Introduction. the aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical results of the shoulder prosthesis revision procedure to reverse implant without removing the humeral stem using a modular system (Lima LTD) and determine if this procedure is beneficial for the patients. Methods. e selected only the patients where a revision to reverse (RSA) of hemiarthroplasty (Hemi) originally implanted for fracture (Group I) and revision to reverse (RSA) of anatomical total prosthesis (TSA) were performed. From 2004 to 2009 26 cases responding to these parameters were identified: 18 cases in Group I (failed hemiarthroplasty for tuberosities resorptions or rotator cuff failure) and 8 in Group II (failed TSA for rotator cuff omplication). The mean follow-up was 32 months (min 18–max 76) and the mean age was 72 (min 65–max 80). Clinical assessment was performed with preoperative and postoperative Constant score rating scale (CS) and range of motion evaluation (ROM). Radiological assessment was performer by AP and Axial X-ray views. Operative time was calculated. Results. overall pre-op CS was 24 (min 18–max 30), post-op CS was 47,8 (min 35–max 60). In Group I the mean improvement of CS was 25,3; in Group II was 17. All patients had a clinical improvement of the range of motion. X-Rays study did not show radiolucent lines related to implant mobilization. No major complications were observed in all the cases. Discussion and Conclusion. Revision surgery for failed Hemi or TSA is commonly related to a relatively increase of complication and/or poorer out come if compared to a primary RSA implant. Our study results demonstrate that using a full modular system from the first implant allows to skip the humeral stem removal/reimplant step in case of conversion of a shoulder prosthesis to a reverse with good clinical result, no radiological signs of mobilization and non major complication probably related to a shorter and less aggressive operative time and procedure

Introduction. Numerous fixation modalities can be used for various indications, including deformity correction, trauma, infection, and non-union. The Modular Rail System (MRS) is a well-tolerated apparatus that is a viable option for patients who do not want a circular frame or for whom internal fixation is not appropriate due to poor soft tissues/co-morbidities. This case series evaluates the outcomes of the use of the MRS in our centre. Materials and Methods. Cases were identified from a prospectively gathered database. Data were collected including indication for treatment, frame duration, complications and treatment outcome. Eighteen eligible cases were identified (mean age 26, range 8–71). The MRS was sited in the femur in 14 cases, the tibia in three and the fibula in one. In nine cases, a circular frame was sited on the tibia below a femoral MRS. Frames were removed at an average of 20 weeks (range 7–31). Results. Eight complications occurred in six patients including fracture following removal (2), premature union (2), deep infection (1), scar complications (1), pin exchange (1) and non-union (1). 17/18 patients achieved their treatment goal and a satisfactory clinical outcome. Conclusions. We have demonstrated the use of the MRS in both trauma and elective practice and have found it to be well tolerated in our cohort of patients, particularly the paediatric and elderly populations. This case series demonstrates that, with the correct patient selection, the MRS is a versatile adjunct for use in limb reconstruction cases

Corrosion in modular taper connections of total joint replacement has become a hot topic in the orthopaedic community and failures of modular systems have been reported. The objective of the present study was to determine in vivo titanium ion levels following cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a modular neck system. A consecutive series of 173 patients who underwent cementless modular neck THA and a ceramic on polyethylene bearing was evaluated retrospectively. According to a standardized protocol, titanium ion measurements were performed on 67 patients using high-resolution inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Ion levels were compared to a control group comprising patients with non-modular titanium implants and to individuals without implants. Although there was a higher range, modular-neck THA (unilateral THA: 3.0 μg/L (0.8–21.0); bilateral THA: 6.0 μg/L (2.0–20.0)) did not result in significant elevated titanium ion levels compared to non-modular THA (unilateral THA: 2.7 μg/L (1.1–7.0), p = 0.821; bilateral THA: 6.2 μg/L, (2.3–8.0), p = 0.638). In the modular-neck THA group, patients with bilateral implants had significantly higher titanium ion levels than patients with an unilateral implant (p < 0.001). Compared to healthy controls (0.9 μg/L (0.1–4.5)), both modular THA (unilateral: p = 0.029; bilateral p = 0.003) and non-modular THA (unilateral: p < 0.001; bilateral: p < 0.001) showed elevated titanium ion levels. The data suggest that the present modular stem system does not result in elevated systemic titanium ion levels in the medium term when compared to non-modular stems. However, more outliner were seen in modular-neck THA. Further longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the use of systemic titanium ion levels as an objective diagnostic tool to identify THA failure and to monitor patients following revision surgery

Periprosthetic fractures involving the femoral meta/diaphysis can be treated in various fashions. The overall incidence of those fractures after primary total knee arthroplasties (TKA) ranges from 0.3 to 2.5%, however, can increase above 30% in revision TKA, especially in older patients with poorer bone quality. Various classifications suggest treatment algorithms. However, they are not followed consequently. Revision arthroplasty becomes always necessary if the implant becomes loose. Next, it should be considered in case of an unhappy TKA prior to the fracture rather than going for an osteosynthesis. Coverage of the associated segmental bone loss in combination with proximal fixation, can be achieved in either cemented or non-cemented techniques, with or without the combination of osteosynthetic fracture stabilization. Severe destruction of the metaphyseal bone, often does not allow adequate implant fixation for the revision implant and often does not allow proper anatomic alignment. In addition the destruction might include loss of integrity of the collaterals. Consequently standard or even revision implants might not be appropriate. Although first reports about partial distal femoral replacement are available since the 1960´s, larger case series or technical reports are rare within the literature and limited to some specialised centers. Most series are reported by oncologic centers, with necessary larger osseous resections of the distal femur. The implantation of any mega prosthesis system requires meticulous planning, especially to calculate the appropriate leg length of the implant and resulting leg length. After implant and maybe cement removal, non-structural bone might be resected. Trial insertion is important due to the variation of overall muscle tension and recreation of the former joint line. So far very few companies offer yet such a complete, modular system which might also be expanded to a total femur solution. Furthermore it should allow the implantation of either a cemented or uncemented diaphyseal fixation. In general, the fracture should be well bridged with a longer stem in place. At least 3 cm to 5 cm of intact diaphysis away to the fracture site is required for stable fixation for both cemented and cementless stems. Application of allograft struts and cables maximises the biomechanical integrity of the fracture zone to promote fracture repair and implant fixation. Modular bridging systems do allow centimeter wise adaption distally, to the knee joint. Consequently in modern systems fully hinged or rotational hinge knee systems can be coupled, and adjusted accordingly to the patellar tracking and joint line. Fixation of the tibial component can be achieved in uncemented and cemented techniques. We still prefer the latter. Although a reliable and relatively quick technique, frequent complications for all mega systems have been described. These usually include infections, rotational alignment and loosening of the femoral fixation or subsequent proximal femoral fractures. Infections usually can be related to large soft tissue compromise or extensive exposure or longer procedure times. Thus implantation of such reconstruction systems should be reserved to specialised centers, with adequate facilities experience, in order to minimise complications rates and optimise patients function postoperative

Modern hip implants feature a modular design, whereby the individual components of the implant are assembled during the surgery. Increased reported failure rates associated with the utilization of modular junctions have raised many clinical concerns about the increased release of metal ions/debris leading to adverse local tissue reactions. Implant materials are subject to a myriad of mechanical motion and forces, and varying electrochemical conditions and pH changes from the surrounding environment. To date, no studies have attempted to model the collected data in order to predict the performance of the materials so that precautions can be taken before the problem reaches the critical stage. This study reports the effects of pH variation, displacement variation, and load variation on the mechanical and corrosion behavior of the hip implant modular junction system, tested with a custom-built fretting-corrosion apparatus. The main objective of this study is to combine the complete data set of the in-vitro experiments to create fretting-corrosion wear maps that can predict the dangerous domains of the hip implant modular system. For each test, the flat portions of two CoCrMo pins were loaded perpendicularly against a Ti6Al4V Rod (Ti alloy) in a Flat-on-flat configuration in a simulated synovial fluid in order to simulate the modular hip implant system. A schematic diagram of contact conditions is presented in Figure 1. A sinusoidal displacement was applied onto the rod, which articulated against the CoCrMo alloy pins, at a frequency of 1Hz. The experiential data from the fretting-corrosion tests has been used to create fretting-corrosion maps. The variables incorporated into the maps include: total mass loss, electrochemical destabilization, pH variation, load variation, displacement variation, and visual examination of the wear features of the contact zone. Total mass loss has been estimated via measurement of the simulator fluid by ICP-MS technique. Electrochemical destabilization was evaluated by a single parameter (V. Drop. ). The electrochemical destabilization of the tribosystem was evaluated by measuring the drop in potential, V. Drop. (V vs. SCE), resultant from the initiation of the fretting phase. The V. Drop. refers to the initial cathodic drop in potential in response to the initial onset of fretting motion. The data from the in vitro fretting-corrosion experiments has been combined to create four fretting-corrosion maps (Figures 2A–3D). Partial slip wear features and mechanical behavior was observed at 25µm displacement. 25–150µm displacement amplitudes showed gross slip behavior. Anything larger than 150µm displayed wear features that were indistinguishable from sliding wear. In general, total mass loss and V. Drop. increased with increasing displacement. Samples that were tested at pH 6.0 or higher showed signs of material transfer and higher V. Drop. Finally, there was a general decrease in V. Drop. with increased applied load and pH. In general, the wears maps were able to offer some predictive validity, however, there were some discrepancies between visual observations and the observed damage parameters. It is possible that other parameters could offer better correlation. Future studies will be conducted to measure other parameters. For figures/tables, please contact authors directly.

INTRODUCTION. Managing severe periacetabular bone loss during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a challenging task. Multiple treatment options have been described. Delta Revision Trabecular Titanium™ (TT) cup is manufactured by Electron Beam Melting (EBM) technology that allows modulating cellular solid structures with an highly porous structure were conceived to rich the goals of high bone ingrowth and physiological load transfer. The caudal hook and fins ensure additional stability and the modular system allows the surgeon to treat bone defects in the most complex revisions. Entirely modular, the system can meet all intra-operative needs thanks to a customized implant construction. The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the short to mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of this acetabular revision cups. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We prospectively assessed clinical and radiographic results of 31 cases of acetabular revisions that were performed from June 2007 and March 2012 by Delta TT Lima Revision system. The mean age of patients was 69.5 years (range 29–90). The causes of revision were aseptic loosening in 22 cases (71.0%), periprosthetic acetabular fractures in 4 cases (13.0%), multiple dislocation of the primary implant in 3 cases (9.6%) and outcome of infection in 2 cases (6.4%). Stem revision was performed in 11 cases (35,4%). In 24 cases bone impaction grafting was used to fill cavitary defects (Paprosky 2B-3A); in 7 cases TT augments were used with the same aim. The average follow-up was 32 months (range 12–69). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS. No major complications were observed. The mean HHS significantly increased from 39.9 (range 17–60) preoperatively to 86.5 (range 65–100) at the last follow-up examination. The implanted cups were radiographically stable at the last follow-up visit without radiolucent lines or periprosthetic osteolysis. Trabecular Titanium showed a high capacity of osseointegration, providing excellent results in short to mid-term follow-up. The impaction grafting has demonstrated effective restoration of bone stock and no radiographic evidence bone resorption (Fig. 1). DISCUSSION. Delta Revision TT is a good solution for acetabular revision surgery even when there are cavitary and segmental bone defects. It is possible to restore muscle tension and correct anatomical impairments, while enhancing implant stability and minimising the risk of dislocation

Aim. Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) after failed knee arthroplasty, especially in complicated courses with persisting or recurrent infections, may result in a considerable destruction of bone substance, the extensor apparatus and the surrounding soft tissue. In these cases reconstruction of a proper knee function may be impossible and the only solutions are: knee arthrodesis or above-the-knee amputation (AKA). However, both methods are associated with considerable functional deficits and high complication rates. The primary aim of the current study is to analyse the clinical course, outcome and complications in patients with knee arthrodesis and AKA after PJI and to compare these two methods in terms of the analysed parameters. Method. Patients treated with a knee arthrodesis or AKA after PJI in an 11-year time period were included in this study. Demographic data, comorbidities, infecting characteristics and operative procedures were recorded. Patients were seen in regular intervals and underwent physical and radiographic examination. Major complications such as: re-infection, implant-failure, revision surgeries or stump healing disorders were recorded. Functional outcome with use of the Lower-Extremity-Functional-Score was assessed and the patients reported general health status (SF-12-questionnaire) was recorded. Results. In total 87 patients with a knee arthrodesis and 32 patients with an AKA after PJI were included. Knee arthrodesis was performed in 81 patients with a modular system and in six cases with bone fusion. Re-arthrodesis had to be performed in 21 cases. Survival rate of knee arthrodesis was 86% after one year, 71% after five and 61% after ten years. Major complications such as recurrence of infection (n=16) implant loosening (n=12), implant failure (n=3) or per-implant fracture (n=5) occurred in 30% of the patients. In seven patients an amputation after failed arthrodesis had to be performed. In patients with AKA after PJI a similar complication rate of 34% (p=0.64) was seen. Recurrence of infection was diagnosed in nine patients and a re-amputation had to be performed in four cases. The final functional examination was assessed after a mean interval of 48 month and revealed comparably in both cohorts a comparable limitation of functionality (p=0.181) and a slightly worse physical quality of life after knee arthrodesis compared to patients with AKA (p=0.08). Conclusions. Knee arthrodesis or above the knee amputation after PJIshow similar functional limitations and comparably high complication rates. The patients have to be supervised by an interdisciplinary team to avoid complications and regain quality of life

The purpose of the following study was to present the general strategy for preserving the lower extremity by knee arthrodesis and to analyze the outcome of knee arthrodeses performed by a special modular system. Between 2009 and 2014 35 knee arthrodeses were performed. 23 patients were male, 12 female. The average age was 66 years (42 to 83 years). The patients underwent an average of 6 operations because of infected knee arthroplasties previous to the knee arthrodesis. The main pathogen was S. epidermidis followed by MRSA. The arthrodeses system included a non cemented femoral and tibial stem (press fit application plus two static locking screws). These were connected by a special stem to stem clamp. Immediate postoperative full weight-bearing was possible in 32 of 35 patients. We saw 4 recurrent infections (all connected to the patients, who did not show a full weight bearing after knee arthrodesis). In two cases re-revision surgery was successful and lead to a sufficient re-arthrodesis. In two cases above-knee-amputation was necessary. Peri-implant fractures were detected in 3 cases. All of them could be cured by changing the arthrodesis stem and to a longer one bridging the fracture. In one case a stem loosening was seen. This was as well addressed by the use of a longer stem. Knee arthrodesis by a modular non cemented system is a god alternative in order to preserve the weight-bearing lower extremity. The complication rate is rather high due to the fact, that this procedure presents the final alternative to do so in patients, who are in extremis in terms of a long lasting aggressive peri-arthroplasty infection the lead to massive destruction of the soft tissue around the knee and a significant loss of function

There is no question that excellent long-term results have been demonstrated with all-polyethylene tibial components. Moreover, improvements in polyethylene to increase wear resistance, maintain mechanical strength, and improve oxidative resistance lend even greater credence to the use of an all-polyethylene tibial component. There are several issues of concern. In revision knee replacement for reasons such as patellofemoral problems where the components are otherwise ideal, the arthrotomy performed during the revision usually creates a slight laxity requiring a thicker polyethylene or even a different tibial conformity. With an all-polyethylene tibia, this would require full component revision. It is also true that, even after careful trial reduction, the surgeon occasionally will find that the final construct is slightly lax requiring a thicker final insert. This again is difficult in the situation of all-polyethylene tibia. One of the advantages of an all-polyethylene tibia is to avoid back-sided wear that posed a substantial problem in the past. Most component systems have successfully dealt with a problem of back-sided wear making the advantage of a nonmodular all-polyethylene tibia moot. Finally, in a modular system, the surgeon has the advantage of cementing all components with the tibial trial and then having the ability to remove the trial component, clear the back of the knee and insert the final insert. Lowering health care costs is a laudable and necessary endeavor. We must choose TKR implants to fit patient demand and not overuse or underuse technology and know the true cost of the implants we use

The femur begins to bow anteriorly at the 200 mm level, but may bow earlier in smaller people. If the stem to be used is less than 200 mm, a straight stem can be used. If the stem is longer than 200 mm, it will perforate the anterior femoral cortex. I know this because I did this on a few occasions more than 20 years ago. To use a long straight stem, there are two techniques. One can either do a diaphyseal osteotomy or one can do a Wagner split (extended trochanteric osteotomy). Both of these will put the knee in some degree of hyperextension, probably insignificant in the elderly, but it may be of significance in the young. In very young people, therefore, it may be preferable to use a bowed stem to avoid this degree of recurvatum. There are two different concepts of loading. Diaphyseal osteotomy implies a proximal loading has been sought. The Wagner split ignores the proximal femur and seeks conical fixation in the diaphysis. There will be very little bone-bone contact between what remains of the attached femur and the detached anterior cortex so that it is important to ensure that the blood supply to the anterior cortex remains intact, preferably by using Wagner's technique, using a quarter-inch osteotome inserted through the vastus to crack the medial cortex. Current modularity is of two types. Distal modularity was attempted many years ago and was never successful. Proximal modularity, as for example, the S-ROM stem, implies various sizes of sleeves fit onto the stem to get a proximal canal fill. In mid-stem modularity, the distal stem wedges into the cone. It has to be driven into where it jams and this can be somewhat unpredictable. For this reason, the solid Wagner stem has been replaced by the mid-stem modular. Once the distal femur is solidly embedded, the proximal body is then selected for height and version. The proximal body is unsupported in the mid-stem modular and initially, few fractures were noted at the taper junction. Cold rolling, shot peening and taper strengthening seem to have solved these problems. There are a variety of types of osteotomy, which can be used for different deformities. With a mid-stem modular system, generally, all that needs to be done is a Wagner-type split and fixation is sought in the mid-diaphysis by conical reaming. No matter what stem is used, distal stability is necessary. This is achieved by flutes, which engage the endosteal cortex. The flutes alone must have sufficient rotational stability to overcome the service loads on the hip of 22 Nm. I divide revision into three categories. In type one, the isthmus is intact, i.e. the bone below the lesser trochanter so that a primary stem can be used. In type two, the isthmus is damaged, i.e. the bone below the lesser trochanter, so a long revision stem is required. In a type three, there is more than 70 mm of missing proximal femur. The Wagner stem may be able to handle this on its own, but most other stems are better supported with a structural allograft cemented to the stem. The reported long term results of mid-stem modular revision implants are good as in most, over 90% survivorship. The introduction of modularity appears to have overcome initial disadvantage of the Wagner stem, i.e. its unpredictability in terms of leg length

There is no question that excellent long-term results have been demonstrated with all-polyethylene tibial components. Moreover, improvements in polyethylene to increase wear resistance, maintain mechanical strength, and improve oxidative resistance lend even greater credence to the use of an all-polyethylene tibial component. There are several issues of concern. In revision knee replacement for reasons such as patellofemoral problems where the components are otherwise ideal, the arthrotomy performed during the revision usually creates a slight laxity requiring a thicker polyethylene or even a different tibial conformity. With an all-polyethylene tibia, this would require full component revision. It is also true that, even after careful trial reduction, the surgeon occasionally will find that the final construct is slightly lax requiring a thicker final insert. This again is difficult in the situation of all-polyethylene tibia. One of the advantages of an all-polyethylene tibia is to avoid back-side wear that posed a substantial problem in the past. Most component systems have successfully dealt with the problem of back-side wear making the advantage of a nonmodular all-polyethylene tibia moot. Finally, in a modular system, the surgeon has the advantage of cementing all components with the tibial trial and then having the ability to remove the trial component, clear the back of the knee and insert the final insert

The most important advantage of modular revision stems is versatility - managing ALL levels of femoral bone loss (present before revision or created during revision). The surgeon quickly gains familiarity with the techniques and instruments for preparation and implantation and subsequently masters its use for all variety of situations. This allows the operating room staff to become comfortable with the instrumentation and components. This ability to use the stem in a variety of bone loss situations eliminates intraoperative shuffle (changes in the surgical plan resulting in more instruments being opened), as bone loss can be significantly under-estimated preoperatively or may change intraoperatively. Furthermore, distal fixation can be obtained simply and reliably. The most critical advantage is the ability to separate completely the critical task of fixation from other important tasks of restoring offset, leg length, and stability. Once fixation is secured, the surgeon can concentrate on hip stability and on optimization of hip mechanics (leg length and offset). This allows the surgeon to maximise patient functionality postoperatively. Additionally, the surgeon can control the diameter of the proximal body to ensure proper bony apposition, especially if an extended trochanteric osteotomy was made to obtain femoral exposure. The most under-appreciated advantage is the straightforward instrumentation that makes the operation easier for the staff and the surgeon, while enhancing the operating room efficiency and reducing cost. Also, although the implant itself may result in more cost, most modular systems allow for a decrease in inventory requirements, which make up the cost differential

The use of modular systems adds versatility to the implant system, better restoration of hip biomechanics and lower inventory to the hospital. There have been reports of high metal ions, ARMD reactions and high implant failure rates due to potential problems from taper failures. These are more common in metal-on-metal hip replacements, but are being also reported in other bearings. Between 2001 and 2010, we performed 383 consecutive metal-on-metal (MoM) THRs through a posterior approach, using a BHR cup and Birmingham modular head with one of three different stems, all with 12/14 tapers. The earliest 104 hips employed a cemented MS30 stem (Zimmer GmbH, Winterthur, Switzerland). Subsequent 256 were Synergy and then 23 Anthology (both uncemented and both Smith and Nephew Orthopaedics, Memphis TN USA). There was no significant difference in the average age at surgery (65.4 years cemented vs 65.6 uncemented, p = 0.69), gender ratio (1.68 vs 1.89, p = 0.64), or bearing diameter (46.7 vs 46.8, p = 0.31). The earlier 203 Synergy stems were monoblock heads, while the remaining uncemented stems included a tapered sleeve in addition. There were 3 deep infections and 11 debris-related failures (overall revision rate 4.9%). The revision rate from aseptic failures (ALTR, effusion, osteolysis or component loosening) is 2.87%. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the entire cohort showed a 10-year implant survival of 96.8% with revision for any reason as the end-point. Cemented stems had a 100% survival at 10 years and 98.6% at 12 years. The uncemented stems had a 93.8% survival at 10 years. Within the uncemented group, the monoblocks had a 5 and 10-year survival of 99.0% and 96.4% respectively while the sleeved had 98.7% (5 years) and 96.3% (7 years) and 82.5% at 8 years. Retreival analysis showed clear evidence of taper failure. Our experience suggests taper failure leading to ALTRs and its sequelae. Others have reported ALTR type reactions in metal on polyethylene and ceramic on polyethylene bearing types as well in bearing diameters ranging from 28mm to 40mm. There is a need to improve taper design especially for use with large heads, and in high demand patients

Modern modular revision stems employ tapered conical (TCR) distal stems designed for immediate axial and rotational stability with subsequent osseo-integration of the stem. Modular proximal segments allow the surgeon to achieve bone contact proximally with eventual ingrowth that protects the modular junction. The independent sizing of the proximal body and distal stem allows for each portion to obtain intimate bony contact and gives the surgeon the ability precisely control the femoral head center of rotation, offset, version, leg length, and overall stability. The most important advantage of modular revision stems is versatility - the ability to manage ALL levels of femoral bone loss (present before revision or created during revision). Used routinely, this allows the surgeon to quickly gain familiarity with the techniques and instruments for preparation and implantation and subsequently master the use for all variety of situations. This also allows the operating room staff to become comfortable with the instrumentation and components. Additionally, the ability to use the stem in all bone loss situations eliminates intra-operative shuffle (changes in the surgical plan resulting in more instruments being opened), as bone loss can be significantly under-estimated pre-operatively or may change intra-operatively. Furthermore, distal fixation can be obtained simply and reliably. Paprosky 1 femoral defects can be treated with a primary-type stem for the most part. All other femoral defects can be treated with a TCR stem. Fully porous coated stems also work for many revisions but why have two different revision stem choices available when the TCR stems work for ALL defects?. The most critical advantage is the ability to separate completely the critical task of fixation from other important tasks of restoring offset, leg length, and stability. Once fixation is secured, the surgeon can concentrate on hip stability and on optimization of hip mechanics (leg length and offset). The ability to do this allows the surgeon to maximise patient functionality post-operatively. Modular tapered stems have TWO specific advantages over monolithic stems in this important surgical task. The proximal body size and length can be adjusted AFTER stem insertion if the stem goes deeper than the trial. Further, proximal/distal bone size mismatch can be accommodated. The surgeon can control the diameter of the proximal body to ensure proper bony apposition independent of distal fitting needs. If the surgeon believes that proximal bone ingrowth is important to facilitate proximal bone remodeling, modular TCR stems can more easily accomplish this. The most under-appreciated advantage is the straightforward instrumentation system that makes the operation easier for the staff and the surgeon, while enhancing the operating room efficiency and reducing cost. Also, although the implant itself may result in more cost, most modular systems allow for a decrease in inventory requirements, which make up the cost differential. One theoretical disadvantage of modular revision stems is modular junction fracture, which can happen if the junction itself is not protected by bone. Ensuring proximal bone support can minimise this problem. Once porous ingrowth occurs proximally, the risk of junction fracture is eliminated. Even NON-modular stems fracture when proximal bone support is missing. Another theoretical issue is modular junction corrosion but this not a clinical one, since both components are titanium. One can also fail to connect properly the two parts during surgery

INTRODUCTION. Deformation of modular acetabular press-fit shells is of much interest for surgeons and manufacturers. Initial fixation is achieved through press-fit between shell and acetabulum with the shell mechanically deforming upon insertion. Shell deformation may disrupt the assembly process of modular systems and may adversely affect integrity and durability of the components and tribology of the bearing. The aim of the study was to show shell deformation as a function of bone and shell stiffness. METHODS. The stiffness of the generic shells was determined using a uniaxial/ two point loading frame by applying different loads, and the change in dimension was measured by a coordinate measurement machine (CMM). Cadaver lab deformation measurements were done before and after insertion for 32 shells with 2 wall thicknesses and 11 shell sizes using the ATOS Triple Scan III (ATOS) optical system previously validated as a suitable measurement system to perform those measurements. Multiple deformation measurements per cadaver were performed by using both hip sides and stepwise increasing the reamed acetabulum by at least 1 mm, depending on sufficient residual bone stock. The under-reaming was varied between 0mm and 1mm, respectively. From the deformations, the resulting forces on the shells and bone stiffness were calculated assuming force equilibrium as well as linear-elastic material behaviour in each point at the rim of the shell. RESULTS. Radial stiffness for shells with 3 mm wall thickness ranged between 6257 N/mm and 2920 N/mm, with 4 mm wall thickness it ranged between 14341 N/mm and 6875 N/mm. The radial shell deformation ranged between 3 µm and 187 µm. The resulting maximum radial forces acting on the shells ranged between 26 N and 916 N. From these values, bone stiffness [N/mm] at the point of the maximum deformation has been calculated. Adding the bone stiffness and the shell stiffness using the equation for serial springs, one obtains a positive correlation between total stiffness and maximum deformation. DISCUSSION. The measured deformation values are within the same order of magnitude previously published [Lin 2006, Squire 2006]. The large variations of resulting maximum forces exhibit the need to further investigate shell deformation using commercial shell systems. The calculated bone stiffness at the point of the maximum deformation seems to be a valid predictor for expected shell deformation, but this also needs more data. A future goal is to determine expected shell deformation from bone data as a design rational

INTRODUCTION. Deformation of modular acetabular press-fit shells is a topic of much interest for surgeons and manufacturer. Such modular components utilise a titanium shell with a liner manufactured from metal, polyethylene or ceramic. Initial fixation is achieved through a press-fit between shell and acetabulum with the shell mechanically deforming upon insertion. Shell deformation may disrupt the assembly process of inserting the bearing liner into the acetabular shell for modular systems. This may adversely affect the integrity and durability of the components and the tribology of the bearing. OBJECTIVE. Most clinically relevant data to quantify and understand such shell deformation can be achieved by cadaver measurements. ATOS Triple Scan III was identified as a measurement system with the potential to perform those measurements. The study aim was to validate an ATOS Triple Scan III optical measurement system against a co-ordinate measuring machine (CMM) using in-vitro testing and to check capability/ repeatability under cadaver lab conditions. METHODS. Two sizes of custom-made acetabular shells were deformed using a uniaxial/ two-point loading frame and measured repeatedly at different loads. Roundness measurements were performed using both the ATOS Triple Scan III optical system and a co-ordinate measuring machine and then compared. The repeatability was also tested by measuring shells pre and post insertion in a cadaver lab multiple times. RESULTS. The in-vitro comparison with CMM demonstrated a maximum difference of 5 µm at the rim and 9 µm at the measurement point closest to the pole of the shell. Deviation between the two systems increased towards the pole for the in-vitro measurements. However as press fit shells are designed to be loaded at the rim, this is likely where the maximum deflection will occur as a result of the highest force. Therefore, the increased difference between the systems towards the pole is of less importance compared with accuracy at the rim. Maximum repeatability was below 1 µm for the CMM and 3 µm for the ATOS Triple Scan III optical system. Repeatability of the ATOS Triple Scan III optical system was comparable between pre insertion (below 2 µm) and post insertion (below 3 µm) measurements in the cadaver lab. In addition these values were comparable to the repeatability measured during the in-vitro validation study (below 3 µm). This proves high repeatability not only for in-vitro conditions, but also for the cadaver lab as well. CONCLUSIONS. This study supports the view that the ATOS Triple Scan III optical system fulfils the necessary requirements to accurately measure shell deformation in cadavers. As a result, the authors propose further studies using cadavers to identify the impact of other factors upon shell deformation. Other factors to be measured include bone strength, shell diameter, under reaming and wall thickness

Introduction. Total hip replacement is one of the most successful orthopaedic surgeries, not least because of the introduction of modular systems giving surgeons the flexibility to intraoperatively adapt the geometry of the artificial joint to the patient's anatomy. However, taper junctions of modular implants are at risk of fretting-induced postoperative complications such as corrosion, which can lead to adverse tissue reactions. Interface micro-motions are suspected to be a causal factor for mechanical loading-induced corrosion, which can require implant revision. The aim of this study was to determine the micro-motions at the stem-head taper interface during daily activities and the influence of specific material combinations. Materials & Methods. The ball heads (ø 32mm, 12/14, size L, CoCr or Al2O3) were quasi-statically assembled to the stems (Ti or CoCr, Metha, Aesculap AG, Germany, v=0.5 kN/s, F=6 kN, n=3 each, 10° adduction/ 9° flexion according to ISO 7206-4) and then loaded sinusoidally using a material testing machine (Mini Bionix II, MTS, USA, Figure 1). The peak forces represented different daily activities [Bergmann, 2010]: walking (2.3 kN), stair climbing (4.3 kN) and stumbling (5.3 kN). 2,000 loading cycles (f=1 Hz) were applied for each load level. Six eddy-current sensors, placed between stem and head, were used to determine the displacement (interface micro-motion and elastic deformation) between head and stem (Figure 1). A finite element model (FEM) based on CAD data was used to determine the elastic deformation of the prostheses for the experimentally tested activities (Abaqus, Simulia, USA). Tie-junctions at all interfaces prevented relative movements of the adjacent surfaces. The resultant translations at the centre of the ball head were determined using a coordinate transformation and a subsequent subtraction of the elastic deformation. Results. FEM simulations exhibited a negligibly small elastic deformation for all material configurations indicating that the taper axis was located close to the direction of force application. The resultant micro-motions ranged between 3.3 and 33.4 µm and increased with rising peak forces for all material couplings (p<0.001, Figure 2). Ti–stems exhibited significantly larger micro-motions especially when combined with Al2O3-heads (Figure 2). The differences between the head materials on a similar stem material were not significant (p>0.857, Figure 2). Discussion. The observed differences between the two stem materials are unexpected. They might be due to the differences in stiffness between head and stem or to different taper surface morphologies. The same factors might also explain the different trends for the Ti-stems (larger for Al2O3-heads) compared to the CoCr-stems (larger for CoCr-heads). The magnitude of the observed micro-motions probably increases with contamination [Jauch, 2011] or insufficient assembly forces, facilitating fretting and crevice corrosion, which has been described for all of the combinations tested. Whether the measured magnitudes of micro-motion do already comprise a problem is presently unclear and requires further clarification

The advantages of modularity in both primary and revision hip surgery are well documented, and have been at the heart of innovation in hip implant design over the last two decades. There have been significant developments in modularity proximally at the head-neck junction, more distally with modular necks and at mid-stem level, notable for complex revisions. Modularity allows us to address version, length and offset issues and to restore optimal hip biomechanics. There are, however, increasing clinical concerns associated with the failure of taper junctions. The use of large femoral heads and modular stems are now considered major risk factors for taper corrosion. Recent studies have shown an 8–9% early revision rate of one modular neck design due to pain and adverse local tissue reaction. I will summarise our laboratory and retrieval data on taper design and tribology in order to put in perspective the clinical use of modularity in hip arthroplasty. Modular junctions rely on a frictional interlock. The engagement obtained and resulting micromotion is strongly influenced by taper size, taper length/engagement, material, surface finish, neck length and offset. In our quest for thinner femoral necks, greater offsets and bigger femoral heads, we have inadvertently created an environment that can generate fretting corrosion at modular junctions and leads to premature implant failure. Our work demonstrates that increasing torque and bending moment leads to increased susceptibility to fretting corrosion at the modular taper interface of total hip replacements. This is particularly relevant with the increasing use of larger diameter femoral heads that produce higher torques. It also identifies surface area and surface finish as important factors in wear and corrosion at the modular interface of total hip replacements. Critically, the combination of these factors can lead to extensive corrosion at the interface. Surgical technique is also important. Higher impaction loads on clean, dry surfaces result in greater contact length and extraction forces, which may influence micromotion. It is critical in future that all innovation is introduced in a systematic gradual fashion so that we do not fall into similar traps again. The unintended consequences of minor changes in design may have a massive effect on outcomes. Our findings suggest that it may be possible to continue to employ the advantages of modularity in hip surgery whilst avoiding some of the pitfalls that have led to the failure of some modular systems. Understanding the key design and surgical factors that drive the performance of taper junctions is vital for the surgical community. There is a body of knowledge that supports appropriate taper use / modularity to help surgeons deal with complex situations. We must be careful not throw the baby out with the bathwater

Objective:. Evaluation of the early results of the implementation of reverse shoulder arthroplasty prosthesis “Comprehensive Reverse” in primary and revision shoulder arthroplasties. Material and Methods:. September 2010–December 2012, 48 patients (32 women, 16 men) underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty using Comprehensive Reverse system. Average age of 69.88. A total of 46 patients were followed. In 22 patients the operation was performed for revision. Patients were pre-and postoperatively evaluated using Oxford, Constant, SF-12 scores, radiographs, pain and range of motion. Mean follow-up 13 months. Results:. In both groups there was an improvement in pain level from 7.9 to 3.2 in the primary replacement group and 7.8 to 5.3 in the revision group. Forward flexion has improved from 60 ° to 107 ° and from 53 ° to 95 ° respectively. Abduction has improved from 52 ° to 90 ° and 42 ° to 77 °, respectively. Significant improvement of Oxford Score from 13.77 to 33.30 in the first group and 12.27 to 21.20 in the second group. Constant score improved from 19.17 to 45.43 and 17.36 to 34.50 in both groups respectively. Furthermore, significant correlations were observed between the key variables. Post operative Complications includes separation of baseplate–glenosphere (one patient) required revision, large post operative hematoma in one patient and periprosthetic fracture type C in one case after a fall required revision using Mosaic Modular System. There was one case of superficial infection treated surgically and with antimicrobial treatment. Discussion:. The results of this study show a satisfactory short and acceptable result for the use of reverse shoulder prosthesis “Comprehensive” against primary disease of the shoulder and for revision with better results in the first group. Long-term monitoring is required to better and more complete clinical assessment of the reverse arthroplasty

Massive proximal femoral bone loss can be a complex problem, despite various modern technical and implant solutions. Due to inadequate bone stock and missing proximal fixation possibilities, including larger segmental osseous defects, the use of a mega prosthesis might become necessary. Coverage of the segmental bone loss in combination with distal fixation, can be achieved in either cemented or non-cemented techniques. Some implant types allow for additional fixation of the gluteal muscles, attached with non-absorbable sutures or synthetic mesh grafts. Although first reports about partial or even complete femoral replacement are available since the 1960's, larger case series or technical reports are rare within the literature and limited to some specialised centers. Most series are reported by oncologic centers, with necessary larger osseous resections of the femur. The final implantation of any mega prosthesis system requires meticulous planning, especially to calculate the appropriate leg length of the implant and resulting leg length. Combination of a posterior hip with a lateral knee approach allows for the enlargement to a total femur replacement, if necessary. The lateral vastus muscle is detached and the entire soft tissues envelope can be displaced medially. After implant and cement removal, non-structural bone might be resected. Trial insertion is important, due to the variation of overall muscle tension intraoperatively and prevention of early or late dislocation. Currently the use of proximal modular systems, including length, offset and anteversion adaption, became the technique of choice for these implant systems. However, just very few companies offer yet such a complete system, which might also be expanded to a total femur solution. We were able to evaluate our Endo-Klinik results of total-femur replacements within 100 consecutive patients in non-infected cases, after a mean follow up time of five years. There we “only” 68% patients without complications, main complications included: 13% revealed a deep infection; dislocation was found in 6%, material failure and consequent breakage in 3%, persistent patellar problems in 2% and finally 1% with peroneal nerve palsy. These results show that a total-femur replacement is associated with a high complication rate, even in non-infected patient cohorts