Introduction. Limb-length discrepancy (LLD) is a common postoperative complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study focuses on the correlation between patients’ perception of LLD after THA and the anatomical and functional leg length, pelvic and knee alignments and foot height. Previous publications have explored this topic in patients without significant spinal pathology or previous spine or lower extremity surgery. The objective of this work is to verify if the results are the same in case of stiff or fused spine. Methods. 170 patients with stiff spine (less than 10° L1-S1 lordosis variation between standing and sitting) were evaluated minimum 1 year after unilateral primary THA implantation using EOS® images in standing position (46/170 had previous lumbar fusion). We excluded cases with previous lower limbs surgery or frontal and sagittal spinal imbalance. 3D measures were performed to evaluate femoral and tibial length, femoral offset, pelvic obliquity, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), knee flexion/hyperextension angle, tibial and femoral rotation. Axial pelvic rotation was measured as the angle between the line through the centers of the hips and the EOS x-ray beam source. The distance between middle of the tibial plafond and the ground was used to investigate the height of the foot. For data with normal distribution, paired Student's t-test and independent sample t-test were used for analysis. Univariate logistic regression was used to determine the correlation between the perception of limb length discrepancy and different variables. Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate the correlation between the patient perception of LLD and variables found significant in the univariate analysis. Significance level was set at 0.05. Results. Anatomical femoral length correlated with patients’ perception of LLD but other variables were significant (the height of the foot, sagittal and frontal knee alignment, pelvic obliquity and pelvic rotation more than 10°). Interestingly some factors induced an unexpected perception of LLD despite a non-significant femoral length discrepancy less than 1cm (pelvic rotation and obliquity, height of the foot). Conclusions. LLD is a multifactorial problem. This study showed that the anatomical femoral length as the factor that can be modified with THA technique or choice of prosthesis is not the only important factor. A comprehensive clinical and radiological evaluation is necessary preoperatively to investigate spinal stiffness, pelvic obliquity and rotation, sagittal and coronal knee alignment and foot deformity in these patients. Our study has limitations as we do not have preoperative EOS measurements for all patients. We cannot assess changes in leg length as a result of THA. We also did not investigate the degree of any foot deformities as flat foot deformity may potentially affect the patients perception of the leg length. Instead, we measured the distance between the medial malleolus and ground that can reflect the foot arch height. More cases must be included to evaluate the potential influence of pelvis anatomy and functional orientation (pelvic incidence, sacral slope and pelvic tilt) but this study points out that spinal stiffness significantly decreases the LLD tolerance previously reported in patients without degenerative stiffness or fusion

Introduction. Leg length discrepancy (LLD) in patients with unilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) can be problematic for both patients and surgeons. Patients can acquire gait asymmetry, back pain, and arthritis. Surgical considerations include timing of correction and arthroplasty planning. This study audits standing long leg films performed at skeletal maturity in our patients. The aim of this study is to identify if surgical procedure or AVN type could predict the odds of needing an LLD Intervention (LLDI) and influence our surveillance. Materials and Methods. Hospital database was searched for all patients diagnosed with DDH. Inclusion criteria were patients with appropriately performed long leg films at skeletal maturity. Exclusion criteria were patients with non DDH pathology, skeletally immature and inadequate radiographs. All data was tabulated in excel and SPSS was used for analysis. Traumacad was used for measurements and AVN and radiologic outcome grades were independently classified in duplicate. Results. 110 patients were identified. The mean age of follow-up was 15 years with final average LLD of 1mm(±5mm). The DDH leg tended to be longer and length primarily in the femur. 31(28.2%) patients required an LLDI. 19 Patients had a final LLD >1.5cm. There was no statistical significant difference in the odds of needing an LLDI by type of surgical procedure or AVN. AVN type 4 was associated with greatest odds of intervention. The DDH leg was more likely to require ipsilateral epiphysiodesis or contralateral lengthening in Type 1 and 2 AVN. Conclusions. The DDH leg tends to be longer, leg lengths should be monitored, and leg length interventions are frequently required irrespective of previous DDH surgical procedure or the presence of AVN

Introduction. While THA is associated with positive results and long-term improvement in patient quality of life, outcomes are nonetheless associated with adverse events and post-procedural deficits related to discrepancies in leg length (LLD), offset and cup placement. Post-THA errors in these parameters are associated with gait alteration, low back pain and patient dissatisfaction. Such discrepancies often necessitate revision and increasingly lead to medical malpractice litigation. Maintaining accuracy in post-surgical leg length, offset and cup placement during THA is difficult and subject to error. The sensitivity of these factors is highlighted in studies that have shown that a change of as little as 5 degrees of flexion or abduction can induce alterations in leg length of up to several millimeters. Similarly, positioning of implants can alter global and femoral offset, affecting abductor strength, range of motion and overall physical function. Compounding the biochemical issues associated with inaccurate leg length are the costs associated with these deficits. Traditional freehand techniques of managing intra-operative parameters rely on surgeon experience and tissue tensioning to manually place components accurately. These methods, however, are only able to assess leg length and are subject to inaccuracies associated with patient movement or orientation changes during surgery. Mechanical methods of minimizing post-surgical discrepancies have been developed, such as outrigger or caliper devices, although these methods also address leg length only and provide poor feedback regarding offset and center of rotation, therefore providing insufficient data to accurately achieve appropriate post-surgical leg length. Computer-assisted navigation methods provide more data regarding leg length, offset and center of rotation, but are limited by their cumbersome nature and the large capital costs associated with the systems. The Intellijoint HIP. ®. surgical smart tool (Intellijoint Surgical, Inc., Waterloo, ON) is an intra-operative guidance tool that provides surgeons with real time data on leg length, offset and center of rotation, thereby allowing for confident selection of the correct implant in order to ensure appropriate post-surgical biomechanics. The early clinical results from an initial cohort of patients indicate that Intellijoint HIP. ®. is safe and effective. No adverse events were reported in the initial cohort, and the smart tool was able to measure surgical parameters to within 1mm when compared to radiographic measurements. With training cases removed, 100% of cases had a post-procedure leg length discrepancy of less than 5mm. This paper describes the indications, procedural technique and early clinical results of the Intellijoint HIP. ®. smart tool, which offers a safe, accurate and easy-to-use option for hip surgeons to manage leg length, offset and cup position intra-operatively

Objective. Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) involves performing a corrective osteotomy of the proximal tibia and removing a wedge of bone to correct varus alignment. Although previous studies have investigated changes in leg length before and after OWHTO using X-rays, none has evaluated three-dimensional (3D) leg length changes after OWHTO. We therefore used 3D preoperative planning software to evaluate changes in leg length after OWHTO in three dimensions. Methods. The study subjects were 55 knees of 46 patients (10 men and 36 women of mean age 69.9 years) with medial osteoarthritis of the knee or osteonecrosis of the medial femoral condyle with a femorotibial angle of >185º and restricted range of motion (extension <–10º, flexion <130º), excluding those also suffering from patellofemoral arthritis or lateral osteoarthritis of the knee. OWHTO was simulated from computed tomography scans of the whole leg using ZedHTO 3D preoperative planning software. We analyzed the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), flexion contracture angle (FCA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), angle of correction, wedge length, 3D tibial length, 3D leg length, and 3D increase in leg length before and after OWHTO. We also performed univariate and multivariate analysis of factors affecting the change in leg length (preoperative and postoperative H-K-A angle, wedge length, and correction angle). Results. Mean HKA increased significantly from −4.7º ± 2.7º to 3.5º ± 1.3º, as did mean mMPTA from 83.7º ± 3.3º to 92.5º ± 3.0º (p <0.01). Mean FCA was 4.7º ± 3.6° preoperatively and 4.8º ± 3.3º postoperatively, a difference that was not significant (p = 0.725). The mean correction angle was 9.1º ± 2.8º and the mean wedge length was 9.4º ± 3.2º mm. Mean tibial length increased significantly by 4.7 ± 2.3 mm (p <0.01), and mean leg length by 5.6 ± 2.8 mm (p <0.01). The change in leg length was strongly correlated with wedge length (R = 0.846, adjusted R. 2. = 0.711, p <0.01). Discussion and Conclusion. Mean 3D leg length after OWHTO increased significantly by 5.4 ± 3.1 mm. A difference in leg length of >5 mm is believed to affect back pain and gait abnormalities, and changes in leg length must therefore be taken into consideration. The 3D dimensional change in leg length was strongly correlated with wedge length, and could be predicted by the formula (change in leg length in mm) = [(wedge length in mm) ×0.75) − 1.5]. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Typical devices to limit leg length changes rely on a fixed point in the ileum and femur in order to measure leg length changes intraoperatively. The aim of this study is to determine the ideal position for placement of these devices and to identify potential sources of error. Using saw bones the leg length device was attached at four different positions along the iliac crest extending from the ASIS to its midpoint. After marking the femur on the lateral edge of the Greater Trochanter, measurements were taken with gradually increasing leg length from each individual position on the ileum. This was also performed for different degrees of hip flexion. It was determined that when the hip was in an extended position the degree of error was small for all positions along the iliac crest, with a tendency for an increase error the closer the pin is to the ASIS. When the hip is flexed the error is increased with pin positions closer to the ASIS. With a lengthening of 10 mm, minimal leg length changes can be determined using the device. More than 20 mm resulted in significant change using the leg length device. Ideal iliac crest pin position is towards the midpoint of the iliac crest, which will minimise the potential error. Measuring the leg length while the hip is in a neutral position will limit the error and increase the accuracy—thus avoiding unwanted lengthening

Introduction. Leg length discrepancy is a significant concern after total hip replacement (THR). We hypothesised that the intra-operative use of a navigation system was able to accurately control the leg length during THR. Material. 50 cases have been prospectively analysed. There were 29 men and 21 women, with a mean age of 66.1 years (range, 50 to 80 years), all operated on for THR for end-stage hip osteoarthritis. Methods. All procedures were performed with a non-image based navigation system. The expected correction of the leg length was defined prior to the procedure. The leg length was recorded before any bone resection by the 3D-distance between the pelvic and the femoral navigation trackers when placing the operated leg in a position near the anatomic one. The THR was performed according to the indication of the navigation system. The vertical positioning of the femoral component and the length of the prosthetic neck were defined to achieve the expected planning; however a correction was allowed to compensate for excessive muscular tension or risk of prosthetic instability according to the surgeon's judgment. The final leg length was recorded with the same technique as previously, with an accurate control of the repositioning of the limb in the 3D space by the navigation system. The length variation before and after THR measured by the navigation system was compared to the planning and to a conventional radiographic measurement on plain, standing pelvic X-rays with a Wilcoxon test at a 5% level of significance. The linear correlation coefficient between the different techniques was calculated. The agreement between the different techniques was assessed according to Bland-Altman. Results. The mean planned leg length change was 7.1 ± 6.1 mm. The mean leg length variation was 9.7 ± 4.2 mm as measured by the navigation system, and 11.0 ± 9.2 mm as measured on plain X-rays. The expected goal was achieved within 5 mm for 45 patients (90%). There was no significant difference between paired navigated and radiographic measurements (p=0.46). There was no significant difference between the planning variation and the navigated measurements (p=0.15). There was a good correlation between the planning variation and the navigated measurements (R. 2. =0.59, p<0.001). There was a good coherence between the planning variation and the navigated measurements. Discussion. The hypothesis of the current study was confirmed. The navigation system used in the current study was able to control very accurately the leg length change during THR. This technique of measurements may be more accurate and more precise than any conventional technique of intra-operative leg length control. The incidence of changes in the implant size or position can be easily detected, and the best compromise may be chosen intra-operatively

Summary. The mathematical model has proven to be highly accurate in measuring leg length before and after surgery to determine how leg length effects hip joint mechanics. Introduction. Leg length discrepancy (LLD) has been proven to be one of the most concerning problems associated with total hip arthroplasty (THA). Long-term follow-up studies have documented the presence of LLD having direct correlation with patient dissatisfaction, dislocation, back pain, and early complications. Several researchers sought to minimize limb length discrepancy based on pre-operative radiological templating or intra-operative measurements. While often being a common occurrence in clinical practice to compensate for LLD intra-operatively, the center of rotation of the hip joint has often changes unintentionally due to excessive reaming. Therefore, the clinical importance of LLD is still difficult to solve and remains a concern for clinicians. Objective. The objective of this study is two-fold: (1) use a validated forward-solution hip model to theoretically analyze the effects of LLD, gaining better understanding of mechanisms leading to early complication of THA and poor patient satisfaction and (2) to investigate the effect of the altered center of rotation of the hip joint regardless LLD compensation. Methods. The theoretical mathematical model used in this study has been previously validated using fluoroscopic results from existing implant designs and telemetric devices. The model can be used to theoretically investigate various surgical alignments, approaches, and procedures. In this study, we analyzed LLD and the effects of the altered center of rotation regardless of LLD compensation surgeons made. The simulations were conducted in both swing and stance phase of gait. Results. During swing phase, leg shortening lead to loosening of the hip capsular ligaments and subsequently, variable kinematic patterns. The momentum of the lower leg increased to levels where the ligaments could not properly constrain the hip leading to the femoral head sliding from within the acetabular cup (Figure 1). This piston motion led to decreased contact area and increased contact stress within the cup. Leg lengthening did not yield femoral head sliding but increased joint tension and contact stress. A tight hip may be an influential factor leading to back pain and poor patient satisfaction. During stance phase, leg shortening caused femoral head sliding leading to decreased contact area and an increase in contact stress. Leg lengthening caused an increase in capsular ligaments tension leading to higher stress in the hip joint (Figure 2). Interestingly, when the acetabular cup was superiorized and the surgeon compensated for LLD, thus matching the pre-operative leg length by increasing the neck length of the femoral implant, the contact forces and stresses were marginally increased at heel strike (Figure 3). Conclusion and Discussion. Altering the leg length during surgery can lead to higher contact forces and contact stresses due to tightening the hip joint or increasing likelihood of hip joint separation. Leg shortening often lead to higher stress within the joint. Further assessment must be conducted to develop tools that surgeons can use to ensure post-operative leg length is similar to the pre-operative condition. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction:. High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a common treatment for medial compartment arthritis of the knee in younger, more active patients. The HTO shifts load away from the degenerative medial compartment and into the lateral compartment. This change can be accomplished with either a lateral closing or a medial opening wedge HTO. An HTO also potentially affects leg length. Mathematical models predict that the osteotomy type (opening versus closing) and the magnitude of the correction determine the change in leg length, but no in vivo studies have been published. The purpose of this study is to quantify and compare leg length change following opening and closing wedge HTO. Study Design:. Retrospective cohort study – Level III evidence. Methods:. Thirty-two medial opening and 32 lateral closing HTO's were selected from patients treated at our institution between 2006 and 2009. Pre-operative and one-year post-operative full-length lower extremity radiographs were obtained along with operative reports. Pre- and post-operative coronal plane alignment and leg length were measured and surgical details were collected. Results:. The 64 osteotomies were performed in 62 patients (43 male, 19 female) at an average age of 57 years. The mean opening wedge was 9.3 mm (range: 5 to 17 mm) and the mean closing wedge was 8.0 mm (range: 6 to 10 mm). Knee alignment changed from a mean of 174 degrees pre-operatively to a mean of 183 degrees post-operatively in both groups. In the medial opening wedge group, total leg length was found to increase from 836.3 ± 63.5 mm pre-operatively to 841.8 ± 64.1 post-operatively, a change of 5.5 ± 4.4 mm (p < 0.0001). A significant correlation was found between the amount of correction and the increase in overall leg length (r. 2. = 0.21, p = 0.009). In the lateral closing wedge group, total leg length was found to decrease from 840.6 ± 51.5 mm pre-operatively to 837.9 ± 52.0 post-operatively, a decrease of 2.7 ± 4.0 mm (p = 0.0008). No correlation was found between the amount of correction and the change in overall leg length. The difference in mean leg length change between opening and closing wedge osteotomies was 8.2 ± 5.9 mm (p < 0.0001). Conclusions:. Medial opening wedge HTO can result in significant leg lengthening depending on the degree of opening. Leg length changes associated with lateral closing wedge HTO are generally smaller. Both techniques results in less leg length change than mathematical models predict. Pre-operative leg length discrepancy should be considered when choosing an osteotomy technique

Introduction. Leg length and offset are important considerations in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Navigation systems are capable of providing intra-operative measurements of leg length and offset, and high accuracy has been shown in experimental studies. Objective. This in-vivo study assesses the accuracy of an imageless navigation system, with a pin-less femoral array, in measuring offset and leg length changes. Method. A prospective, consecutive series of 24 patients undergoing navigated total hip arthroplasty were included in the study. Intra-operative measurements of leg length and offset were recorded using the navigation system. For each patient pre- and post-operative digital radiographs were scaled and analysed to provide radiographic measurements of change in leg length and offset. Results. Measurements of leg length change made by the navigation system showed a statistically significant correlation with the size of change measured radiographically (R=.77, P < 0.0001). The mean difference between the radiographic and navigational measurement was 0.4 ± 2.8 mm. The navigation system was accurate to within 1 mm of the radiographic measurement in 50% of cases, within 2 mm in 67% of cases, and within 5 mm in 96% of cases. Measurements of offset change by the navigation system also showed a statistically significant correlation with radiographic measurements, however the correlation was less pronounced (R=.47, P=0.02). The mean difference between navigational and radiographic measurements was 1.4 ± 6.4 mm. The navigation system was accurate to within 1 mm of the radiographic measurement in 8% of cases, within 2 mm in 25% of cases, and within 5 mm in 75% of cases. Conclusion. This study demonstrates in-vivo that an imageless, non-invasive navigation system is a reliable tool for intra-operative leg length and offset measurement

Introduction. Leg length and offset are important considerations in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Navigation systems are capable of providing intra-operative measurements, which help guide the surgeon in leg length and offset adjustment. Objective. This controlled study investigates whether the use of computer navigation leads to more accurate achievement of pre-operative leg length and offset targets in THA. Method. A total of 61 patients were included in the study. A prospective, consecutive series of 24 patients undergoing navigated total hip arthroplasty were compared to an historic, consecutive series of 37 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty without the use of navigation. The changes made to leg length and femoral offset were measured from scaled pre- and post-operative digital radiographs. The target changes to leg length and femoral offset were recorded from pre-operative digital templating sessions. Results. No statistically significant differences in terms of age, sex and body mass index were found between the two groups. Femoral offset targets were more closely achieved in the navigated cohort compared with the non-navigated group (P < 0.05). The mean deviation from the pre-operative target offset change was 2.9 ± 2.7 mm in the navigated group, and 5.1 ± 4.6 mm in the non-navigated group. For leg length, no statistically significant difference was found between the navigated and non-navigated cohorts in the difference between planned targets and radiographic changes (P=0.78). The mean deviation from target leg length change was 3.9 ± 2.9 mm in the navigated group and 4.2 ± 3.4 mm in the non-navigated group. When the navigation system was employed, procedure time was longer by a mean of 6 minutes, however this finding was not statistically significant (P=0.084). Conclusion. The use of navigation helps the surgeon to achieve their pre-operative goals for offset change. The navigation system was not shown to impact leg length management

Background. Leg length discrepancy real or perceived remains an important source of patient dissatisfaction after a total hip replacement. Pre-operative templating and intra-operative measurement has to be used to ensure an accurate restoration of the normal centre of rotation of the hip as well as equal leg lengths. Theoretically more bone has to be resected from the femur to maintain the centre of the femoral head in the same location. This is due to a smaller size of the prosthetic femoral head compared to the native femoral head. It was postulated that this was an accurate predictor of leg length after a total hip replacement. Methods. 56 consecutive patients who underwent a total hip replacement (cemented, uncemented or hybrid) had intra-operative measurements documented of their femoral head-neck resection distance. This was compared with the measurement of the femoral prosthesis that was inserted. A telephonic survey of the patients perceived leg equality as well as a radiological measurement of their actual leg lengths on a standing AP X-ray at 6 weeks post-operatively was done. Results. Forty eight of the 56 patients (85%) reported subjectively equal leg lengths. Eight patients reported unequal leg lengths, 5 longer and 3 shorter. Of the 5 cases that reported longer leg lengths 4 had more prosthesis inserted than bone resected. The 3 shorter reported legs also had more prosthesis inserted than bone resected in 2 cases. Of the 8 patients who reported unequal leg lengths only 3 were unequal on X-ray measurement (2 longer and 1 shorter). There was good correlation between the amount of bone resected versus prosthesis inserted and the patient's subjective evaluation of leg length discrepancy, but poor correlation between subjective leg length discrepancy and objective radiological evaluation. NO DISCLOSURES

Background. Total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip is a technically demanding procedure. Restoration of the anatomical hip center frequently requires limb lengthening in excess of 4 cm and increases the risk of neurologic traction injury. However, it can be difficult to predict potential leg length change, especially in total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type IV developmental hip dysplasia. The purpose of the present study was to better define features that might aid in the preoperative prediction of leg length change in THAs with subtrochanteric femoral shortening osteotomy for Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip. Patients and Methods. Primary total hip arthroplasties with subtrochanteric femoral shortening osteotomy were performed in 70 hips for the treatment of Crowe type IV developmental hip dysplasia. The patients were subdivided into two groups with or without iliofemoral osteoarthritis. Leg length change after surgery was measured radiographically by subtracting the amount of resection of the femur from the amount of distraction of the greater trochanter. Preoperative passive hip motion was retrospectively reviewed from medical records and defined as either higher or lower motion groups. Results. The preoperative flexion of patients without iliofemoral osteoarthritis was significantly higher than for patients with iliofemoral osteoarthritis. All hips without iliofemoral OA had higher motion. The preoperative flexion in the higher motion group both with and without iliofemoral OA was significantly greater than in the lower group with iliofemoral OA (Figure 1). Leg length change in patients without iliofemoral osteoarthritis was significantly greater than with iliofemoral osteoarthritis (Figure 2), and the higher hip motion group had greater leg length change in THA than the lower motion group. No clinical evidence of postoperative neurologic injury was observed in patients with iliofemoral OA. Postoperative transient calf numbness in the distribution of the sciatic nerve was observed in 2 of 25 hips without iliofemoral OA (8.0%), however, no sensory and motor nerve deficit was observed. Discussion. The authors hypothesized that preoperative hip motion could affect soft tissue contractures, and our findings suggest that the soft tissues surrounding the hip joint with iliofemoral OA should be more contracted than the hip without OA. We also found leg length change in the higher motion group was greater than in the lower motion group. Previous studies reported limb lengthening in excess of 4 cm could increase the risk of nerve palsy. Transient calf numbness in the distribution of the sciatic nerve was observed in 2 hips without iliofemoral OA and their leg length change was not greater than 4 cm. Our findings suggest that hips without iliofemoral OA should be paid attention to protect the nerves from excessive elongation. The current study identifies several features that might help predict leg length change during the preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type IV developmental hip dysplasia

Inaccurate component placement during total hip arthroplasty (THA) can have significant and costly consequences. Malpositioning of the acetabular cup components can lead to dislocation and revision surgery, while postoperative discrepancies in leg length can lead to biomechanical imbalances, causing chronic low back pain. Current methods for monitoring these parameters intraoperatively rely on manual methods such as tissue tensioning or on the surgeon's experience, both of which are subject to inaccuracies. Computer-assisted navigation, while currently used in only a small percentage of THA procedures, is an emerging technology that has the potential to improve the accuracy with which surgeons place components during THA by providing real-time, intraoperative data. One innovative navigation system – Intellijoint HIP. ®. (Intellijoint Surgical, Waterloo, ON) – has demonstrated its accuracy, time-neutrality, safety and effectiveness in clinical studies and has the potential to improve outcomes and reduce re-admissions and revisions during both primary and revision THA. The ability to assist with placement of the cup component at a preoperative target is a hallmark of navigation systems. In studies examining the proportion of cups placed within Lewinnek's safe zone, significantly more cups were placed within this zone with the Intellijoint system than when using traditional methods (anteversion: 58% vs. 37%, p=0.005; inclination: 87% vs. 67%, p=0.002). Similarly, surgeons were better able to place the cup at a functional orientation of 40 degrees inclination/20 degrees anteversion, with a significantly higher proportion of cups placed within 10 degrees of this target while using the Intellijoint system (70%) than during conventional THA (53%, p=0.02). In comparisons with postoperative imaging, the Intellijoint system has demonstrated excellent accuracy. In a recent study, intraoperative measurements of anteversion and inclination were within 3.3 ± 3.1 degrees and 1.1 ± 0.9 degrees, respectively, of postoperative 3D EOS imaging. Results for leg length discrepancy are similarly accurate: across several studies, the mean difference between navigation and radiographic measurements ranged from 0.3 to 4.3mm. Evidence indicates that the 90-day rates of dislocation and revision surgery following primary THA with the Intellijoint system were substantially lower than rates associated with traditional methods. These results hold true following navigation-assisted revision surgery as well. At 90 days, 1 year and 2 years post-procedure, no dislocations were reported. Beyond dislocation, the overall rate of adverse events in cases using Intellijoint has been reported as remarkably low. No device-related fractures have been reported, nor have any instances of postoperative pain at the sites of the surgical pins supporting the camera and/or tracker components. Finally, there is no significant increase in surgical time associated with the use of this device, with a large study comparing navigated THA with traditional THA showing a 2.9-minute increase in procedural time (p=0.60), 1.0 minute of which occurs prior to primary incision (unpublished data). Computer-assisted navigation – and the Intellijoint HIP system specifically – has demonstrated the ability to improve the accuracy with which surgeons implant components during THA without adversely affecting operating room efficiency or patient safety. This technology has the potential to dramatically improve patient-related outcomes in both the short- and long-term and represents the benefits associated with advanced technologies in the operating room

Introduction. Limb length discrepancy after THA can result in medicolegal litigation. It can create discomfort for the patient and potentially cause back pain or affect the longevity of the implant. Some patients tolerate the length inequality better compared to others despite difference in anatomical femoral length after surgery. Methods and materials. We analyzed the 3D EOS images of 75 consecutive patients who underwent primary unilateral THA (27 men, 48 women). We measured the 3D length of the femur and tibia (anatomical length), the 3D global anatomical length (the sum of femur and tibia anatomical lengths), the 3D functional length (center of the femoral head to center of the ankle), femoral neck-shaft angle, hip-knee-ankle angle, knee flexum/recurvatum angle, sacral slopes and pelvic incidence. We correlated these parameters with the patient perception of the leg length. Results. The values for leg length and pelvic parameters are shown in table 1. 37 patients had a perception of the LLD (49.3%). When the global anatomical length was shorter on the operated side, the perception of the discrepancy was observed in 56% of the cases. In case of anatomical length longer on the operated side, the perception of the discrepancy was described by the patients in 46% of the cases. The LLD perception was correlated with difference in functional length (p=0.0001), pelvic obliquity (p=0.003) and sacral slope (p=0.023). The anatomical femoral length was not correlated with the LLD perception (p=0,008). Discussion. The perception of LLD is a multifactorial complication. We found that the anatomical femoral length (that can be directly affected by the position of the stem) is not the only important factor. The functional length of the lower extremity which can also be affected by the knee deformities is better correlated with the LLD. The pelvic obliquity and version also affect the patient perception of the LLD

Incorrect restoration of leg length (LL) and offset is a major source of patient dissatisfaction and dysfunction after total hip arthroplasties (THAs). Evaluations on anterior-posterior x-ray images are state-of-the-art to assess the accuracy of such techniques. However, x-ray based measurements of LL and offset are challenging and limited in terms of accuracy. Within this study, we evaluated the accuracy of such measurements by analysing a series of clinical data. We evaluated the results on the non-treated side, since we know that there should be no significant difference between pre- and postoperative measurements on this side. A series of 44 consecutive patients was analysed regarding changes in the difference between pre- and post-operative LL and offset measurements. Anterior-posterior x-rays were taken pre- (pre-OP) and post-operatively (post-OP) with a calibration by a scaling ruler (pre-OP) or implant size (post-OP). The LL and offset measurements were performed with a digital planning software based on the teardrop and transischial line. The distance between the teardrop/transischial line and the trochanter minor was measured to assess LL differences. Femoral offset (FO) was calculated as the orthogonal distance between the centre of the femoral head and the proximal shaft axis. Global offset (GO) was calculated as the distance between the inferior aspect of the teardrop figure and the shaft axis along the teardrop line. Descriptive statistics (mean value ± standard deviation) were calculated for the different types of measurements. Statistically significant differences were checked according to a student's t-test (α = 0.05). The differences between the pre-and post-operative situation was 0.8±3.2 mm for LL, 0.2±3.5 mm for GO, and −0.5±2.5 mm for FO when referencing to the teardrop line and 0.9±4.0 mm (LL) and −0.3±2.7 mm (FO) for the transischial line. The error distributions did not show statistically significant differences when referencing to the teardrop or transischial line. But high differences (0.1±6.6 mm) were found when comparing the LL values (teardrop vs. transischial) case-by-case. Within this study we demonstrated that x-ray based offset and LL measurements show reasonable inaccuracies. X-ray based evaluations of navigation-based techniques to assist LL and offset restoration cannot produce significantly better results than these analysed limits. That is, even if the navigation technique would be perfectly accurate, the evaluation would not achieve better accuracies than approximately ±3.5 mm for LL, ±3.5 mm for GO, and ±2.5 mm for FO

INTRODUCTION. Leg length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be functionally disabling for affected patients and can lead on to litigation issues. Assessment of limb length discrepancy during THA using traditional methods has been shown to produce inconsistent results. The aim of our study was to compare the accuracy of navigated vs. non navigated techniques in limb length restoration in THA. METHODS. A dataset of 160 consecutive THAs performed by a single surgeon was included. 103 were performed with computer navigation and 57 were non navigated. We calculated limb length discrepancy from pre and post op radiographs. We retrieved the intra-operative computer generated limb length alteration data pertaining to the navigated group. We used independent sample t test and descriptive statistics to analyse the data. RESULTS. The two subgroups were matched for age, diagnosis and preoperative leg length discrepancy. The mean age was 69.12 (37–89, SD-8.3) and the mean BMI was 29 (19–44, SD-5.03). The mean post op limb length discrepancy in the non navigated group was 5 mm (SD-6) as compared to mean of 3.5mm (SD-6.5) for the computer navigated group. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.04). 18% of patients in the non navigated group had a limb length discrepancy of >10 mm as compared to 12% in the navigated group. There was no statistically significant difference between the computer predicted leg length alterations and those measured on radiographs. (p>0.15). DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION. The use of Computer navigation in THA can be useful in reducing errors related to leg length discrepancy. It helps in reducing the rates of unacceptably high discrepancies. In our experience, the results of this technique were predictable and reproducible. We intend to continue using this tool for our total hip arthroplasties

Introduction

Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a common sequalae of limb reconstruction procedures. The subsequent biomechanical compensation can be directly linked to degenerative arthritis, lower back pain, scoliosis and functional impairment. It becomes particularly problematic when >2cm, established as a clinical standard. This two-arm experimental study assesses how reliable an iPhone application is in the measurement of LLD at different distances in control and LLD patients.

In previous congress of ISTA in Hawaii, we reported the results about accuracy of the cup center position in our image-free navigation system. In the new version of our navigation system, leg elongation and offset change as well as cup center position can be navigated. In this study, we therefore investigated the accuracy of cup center position, leg elongation and offset change.

Twenty four THA operations were performed with using the image-free OrthoPilot THA3.1 dysplasia navigation system (B. Braun Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) between August 2009 and December 2009 by three experienced surgeons. In this system, cup center height was shown as the distance from tear drop, and cup medialization was shown as horizontal distance from inner wall of acetabulum. Leg elongation and offset change were navigated by comparing the two reference points in femur between registration before neck resection and that after inserting the trial implant. After operation, the cup angles were measured on CT image, and cup center position, leg elongation and offset change were measured on plain radiography. We compared these values that indicated by the navigation system to those measured on the CT image and the plain radiography.

The average cup inclination was 37.5 ± 7.0 degree and anteversion was 22.2 ± 4.7 degree. The average absolute difference between navigation and measured angles were 5.2 ± 4.0 degree in inclination, 5.9 ± 4.0 degree in anteversion. The difference of cup height was 5.8 ± 3.9 mm, cup medialization was 3.8 ± 2.7 mm, leg elongation was 4.3±3.3mm, and offset was 5.4±4.1mm, respectively.

By using this new version navigation system, we can plan the cup center position and navigate it within smaller error of vertical and horizontal direction than the previous system. Moreover, leg elongation and offset change can be satisfactory navigated during operation. However surgeon's skill and learning curve might have influence the accuracy. We have to continue to evaluate this system and make effort to further improvement.

Introduction. Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) often results in femoral head deformity and leg length discrepancy (LLD). Objective of this study was to analyse femoral morphology in LCPD patients at skeletal maturity to assess where the LLD originates, and evaluate the effect of contralateral epiphysiodesis for length equalisation on proximal and subtrochanteric femoral lengths. Materials and Methods. All patients treated for LCPD in our institution between January 2013 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with unilateral LCPD, LLD of ≥5mm and long leg standing radiographs at skeletal maturity were included. Total leg length, femoral and tibial length, articulotrochanteric distance (ATD) and subtrochanteric femoral length were compared between LCPD side and unaffected side. Furthermore, we compared leg length measurements between patients who did and who did not have a contralateral epiphysiodesis. Results. 79 patients were included, 21/79 underwent contralateral epiphysiodesis for leg length correction. In the complete cohort the average LLD was 1.8cm (95% CI 1.5 – 2.0), average ATD difference was 1.8cm (95% CI −2.1 – −1.9) and average subtrochanteric difference was −0.2cm (95% CI −0.4 – 0.1). In the epiphysiodesis group the average LLD before epiphysiodesis was 2.7 (1.3 – 3.4) cm and 1.3 (−0.5 – 3.8) cm at skeletal maturity. In the non-epiphysiodesis group the average LLD was 2.0 (0.5 – 5.1), p=0.016. The subtrochanteric region on the LCPD side was significantly longer at skeletal maturity in the epiphysiodesis group compared to the non-epiphysiodesis group: −1.0 (−2.4 – 0.6) versus 0.1 (−1.0 – 2.1), p<0.001. Conclusions. This study concludes that LLD after LCPD originates from the proximal segment only. In patients who had had a contralateral epiphysiodesis, the subtrochanteric femoral region was significantly longer on the LCPD side. These anatomical changes need to be considered by paediatric surgeons when advising leg length equalisation procedures, and by arthroplasty surgeons when LCPD patients present for hip arthroplasty

Introduction. Angular deformities of the distal femur can be corrected by opening, closing and neutral wedge techniques. Opening wedge (OW) and closing wedge (CW) are popular and well described in the literature. CW and OW techniques lead to leg length difference whereas the advantage of neutral wedge (NW) technique has several unique advantages. NW technique maintains limb length, wedge taken from the closing side is utilised on the opening side and since the angular correction is only half of the measured wedge on either side, translation of distal fragment is minimum. Leg lengths are not altered with this technique hence a useful technique in large deformities. We found no reports of clinical outcomes using NW technique. We present a technique of performing external fixator assisted NW correction of large valgus and varus deformities of distal femur and dual plating and discuss the results. Materials & Methods. We have treated 20 (22 limbs – 2 patients requiring staged bilateral corrections) patients for distal femoral varus and valgus deformities with CWDFO between 2019 and 2022. Out of these 4 patients (5 limbs) requiring large corrections of distal femoral angular deformities were treated with Neutral Wedge (NW) technique. 3 patients (four limbs) had distal femoral valgus deformity and one distal femoral varus deformity. Indication for NW technique is an angular deformity (varus or valgus of distal femur) requiring > 12 mm opening/closing wedge correction. We approached the closing side first and marked out the half of the calculated wedge with K – wires in a uniplanar fashion. Then an external fixator with two Schanz screws is applied on the opposite side, inserting the distal screw parallel to the articular surface and the proximal screw 6–7 cm proximal to the first pin and at right angles to the femoral shaft mechanical axis. Then the measured wedge is removed and carefully saved. External fixator is now used to close the wedge and over correct, creating an appropriate opening wedge on the opposite side. A Tomofix (Depuoy Synthes) plate is applied on the closing side with two screws proximal to osteotomy and two distally (to be completed later). Next the osteotomy on the opposite side is exposed, the graft is inserted. mLDFA is measured under image intensifier to confirm satisfactory correction. Closing wedge side fixation is then completed followed by fixation of opposite side with a Tomofix or a locking plate. Results. 3 patients (4 limbs) had genu valgum due to constitutional causes and one was a case of distal femoral varus from a fracture. Preoperative mLDFA ranged from 70–75° and in one case of varus deformity it was 103°. We achieved satisfactory correction of mLDFA in (85–90°) in 4 limbs and one measured 91°. Femoral length was not altered. JLCA was not affected post correction. Patients were allowed to weight bear for transfers for the first six weeks and full weight bearing was allowed at six weeks with crutches until healing of osteotomy. All osteotomies healed at 16–18 weeks (average 16.8 weeks). Patients regained full range of movement. We routinely recommend removal of metal work to facilitate future knee replacement if one is needed. Follow up ranged from 4 months to 2 yrs. Irritation from metal work was noted in 2 patients and resolved after removing the plates at 9 months post-surgery. Conclusions. NWDFO is a good option for large corrections. We describe a technique that facilitates accurate correction of deformity in these complex cases. Osteotomy heals predictably with uniplanar osteotomy and dual plate fixation. Metal work might cause irritation like other osteotomy and plating techniques in this location