Abstract
Introduction
Tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail is an established procedure considered as a salvage in case of severe arthritis and deformity of the ankle and subtalar joints [1]. Recently, a significant development in hindfoot arthrodesis with plates has been indicated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare a plate specifically developed for arthrodesis of the hindfoot with an already established nail system [2]
Method
Sixteen paired human cadaveric lower legs with removed forefoot and cut at mid-tibia were assigned to two groups for tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis using either a hindfoot arthrodesis nail or an arthrodesis plate. The specimens were tested under progressively increasing cyclic loading in dorsiflexion and plantar flexion to failure, with monitoring via motion tracking. Initial stiffness was calculated together with range of motion in dorsiflexion and plantar flexion after 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 cycles. Cycles to failure were evaluated based on 5° dorsiflexion failure criterion
Result
Initial stiffness in dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, varus, valgus, internal rotation and external rotation did not differ significantly between the two arthrodesis techniques (p ≥ 0.118). Range of motion in dorsiflexion and plantar flexion increased significantly between 200 and 1000 cycles (p < 0.001) and remained not significantly different between the groups (p ≥ 0.120). Cycles to failure did not differ significantly between the two techniques (p = 0.764).
Conclusion
From biomechanical point of view, both tested techniques for tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis appear to be applicable. However, clinical trials and other factors, such as extent of the deformity, choice of the approach and preference of the surgeon play the main role for implant choice.
Acknowledgements
This study was performed with the assistance of the AO Foundation.
