We evaluated the efficacy of using the expandable nail for treating non-union and malunion of the tibial and femoral shafts. Records of 20 patients were retrospectively reviewed: 12 had femoral non-union, 7 had tibial non-union, and one had tibial malunion. The bones underwent reaming and the largest possible nail sizes were inserted during reoperation. The mean age of the patients was 35 years (26-49) in the tibia group and 53 years (23-85) in the femur group. The fractures were defined according to AO/OTA classification and divided between open and closed. The initial treatment was 6 interlocking intramedullary nails and 2 external fixation in the tibia group, and 6 interlocking intramedullary nails, 3 plates and screws and 2 proximal femoral nails in the femoral group. The respective intervals between the original trauma and re-operation were 12 months and 15 months and the respective operation times were 59 minutes (35-70) and 68 minutes (20-120). All fractures healed satisfactorily without the need for an additional procedure. Healing time was 26 weeks (6-52) and 14 weeks (6-26) in the tibia and femur group, respectively. Limb shortenings of 10cm and 4cm were recorded in one patient each in the tibia group and of 3cm in one patient in the femur group. Using the expandable nail system permitted us to ream the bone and expand the nail to its maximal diameter, i.e. up to 16mm in the tibia and 19mm in the femur. We believe that using a bigger nail diameter contributes to better stabilisation of the fracture and promotes better and faster bone healing. Based on our experience, we recommend the use of the expandable nail system to treat tibia and femur shaft non-unions and malunions

We evaluated the efficacy of using the expandable nail for treating non-union and malunion of the tibial and femoral shafts. Records of 20 patients were retrospectively reviewed: 12 had femoral non-union, 7 had tibial non-union, and one had tibial malunion. The bones underwent reaming and the largest possible nail sizes were inserted during reoperation. The mean age of the patients was 35 years (26–49) and in the tibia group and 53 years (23–85) in the femur group. The fractures were defined according to AO/OTA classification and divided between open and closed. The initial treatment was 6 interlocking intramedullary nails and 2 external fixation in the tibia group, and 6 interlocking intramedullary nails, 3 plates and screws and 2 proximal femoral nails in the femoral group. The respective intervals between the original trauma and re-operation were 12 months and 15 months and the respective operation times were 59 minutes (35–70) and 68 minutes (20–120). All fractures healed satisfactorily without the need of an additional procedure. Healing time was 26 weeks (6– 52) and 14 weeks (6–26) in the tibia and femur group, respectively. Limb shortenings of 10 cm and 4 cm were recorded in one patient each in the tibia group and of 3 cm in one patient in the femur group. Using the expandable nail system permitted us to ream the bone and expand the nail to its maximal diameter, i.e., up to 16 mm in the tibia and 19 mm in the femur. We believe that using a bigger nail diameter contributes to better stabilization of the fracture and promotes better and faster bone healing. Based on our experience, we recommend the use of the expandable nail system to treat tibia and femur shaft non-unions and malunions

Aims. Patients with A1 and A2 trochanteric hip fractures represent a substantial proportion of trauma caseload, and national guidelines recommend that sliding hip screws (SHS) should be used for these injuries. Despite this, intramedullary nails (IMNs) are routinely implanted in many hospitals, at extra cost and with unproven patient outcome benefit. We have used data from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) to examine the use of SHS and IMN for A1 and A2 hip fractures at a national level, and to define the cost implications of management decisions that run counter to national guidelines. Methods. We used the NHFD to identify all operations for fixation of trochanteric fractures in England and Wales between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2021. A uniform price band from each of three hip fracture implant manufacturers was used to set cost implications alongside variation in implant use. Results. We identified 18,156 A1 and A2 trochanteric hip fractures in 162 centres. Of these, 13,483 (74.3%) underwent SHS fixation, 2,352 (13.0%) were managed with short IMN, and 2,321 (12.8%) were managed with long IMN. Total cost of IMN added up to £1.89 million in 2021, and the clinical justification for this is unclear since rates of IMN use varied from 0% to 97% in different centres. Conclusion. Most trochanteric hip fractures are managed with SHS, in keeping with national guidelines. There is considerable variance between hospitals for implant choice, despite the lack of evidence for clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of more expensive nailing systems. This suggests either a lack of awareness of national guidelines or a choice not to follow them. We encourage provider units to reassess their practice if outwith the national norm. Funding bodies should examine implant use closely in this population to prevent resource waste at a time of considerable health austerity. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):741–745

Introduction. We retrospectively evaluated our five years' experience in using Expandable Fixion nail system in tibial diaphyseal fractures. Materials/Methods. Eighteen cases with closed tibial diaphyseal fracture were identified between January 2006 and January 2011, all treated successfully with Fixion intramedullary nail as a primary osteosynthesis device. Results. All patients were followed-up in our department until clinical and radiological fusion was achieved with a mean follow-up of 13 months (range 6–20 months). There was one asymptomatic delayed union at 13 months, treated with regular observation until fusion was achieved. There was no incidence of infection, compartment syndrome or non-union in this group. Conclusion. We conclude from our experience that Expandable Fixion Nail is as effective as traditional locking intramedullary nail system in treating closed tibial shaft fracture with the advantages of shorter theatre time and less radiation exposure

We report the our experience of using the Sheffield intra-medullary telescoping nail system for managing recurrent fractures and deformity problems in the long bones of the lower limbs. 15 children with conditions like osteogenesis imperfecta, fibrous dysplasia and neurofibromatosis were operated from the years 1993 to 2001 and followed up for a mean period of five years nine months. The average age at the time of the initial nailing was six years. In all, 21 femurs and 10 tibiae were nailed. A total of thirteen complications were noted in seven patients, including re-fractures with the nail-in-situ in seven bones, migration of the rods in four bones, fracture of the nail and one sub-clinical infection after femur nailing. Nine revision operations were necessary to address these problems including removal of the infected nail. All these revisions were successful. The estimated 5 year cumulative survival rate was 73% for femur and 75% for tibia. We have not experienced any evidence of epiphyseal damage after the procedure. All our patients can ambulate independently now. Elongating intramedullary rods are ideal in children with any condition that can cause recurrent fractures or limb deformity as they improve walking capability and prevent further deformity

Aim & introduction. Infected knee with bone defect resulting from failed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or destruction of native joint can necessitate restoration of segmental defect and arthrodesis for therapy of infection and maintenance of walking ability. In segmental knee defect external fixators or KAFO are not suitable, not comfortable and poor tolerated by elderly patients. Both custom-made Femoro-Tibial Nail (FTN) combined with acrylic cement spacer and Knee Arthrodesis Nail System (KANS) offer maintenance of supportive function of extremity and avoidance of leg length discrepance after removal of TKA. Method. The group consists of 13 patients. In 12 cases knee arthrodesis have been performed due to infection with bone defect after removal of infected TKA, and in 1case due to inflammatory destruction of native knee joint. In 7 cases FTN with ALAC spacer and in 6 cases KANS (5 cases Orthopedic Salvage System-OSS; 1 case Link KANS) was used. In cases treated with FTN the gap between distal femur and proximal tibia was filled with hand-made acrylic cement spacer loaded with selected antibiotic (2g per 40 g cement) so that the spacer finally gained cylindrical shape. Results. Stable knee was noted after 7 years in 4 of 7 knees treated with FTN with ALAC spacer and after 2 years in 6 of 6 after KANS. Infection free knee was gained after 7 years in 4 of 7 cases treated with FTN with ALAC spacer and after 2 years in 5 of 6 cases treated with KANS. Amputation was necessary after 6 years in 3 of 7 cases treated with FTN with ALAC spacer and after 2 years in none case treated with KANS. Complications occurred in 2 cases after FTN with ALAC spacer (1x: FTN breackage, 1x: stress fracture of femoral neck) and in 1 case after KANS (OSS implant failure). Replacement of FTN nail and cement spacer in 1 case and respectively revision of OSS KANS in 1 cases was performed. Conclusions. Compared with the KANS, custom-made FTN combined with ALAC spacer proved to be effective up to 6 years, but shoved higher rate of complications and amputations after 6 years. It can be considered as a temporary low-cost salvage procedure for infected TKA with segmental bone defect as 1. st. stage in two-stage arthrodesis for infected knee prosthesis

Background:

In recent times there has been an increasing trend towards surgical intervention in paediatric femoral shaft fractures with widening indications. Titanium elastic nails and external fixation are two widely practiced procedures for such fractures.

Introduction:

This study presents a series of 64 patients undergoing tibio-talo-calcaneal (TTC) fusions with a hindfoot nail to compare the times to union and complications comparing use of allograft with no allograft.

Purpose of Study: To evaluate the results of our first consecutive cases using Fixion nail for treatment of femoral shaft fractures.

Materials and Methods: Thirty consecutive patients treated at our department with the expandable Fixion nail for femoral fractures were evaluated in a prospective study. Demographic, preoperative, operative and follow-up data was collected from admission and out-patients files. The pre- and post-operative X-rays were evaluated by two senior authors to determine fracture classification (AO/ASIF-CCF), union and healing. This data was inserted into excel file for statistics and evaluation.

Results: The average age was 36 years. Fourteen fractures were due to MVA, 10-falls, 2-crush injuries, 2-non-unions, 1-pathological and one from gunshot wound. Six fractures were open. Twenty eight were middle shaft fractures and two were distal. Three primary nail diameters were used 8.5mm, 10mm and 12mm.

All fractures healed at an average time of 9.2 weeks (5–26) and for the open fractures 19 (12–26) weeks. Hardware was removed in 8 cases with no complications. In two cases re-operation was needed. In one early case the nail was fractured and replaced. In the second case the bone was circlaged due to fragmentation around the fracture site and a bigger nail was inserted few days later (wrong smaller nail was inserted previously).

Conclusions: This preliminary clinical study demonstrates our experience treating femoral fractures with Fixion nail. We find this nail to be simple for use and with satisfactory healing and alignment results.

Introduction: The proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) system is a cephalomedullary device originally designed to contend with the challenge of unstable tro-chanteric femoral fractures with the novel helical blade component aimed at limiting femoral head limiting cutout. We demonstrate its use in a variety of cases.

Methods: This is a prospective study of 370 consecutive patients treated with short and long PFNA systems at a single center with 1-year follow-up. The device was used for unstable trochanteric femoral fractures (AO-classification 31. A.2 and A.3), prophylactic and definitive fixation of pathological fractures and high energy femoral fractures for a wide age range (19–101 years). Clinical outcome involved assessment of general mobility & function, operative and post-operative parameters & complications. Radiological outcome involved assessment of blade tip-apex distance, nail tip-femoral scar distance and distal locking configurations.

Results: 17% died within the follow-up period. 72% achieved their pre-trauma mobility status and nearly all fractures healed within 6 months including those in over 85 years. Of 18 problematic cases, serious complications included deep infection, loss of proximal reduction, ipsilateral femoral shaft fracture and periprosthetic supra-condylar fracture. There were no cases of acetabular penetration or blade cut-out. Short PFNA was associated with the majority of femoral shaft fractures and the only significant finding regarding instrumentation.

Discussion: This study supports long PFNA design theory demonstrating adequate purchase in the femoral head-neck zone, shown by lack of cut-out. Positive results have been demonstrated in a variety of cases making it a useful option in fractures in all ages and indications alongside unstable trochanteric configurations.

Failure of cephalomedullary fixation for proximal femur fractures is an uncommon event associated with significant morbidity to the patient and cost to the healthcare system. This institution changed nailing system from the PFNA (DePuy Synthes) to InterTan (Smith and Nephew) in February 2020. To assess for non-inferiority, a retrospective review was performed on 247 patients treated for unstable proximal femur fractures (AO 31 A2; A3). Patients were identified through manual review of fluoroscopic images. Stable fracture patterns were excluded (AO 31 A1). Pre/post operative imaging, demographic data, operative time and ASA scores assessed. Internal/external imaging and national joint registry data were reviewed for follow up. No significant difference was found in overall failure rate of PFNA vs InterTan (4.84% vs 3.23%; p = 0.748). Overall, short nails were more likely to fail by cut-out than long nails (7.5% vs 1.2%; p = 0.015). Nails which failed by varus cut-out had a higher tip/apex distance (TAD) (26.2mm vs 17.0mm; p < 0.001). Of concern, varus cut-out occurred in two InterTan nails with TAD of <25mm. The PFNA enjoyed a shorter operative time for both the short (59.1 vs 71.8 mins; p = 0.022) and long nails (98.8 vs 114.3 mins; p = 0.016) with no difference in 120-day survival rate. Overall failure rates of the PFNA and InterTan nailing systems were comparable. However, the failure rate of short nails in this study is concerning. Using long nails with a lag screw design for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures may reduce failure rates. Cumulative frequency analysis suggests stringent tip-apex distances of less than 21mm may reduce failure rates in lag-screw design cephulomedullary nails. This dataset suggests that unstable intertrochanteric fractures may be more reliably managed with a long cephalomedullary device

Aims. The study objective was to prospectively assess clinical outcomes for a pilot cohort of tibial shaft fractures treated with a new tibial nailing system that produces controlled axial interfragmentary micromotion. The hypothesis was that axial micromotion enhances fracture healing compared to static interlocking. Methods. Patients were treated in a single level I trauma centre over a 2.5-year period. Group allocation was not randomized; both the micromotion nail and standard-of-care static locking nails (control group) were commercially available and selected at the discretion of the treating surgeons. Injury risk levels were quantified using the Nonunion Risk Determination (NURD) score. Radiological healing was assessed until 24 weeks or clinical union. Low-dose CT scans were acquired at 12 weeks and virtual mechanical testing was performed to objectively assess structural bone healing. Results. A total of 37 micromotion patients and 46 control patients were evaluated. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of age, sex, the proportion of open fractures, or NURD score. There were no nonunions (0%) in the micromotion group versus five (11%) in the control group. The proportion of fractures united was significantly higher in the micromotion group compared to control at 12 weeks (54% vs 30% united; p = 0.043), 18 weeks (81% vs 59%; p = 0.034), and 24 weeks (97% vs 74%; p = 0.005). Structural bone healing scores as assessed by CT scans tended to be higher with micromotion compared to control and this difference reached significance in patients who had biological comorbidities such as smoking. Conclusion. In this pilot study, micromotion fixation was associated with improved healing compared to standard tibial nailing. Further prospective clinical studies will be needed to assess the strength and generalizability of any potential benefits of micromotion fixation. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):825–833

Unstable distal tibia fractures are challenging injuries requiring surgical treatment. Intramedullary nails are frequently used; however, distal fragment fixation problems may arise, leading to delayed healing, malunion or nonunion. Recently, a novel angle-stable locking nail design has been developed that maintains the principle of relative construct stability, but introduces improvements expected to reduce nail toggling, screw migration and secondary loss of reduction, without the requirement for additional intraoperative procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical competence of a novel angle-stable intramedullary nail concept for treatment of unstable distal tibia fractures, compared to a conventional nail in a human cadaveric model under dynamic loading. Ten pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric tibiae with a simulated AO/OTA 42-A3.1 fracture were assigned to 2 groups for reamed intramedullary nailing using either a conventional (non-angle-stable) Expert Tibia Nail with 3 distal screws (Group 1) or the novel Tibia Nail Advanced system with 2 distal angle-stable locking low-profile screws (Group 2). The specimens were biomechanically tested under conditions including quasi-static and progressively increasing combined cyclic axial and torsional loading in internal rotation until failure of the bone-implant construct, with monitoring by means of motion tracking. Initial axial construct stiffness, although being higher in Group 2, did not significantly differ between the 2 nail systems, p=0.29. In contrast, initial torsional construct stiffness was significantly higher in Group 2 compared to Group 1, p=0.04. Initial nail toggling of the distal tibia fragment in varus and flexion was lower in Group 2 compared to Group 1, being significant in flexion, p=0.91 and p=0.03, respectively. After 5000 cycles, interfragmentary movements in terms of varus, flexion, internal rotation, axial displacement and shear displacement at the fracture site were all lower in Group 2 compared to Group 1, with flexion and shear displacement being significant, p=0.14, p=0.04, p=0.25, p=0.11 and p=0.04, respectively. Cycles to failure until both interfragmentary 5° varus and 5° flexion were significantly higher in Group 2 compared to Group 1, p=0.04. From a biomechanical perspective, the novel angle-stable intramedullary nail concept has the potential of achieving a higher initial axial and torsional relative stability and maintaining it with a better resistance towards loss of reduction under dynamic loading, while reducing the number of distal locking screws, compared to conventional locking in intramedullary nailed unstable distal tibia fractures

Introduction and Objective. Intramedullary nails are frequently used for treatment of unstable distal tibia fractures. However, insufficient fixation of the distal fragment could result in delayed healing, malunion or nonunion. The quality of fixation may be adversely affected by the design of both the nail and locking screws, as well as by the fracture pattern and bone density. Recently, a novel concept for angular stable nailing has been developed that maintains the principle of relative stability and introduces improvements expected to reduce nail toggling, screw migration and secondary loss of reduction. It incorporates polyether ether ketone (PEEK) inlays integrated in the distal and proximal canal portions of the nail for angular stable screw locking. The nail can be used with new standard locking screws and low-profile retaining locking screws, both designed to enhance cortical fixation. The low-profile screws are with threaded head, anchoring in the bone and increasing the surface contact area due to the head's increased diameter. The objective of this study was to investigate the biomechanical competence of the novel angular stable intramedullary nail concept for treatment of unstable distal tibia fractures, compared with four other nail designs in an artificial bone model under dynamic loading. Materials and Methods. The distal 70 mm of thirty artificial tibiae (Synbone) were assigned to 5 groups for distal locking using either four different commercially available nails – group 1: Expert Tibia Nail (DePuy Synthes); group 2: TRIGEN META-NAIL with Internal Hex Captured Screws (Smith & Nephew); group 3: T2 Alpha with Locking Screws (Stryker); group 4: Natural Nail System featuring StabiliZe Technology (Zimmer) – or the novel angular stable TN-Advanced nail with low-profile screws (group 5, DePuy Synthes). The distal locking in all groups was performed using 2 mediolateral screws. All specimens were biomechanically tested under quasi-static and progressively increasing combined cyclic axial and torsional loading in internal rotation until failure, with monitoring by means of motion tracking. Results. Initial nail toggling of the distal tibia fragment in group 5 was significantly lower as compared with group 3 in varus (p=0.04) or with groups 2 and 4 in flexion (p≤0.02). In addition, the toggling in varus was significantly lower in group 1 versus group 4 (p<0.01). Moreover, during dynamic loading, within the course of the first 10,000 cycles the movements of the distal fragment in terms of varus, flexion, internal rotation, as well as axial and shear displacements at the fracture site, were all significantly lower in group 5 compared with group 4 (p<0.01). Additionally, group 5 demonstrated significantly lower values for flexion versus groups 2 and 3 (p≤0.04), for internal rotation versus group 1 (p=0.03), and for axial displacement versus group 3 (p=0.03). A trend to significantly lower values was detected in group 5 versus group 1 for varus, flexion and shear displacement – with p ranging between 0.05 and 0.07 – and versus group 3 for shear displacement (p=0.07). Cycles to failure were highest in group 5 with a significant difference to group 4 (p<0.01). Conclusions. From a biomechanical perspective, the novel angular stable intramedullary nail concept with integrated PEEK inlays and low-profile screws provides ameliorated resistance against nail toggling and loss of reduction under static and dynamic loading compared with other commercially available intramedullary nails used for fixation of unstable distal tibia fractures

Purpose. To compare the clinical and radiological results between internal fixation using the proximal femoral nail system and bipolar hemiarthroplasty in reverse oblique intertrochanteric hip fracture in elderly patients. Materials and Methods. From January 2005 to July 2012, we reviewed 53 patients who had been treated surgically for reverse oblique intertrochanteric fracture and been followed up on for a minimum of 2 years. The patients, all over 70 years old, were divided into two groups for retrospective evaluation: one group was treated with open reduction and internal fixation using the proximal femoral nail system (31 cases), and the other group was treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty (22 cases). Results. Early ambulation postoperatively and less pain at postoperative three months were significantly superior in the bipolar hemiarthroplasty group. However, by 24 months postoperatively, the open reduction and internal fixation group had higher Harris scores and correspondingly less pain than the bipolar hemiarthroplasty group. There were no significant differences in union rate, duration of hospitalization or lateral wall fracture healing between the two groups. Four patients in the open reduction and internal fixation group underwent reoperation. Conclusions. In the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the reverse oblique type, if the patient's health and bone quality are good, open reduction and internal fixation is considered to be the better choice. However, in cases of severe communition of fracture and poor bone quality along with high risk of early reduction failure, bipolar hemiarthroplasty is an alternative offering advantages in terms of early ambulation, less pain at early stages, and lower risk of reoperation

INTRODUCTION. Intramedullary nail fixation has been used for successful treatment of long bone fracture such as humerus, tibia and femur. We look at the experience of our trauma unit in treating long bone fracture using the AO approved Expert femoral/tibial nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). We look at the union and complication rates in patients treated with AO approved nailing system for pertrochanteric, femoral and tibial shaft fracture. METHODS. We carried out retrospective case notes review of patients that underwent femoral and tibial nailing during the period of study- October 2007 to August 2009. All patients were treated using the AO approved nailing system. We identified all trauma patients that underwent femoral and tibial nailing through the trauma register. Further information was then obtained by going through medical notes and reviewing all followed-up X-rays stored within the online radiology system. RESULTS. 149 patients, 85 male and 64 female were included into the study. 150 procedures were carried out during period of study as 1 patient underwent conversion of lateral entry femoral nail to PFNA due to refracture. Patients' age ranged from 14-96 with mean of 55. 140 patients had isolated long bone fracture (either femur or tibia) compared to 9 patients with multiple bone fractures. Our unit performed 64 Expert tibial nail, 36 PFNA, 31 Expert lateral entry femoral nail and 19 Expert retrograde femoral nail during period of study. 13 patients treated with intramedullary nail sustained open fracture, 9 of them were compound tibial fracture compared to 4 compound femoral fractures. All patients were followed-up between 2 to 24 months or until death. 9 out of 17 patients that died in this study had diagnosis of tumour. Complication rates were 17% for Expert tibial nail (1 patient with valgus deformity, peroneal nerve palsy and delayed union, 3 with delayed union, 4 with broken locking screw, 2 with wound infection and 1 with abscess over wound site), 4% for lateral/retrograde femoral nail (1 each for pulmonary embolism and broken locking screw) and 4% for PFNA (1 each for delayed union and deep vein thrombosis). The overall complication rates were 10% from this study. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS. We conclude that the AO approved nailing system used for treating pertrochanteric, femoral and tibial fractures were effective with high union rate. The overall complication rates were 10% from this study. Complication rates for tibial nail were as high as 17% compared to 4% for femoral nail or PFNA. The complication rates for PFNA in our study were lower compared to 29% in PFN that was reported in one literature

Aim: To compare of strength of constructs using the newer and part specific nail systems: Polarus and European Humeral Nail with that using PHILOS and Conventional plate systems in a simulated 2-part fracture of proximal humerus, in an osteoporotic bone model. Materials and Methods: A Biomechanical laboratory study was undertaken. Third generation composite Humerus model was used, with short e-glass epoxy fibres forming cortex and polyurethane cancellous core. Low-density polyurethane core (1.2gm/cc) was used to simulate an osteoporotic model. Osteotomy at surgical neck of humerus was carried out to create 2-part fracture of proximal humerus. Samples were fixed using one of the implants- the Polarus nail, the European Humeral Nail, PHILOS Plate, Clover Leaf Plate or T-Plate. Following fixation samples were placed in a custom made jig to fix proximal and distal ends without interfering with implants and osteotomy site. All samples were subjected to cyclical torque, torque to failure, cyclical compression and Compression loading to failure. Results: The two Nail systems that are specifically designed for fixation of proximal humerus fracture provided significantly better fixation in all the test modalities. PHILOS construct shows less plastic deformation in cyclical torque and cyclical compression when compared to the other plates but the 2 nail systems were far superior. Locking screws did not ‘back off’ in any of the experiments involving the Polarus, European Humeral Nail and PHILOS construct, however ordinary screws used with the conventional plates did back off both in ‘torque and compression’ testing. Conclusions: Polarus and European Humeral Nail constructs provide better stability in torque and compression as compared to PHILOS, which in turn is a more stable construct in comparison to conventional plating devices

We would like to present this case series of 10 adolescent patients with displaced, closed diaphyseal tibial fractures managed using the Taylor Spatial Frame. Management options for these injuries include non-operative treatment, antegrade nailing, flexible nailing systems, plating and external circular fixation. External circular fixation allows anatomical reduction avoiding potential complications such as growth arrest associated with antegrade nailing and retained metal work with plating. Flexible nailing system and cast immobilisation are unreliable for precise anatomical reduction. With limited evidence as to the extent of post-traumatic deformity that is acceptable, combined with the limited remodeling potential that this patient group possess, the precision of percutaneous fixation with the Taylor Spatial Frame system has clear advantages. This is a retrospective analysis of 10 adolescent patients with a mean age of 14.5 years (range 13 to 16 years). Data collected includes fracture configuration, deformity both pre and post operatively compared to post frame removal, length of time in frame and complications. The data was gathered using the patient case notes and the Picture Archiving and Communications System. The mean time in frame was 15.5 weeks (range 11 to 22 weeks). One non-union in a cigarette smoker was successfully managed with a second Taylor Spatial Frame episode. Our conclusion was that with careful patient selection the Taylor Spatial Frame allows successful treatment of closed tibial fractures in adolescents, avoiding complications such as growth arrest and post-traumatic deformity as well as avoiding retained metalwork

Simultaneous arthrodesis of the ankle and subtalar joints is an established treatment option for combined ankle and subtalar arthritis or complex hindfoot deformities. The use of a curved intra medullary nail has potential advantages in terms of stability, hindfoot alignment and avoidance of the lateral neurovascular bundle. We devised a comparative description of the results of hindfoot fusion using a curved locking nail before and after the introduction of anatomically specific modifications to the device through a retrospective review of notes and radiographs of patients undergoing simultaneous ankle and subtalar fusion by retrograde intramedullary nailing using an ACE¯ (Humeral Nail. Patients undergoing the same procedure using the Tibiotalocalcaneal [TTC] Nail System [DePuy] were recruited and studied prospectively. The outcome was assessed by a combination of notes review, clinical examination and telephone questionnaire. Between 1996 and 2004, 71 arthrodeses in 67 patients have been performed. The average follow up is 27 months [3-73] and mean age 58 years. Fifty-two arthrodeses utilised the ACE humeral nail and nineteen used the newer TTC nail. Both nailing systems are locked proximally and distally and provide a short radius laterally directed distal curve. Mean time to union is 4.3 months [3-10]. Average AOFAS hindfoot score post-operatively is 65, with a mean improvement of 40 points from the pre-operative score in the TTC nail group. Post-operative complications included deep infection, amputation and a non-union rate of 10% overall. In the humeral nail group, four symptomatic stress reactions [8%] and three fractures of the tibia [6%] occurred at the tip of the nail. No stress-riser effect has to date been seen in the TTC nail group. Prominent metalwork removal has also been significantly reduced in the TTC nail group. Our results show hindfoot fusion using a curved intramedullary nail to be an effective technique in complex cases of hindfoot arthritis and deformity. Anatomically specific alterations to the nail have resulted in a significant reduction in certain complications. Alternate proximal locking options in the TTC nail have reduced prominent metalwork and, more significantly, the incidence of stress reactions and fractures appears to have been eliminated

The treatment of fractures of the proximal tibia is complex and makes great demands on the implants used. Our study aimed to identify what levels of primary stability could be achieved with various forms of osteosynthesis in the treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the proximal tibia. Pairs of human tibiae were investigated. An unstable fracture was simulated by creating a defect at the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction. Six implants were tested in a uniaxial testing device (Instron) using the quasi-static and displacement-controlled modes and the force-displacement curve was recorded. The movements of each fragment and of the implant were recorded video-optically (MacReflex, Qualysis). Axial deviations were evaluated at 300 N. The results show that the nailing systems tolerated the highest forces. The lowest axial deviations in varus and valgus were also found for the nailing systems; the highest axial deviations were recorded for the buttress plate and the less invasive stabilising system (LISS). In terms of rotational displacement the LISS was better than the buttress plate. In summary, it was found that higher loads were better tolerated by centrally placed load carriers than by eccentrically placed ones. In the case of the latter, it appears advantageous to use additive procedures for medial buttressing in the early phase