Acetabular morphology and orientation differs from ethnic group to another. Thus, investigating the normal range of the parameters that are used to assess both was a matter of essence. Nevertheless, the main aim of this study was clarification the relationship between acetabular inclination (AI) and acetabular and femoral head arcs’ radii (AAR and FHAR). A cross-sectional retrospective study that had been done in a tertiary center where Computed tomography abdomen scouts’ radiographs of non-orthopedics patients were included. They had no history of pelvic or hips’ related symptoms or fractures in femur or pelvis. A total of 84 patients was included with 52% of them were females. The mean of age was 30.38± 5.48. Also, Means of AI were 38.02±3.89 and 40.15±4.40 (P 0.02, significant gender difference) for males and females, respectively. Nonetheless, Head neck shaft angle (HNSA) means were 129.90±5.55 and 130.72±6.62 for males and females, respectively. However, AAR and FHAR means for males and females were 21.3±3.1mm, 19.9±3.1mm, P 0.04 and 19.7±3.1mm, 18.1±2.7mm, P 0.019, respectively. In addition, negative significant correlations were detected between AI against AAR, FHAR, HNSA and body mass index (BMI) (r 0.529, P ≤0.0001, r 0.445, P ≤0.0001, r 0.238, P 0.029, r 0.329, P ≤0.007, respectively). On the other hand, high BMI was associated with AAR and FHAR (r 0.577, P 0.0001 and r 0.266, p 0.031, respectively). This study shows that high AI is correlated with lower AAR, FHAR. Each ethnic group has its own normal values that must be studied to tailor the path for future implications in clinical setting

Introduction and Aims. Peritrochanteric femur fractures are common and impose major costs on the healthcare system. A fixed angle sliding hip screw is the principle method of treatment, but the rate of mechanical failure associated with these devices can be high; the usual mechanism being the collapse of the neck shaft angle leading to extrusion of the screw from the femoral head, commonly known as “cutout”. Many variables contribute to the risk of cutout, however there is substantial evidence that the “Tip Apex Distance” (a single number that summarises the position and depth of the lag screw on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs after controlling for magnification) is the single best predictor of risk of failure. There is a strong statistical relationship between an increasing tip apex distance (TAD) and the rate of cutout. Specifically, a TAD of 25 mm or less significantly reduces risk of failure. The aim of our study is to assess levels of compliance with a maximum TAD of 25 mm in peritrochanteric femur fractures treated with Dynamic Hip Screws and IM Nails. Methods. We retrospectively measured the TAD of 45 patients who had undergone DHS or IM nails in the previous 6 months. Results. 21/28 of DHS were within 25 mm as opposed to 15/17 of IM nails. Discussion. In this cohort, 75% and 88% of patients respectively had a tip apex distance which complied with best evidence to reduce risk of failure. In total, 20% of patients fell outwith acceptable limits. It was surmised that the IM nails would have greater tip apex distances due to fractures generally being more complex, however it is suggested that this may be ameliorated by greater senior input in these cases

There is continued concern over complication rates (20–30% of cases) in locked proximal humeral plating. The most common sequelae of this is screw penetration of the humeral head. This is associated with natural settling of the fracture, malreducition in varus, insufficent medial support of the fracture. The proximity of the screws to the articular surface can also be influential on outcome if collapse occurs. Our operative technique is to establish the rotation of the humeral head where the drill appears closest to the articular margin (by sequential xray screening) and subtract from this to avoid intra-articular penetration of the humeral head. 55 Consecutive patients of average age 56.4 years (14.7–86.1), 17 male and 38 females, who underwent PHILOS plating were identified using Bluespier database. Xrays were analysed for fracture pattern, restoration of neck-shaft angle, plate positioning, number and configuration of screws and presence of screw penetration both intra-operatively and at postoperative follow-up. There were 6.07 screws used per head (total 330). There was one intraoperative screw penetration and 3 patients had evidence of screw penetration at follow-up, which required implant removal (total screw penetration rate of 7%). There was one case of AVN. The mean neck shaft angle was 137 degrees (anatomical 135 degrees). Accurate reduction of fractures and placement of screws in the humeral head using image intensifier can act to minimise risk of screw penetration and make some of the complications of locked proximal humeral plating avoidable