Identifying and restoring alignment is a primary aim of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In the coronal plane, the pre-pathological hip knee angle can be predicted using an arithmetic method (aHKA) by measuring the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (aHKA=MPTA - LDFA). The aHKA is shown to be predictive of coronal alignment prior to the onset of osteoarthritis; a useful guide when considering a non-mechanically aligned TKA. The aim of this study is to investigate the intra- and inter-observer accuracy of aHKA measurements on long leg standing radiographs (LLR) and preoperative Mako CT planning scans (CTs). Sixty-eight patients who underwent TKA from 2020–2021 with pre-operative LLR and CTs were included. Three observers (Surgeon, Fellow, Registrar) measured the LDFA and MPTA on LLR and CT independently on three separate occasions, to determine aHKA. Statistical analysis was undertaken with Bland-Altman test and coefficient of repeatability. An average intra-observer measurement error of 3.5° on LLR and 1.73° on CTs for MPTA was detected. Inter-observer errors were 2.74° on LLR and 1.28° on CTs. For LDFA, average intra-observer measurement error was 2.93° on LLR and 2.3° on CTs, with inter-observer errors of 2.31° on LLR and 1.92° on CTs. Average aHKA intra-observer error was 4.8° on LLR and 2.82° on CTs. Inter-observer error of 3.56° for LLR and 2.0° on CTs was measured. The aHKA is reproducible on both LLR and CT. CT measurements are more reproducible both between and within observers. The difference between measurements using LLR and CT is small and hence these two can be considered interchangeable. CT may obviate the need for LLRs and may overcome difficulties associated with positioning, rotation, body habitus and flexion contractures when assessing coronal alignment

The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) is a recent method for classifying knees using the hip-knee-ankle angle and joint line obliquity to assist surgeons in selection of an optimal alignment philosophy in total knee arthroplasty (TKA)1. It is unclear, however, how CPAK classification impacts pre-operative joint balance. Our objective was to characterise joint balance differences between CPAK categories. A retrospective review of TKA's using the OMNIBotics platform and BalanceBot (Corin, UK) using a tibia first workflow was performed. Lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were landmarked intra-operatively and corrected for wear. Joint gaps were measured under a load of 70–90N after the tibial resection. Resection thicknesses were validated to recreate the pre-tibial resection joint balance. Knees were subdivided into 9 categories as described by MacDessi et al.1 Differences in balance at 10°, 40° and 90° were determined using a one-way 2-tailed ANOVA test with a critical p-value of 0.05. 1124 knees satisfied inclusion criteria. The highest proportion of knees (60.7%) are CPAK I with a varus aHKA and Distal Apex JLO, 79.8% report a Distal Apex JLO and 69.3% report a varus aHKA. Greater medial gaps are observed in varus (I, IV, VII) compared to neutral (II, V, VIII) and valgus knees (III, VI, IX) (p<0.05 in all cases) as well as in the Distal Apex (I, II, III) compared to Neutral groups (IV, V, VI) (p<0.05 in all cases). Comparisons could not be made with the Proximal Apex groups due to low frequency (≤2.5%). Significant differences in joint balance were observed between and within CPAK groups. Although both hip-knee-ankle angle and joint line orientation are associated with joint balance, boney anatomy alone is not sufficient to fully characterize the knee

A primary goal of revision Total Knee Arthroplasty (rTKA) is restoration of the Joint Line (JL) and Posterior Condylar Offsets (PCO). The presence of a native contralateral joint allows JL and PCO to be inferred in a way that could account for patient-specific anatomical variations more accurately than current techniques. This study assesses bilateral distal femoral symmetry in the context of defining targets for restoration of JL and PCO in rTKA. 566 pre-operative CTs for bilateral TKAs were segmented and landmarked by two engineers. Landmarks were taken on both femurs at the medial and lateral epicondyles, distal and posterior condyles and hip and femoral centres. These landmarks were used to calculate the distal and posterior offsets on the medial and lateral sides (MDO, MPO, LDO, LPO respectively), the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), TEA to PCA angle (TEAtoPCA) and anatomic to mechanical axis angle (AAtoMA). Mean bilateral differences in these measures were calculated and cases were categorised according to the amount of asymmetry. The database analysed included 54.9% (311) females with a mean population age of 68.8 (±7.8) years. The mean bilateral difference for each measure was: LDFA 1.4° (±1.0), TEAtoPCA 1.3° (±0.9), AAtoMA 0.5° (±0.5), MDO 1.4mm (±1.1), MPO 1.0mm (±0.8). The categorisation of asymmetry for each measure was: LDFA had 39.9% of cases with <1° bilateral difference and 92.4% with <3° bilateral difference, TEAtoPCA had 45.8% <1° and 96.6% <3°, AAtoMA had 85.7% <1° and 99.8% <3°, MDO had 46.2% <1mm and 90.3% <3mm, MPO had 57.0% <1mm and 97.9% <3mm. This study presents evidence supporting bilateral distal femoral symmetry. Using the contralateral anatomy to obtain estimates for JL and PCO in rTKA may result in improvements in intraoperative accuracy compared to current techniques and a more patient specific solution to operative planning

Introduction. Deformity influences the weight bearing stresses on the knee joint. Correction of mechanical alignment is performed to offload the knee and slow the rate of degenerative change. Fixator assisted deformity correction facilitates accurate correction prior to internal fixation. We present our results with standard Ilizarov and UNYCO system assisted deformity correction of the lower limb. Materials and Methods. Retrospective analysis of adult surgical cases of mechanical re-alignment performed between 2010 and 2019 in a tertiary referral centre. We recorded standard demographics and operative time from the electronic patient record. We analysed digitalised radiographs to record pre- and post-operative measurements of: Mechanical axis deviation (MAD), femoral tibial angle (FTA), Medial Proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and Mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA). The accuracy of the correction was analysed. Time to healing, secondary interventions and complications were also recorded. Results. 7 patients underwent fixator assisted deformity correction with the UNYCO system and 11 with a standard Ilizarov frame. Mean pre-op MAD was 45.8mm in the UNYCO group and 43.4mm in Ilazrov; Mean post-op MAD was 9.5mm in the UNYCO group (5–15) and 12.3 in the Ilizarov group (1–25) p=0.07. The average surgical time in the UNYCO group was 200 minutes (128–325) and 252 minutes (203–301) in the Ilizarov group p=0.07. The mean post op MPTA was 90.2 (87–96) in the UNYCO group and 87.4 (81–94) in the Ilizarov group. The mean mLDFA was 90.0(81–93.5) in the UNYCO group and 87.3(82.2–93.9) in the Ilizarov group. All the corrections involved a plate or nail fixation and mean time to union was 76.3 days in the UNYCO and 117.3 in the Ilizarov group. Conclusions. Both systems allowed accurate correction of deformity and limb alignment. In this small series we were unable to show a difference in theatre time. The application of the principles of deformity correction are as important as the surgical methods

Introduction. Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) can give excellent results in well-selected patients. Axial alignment has been extensively studied in this type of surgery. However because there is no distal femoral cut, coronal alignment in PFA is less well known. The position of the patellofemoral component decides the varus or valgus alignment of the implant. Hypothesis. Coronal alignment in PFA (PFJ-Gender, Zimmer, Warsaw, US) is determined by the anterior condylar anatomy and features an important variance influencing coronal alignment. Materials and methods. Coronal alignment was measured in 57 PFAs on full leg weight bearing radiographs as the lateral distal femoral angle compared to the mechanical axis (mLDFA). In a first group of patients the anterior condylar anatomy was followed and in a second group the PFA was aligned to the Whiteside's line. Results. In the group following the condylar anatomy the mean (SD) mLDFA was 100° (9°) compared to the group where the Whiteside's line was followed, which presented a mean (SD) mLDFA was 89° (3°). Patellofemoral tracking evaluated on a Merchant view was better in the second group. Discussion. Literature shows that accurate patellofemoral alignment is 1° of valgus from the mechanical axis. Following the anterior condylar anatomy doesn't allow to recreate accurate frontal alignment with a PFA. This can be obtained by following Whiteside's line as a substitute for finding the mechanical axis. Conclusion. Whiteside's line is not only an accurate landmark for axial alignment but also for coronal alignment in PFA aligning the implant with the mechanical axis

With observed success and increased popularity of growth modulation techniques, there has been a trend towards use in progressively younger patients. Younger age at growth modulation increases the likelihood of complete deformity correction and need for implant removal prior to skeletal maturity introducing the risk of rebound deformity. The purpose of this study was to quantify magnitude and identify risk factors for rebound deformity after growth modulation. We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing growth modulation with a tension band plate for coronal plane deformity about the knee with subsequent implant removal. Exclusion criteria included completion epiphysiodesis or osteotomy at implant removal, ongoing growth modulation, and less than one year radiographic follow-up without rebound deformity. Mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), and mechanical axis station were measured prior to growth modulation, prior to implant removal, and at final follow-up. Sixty-seven limbs in 45 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age at growth modulation was 9.8 years (range 3.4–15.4 years) and mean age at implant removal was 11.4 years (range 5.3–16.4 years). Mean change in HKA after implant removal was 6.9O (range 0O–23 O). Fifty-two percent of patients had greater than 5O rebound and 30% had greater than 10O rebound in HKA after implant removal. Females less than ten years and males less than 12 years at time of growth modulation had greater mean change in HKA after implant removal compared to older patients (8.4O vs 4.7O, p=0.012). Patients with initial deformity greater than 20O degrees had an increased frequency of rebound greater than 10O compared to patients with less severe initial deformity (78% vs 22%, p=0.002). Rebound deformity after growth modulation is common. Growth modulation at a young age and large initial deformity increases risk of rebound. However, rebound does not occur in all at risk patients, therefore, we caution against routine overcorrection. Patients and their families should be informed about the risk of rebound deformity after growth modulation and the potential for multiple surgical interventions prior to skeletal maturity

Introduction. Wear debris from polyethylene tibial inserts has been associated with limited longevity of total knee replacements (TKRs). While material factors were studied extensively and considerable progress has been made, there is little knowledge about surgical factors, particularly on how the wear rate is related to implant positioning. It was the purpose of this study to determine the combined effect of patient and implant positioning factors on the volumetric wear rate of TKRs. Our hypothesis was that implant alignment has a significant impact on the wear rate when controlled for other patient factors. Methods. This study included 59 tibial inserts of a cruciate retaining TKR design (Nexgen, Zimmer Inc.). The patients' age, sex, weight, height, and implant size were obtained. All implants were scanned with a coordinate measuring machine. Volumetric wear was determined using an autonomous mathematical reconstruction method (Figure 1). Radiographs were used to determine the anatomic lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA), anatomic medial proximal tibial angle (aMPTA), femoral tilt angle (FTA) and posterior tibial slope (PTS). Also, the patella position was assessed using the Blackburne-Peel Index (BPI) and the Insall-Salvati Ratio (Figure 2). General linear modeling (SPSS) was conducted in order to determine the most significant patient and implant positioning factors on wear rate. Results. After adjustment for creep, the mean volumetric wear rate was 11.6 mm. 3. /yr (Figure 2). According to the linear regression model wear increased with younger age (p=0.0014) and male sex (p<0.001). The wear rate was independent of patient weight (p=0.17). From the multiple positioning factors only BPI and tibial slope were significant and inversely correlated with wear (p=0.009 and 0.026, respectively). The average ISR was normal before and after surgery, whereas the BPI was only in the normal range prior to surgery, and dropped postop into pseudo-baja (p<0.001, Figure 3). Discussion. The effect of male sex on wear volume can partially be explained by a larger average implant size; however, other unknown confounding factors may play a role too. The effect of younger age is likely related to higher patient activity. Based on previous gait analysis, we speculate that increasing tibial slope results in larger AP translations of the knee joint and thus more wear. Interestingly, BPI remained a highly significant factor when controlled for all other factors. The average BPI clearly dropped post-operatively, whereas the average ISR did not, indicating that not true patella baja, but a joint line elevation occurred due to the reconstruction. Joint line elevation may affect the quadriceps mechanism leading to higher contact forces and subsequent higher wear. Post-operative joint line elevation can be explained by the intention to keep bone loss at a minimum, while using thick polyethylene inserts. Further studies are needed to determine the trade-offs between bone conservation and reduction of wear rate. However, this study has revealed the importance of surgical factors regarding polyethylene wear reduction in TKR. Acknowledgements. This study was funded by NIH grant R01AR059843. For figures/tables, please contact authors directly.

Introduction. Neutral mechanical alignment in TKA has been shown to be an important consideration for survivorship, wear, and aseptic loosening. However, native knee anatomy is described by a joint line in 3° of varus, 2–3° of mechanical distal femoral valgus, and 2–3° of proximal tibia varus. Described kinematic planning methods replicate native joint alignment in extension without changing tibiofemoral alignment, but do not account for native alignment through a range of motion. An asymmetric TKA femoral component with a thicker medial femoral condyle and posterior condylar internal rotation paired with an asymmetric polyethylene insert aligns the joint line in 3° of varus while maintaining distal femoral and proximal tibial cuts perpendicular to mechanical axis. The asymmetric components recreate an anatomic varus joint line while avoiding tibiofemoral malalignment or femoral component internal rotation, a risk factor for patellofemoral maltracking. The study seeks to determine how many patients would be candidates for a kinematically planned knee without violating the principle of a neutral mechanical axis (0° ± 3°). Methods. A cohort comprised of 55 consecutive preoperative THA patients with asymptomatic knees and 55 consecutive preoperative primary unilateral TKA patients underwent simultaneous biplanar radiographic imaging. Full length coronal images from the thoracolumbar junction to the ankles were measured by two independent observers for the following: mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA). Patients who met the following conditions: mTFA 0°±3°; mLDFA 87°±3°; and mMPTA 87°±3°, were considered candidates for TKA with an asymmetric implant that would achieve a kinematic joint line and neutral mechanical axis. Similarly, patients with the following conditions: mTFA 0°±3°; mLDFA 90°±3°; and mMPTA 90°±3°, were considered candidates for TKA with a symmetric implant that would achieve a kinematic joint line and neutral mechanical axis. Results. In this cohort of 110 patients, the mean mTFA was 1° varus ± 5°, the mean mLDFA was 87° ± 3°, mMPTA 87°± 2°. The comparison of patients meeting each of the three conditions required for a TKA with a neutral mechanical axis and a kinematic joint line are outlined in Table 1. Conclusion. A TKA with kinematic 3° varus joint line and neutral mechanical axis was possible in 52% of patients using an asymmetric implant and 23% of patients using a symmetric implant. Previous descriptions of kinematic planning using standard TKA components required compromise of neutral mechanical axis alignment with detrimental effects on overall survivorship. Knee arthroplasty using an asymmetric implant may achieve the best of both worlds, neutral mechanical axis and a kinematic joint line, in a large percentage of patients

Aims

Double-level lengthening, bone transport, and bifocal compression-distraction are commonly undertaken using Ilizarov or other fixators. We performed double-level fixator-assisted nailing, mainly for the correction of deformity and lengthening in the same segment, using a straight intramedullary nail to reduce the time in a fixator.

Aims

Computer hexapod assisted orthopaedic surgery (CHAOS), is a method to achieve the intra-operative correction of long bone deformities using a hexapod external fixator before definitive internal fixation with minimally invasive stabilisation techniques.

The aims of this study were to determine the reliability of this method in a consecutive case series of patients undergoing femoral deformity correction, with a minimum six-month follow-up, to assess the complications and to define the ideal group of patients for whom this treatment is appropriate.