Abstract
Introduction:
Mayo 2A Olecranon fractures are traditionally managed with a tension band wire device (TBW) but locking plates may also be used to treat these injuries.
Objectives:
To compare clinical outcomes and treatment cost between TBW and locking plate fixation in Mayo 2A fractures.
Methods:
All olecranon fractures admitted 2008–2013 were identified (n=129). Patient notes and radiographs were studied. Outcomes were recorded with the QuickDASH (Disabilies of Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score. Incidence of infection, hardware irritation, non-union, fixation failure and re-operation rate were recorded.
Results:
89 patients had Mayo 2A fractures (69%). Of these patients 64 underwent TBW (n=48) or locking plate fixation (n=16). The mean age for both groups were 57 (15–93) and 60 (22–80) respectively. In the TBW group, the final follow-up QuickDASH was 12.9, compared with 15.0 for the Locking plate group. There was no statistically significant difference between either group (p = 0.312). 19 of the 48 TBW patients had complications (48%). There was 1 infection (2%). 15 cases of metalwork irritation (31%). 1 non-union (2%). 2 fixation failures (4%). 14 of the 48 TBW patients had re-operations (29%). There were 13 removal of metalwork procedures (27%), 1 washout (2%) and 2 revision fixations (4%).
There were 0 complications and 0 re-operations in the 16 patients who underwent locking plate fixation. This was statistically significant, (p = 0.003) and (p= 0.015) respectively. TBW costs £7.00 verses £244.10 for a locking plate. Theatre costs were equivalent. A 30 minute day surgery removal of metalwork or similar case costs £1420. In this cohort, when costs of re-operation were included, locking plates were on average £177 less per patient.
Conclusions:
Locking plates are superior to TBW in terms of incidence of post-operative morbidity and re-operation rate. Financial savings may be made by choosing a more expensive initial implant.
