objectively evaluate the therapeutic benefit of the image review. Patient(tm)s management was compared to management plans after image review and differences were attributed to the visual inspection of the x-rays on the mobile phone. Concurrent to the retrospective review, the ED is currently trialling this with a Sony-Erickson K750i. After hours orthopaedic cases are sent via MMS to the registrar prior to consultation. In the emergency department, 10% of patients who presented with a fracture were reviewed in person by an orthopaedics registrar and none were admitted straight from ED whilst two were admitted following review at the OPD. X-rays of 40 patients were reviewed in this study. Twenty-seven patients presented with a fracture and four with islocations. When the clinical data was reviewed alongside images of x-rays by an orthopaedic registrar, a difference in management plans were observed in 25% of cases and 7.5% where surgical intervention would yield a better result. Twenty-six of the twenty-seven fractures and four dislocations were successfully visualised on the MMS. In 18 cases, picture messaging provided additional information compared to verbal report alone. The limiting factor in picture messaging was the resolution and size of the radiograph. Ease of operation and portability was found to be satisfactory by both ED and Orthopaedic staff. Equipping the ED with the phone has enhanced communication with the orthopaedics department and increased the potential for optimising patient care. This will be formally assessed through questionnaires after 12 months trial of the phone. Picture messaging is an inexpensive way of utilising technical advancements to improve patient care. Consistent with current literature, the quality of images was not sufficient as a diagnostic tool but rather a screening tool. Picture messaging is valuable practically and educationally and enhances the consultation and teaching process whilst encompassing medical staff who have limited skills in radiological description

Computer assisted total knee arthroplasty helps in accurate and reproducible implant positioning, bony alignment, and soft-tissue balancing which are important for the success of the procedure. In TKR, there are two surgical techniques one is measured resection in which bony landmarks are used to guide the bone cuts and the other is gap balancing which equal collateral ligament tension in flexion and extension is done before and as a guide to final bone cuts. Both these procedures have their own advantages and disadvantages. We retrospectively collected the data of 128 consecutive patients who underwent computer-assisted primary TKA using either a gap-balancing technique or measured resection technique. All the operations were performed by a single surgeon using computer navigation system available during a period between June 2016 to October 2016. Inclusion criteria were all patients requiring a primary TKA, male or female patients, and who have given informed consent for participation in the study. All patients requiring revision surgery of a previous implanted TKA or affected by active infection or malignancy, who presented hip ankylosis or arthrodesis, neurological deficit or bone loss or necessity of more constrained implants were excluded from the study. Two groups measured resection and gap balancing was randomly selected. At 1-year follow-up, patients were assessed by a single orthopaedic registrar blinded to the type of surgery using the Knee Society score (KSS) and functional Knee Society score (FKSS). Outcomes of the 2 groups were compared using the paired t test. All the obtained data were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 11.5 statistical software (SPSS Inc. Chicago). Inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and paired t-test were used and statistical significance was set at P = 0.05. In the measured resection group, the mean FKSS increased from 48.8769 (SD, 2.3576), to 88.5692 (SD, 2.7178) respectively. In the gap balancing group, the respective scores increased from 48.9333 (SD, 3.6577) to 89.2133(SD, 7.377). Preoperative and Postoperative increases in the respective scores were slightly better with the gap balancing technique; the respective p values were 0.8493 and 0.1045. The primary goal of TKA is restoration of mechanical axis and soft-tissue balance. Improper restoration leads to poor functional outcome and premature prosthesis loosening. Computer navigation enables precise femoral and tibial cuts and controlled soft-tissue release. Well balanced and well aligned knee is important for good results. Mechanical alignment and soft-tissue balance are interlinked and corrected by soft tissue releases and precise proximal tibial and distal femoral cuts. The 2 common techniques used are measured resection and gap balancing techniques. In our study, knee scores of the 2 groups at 1-year follow-up were compared, as most of the improvement occurs within one year, with very little subsequent improvement. Some surgeons favour gap balancing technique, as it provides more consistent soft-tissue tension in TKA

Purpose of Study. To investigate the level of Orthopaedic Residents' knowledge of safety techniques in the procedures involving the use of C-arm. Methods. A survey of evidence based questions regarding safety techniques in the use of C-arm was administered to 58 Orthopaedic Residents from three major tertiary hospitals. Results. Of the 58 questionnaires administered, 42 usable questionnaires were returned (a 72.4% response rate). Only 33% of orthopaedic residents have received some form of formal training on safety techniques in the use of a C-arm. 95% of orthopaedic residents protect themselves with a lead apron in every case that that involves the use of a C- arm. 62% of residents do not know that scattered radiation is as harmful as direct radiation. Conclusion. Most orthopaedic residents believe that they are responsible for their own safety, as well as, the safety of their patients and the theatre staff during procedures that involve the use of c-arm. A majority of orthopaedic residents however, lack the detailed knowledge of the safety techniques in the use a C-arm. This knowledge gap may lead to unnecessary exposure to ionising radiation. We therefore, propose a mandatory training on “ionising radiation and safety techniques” for orthopaedic registrars. NO DISCLOSURES

Background. The gold standard of care of clubfoot is the Ponseti method of serial manipulation and casting, followed by percutaneous tendo-achilles tenotomy. In our setting, registrars work in district hospitals where they run Ponseti clubfoot clinics with little or no specialist supervision. They use the Pirani score to serially assess improvement of the deformity during casting and to determine whether the foot is ready for tenotomy. Purpose of Study. To test the inter-observer reliability of the Pirani score, and whether it can be used by non-specialist doctors running Ponseti clubfoot clinics. Methods. Ethics permission was obtained from our institution. This is a prospective study where patients under the age of one year with idiopathic clubfoot were recruited from clubfoot clinics at our institution, over a period of four months. Following a training session using the original description of the score, each foot was independently assessed using the Pirani score by two paediatric orthopaedic surgeons, two orthopaedic registrars and two medical officers. The inter-observer reliability was assessed using the Fixed-marginal Kappa statistic and Percentage agreement. The first 15 feet were used as a learning curve, and hence excluded from final analysis. Results. 73 feet in 37 patients with idiopathic clubfoot (25 boys, 12 girls) under the age of 1 year were included in the study. The Kappa statistic and percentage agreement for the six variables of the Pirani score were determined. Whilst the overall agreement was determined by the Kappa statistic to be slight to fair, the two consultants were found to have a higher inter-observer reliability than the registrars and medical officers. Conclusion. Our results conflict with previously published studies in that the inter-observer reliability of the Pirani score was poor. In addition, we feel that this score cannot be reliably used by non-specialist doctors running Ponseti clubfoot clinics. NO DISCLOSURES

The safe and effective management of orthopaedic patients out of hours requires the communication of radiographs between junior residents and their non-resident seniors. Despite stringent guidelines issued by the Caldecott Guardian on the transmission of patient sensitive data, there is no data describing actual exchanges in the literature. The objective was t describe current trends in the transmission of patient sensitive data between resident Orthopaedic juniors and their non-resident seniors out of hours. The method was a Questionnaire survey polling Orthopaedic registrars in North London. Seventy-six (76) trainees participated in the survey. Fifty Three (53) trainees received radiographs for review off site. Forty-eight (48) reported receiving patient radiographs for review to their personal email account. 48% of these trainees reported that the images contained patient sensitive information. 40% of the trainees who received images to their personal email had a NHS mail account which was not used. Remote access to patient radiographs improves patient management out of hours. Although there is some awareness of Caldecott guidelines for the handling of patient sensitive electronic data, compliance is extremely poor. We recommend that all trainees who routinely handle patient sensitive data remotely acquire a free NHS mail account for receiving patient radiographs

Purpose:. Paediatric forearm fractures are commonly seen and treated by closed reduction and plaster cast application in theatre. Historically, cast application has been subjectively evaluated for its adequacy in maintaining fracture reduction. More recently emphasis has been placed on objectively evaluating the adequacy of cast application using indicators such as the Canterbury index (CI). The CI has been used in predicting post-reduction, re-displacement risk of patients by expressing the casting and padding indices as a ratio. The CI has been criticized for not including cast 3 point pressure, fracture personality and lack of standardization of X-ray views as well as practical requirement of physical measurement using rulers. The aim of this study was to determine whether subjective evaluation of these indices, on intra-operative fluoroscopy and the day 1 to 7 postoperative X-ray, was accurate in predicting a patient's ultimate risk of re-displacement, following reduction and casting. Materials and Methods:. In total, 22 X-rays from 11 patients were evaluated by 20 orthopaedic registrars and 8 consultants, before and after a tutorial on the Canterbury index. Results:. Formal tutorial did not show an increased subjective predictive accuracy. No clear correlation could be demonstrated between CI and the clinical outcome. Conclusion:. Value of the CI in clinical practice is doubtful due to various confounding factors. The CI has been used due to lack of other available systems, and ideally a system should be sought which incorporates fracture personality, cast 3 point pressure and standardisation of X-Rays

Background. It has been suggested that routine follow-up of primary THR patients could be performed by GPs in primary care, rather than by orthopaedic specialists. Essential radiographic follow-up would likely be based on radiographic reports, rather than on inspection of the radiographs themselves. Aim. To look at the quality of the radiographic reports to determine their usefulness as a method of radiographic follow-up of THRs. Methods. The immediate pre-revision radiographs of a consecutive series of 50 patients, who had undergone revision surgery in 2 hospitals, were examined by a senior orthopaedic registrar, supervised by a Consultant with a revision THR practice, and compared to the findings of the corresponding radiologist report. Signs of failure were categorised into loosening, bone lysis and polyethylene wear. Results. Comparison to previous radiographs, essential in assessing THRs, was only performed by radiologists in 42% of cases. Fixation type (cemented/uncemented) was mentioned in only 2 cases and was correct in 1 case. With regard to loosening, acetabular component loosening was missed by radiologists in 10% of cases and femoral component loosening in 12%. Radiologists missed osteolysis on the acetabular side in 28% of cases and on the femoral side in 26%. Polyethylene wear was reported by surgeons in 30% of cases, but radiologists failed to report this in 28% of cases. Discussion. The radiographs reviewed contained definite evidence of failure, being pre-revision radiographs. Despite this, a significant amount of important information was lacking in the radiologists' reports. Primary care doctors would have been reassured that all was well with the prosthesis in a significant number of cases and hence specialist referral would have not taken place, unless the patient was symptomatic. We cannot support the radiographic component of GP follow-up of primary THRs using radiological reports on the basis of this study

Introduction. There have been concerns regarding the quality of training received by Orthopaedic trainees. There has been a reduction in working hours according to the European working times directive. National targets to reduce surgical waiting lists has increased the workload of consultants, further reducing the trainees' surgical experience. Navigation assisted procedures are successfully used in orthopaedics and provides useful feedback to the surgeon regarding precision of implant placement. We investigated the use of navigation aids as an alternative source of training surgical trainees. Methods. We choose a navigation assisted knee replacement (TKR) model for this study. A first year Orthopaedic registrar level trainee was taught the TKR procedure by a scrubbed consultant in 5 cases. He was then trained in use of non-CT based navigation surgery. The Trainee then performed navigation assisted non-complex primary TKR surgery. A consultant Orthopaedic surgeon was available throughout for advice and support. Data collected included pre and post procedure valgus and varus alignment of the knee, total operative time and WOMAC scores pre and post operatively. Results. A total of 42 TKRs were performed. Intra-operative review by the consultant surgeon was necessary on 3 occasions in the first 10 cases and two occasions in the remaining cases. The average operative time reduced from 184.25 minutes in the first 10 cases to 163.11 minutes in the next 20 cases and 150.33 minutes in the next 12 cases. The varus/valgus alignment was corrected to within 8 degrees in all cases. A significant improvement in WOMAC scores was recorded for all patients (p< 0.05). Conclusion. We believe that this model can be used as a training aid in various orthopaedic surgical procedures

Background. Smartphones are now a ubiquitous presence within the modern healthcare setting. Uses such as internet, database software and storage of medical textbooks, all contribute to the clinical value of the devices. Within orthopaedics, transmission of digital images via smartphones is now routinely used to obtain instant second opinions of trauma radiographs. However questions remain as to whether smartphone image quality is sufficient for primary diagnosis and secondary consultation. Aim. To assess the accuracy of diagnosis made when radiographs are viewed on a smartphone screen in comparison with a standard digital monitor. Also to assess the diagnostic confidence, diagnostic difficulty, subjective image quality and formulation of management plan. Method. 30 orthopaedic registrars viewed a total of 900 radiographs–450 radiographs were viewed on a 3.5inch, 640×960 PPI smartphone screen and 450 on a standard digital monitor. Likert scales were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy, confidence and difficulty along with image quality and management plan. Initially images were viewed on the smartphone screen and after one week the same images were viewed on the digital monitor. Results were then compared. Results. There was no difference in diagnostic accuracy between smartphone and digital monitors although participants tended to be more confident in their diagnosis when made on the larger screen of the digital monitor. Diagnostic difficulty was higher in the smartphone group and image quality was lower. However there was a high correlation between management plans made after viewing images in both modalities. Discussion. This study demonstrates that although participants found the image quality poorer and found it marginally more difficult to make a diagnosis the same diagnosis was arrived at and the same management plan formulated using a smartphone compared to a standard digital monitor. Therefore smartphone based teleradiology appears to have a valid use in orthopaedic trauma

Aims

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the provision of orthopaedic care across the UK. During the pandemic orthopaedic specialist registrars were redeployed to “frontline” specialties occupying non-surgical roles. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on orthopaedic training in the UK is unknown. This paper sought to examine the role of orthopaedic trainees during the COVID-19 and the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on postgraduate orthopaedic education.

Aims

Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, incidence of hip fracture has not changed. Evidence has shown increased mortality rates associated with COVID-19 infection. However, little is known about the outcomes of COVID-19 negative patients in a pandemic environment. In addition, the impact of vitamin D levels on mortality in COVID-19 hip fracture patients has yet to be determined.

Introduction

Virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) are being increasingly used to offer safe and efficient orthopaedic review without the requirement for face-to-face contact. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, we sought to develop an online referral pathway that would allow us to provide definitive orthopaedic management plans and reduce face-to-face contact at the fracture clinics.

We report the results of six trauma and orthopaedic projects to Kenya in the last three years. The aims are to deliver both a trauma service and teaching within two hospitals; one a district hospital near Mount Kenya in Nanyuki, the other the largest public hospital in Kenya in Mombasa. The Kenya Orthopaedic Project team consists of a wide range of multidisciplinary professionals that allows the experience to be shared across those specialties. A follow-up clinic is held three months after each mission to review the patients. To our knowledge there are no reported outcomes in the literature for similar projects.

A total of 211 operations have been performed and 400 patients seen during the projects. Most cases were fractures of the lower limb; we have been able to follow up 163 patients (77%) who underwent surgical treatment. We reflect on the results so far and discuss potential improvements for future missions.