Aim

External fixator knee arthrodesis is a salvage procedure mainly used in cases of end-stage infected total knee replacement (iTKR). A stable fixation combined with bone-ends compression is basic to achieve knee fusion in such a scenario but providing enough stability can be challenging in the presence of severe bone loss after multiple previous procedures. Compared with monoplanar configuration, a biplanar frame achieves improved coronal stiffness, while providing the advantages of good access to the wound and allowance of early ambulation. Our primary hypothesis stated that a biplanar frame would achieve higher and quicker fusion rate than a monolateral configuration.

Aim. This study assessed quality of life (QoL) in patients having external fixation for treatment of osteomyelitis and fracture-related infection (OM/FRI). Method. Patients who had surgery for OM/FRI and who completed the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L or EQ-5D- 3L questionnaires, were identified between 2010 and 2020. Patients were followed-up for 2 years after surgery. QoL was compared between patients who had either an Ilizarov frame or a monolateral external fixator with those who did not receive external fixation. Results. 165 patients were included. Of these, 37 (22.4%) underwent application of external fixation which included 23 circular frames and 14 monolateral external fixators. Patients in the frame group had more BACH ‘Complex’ infections (34/37; 91.9%), compared to non-frame patients (57/81; 70.3%). Pre-operatively, the mean EQ-index score for patients planned to receive a frame (0.278 SD 0.427) was worse compared to other treatments (0.453 SD 0.338, p=0.083). At 6 weeks after surgery, the EQ-index score remained significantly lower in frame patients compared to non-frame patients (frame: 0.379 SD 0.363; no frame: 0.608 SD 0.326, p=0.016). By 6 months, 26/37 patients had undergone frame removal. The patients who had frames in situ at 6 months had lower EQ-index scores when compared to patients who had their frames removed (frame in situ: 0.187 SD 0.213; frame removed 0.674 SD 0.206, p=0.076). At one year, 36/37 (97.3%) patients had their frame removed. QoL had greatly improved, to levels similar to non-frame patients (no frame: 0.652 SD 0.357; frame removed: 0.657 SD 0.247, p=0.949). Conclusions. Frame treatment leads to significant improvement in Quality of Life in patients suffering from osteomyelitis, with similar results in EQ5D scores after 1 year compared to patients who did not need an external fixator. These effects cannot be felt until after the frame has been removed with impaired QoL during frame treatment, especially in those patients with frames in situ for more than 6 months. This underlines the need for close and professional patient support during frame treatment for bone infection

The aim of this paper is to describe the technique and evaluate the effectiveness of the RIA system in the first cases of bone loss treated by the authors with this technique. Between January 2010 and January 2011, ten patients were treated with an average age of fourty six years, with infected bone loss as a result of open fractures in various bone segments, with multiple failed treatment attempts, including three humeri, four femurs and three tibiae. The average size of the initial bone loss was 4 cm, varying from 1 to 8 cm. In 4 patients it was used simultaneously a Ilizarov apparatus with acute compression of the focus, in two patients a Ender pin and monolateral external fixator, three other cases with a SAFE nail with core with antibiotics and in one case an osteosynthesis with a plate and screws. The RIA was introduced with a percutaneous technique with a one pass drilling. The graft thus collected was mixed with appropriate antibiotics and aplied at the defect. The volume of the harvested graft, complications of the donor and recipient and the final results was recorded. The review showed that the average volume of graft was 60 cc, from 20 to 90 cc. In two female patients older than 70 years with osteoporosis, insufficient bone of poor quality was obtained. Problems included a case of iatrogenic fracture of the donor site, due to poor surgical technique and a case of relapse of the nonunion. Regarding the effectiveness of grafts extracted with the RIA system, 90% of the cases achieved consolidation in average of 5 months after grafting, range 3–9 months. This short experience with the RIA system showed that it is an attractive method allowing a rapid removal of a large volume of bone graft with a minimally invasive approach and a short learning curve. It is not indicated in elderly patients with osteoporosis and those with a narrow medullar canal less than 11 mm. Special attention must be done to the need to choose a drill no larger than 1 mm of the diameter of the isthmus, to do a single entry point and with only one drill passage to prevent the weakening of the donor site

Malformation and hypoplasia of the clavicle can result in pain, impaired function, restricted shoulder movement, subjective feeling of instability and cosmetic deformity. There are no reports of clavicle lengthening by osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis (DO). This is a retrospective review of 5 patients (7 clavicles) who underwent clavicle lengthening by DO using a monolateral external fixator for clavicular hypoplasia. There were 3 males and 2 females with mean age 15 years (9 to 23) and mean follow-up 21 months (8 to 51). Preoperative diagnoses included Klippel-Feil syndrome, cleidocranial dysplasia with torticollis, congenital myopathy and Noonans syndrome and obstetric brachial plexus injury. Mean length gained was 31 mm (15 to 41) which represens an average of 24.7% of overall bone length. Mean time in fixator was 174 days (161 to 263) and mean external fixation index was 56 days/cm. Two patients required internal fixation following fixator removal to consolidate union and one required additional internal fixation for atrophic regenerate. Mean preoperative oxford shoulder score improved from 28.5 to 41 and all patients were extremely satisfied with their result. Two patients developed pin site infections. Clavicular lengthening by distraction osteogenesis for congenital clavicular hypoplasia is a previously unreported technique that enables gradual correction of deformity without risking brachial plexus traction injury following acute correction. It has the potential to improve shoulder pain, function, range of movement and cosmesis. Distraction ≥25% of overall bone length may require additional plate fixation to consolidate union

Aims

Excision of chronic osteomyelitic bone creates a dead space which must be managed to avoid early recurrence of infection. Systemic antibiotics cannot penetrate this space in high concentrations, so local treatment has become an attractive adjunct to surgery. The aim of this study was to present the mid- to long-term results of local treatment with gentamicin in a bioabsorbable ceramic carrier.

Aims

The Precice intramedullary limb-lengthening system has demonstrated significant benefits over external fixation lengthening methods, leading to a paradigm shift in limb lengthening. This study compares outcomes following antegrade and retrograde femoral lengthening in both adolescent and adult patients.

Lengthening of the humerus is now an established technique. We compared the complications of humeral lengthening with those of femoral lengthening and investigated whether or not the callus formation in the humerus proceeds at a higher rate than that in the femur. A total of 24 humeral and 24 femoral lengthenings were performed on 12 patients with achondroplasia. We measured the pixel value ratio (PVR) of the lengthened area on radiographs and each radiograph was analysed for the shape, type and density of the callus. The quality of life (QOL) of the patients after humeral lengthening was compared with that prior to surgery. The complication rate per segment of humerus and femur was 0.87% and 1.37%, respectively. In the humerus the PVR was significantly higher than that of the femur. Lower limbs were associated with an increased incidence of concave, lateral and central callus shapes. Humeral lengthening had a lower complication rate than lower-limb lengthening, and QOL increased significantly after humeral lengthening. Callus formation in the humerus during the distraction period proceeded at a significantly higher rate than that in the femur.

These findings indicate that humeral lengthening has an important role in the management of patients with achondroplasia.

Ten patients, who were unsuitable for limb lengthening over an intramedullary nail, underwent lengthening with a submuscular locking plate. Their mean age at operation was 18.5 years (11 to 40). After fixing a locking plate submuscularly on the proximal segment, an external fixator was applied to lengthen the bone after corticotomy. Lengthening was at 1 mm/day and on reaching the target length, three or four screws were placed in the plate in the distal segment and the external fixator was removed. All patients achieved the pre-operative target length at a mean of 4.0 cm (3.2 to 5.5). The mean duration of external fixation was 61.6 days (45 to 113) and the mean external fixation index was 15.1 days/cm (13.2 to 20.5), which was less than one-third of the mean healing index (48 days/cm (41.3 to 55). There were only minor complications.

Lengthening with a submuscular locking plate can successfully permit early removal of the fixator with fewer complications and is a useful alternative in children or when nailing is difficult.

Femoral lengthening using the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor is a new technique. However, with intramedullary distraction the surgeon has less control over the lengthening process. Therefore, 33 femora lengthened with this device were assessed to evaluate the effect of operative variables under the surgeon’s control on the course of lengthening. The desired lengthening was achieved in 32 of 33 limbs. Problems encountered included difficulty in achieving length in eight femora (24%) and uncontrolled lengthening in seven (21%). Uncontrolled lengthening was more likely if the osteotomy was placed with less than 80 mm of the thick portion of the nail in the distal fragment (p = 0.052), and a failure to lengthen was more likely if there was over 125 mm in the distal fragment (p = 0.008). The latter problem was reduced with over-reaming by 2.5 mm to 3 mm. Previous intramedullary nailing also predisposed to uncontrolled lengthening (p = 0.042), and these patients required less reaming.

Using the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor, good outcomes were obtained; problems were minimised by optimising the position of the osteotomy and the amount of over-reaming performed.