Abstract
Aim
External fixator knee arthrodesis is a salvage procedure mainly used in cases of end-stage infected total knee replacement (iTKR). A stable fixation combined with bone-ends compression is basic to achieve knee fusion in such a scenario but providing enough stability can be challenging in the presence of severe bone loss after multiple previous procedures. Compared with monoplanar configuration, a biplanar frame achieves improved coronal stiffness, while providing the advantages of good access to the wound and allowance of early ambulation. Our primary hypothesis stated that a biplanar frame would achieve higher and quicker fusion rate than a monolateral configuration.
Method
We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining patients managed with biplanar external fixator knee fusion due to non-revisable iTKR between 2014 and 2018. We compared this group of patients with a historical cohort-control patient who had been previously published by our unit in 2013, since we switched from a monoplanar to a biplanar configuration for the management of this kind of complex end-stage iTKR. Primary end-points were fusion rate, time to achieve bone fusion and infection eradication rate. Limb-length discrepancy, pain level, patient satisfaction, and health-related quality of life were also evaluated.
Results
A total of 29 cases were finally included; 8 patients were managed with a bilateral external fixator and 21 patients were managed with a monoplanar external fixator. In the biplanar configuration group, infection was eradicated in 100% of the patients, and fusion was achieved in all cases after 5.24 months on average. In comparison, in the monolateral configuration group, infection was eradicated in 18 (86%) out of 21, whereas fusion was achieved in 17 (81%) of the patients after a mean of 10.3 months (range, 4–16). Such difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). In both groups, postoperative pain was mild (VAS score 2,25 and 3,4, respectively) and patients expressed a high degree of satisfaction once fusion was achieved.
Conclusions
External fixation knee fusion is a useful limb-salvage procedure in end-stage cases of knee PJI. According to our data, the use of a biplanar configuration allows us to reduce in half (10.3 vs 5.2 months, p<0.05) the time needed to achieve the solid bone fusion in such a complex scenario. In this cohort of previously multi-operated patients, the satisfaction is high, and the level of pain is low if a solid bone fusion free of infection is achieved.
