Aims

The optimal bearing surface design for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of fixed-bearing (FB) and mobile-bearing (MB) UKAs from a single high-volume institution.

Aims

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is the preferred treatment for anterior medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) owing to the rapid postoperative recovery. However, the risk factors for UKA failure remain controversial.

Aims. The primary objective of this study was to compare short-term implant survival between cemented and cementless fixation for the mobile-bearing Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) across various age groups. The secondary objectives were to compare modes of failure and to evaluate patient-reported outcomes. Methods. A total of 25,762 patients, comprising 8,022 cemented (31.1%) and 17,740 cementless (68.9%) medial UKA cases, were included from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Patient stratification was performed based on age: < 50 years, 50 to 59 years, 60 to 69 years, and ≥ 70 years. Survival rates and hazard ratios were calculated. Modes of failure were described and postoperative change in baseline for the Oxford Knee Score and numerical rating scale for pain at six and 12 months’ follow-up were compared. Results. The 2.5-year implant survival rate of cementless UKA was significantly higher compared to cemented UKA in patients aged younger than 60 years (age < 50 years: 95.9% (95% CI 93.8 to 97.3) vs 90.9% (95% CI 87.0 to 93.7); p = 0.007; and 50 to 59 years: 95.6% (95% CI 94.9 to 96.3) vs 94.0% (95% CI 92.8 to 95.0); p = 0.009). Cemented UKA exhibited significantly higher revision rates for tibial loosening (age < 50 and 60 to 69 years), while cementless UKA was associated with higher revision rates for periprosthetic fractures (age ≥ 60 years). Patient-reported outcomes were similar between both fixation techniques, irrespective of age. Conclusion. Cementless fixation resulted in superior short-term implant survival compared to cemented fixation among younger patients undergoing Oxford mobile-bearing medial UKA. Distinct failure patterns between fixation techniques emerged across various age groups, with revisions for tibial loosening being associated with cemented UKA in younger patients, while revisions for periprosthetic fractures were specifically identified among elderly patients undergoing cementless UKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2025;107-B(3):329–336

Aims. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is undertaken in patients with a passively correctable varus deformity. Our hypothesis was that restoration of natural soft tissue tension would result in a comparable lower limb alignment with the contralateral normal lower limb after mobile-bearing medial UKA. Patients and Methods. In this retrospective study, hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, position of the weight-bearing axis (WBA) and knee joint line obliquity (KJLO) after mobile-bearing medial UKA was compared with the normal (clinically and radiologically) contralateral lower limb in 123 patients. Results. Postoperatively, HKA angle was restored to within ±3° of the contralateral lower limb in 87% of patients andWBA passed within ±1 Kennedy and White's tibial zone of the contralateral normal lower limb in 95% of patients. The difference in the mean KJLO between the two groups was not significant (p=0.05) and the KJLO was within ±3° of the contralateral normal lower limb in 96% of patients. Conclusion. Lower limb alignment & knee joint line obliquity after mobile-bearing medial UKA were comparable to the unaffected contralateral limb in most patients. Clinical Relevance. Comparison with the contralateral normal lower limb is a reliable method to evaluate and validate limb mechanical alignment after mobile-bearing medial UKA

Purpose. We aimed to investigate whether the anterior superior iliac spine could provide consistent rotational landmark of the tibial component during mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using computed tomography (CT). Methods. During sagittal tibial resection, we utilized the ASIS as a rotational landmark. In 47 knees that underwent postoperative CT scans after medial UKA, the tibial component position was assessed by drawing a line tangential to the lateral wall of the tibial component. Rotation of the tibial component was measured using two reference lines: a line perpendicular to the posterior cortical rim of the tibia (angle α) and Akagi's line (angle β). Instant bearing position and posterior cruciate ligament fossa involvement were also evaluated. External rotation of the tibial component relative to each reference line and external rotation of the bearing relative to the lateral wall of the tibial component were considered positive values. Results. The mean angle α and β were 8.0 ± 6.1° (range, −4.0 – 24.3) and 8.7 ± 4.8° (range, 1.9 – 25.2), respectively. The mean instant bearing position was 4.3 ± 28.6° (range, −52.9 – 179.7). One bearing showed complete 180° rotation at 2 weeks postoperatively. Fourteen knees (29.8%) showed posterior cruciate ligament fossa involvement of the tibial resection margin. Conclusions. Due to the wide variation in, and inherent difficulty in identification of, the ASIS during the operation, it is not recommended for guidance of sagittal tibial resection during mobile-bearing medial UKA. Level of Evidence: Level IV

Aims. The aims of this retrospective study were to determine the incidence of extra-articular deformities (EADs), and determine their effect on postoperative alignment in knees undergoing mobile-bearing, medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Patients and Methods. Limb mechanical alignment (hip-knee-ankle angle), coronal bowing of the femoral shaft and proximal tibia vara or medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured on standing, full-length hip-to-ankle radiographs of 162 patients who underwent 200 mobile-bearing, medial UKAs. Results. Incidence of EAD was 7.5% for coronal femoral bowing of >5°, 67% for proximal tibia vara of >3° (MPTA<87°) and 24.5% for proximal tibia vara of >6° (MPTA<84°). Mean postoperative HKA angle achieved in knees with femoral bowing ≤5° was significantly greater when compared to knees with femoral bowing >5° (p=0.04); in knees with proximal tibia vara ≤3° was significantly greater when compared to knees with proximal tibia vara >3° (p=0.0001) and when compared to knees with proximal tibia vara >6° (p=0.0001). Conclusion. Extra-articular deformities are frequently seen in patients undergoing mobile-bearing medial UKAs, especially in knees with varus deformity>10°. Presence of an EAD significantly affects postoperative mechanical limb alignment achieved when compared to limbs without EAD and may increase the risk of limbs being placed in varus>3° postoperatively. Clinical Relevance. Since the presence of an EAD, especially in knees with varus deformity>10°, may increase the risk of limbs being placed in varus>3° postoperatively and may affect long-term clinical and implant survival outcomes, UKR in such knees should be performed with caution

Enhanced appreciation of normal knee kinematics and the inability to replicate these in the replaced total knee has led to increased enthusiasm for partial knee arthroplasty by some. These arthroplasties more closely replicate normal kinematics since they inherently preserve the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Indications for medial UKA are: anteromedial osteoarthritis with an intact ACL, posterior cruciate ligament, and medial collateral ligament (MCL), full thickness cartilage loss, and correctable deformity demonstrated radiographically with valgus stress view; full thickness cartilage laterally with no central ulcer; <15 degrees of flexion contracture, < 15 degrees varus and > 90 degrees flexion. The state of the patellofemoral joint, chondrocalcinosis, obesity, age and activity level are NOT contraindications to medial mobile-bearing UKA. The only certain contraindications are the presence of inflammatory arthritis or a history of previous high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Advantages of medial UKA are that it preserves undamaged structures, it is a minimally invasive technique with low incidence of perioperative morbidity, preservation of the cruciate mechanism results in more “normal” kinematics versus TKA, it normalises contact forces and pressures in the patellofemoral joint, and it provides better range of motion than TKA. Furthermore, medial UKA results in better function than TKA in gait studies, with demanding activities, such as climbing stairs, having a better “feel”. Pain relief with medial UKA is equivalent or better than TKA, and morbidity and mortality are decreased compared with TKA, as well as venous thromboembolism. Recommended preoperative imaging studies consist of plain radiographs with the following views obtained: standing AP, PA flexed, lateral, Merchant or axial, and valgus stress. There are several surgical perils associated with performing medial UKA. First, in regard to patient selection, avoid medial UKA in patients with residual hyaline cartilage – the joint must be bone on bone. Second, perform a conservative tibial resection with respect to depth to prevent tibial collapse as well as excessive overload of weakened bone, and avoid excessive posterior slope. Perform the tibial resection coplanar with tibial spine/ACL insertion to maximise tibial coverage. Avoid overcorrection of deformity. Do not perform a medial release. Balance flexion/extension gaps meticulously. For mobile-bearing designs, remove all impinging osteophytes. Over 55 published studies report results with mobile-bearing medial UKA, with survival ranging 63.2–100% at mean follow-up ranging from 1 to 17.2 years

The December 2023 Knee Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Obesity is associated with greater improvement in patient-reported outcomes following primary total knee arthroplasty; Does mild flexion of the femoral prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty result in better early postoperative outcomes?; Robotic or manual total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial; Patient-relevant outcomes following first revision total knee arthroplasty, by diagnosis: an analysis of implant survivorship, mortality, serious medical complications, and patient-reported outcome measures using the National Joint Registry data set; Sagittal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: are there any discrepancies between robotic-assisted and manual axis orientation?; Tourniquet use does not impact recovery trajectory in total knee arthroplasty; Impact of proximal tibial varus anatomy on survivorship after medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty; Bone cement directly to the implant in primary total knee arthroplasty?; Maintaining joint line obliquity optimizes outcomes in patients with constitutionally varus knees.

Aims

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BCA) have been associated with improved functional outcomes compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in suitable patients, although the reason is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to measure how the different arthroplasties affect knee extensor function.

Aims

It is not clear whether anterior knee pain and osteoarthritis (OA) of the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) are contraindications to medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Our aim was to investigate the long-term outcome of a consecutive series of patients, some of whom had anterior knee pain and PFJ OA managed with UKA.

Aims

Approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2004, the Phase III Oxford Medial Partial Knee is used to treat anteromedial osteoarthritis (AMOA) in patients with an intact anterior cruciate ligament. This unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is relatively new in the United States, and therefore long-term American results are lacking.