Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of locking plate fixation, with and without an associated fibular strut allograft, for the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly osteoporotic patients. Patients and Methods. We undertook a retrospective comparison of two methods of fixation, using a locking plate without an associated fibular strut allograft (LP group) and with a fibular allograft (FA group) for the treatment of these fractures. The outcome was assessed for 52 patients in the LP group and 45 in the FA group, with a mean age of 74.3 years (52 to 89), at a mean follow-up of 14.2 months (12 to 19). The clinical results were evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, the Constant score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and the range of movement. Radiological results were evaluated using the neck-shaft angle (NSA) and humeral head height (HHH). Results. The mean forward elevation in the LP and FA groups was 125.3° (. sd. 21.4) and 148.9° (. sd. 19.8), respectively (p = 0.042), while other clinical factors showed no statistically significant differences between the groups. The changes in NSA and HHH immediately after the operation and at final follow-up were significantly better in the FA group than in the LP group (p = 0.015 and p = 0.021, respectively). Conclusion. For comminuted proximal humeral fractures in osteoporotic patients, locking plate fixation with a fibular strut allograft shows satisfactory short-term results with respect to humeral head support and maintenance of reduction, and may reduce the incidence of complications associated with fixation using a locking plate alone. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:260–265

Aim. The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of intramedullary nail fixation and ‘locking’ plate fixation in the treatment of extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia. Patients and Methods. An economic evaluation was conducted from the perspective of the United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services (PSS), based on evidence from the Fixation of Distal Tibia Fractures (UK FixDT) multicentre parallel trial. Data from 321 patients were available for analysis. Costs were collected prospectively over the 12-month follow-up period using trial case report forms and participant-completed questionnaires. Cost-effectiveness was reported in terms of incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained, and net monetary benefit. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of cost-effectiveness estimates. Results. Mean NHS and PSS costs were significantly lower for patients treated with an intramedullary nail than for those treated with a locking plate (-£970, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1685 to -256; p = 0.05). There was a small increase in QALYs gained in the nail fixation group (0.01, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.06; p = 0.52). The probability of cost-effectiveness for nail fixation exceeded 90% at cost-effectiveness thresholds as low as £15 000 per additional QALY. The cost-effectiveness results remained robust to several sensitivity analyses. Conclusion. This trial-based economic evaluation suggests that nail fixation is a cost-effective alternative to locking plate fixation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:624–33

We evaluated the biomechanical properties of two different methods of fixation for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus. Biomechanical testing of the two groups, locking plate alone (LP), and locking plate with a fibular strut graft (LPSG), was performed using seven pairs of human cadaveric humeri. Cyclical loads between 10 N and 80 N at 5 Hz were applied for 1 000 000 cycles. Immediately after cycling, an increasing axial load was applied at a rate of displacement of 5 mm/min. The displacement of the construct, maximum failure load, stiffness and mode of failure were compared.

The displacement was significantly less in the LPSG group than in the LP group (p = 0.031). All maximum failure loads and measures of stiffness in the LPSG group were significantly higher than those in the LP group (p = 0.024 and p = 0.035, respectively). In the LP group, varus collapse and plate bending were seen. In the LPSG group, the humeral head cut out and the fibular strut grafts fractured. No broken plates or screws were seen in either group.

We conclude that strut graft augmentation significantly increases both the maximum failure load and the initial stiffness of this construct compared with a locking plate alone.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of late displacement after the treatment of distal radial fractures with a locking volar plate, and to investigate the clinical and radiological factors that might correlate with re-displacement. From March 2007 to October 2009, 120 of an original cohort of 132 female patients with unstable fractures of the distal radius were treated with a volar locking plate, and were studied over a follow-up period of six months. In the immediate post-operative and final follow-up radiographs, late displacement was evaluated as judged by ulnar variance, radial inclination, and dorsal angulation. We also analysed the correlation of a variety of clinical and radiological factors with re-displacement. Ulnar variance was significantly overcorrected (p < 0.001) while radial inclination and dorsal angulation were undercorrected when compared statistically (p <  0.001) with the unaffected side in the immediate post-operative stage. During follow-up, radial shortening and dorsal angulation progressed statistically, but none had a value beyond the acceptable range. Bone mineral density measured at the proximal femur and the position of the screws in the subchondral region, correlated with slight progressive radial shortening, which was not clinically relevant.

Volar locking plating of distal radial fractures is a reliable form of treatment without substantial late displacement.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:396–400.

Volar Locking Plates (VLP) have revolutionised the treatment of distal radius fractures allowing the anatomic reduction and stable fixation of the more comminuted and unstable of fractures. The benefits of this in terms of range of movement (ROM), pain and earlier return to work and daily activities is documented. However we were interested in was what improvements in wrist function patients made from 6 to 12 months after injury?

Aims. To report the outcomes of patients with a fracture of the distal tibia who were treated with intramedullary nail versus locking plate in the five years after participating in the Fixation of Distal Tibia fracture (FixDT) trial. Methods. The FixDT trial reported the results for 321 patients randomized to nail or locking plate fixation in the first 12 months after their injury. In this follow-up study, we report the results of 170 of the original participants who agreed to be followed up until five years. Participants reported their Disability Rating Index (DRI) and health-related quality of life (EuroQol five-dimension three-level questionnaire) annually by self-reported questionnaire. Further surgical interventions related to the fracture were also recorded. Results. There was no evidence of a difference in patient-reported disability, health-related quality of life, or the need for further surgery between participants treated with either type of fixation at five years. Considering the combined results for all participants, there was no significant change in DRI scores after the first 12 months of follow-up (difference between 12 and 24 months, 3.3 (95% confidence interval -1.8 to 8.5); p = 0.203), with patients reporting around 20% disability at five years. Conclusion. This study shows that the moderate levels of disability and reduced quality of life reported by participants 12 months after a fracture of the distal tibia persist in the medium term, with little evidence of improvement after the first year. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(7):795–800

Objectives. Secondary fracture healing is strongly influenced by the stiffness of the bone-fixator system. Biomechanical tests are extensively used to investigate stiffness and strength of fixation devices. The stiffness values reported in the literature for locked plating, however, vary by three orders of magnitude. The aim of this study was to examine the influence that the method of restraint and load application has on the stiffness produced, the strain distribution within the bone, and the stresses in the implant for locking plate constructs. Methods. Synthetic composite bones were used to evaluate experimentally the influence of four different methods of loading and restraining specimens, all used in recent previous studies. Two plate types and three screw arrangements were also evaluated for each loading scenario. Computational models were also developed and validated using the experimental tests. Results. The method of loading was found to affect the gap stiffness strongly (by up to six times) but also the magnitude of the plate stress and the location and magnitude of strains at the bone-screw interface. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that the method of loading is responsible for much of the difference in reported stiffness values in the literature. It also shows that previous contradictory findings, such as the influence of working length and very large differences in failure loads, can be readily explained by the choice of loading condition. Cite this article: A. MacLeod, A. H. R. W. Simpson, P. Pankaj. Experimental and numerical investigation into the influence of loading conditions in biomechanical testing of locking plate fracture fixation devices. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:111–120. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0074.R2

Aims

Distal third clavicle (DTC) fractures are increasing in incidence. Due to their instability and nonunion risk, they prove difficult to treat. Several different operative options for DTC fixation are reported but current evidence suggests variability in operative fixation. Given the lack of consensus, our objective was to determine the current epidemiological trends in DTC as well as their management within the UK.

The October 2023 Trauma Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Intramedullary nailing versus sliding hip screw in trochanteric fracture management: the INSITE randomized clinical trial; Five-year outcomes for patients with a displaced fracture of the distal tibia; Direct anterior versus anterolateral approach in hip joint hemiarthroplasty; Proximal humerus fractures: treat them all nonoperatively?; Tranexamic acid administration by prehospital personnel; Locked plating versus nailing for proximal tibia fractures: a multicentre randomized controlled trial; A retrospective review of the rate of septic knee arthritis after retrograde femoral nailing for traumatic femoral fractures at a single academic institution.

The August 2024 Trauma Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Does topical vancomycin prevent fracture-related infections in closed fractures undergoing open reduction and internal fixation? A randomized controlled trial; Is postoperative splinting advantageous after upper limb fracture surgery?; Does suprapatellar nailing resolve knee pain?; Locking versus non-locking plate fixation in comminuted talar neck fractures: a biomechanical study using cadaveric specimens; Revolutionizing recovery metrics: PROMIS versus SMFA in orthopaedic trauma care; Dorsal hook plating of patella fractures: reliable fixation and satisfactory outcomes; The impact of obesity on subtrochanteric femur fracture outcomes; Low-dose NSAIDs (ketorolac) and cytokine modulation in orthopaedic polytrauma: a detailed analysis.

The April 2023 Trauma Roundup. 360. looks at: Displaced femoral neck fractures in patients aged 55 to 70 years: internal fixation or total hip arthroplasty?; Tibial plateau fractures: continuous passive motion approves range of motion; Lisfranc fractures: to fuse or not to fuse, that is the question; Is hardware removal after clavicle fracture plate fixation beneficial?; Fixation to coverage in Grade IIIB open fractures – what’s the time window?; Nonoperative versus locking plate fixation in the proximal humerus; Retrograde knee nailing or lateral plate for distal femur fractures?

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare two fixation methods for surgical neck proximal humeral fractures with medial calcar comminution:. locking plate fixation alone and. locking plate fixation with intramedullary allograft fibular bone peg augmentation. Method: Eight embalmed pairs of cadaveric specimens were utilized in this study. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans were initially performed to determine the bone density of the specimens. Surgical neck proximal humerus fractures were simulated in these specimens by creating a 1-centimeter wedge-shaped osteotomy at the level of the surgical neck to simulate medial calcar fracture comminution. Each pair of specimens had one arm randomly repaired with locking plate fixation, and the other arm repaired with locking plate fixation augmented with an intramedullary fibular autograft bone peg. The constructs were tested in bending to determine the failure loads, and initial stiffness using Digital Imaging Correlation (DIC) technology. The moment created by the rotator cuff was replicated by fixating the humeral head, and applying a point load to the distal humerus. A load was applied with a displacement rate of 4 mm/min, and was stopped approximately every 5 lbs to take a picture and record the load. This process was continued until failure of the specimens was obtained. Results: The intramedullary bone peg autograft increased the failure load of the constructs by 1.57±0.59 times (p = 0.026). Initial stiffness of the construct was also increased 3.13±2.10 times (p = 0.0079) with use of the bone peg. Conclusion: The stronger and stiffer construct provided by the addition of an intramedullary fibular allograft bone peg to locking plate fixation may help maintain reduction, and reduce the risk of fixation failure in surgical neck proximal humerus fractures with medial comminution

Osteosynthesis of high-energy metaphyseal proximal tibia fractures is still challenging, especially in patients with severe soft tissue injuries and/or short stature. Although the use of external fixators is the traditional treatment of choice for open comminuted fractures, patients' acceptance is low due to the high profile and therefore the physical burden of the devices. Recently, clinical case reports have shown that supercutaneous locked plating used as definite external fixation could be an efficient alternative. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of implant configuration on stability and interfragmentary motions of unstable proximal tibia fractures fixed by means of externalized locked plating. Based on a right tibia CT scan of a 48 years-old male donor, a finite element model of an unstable proximal tibia fracture was developed to compare the stability of one internal and two different externalized plate fixations. A 2-cm osteotomy gap, located 5 cm distally to the articular surface and replicating an AO/OTA 41-C2.2 fracture, was virtually fixed with a medial stainless steel LISS-DF plate. Three implant configurations (IC) with different plate elevations were modelled and virtually tested biomechanically: IC-1 with 2-mm elevation (internal locked plate fixation), IC-2 with 22-mm elevation (externalized locked plate fixation with thin soft tissue simulation) and IC-3 with 32-mm elevation (externalized locked plate fixation with thick soft tissue simulation). Axial loads of 25 kg (partial weightbearing) and 80 kg (full weightbearing) were applied to the proximal tibia end and distributed at a ratio of 80%/20% on the medial/lateral condyles. A hinge joint was simulated at the distal end of the tibia. Parameters of interest were construct stiffness, as well as interfragmentary motion and longitudinal strain at the most lateral aspect of the fracture. Construct stiffness was 655 N/mm (IC-1), 197 N/mm (IC-2) and 128 N/mm (IC-3). Interfragmentary motions under partial weightbearing were 0.31 mm (IC-1), 1.09 mm (IC-2) and 1.74 mm (IC-3), whereas under full weightbearing they were 0.97 mm (IC-1), 3.50 mm (IC-2) and 5.56 mm (IC-3). The corresponding longitudinal strains at the fracture site under partial weightbearing were 1.55% (IC-1), 5.45% (IC-2) and 8.70% (IC-3). From virtual biomechanics point of view, externalized locked plating of unstable proximal tibia fractures with simulated thin and thick soft tissue environment seems to ensure favorable conditions for callus formation with longitudinal strains at the fracture site not exceeding 10%, thus providing appropriate relative stability for secondary bone healing under partial weightbearing during the early postoperative phase

Aims. Debate continues regarding the optimum management of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures (PDFFs). This study aims to determine which operative treatment is associated with the lowest perioperative morbidity and mortality when treating low (Su type II and III) PDFFs comparing lateral locking plate fixation (LLP-ORIF) or distal femoral arthroplasty (DFA). Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study of 60 consecutive unilateral (PDFFs) of Su types II (40/60) and III (20/60) in patients aged ≥ 60 years: 33 underwent LLP-ORIF (mean age 81.3 years (SD 10.5), BMI 26.7 (SD 5.5); 29/33 female); and 27 underwent DFA (mean age 78.8 years (SD 8.3); BMI 26.7 (SD 6.6); 19/27 female). The primary outcome measure was reoperation. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications, calculated blood loss, transfusion requirements, functional mobility status, length of acute hospital stay, discharge destination and mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Cox multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for reoperation after LLP-ORIF. Results. Follow-up was at mean 3.8 years (1.0 to 10.4). One-year mortality was 13% (8/60). Reoperation was more common following LLP-ORIF: 7/33 versus 0/27 (p = 0.008). Five-year survival for reoperation was significantly better following DFA; 100% compared to 70.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 51.8% to 89.8%, p = 0.006). There was no difference for the endpoint mechanical failure (including radiological loosening); ORIF 74.5% (56.3 to 92.7), and DFA 78.2% (52.3 to 100, p = 0.182). Reoperation following LLP-ORIF was independently associated with medial comminution; hazard ratio (HR) 10.7 (1.45 to 79.5, p = 0.020). Anatomical reduction was protective against reoperation; HR 0.11 (0.013 to 0.96, p = 0.046). When inadequately fixed fractures were excluded, there was no difference in five-year survival for either reoperation (p = 0.156) or mechanical failure (p = 0.453). Conclusion. Absolute reoperation rates are higher following LLP fixation of low PDFFs compared to DFA. Where LLP-ORIF was well performed with augmentation of medial comminution, there was no difference in survival compared to DFA. Though necessary in very low fractures, DFA should be used with caution in patients with greater life expectancies due to the risk of longer term aseptic loosening. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):635–643

Distal radius fractures have an incidence rate of 17.5% among all fractures. Their treatment in case of comminution, commonly managed by volar locking plates, is still challenging. Variable-angle screw technology could counteract these challenges. Additionally, combined volar and dorsal plate fixation is valuable for treatment of complex fractures at the distal radius. Currently, biomechanical investigation of the competency of supplemental dorsal plating is scant. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical competency of double-plated distal radius fractures in comparison to volar locking plate fixation. Complex intra-articular distal radius fractures AO/OTA 23-C 2.1 and C 3.1 were created by means of osteotomies, simulating dorsal defect with comminution of the lunate facet in 30 artificial radii, assigned to 3 study groups with 10 specimens in each. The styloid process of each radius was separated from the shaft and the other articular fragments. In group 1, the lunate facet was divided to 3 equally-sized fragments. In contrast, the lunate in group 2 was split in a smaller dorsal and a larger volar fragment, whereas in group 3 was divided in 2 equal fragments. Following fracture reduction, each specimen was first instrumented with a volar locking plate and non-destructive quasi-static biomechanical testing under axial loading was performed in specimen's inclination of 40° flexion, 40° extension and 0° neutral position. Mediolateral radiographs were taken under 100 N loads in flexion and extension, as well as under 150 N loads in neutral position. Subsequently, all biomechanical tests were repeated after supplemental dorsal locking plate fixation of all specimens. Based on machine and radiographic data, stiffness and angular displacement between the shaft and lunate facet were determined. Stiffness in neutral position (N/mm) without/with dorsal plating was on average 164.3/166, 158.5/222.5 and 181.5/207.6 in groups 1–3. It increased significantly after supplementary dorsal plating in groups 2 and 3. Predominantly, from biomechanical perspective supplemental dorsal locked plating increases fixation stability of unstable distal radius fractures after volar locked plating. However, its effect depends on the fracture pattern at the distal radius

Introduction:. Mayo 2A Olecranon fractures are traditionally managed with a tension band wire device (TBW) but locking plates may also be used to treat these injuries. Objectives:. To compare clinical outcomes and treatment cost between TBW and locking plate fixation in Mayo 2A fractures. Methods:. All olecranon fractures admitted 2008–2013 were identified (n=129). Patient notes and radiographs were studied. Outcomes were recorded with the QuickDASH (Disabilies of Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score. Incidence of infection, hardware irritation, non-union, fixation failure and re-operation rate were recorded. Results:. 89 patients had Mayo 2A fractures (69%). Of these patients 64 underwent TBW (n=48) or locking plate fixation (n=16). The mean age for both groups were 57 (15–93) and 60 (22–80) respectively. In the TBW group, the final follow-up QuickDASH was 12.9, compared with 15.0 for the Locking plate group. There was no statistically significant difference between either group (p = 0.312). 19 of the 48 TBW patients had complications (48%). There was 1 infection (2%). 15 cases of metalwork irritation (31%). 1 non-union (2%). 2 fixation failures (4%). 14 of the 48 TBW patients had re-operations (29%). There were 13 removal of metalwork procedures (27%), 1 washout (2%) and 2 revision fixations (4%). There were 0 complications and 0 re-operations in the 16 patients who underwent locking plate fixation. This was statistically significant, (p = 0.003) and (p= 0.015) respectively. TBW costs £7.00 verses £244.10 for a locking plate. Theatre costs were equivalent. A 30 minute day surgery removal of metalwork or similar case costs £1420. In this cohort, when costs of re-operation were included, locking plates were on average £177 less per patient. Conclusions:. Locking plates are superior to TBW in terms of incidence of post-operative morbidity and re-operation rate. Financial savings may be made by choosing a more expensive initial implant

There has been a substantial increase in the surgical treatment of unstable chest wall injuries recently. While a variety of fixation methods exist, most surgeons have used plate and screw fixation. Rib-specific locking plate systems are available, however evidence supporting their use over less-expensive, conventional plate systems (such as pelvic reconstruction plates) is lacking. We sought to address this by comparing outcomes between locking plates and non-locking plates in a cohort of patients from a prior randomized trial who received surgical stabilization of their unstable chest wall injury. We used data from the surgical group of a previous multi-centred, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing surgical fixation of acute, unstable chest wall injuries to non-operative management. In this substudy, our primary outcome was hardware-related complications and re-operation. Secondary outcomes included ventilator free days (VFDs) in the first 28 days following injury, length of ICU and hospital stay, and general health outcomes (SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores). Categorical variables are reported as frequency counts and percentages and the two groups were compared using Fisher's Exact test. Continuous data are reported as median and interquartile range and the two groups were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. From the original cohort of 207 patients, 108 had been treated surgically and had data available on the type of plate construct used. Fifty-nine patients (55%) had received fixation with non-locking plates (primarily 3.5 or 2.7 mm pelvic reconstruction plates) and 49 (45%) had received fixation with locking plates (primarily rib-specific locking plates). The two groups were similar in regard to baseline and injury characteristics. In the non-locking group, 15% of patients (9/59) had evidence of hardware loosening versus 4% (2/49 patients) in the locking group (p = 0.1). The rate of re-operation for hardware complications was 3% in the non-locking group versus 0% in the locking group (p = 0.5). No patients in either group required revision fixation for loss of reduction or nonunion. There were no differences between the groups with regard to VFDs (26.3 [19.6 – 28] vs. 27.3 [18.3 – 28], p = 0.83), length of ICU stay (6.5 [2.0 – 13.1] vs 4.1 [0 – 11], p = 0.12), length of hospital stay (17 [10 – 32] vs. 17 [10 – 24], p = 0.94) or SF-36 PCS (40.9 [33.6 – 51.0] vs 43.4 [34.1 – 49.6], p = 0.93) or MCS scores (47.8 [36.9 – 57.9] vs 46.9 [40.5 – 57.4], p = 0.95). We found no statistically significant differences in outcomes between patients who received surgical stabilization of their unstable chest wall injury when comparing non-locking plates versus locking plates. However, the rate of hardware loosening was nearly 4 times higher in the non-locking plate group and trended towards statistical significance, although re-operation related to this was less frequent. This finding is not surprising, given the inherent challenges of rib fixation including thin bones, comminution, potential osteopenia and a post-operative environment of constant motion. We believe that the increased cost of locking plate fixation in this setting is likely justifiable given these findings

There is theoretical concern that volar plating has a disadvantage in cantilever bending when axially loaded dorsal to the neutral axis. This has implications for postoperative rehabilitation protocols and overall outcomes related to maintenance of reduction. Most recent biomechanical studies have compared volar locking plates to traditional dorsal non-locked plates. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability of volar and dorsal locking plate fixation in a model of dorsally unstable distal radius fractures. Fourteen synthetic composite radii (Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA) were used for this study. A dorsally unstable, extra-articular distal radius fracture was simulated by creating a dorsal wedge-shaped defect in the distal metaphysis. Half of the specimens were plated dorsally (n=7) while the other half were plated volarly (n=7) with 2.4mm distal radius locking T-plates (Synthes, Canada). Each specimen was loaded axially in five different positions: central (along the neutral axis of the radius) as well as dorsal, volar, radial and ulnar to the neutral axis using a MTS Sintech 1/G materials testing machine (MTS Systems, Eden Prairie, MN). The plated radii were loaded to 100 N in each position simulating physiological loading during normal range of motion. The main outcome measure was construct stiffness of the plate-bone system (slope of load-displacement curve) for all five loading positions. Construct stiffness with dorsal locking plates was seven times greater than volar locking plates when dorsally loaded (p < 0.001), 60% greater when centrally loaded (p = 0.055) and 35% greater when volarly loaded (p = 0.029). There was no significant difference in stiffness with any other loading configurations. The stability of dorsal locking plate fixation is superior to volar locking plate fixation in the setting of large dorsal defects in the distal radius. This is applicable to both fractures with dorsal comminution and dorsal opening-wedge distal radial osteotomies. Further clinical investigation is needed to compare functional outcomes and complication rates between modern dorsal and volar locking plate techniques

Introduction: Several studies have compared various plate constructs for distal intra-articular humerus fractures. In our experience osteoporotic bone and fractures that have a transverse component close to the elbow joint have tenuous fixation with traditional plating systems due to, at most, two screws in the distal fragment through the plate. Therefore, the aim of this study was to obtain objective data on the performance of two plating systems used for fixation of intra-articular distal humerus fractures with a low transverse component with only two screws through a 3.5 LC-DCP distally. It was hypothesized that locked plating would be more stable than standard plating after cyclic loading. Methods: Twenty pairs of fresh matched cadaver humeri of patients older than 65 years old were harvested. DEXA scans of the right forearm from each pair were obtained. Osteotomies were performed to simulate comminuted supracondylar humerus fracture with intercondylar split (OTA 13-C2.3). The specimens were then randomly assigned to locking or non-locking plate fixation. Ten paired specimens were tested in simulated extension and the remaining ten were tested axially. Fragment motion relative to the humeral shaft was measured using kinematic analysis at the fracture gap. Differences in resultant fragment translations and rotations between fixation groups were checked for significance (p< 0.05) using a one-tailed paired t-test. Differences in cycles to failure were checked for significance using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: On average, during extension tests, the humeri with locking plate fixation did not survive significantly more cycles (4352) than with non-locking (4755) plate fixation. There was no significant difference in fragment translation between locking (0.8 mm) and non-locking (1.7 mm) plates. However, there was a significant difference in fragment rotation between locking (2.8 degrees) and non-locking (3.9 degrees) fixations. On axial testing, the humeri with locking plates on average survived more loading cycles (4072) than those with non-locking plate fixation (2115), but the difference was not significant. Mean translation for locking plate fixation (3.6 mm) was significantly less than for non-locking plate fixation (5.7 mm) and mean fragment rotation was significantly less for locking plate fixation (13.3 degrees) than for non-locking plate fixation (17.8 degrees). Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrated that the fixed-angle 3.5 mm locking plate constructs for comminuted intercondylar humerus fractures reduced fracture site motion, sometimes significantly so, relative to the non-locking constructs in osteoporotic bone. The potential benefit of increased fixation survivability and decreased fracture site motion in osteoporotic bone needs to be evaluated clinically