Aims

Several short- and mid-term studies have shown minimal liner wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) in total hip arthroplasty (THA), but the safety of using thinner HXLPE liners to maximize femoral head size remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to analyze clinical survival and radiological wear rates of patients with HXLPE liners, a 36 mm femoral head, and a small acetabular component with a minimum of ten years’ follow-up.

Aims. The purpose of this study was to directly compare the Modular Dual Mobility (MDM) Mobile Bearing Hip System (Stryker, USA) and large femoral heads (LFHs) in revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) at mid-term follow-up, with specific emphasis on survival free of re-revision for dislocation, any re-revision, dislocation, and the risk of metal-related complications. Methods. We identified 299 revision THAs performed at a single tertiary care academic institution from March 2011 to July 2014. Aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (n = 65), dislocation (n = 58), and reimplantation as part of a two-stage exchange protocol (n = 57) were the most common reasons for index revision. MDM constructs were used in 123 cases, and LFHs were used in 176 cases. Mean age was 66 years (28 to 93), mean BMI was 31 kg/m. 2. (18 to 55), and 45% (n = 136) were female. Mean follow-up was seven years (2 to 12). Results. The ten-year survival free of re-revision for dislocation was 99% (95% CI 95 to 100) in the MDM cohort and 91% (95% CI 84 to 96) in the LFH cohort, with a significantly increased risk of re-revision for dislocation in the LFH cohort (HR 7.1 (95% CI 1.3 to 40.8); p = 0.023). The ten-year survival free of any re-revision was 92% (95% CI 82 to 99%) in the MDM cohort and 84% (95% CI 74 to 90) in the LFH cohort with a significantly increased risk of any re-revision in the LFH cohort (HR 2.6 (95% CI 1.1 to 5.9); p = 0.024). The ten-year survival free of any dislocation was 95% (95% CI 85 to 99) in the MDM cohort and 87% (95% CI 78 to 92) in the LFH cohort with a significantly increased risk of any dislocation in the LFH cohort (HR 2.7 (95% CI 1.1 to 6.3); p = 0.028). There were no re-revisions or reoperations for metallosis or corrosion in the MDM cohort. Conclusion. In this head-to-head comparison, revision THAs with a MDM construct safely and effectively lowered the risk of re-revision for dislocation, any re-revision, and any dislocation compared to LFH at mid-term follow-up. There were no re-revisions or reoperations for metallosis or corrosion in the MDM cohort. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2025;107-B(1):58–64

Large ceramic femoral heads offer several advantages that are potentially advantageous to patients undergoing both primary and revision total hip replacement. Many high-quality studies have demonstrated the benefit of large femoral heads in reducing post-operative instability. Ceramic femoral heads may also offer an advantage in reducing polyethylene wear that has been reported in vitro and is starting to become clinically apparent in mid-term clinical outcome studies. Additionally, the risk of taper corrosion at a ceramic femoral head–neck junction is clearly lower than when using a metal femoral head. With improvements in the material properties of both modern ceramic femoral heads and polyethylene acetabular liners that have reduced the risk of mechanical complications, large ceramic heads have gained popularity in recent years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B, Supple A:63–6

Aims

The increased in vivo resistance to wear of highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has led to an increased use of larger articulations which have been shown to reduce the incidence of early dislocation. To date, there are few reports of the wear of larger articulations using second generation HXLPE liners. Our prospective cohort study measured the bedding-in and early wear of large (36 mm and 40 mm diameter) articulations involving a second generation X3 HXLPE liner and compared our findings with previous clinical and in vitro studies of the same material.

Introduction. Acetabular revision surgery is challenging due to severe bone defects. Burch-Schneider anti-protrusion cages (BS cage: Zimmer-Biomet) is one of the options for acetabular revision, however higher dislocation rate was reported. A computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system indicates us the planned direction for implantation of a cemented acetabular cup during surgery. A large diameter femoral head is also expected to reduce the dislocation rate. The purpose of this study is to investigate short-term results of BS cage in acetabular revision surgery combined with the CT-based navigation system and the use of large diameter femoral head. Methods. Sixteen hips of fifteen patients who underwent revision THA using allografts and BS cage between September 2013 and December 2017 were included in this study with the follow-up of 2.7 (0.1–5.0) years. There were 12 women and three men with a mean age of 78.6 years (range, 59–61 years). The cause of acetabular revision was aseptic loosening in all hips. The failed acetabular cup was carefully removed, and acetabular bone defect was graded using the Paprosky classification. Structural allografts were morselized and packed for all medial or contained defects. In some cases, solid allograft was implanted for segmental defects. BS cage was molded to optimize stability and congruity to the acetabulum and fixed with 6.5 mm titanium screws to the iliac bone. The inferior flange was slotted into the ischium. The upside-down trial cup was attached to a straight handle cup positioner with instrumental tracker (Figure 1) and placed on the rim of the BS cage to confirm the direction of the target angle for cement cup implantation under the CT-based navigation system (Stryker). After removing the cement spacer around the X3 RimFit cup (Stryker) onto the BS cage for available maximum large femoral head, the cement cup was implanted with confirming the direction of targeting angle. Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA score) of the hip was used for clinical assessment. Implant position, loosening, and consolidation of allograft were assessed using anterior and lateral radiographies of the pelvis. Results. Fifteen hips had a Paprosky IIIB defect, and one hip had a pelvic discontinuity. JOA score significantly improved postoperatively. No radiolucent lines and no displacement of BS cage could be found in 9 of 15 hips. Consolidation of allografts above the protrusion cage was observed in these patients. Displacement of BS cage (>5mm) was observed in 6 hips and displacement was stopped with allograft consolidation in 5 of 6 hips. The other patient showed lateral displacement of BS cage and underwent revision surgery. Average cup inclination and anteversion angles were 37.7±5.0 degree and 24.6±7.2 degree, respectively. 12 of 16 patients were included in Lewinnek's safe zone. One patient with 32 mm diameter of the femoral head had dislocation at 17 days postoperatively. All patients who received ≥36mm diameter of femoral head showed no dislocation. Conclusions. CT-based navigation system and the use of large femoral head may influence the prevention of dislocation in the acetabular revision surgery with BS cage for severe acetabular bone defects

Aims

This study investigates head-neck taper corrosion with varying head size in a novel hip simulator instrumented to measure corrosion related electrical activity under torsional loads.

Introduction:. Large diameter femoral heads have been used successfully to prevent dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). However, recent studies show that the peripheral region of contemporary femoral heads can directly impinge against the native soft-tissues, particularly the iliopsoas, leading to activity limiting anterior hip pain. This is because the spherical articular surface of contemporary prosthesis overhangs beyond that of the native anatomy (Fig. 1). The goal of this research was to develop an anatomically shaped, soft-tissue friendly large diameter femoral head that retains the benefits of contemporary implants. Methods:. Various Anatomically Contoured femoral Head (ACH) designs were constructed, wherein the articular surface extending from the pole to a theta (θ) angle, matched that of contemporary implants (Fig. 2). However, the articular surface in the peripheral region was moved inward towards the femoral head center, thereby reducing material that could impinge on the soft-tissues (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2). Finite element analysis was used to determine the femoroacetabular contact area under peak in vivo loads during different activities. Dynamic simulations were used to determine jump distance prior to posterior dislocation under different dislocation modes. Published data was used to compare the implant articular geometry to native anatomy (Fig. 3). These analyses were used to optimize the soft-tissue relief, while retaining the load bearing contact area, and the dislocation resistance of conventional implants. Results:. The resulting ACH prosthesis retained the large diameter profile of contemporary implants over an approximately hemispherical portion (Fig. 2). Beyond this, the peripheral articular surface was composed of smaller convex radii. With this design, the jump distance under posterior and anterior dislocation modes, and the femoroacetabular contact area under loads corresponding to walking, deep knee bend and chair sit, remained identical to that of contemporary implants. Additionally, while contemporary prosthesis extended beyond the native articular surface in the distal-medial and proximal-lateral regions (shaded grey), the ACH implant remained within the margins of the native anatomy (Fig. 3). Conclusion:. A novel large diameter anatomically contoured femoral head prosthesis was developed, to mitigate the soft-tissue impingement with contemporary prosthesis. The ACH retained the large diameter profile of contemporary implants over a hemispherical portion. However, in the peripheral region, the ACH had a smaller profile to reduce soft-tissue impingement

Dislocation remains among the most common complications of, and reasons for, revision of both primary and revision total hip replacements (THR). Hence, there is great interest in maximising stability to prevent this complication. Head size has been recognised to have a strong influence on the risk of dislocation post-operatively. As femoral head size increases, stability is augmented, secondary to an increase in impingement-free range of movement. Larger head sizes also greatly increase the ‘jump distance’ required for the head to dislocate in an appropriately positioned cup. Level-one studies support the use of larger diameter heads as they decrease the risk of dislocation following primary and revision THR. Highly cross-linked polyethylene has allowed us to increase femoral head size, without a marked increase in wear. However, the thin polyethylene liners necessary to accommodate larger heads may increase the risk of liner fracture and larger heads have also been implicated in causing soft-tissue impingement resulting in groin pain. Larger diameter heads also impart larger forces on the femoral trunnion, which may contribute to corrosion, metal release, and adverse local tissue reactions. Alternative large bearings including large ceramic heads and dual mobility bearings may mitigate some of these risks, and several of these devices have been used with clinical success.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B(11 Suppl A):23–6.

Dislocation is a major concern following total hip replacement (THR) for fractured neck of femur. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the use of large diameter femoral head uncemented THR to treat fractured neck of femur, and to demonstrate if the improved stability seen in previous clinical situations with these designs, can be used to benefit this difficult subgroup of patients that are particularly prone to dislocation. Forty-six consecutive independent, active and mentally alert patients with displaced intracapsular fractured neck of femur underwent large diameter head uncemented THR. The mean age of patients was 72.1 years. The outcome measures used were the dislocation rate, reoperation and revision rate, Oxford hip score (OHS), Euroqol (EQ-5D) and residential status. Clinical and radiological data were available on all 46 patients. At a mean follow-up of 12.5 months there were no dislocations. The reoperation, revision and infection rate were all 0%. Two patients died (4.3%) from unrelated causes. Mean pre- and postoperative OHS were 12.1 and 17.9 respectively. The mean pre- and postoperative EQ-5D index scores were 0.97 and 0.83 respectively. The mean postoperative walking distance was 2.5 miles and there were no changes in residential status. This is the first published series utilising a 36-mm diameter metal-on-metal THR for the treatment of fractured neck of femur in mobile, independent patients. We have demonstrated that it affords patients excellent stability with no recorded dislocations

Dislocation is a major concern following THR for fractured neck of femur. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the use of large diameter femoral head uncemented THR to treat fractured neck of femur, and to demonstrate if the improved stability seen in previous clinical situations with these designs, can be used to benefit this difficult subgroup of patients that are particularly prone to dislocation. Forty-six consecutive independent, active and mentally alert patients with displaced intracapsular fractured neck of femur underwent large diameter head uncemented THR. The mean age of patients was 72.1 years. The outcome measures used were the dislocation rate, reoperation and revision rate, Oxford hip score (OHS), EuroQol (EQ-5D) and residential status. Clinical and radiological data were available on all 46 patients. At a mean follow-up of 12.5 months there were no dislocations. There were no reoperations, revisions or infections. Two patients died (4.3%) from unrelated causes. Mean pre- and postoperative OHS were 12.1 and 17.9 respectively. The mean pre- and postoperative EQ-5D index scores were 0.97 and 0.83 respectively. The mean postoperative walking distance was 2.5 miles and there were no changes in residential status. This is the first published series utilising a 36-mm diameter metal-on-metal THR for the treatment of fractured neck of femur in mobile, independent patients. We have demonstrated that it affords patients excellent stability with no recorded dislocations

Introduction:. High failure rates with large diameter, metal on metal hip replacements have highlighted a potential issue with the head/stem taper junction as one of the significant sources of metal ion release. Postulated reasons as to why this may be such a problem with large head metal on metal hip replacements is due to the increased torque achieved by the larger head size. This may be responsible for applying greater micromotion between the head and stem taper and consequently greater amounts of fretting corrosion. The aim of this study was to perform short term in vitro electrochemical tests to assess the effect of increasing head diameter and torque on the fretting corrosion susceptibility of the head/stem taper interface and to investigate its effect on different material combinations. Methods:. 36 mm Cobalt Chrome (CoCr) femoral heads were coupled with either a CoCr or Titanium (Ti) stem with 12/14 tapers, all with a smooth surface finish. Increasing perpendicular horizontal offsets in the sagittal plane created incremental increases in torque. Offset increments of 0 mm, 5.4 mm and 7.5 mm were selected (Figure 1) to simulate the torque force equivalent to 9 Nm, 12 Nm and 17 Nm. An inverted hip replacement setup was used (ASTM F1875-98) (Figure 2). Components were statically loaded at 0 kN and 2.3 kN prior to sinusoidal cyclic loading and electrochemical testing. Mean & fretting currents were calculated every 50 cycles up to a maximum of 1000 cycles of sinusoidal cyclic loading at 3 Hz along with the Overall Mean Current (OMC), Overall Mean Fretting Current (OMFC) and Overall Current change (OCC). Results:. There was a significant increase in the mean current (R = 0.992, p = 0.008) and fretting current (R = 0.929, p = 0.071) for CoCr-CoCr and in the mean current (R = 0.780, p = 0.005) and fretting current (R = 0.810, p = 0.006) for CoCr-Ti material combinations, with increasing femoral offsets. The highest currents (mean and fretting) were produced at 7.5 mm and the lowest at 0 mm offsets. The proportional relationship between torque and corrosion was observed for both CoCr-CoCr and CoCr-Ti material combinations. With low torques we saw higher OMC and OMFC with the Co-Ti material combination however with higher torques we saw higher OMC and OMFC with the CoCr-CoCr combination (Figure 3). Conclusion:. Increasing torque leads to increased susceptibility to fretting corrosion at the modular head/stem taper interface of total hip replacements for both head stem material combinations. This study highlights the risk of high frictional torque, independent of material combination, on the head/ stem with the use of large heads. This is particularly relevant with the increasing use of larger diameter femoral heads across all bearing material combinations, in current hip arthroplasty practice

Introduction. Recent studies on large diameter femoral head hip replacements have implicated the modular taper junction as one of the significant sources of wear and corrosion products and this has been attributed to increased torque and bending on the taper interface. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of frictional torque and bending moment on fretting corrosion at the taper junction and to investigate whether different material combinations also had an effect. Patients/Materials & Methods. We examined 1) Cobalt Chromium (CoCr) heads on CoCr stems 2) CoCr heads on Titanium alloy (Ti) stems and 3) Ceramic heads on CoCr stems. In test 1 increasing torque was imposed by offsetting the femoral stem in the anterior posterior plane in increments of 0 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm and 8 mm where the force generated was equivalent to 0Nm, 9Nm, 14Nm and 18Nm. In Test 2 we investigated the effect of increasing bending moment by offsetting the application of axial load from the midline in the medial-lateral (ML). Offset increments equivalent to +0, +7 and +14 heads were used. For each test we used n=3 for each different material combination. Results. Significantly higher currents and amplitudes were seen with increasing frictional torque for all material combinations, however titanium alloy stems showed the highest corrosion. Increasing bending moments associated with using larger off-set heads produced more corrosion; with titanium alloy stems generally performing worse than cobalt chrome stems. Using ceramic heads did not prevent corrosion, but this was significantly reduced in all loading configurations. Discussion & Conclusion. This is the first study to quantify corrosion associated with different material combinations and loading conditions. Increasing frictional torque and bending, together with the material combination have a significant effect on the fretting corrosion at the taper modular junction. The best performing material combination was ceramic on CoCr

The aim of this study was to investigate the use of large diameter head THR to treat fractured neck of femur, and to demonstrate if this conferred greater stability.

46 independent, mentally alert patients with displaced intracapsular fractures underwent THR. Mean age was 72.1 years. Outcome measures were dislocation, reoperation/ revision rate, Oxford hip score (OHS), Euroqol (EQ-5D) and residential status. Data was collected prospectively, with review being carried out at 3 months and 1 year.

At mean follow-up (12.5 months) there were no dislocations. Reoperation, revision and infection rate were all 0%. Two patients died (4.3%). Mean pre-injury and postoperative OHS were 12.1 and 17.9 respectively. Mean pre-injury and postoperative EQ-5D index scores were 0.97 and 0.83 respectively. Mean postoperative walking distance was 2.5 miles. There were no changes in residential status.

This is the first published series utilising 36-mm diameter metal-on-metal THR for the treatment of fractured neck of femur. We have demonstrated that it affords patients excellent stability with no recorded dislocations.

The aim of this study was to investigate the use of large diameter head THR to treat fractured neck of femur, and to demonstrate if this conferred greater stability.

Forty-six (46) independent, mentally alert patients with displaced intracapsular fractures underwent THR. Mean age was 72.1 years. Outcome measures were dislocation, reoperation/ revision rate, Oxford hip score (OHS), Euroqol (EQ-5D) and residential status. Data was collected prospectively, with review being carried out at 3 months and 1 year.

At mean follow-up (12.5 months) there were no dislocations. Reoperation, revision and infection rate were all 0%. Two patients died (4.3%). Mean pre-injury and postoperative OHS were 12.1 and 17.9 respectively. Mean pre-injury and postoperative EQ-5D index scores were 0.97 and 0.83 respectively. Mean postoperative walking distance was 2.5 miles. There were no changes in residential status.

This is the first published series utilizing 36-mm diameter metal-on-metal THR for the treatment of fractured neck of femur. We have demonstrated that it affords patients excellent stability with no recorded dislocations.

The Accolade®TMZF is a taper-wedge cementless metaphyseal coated femoral stem widely utilized from 2002-2012. In recent years, there have been reports of early catastrophic failure of this implant. Establishing a deeper understanding of the rate and causes of revision in patients who developed aseptic failure in stems with documented concerns about high failure rates is critical. Understanding any potential patient or implant factors which are risk factors for failure is important to inform both clinicians and patients. We propose a study to establish the long-term survival of this stem and analyze patients who underwent aseptic revision to understand the causes and risk factors for failure. A retrospective review was undertaken of all patients who received a primary total hip arthroplasty with an Accolade® TMZF stem at a high-volume arthroplasty center. The causes and timing of revision surgery were documented and cross referenced with the Canadian Institute of Health Information Discharge Abstract Database to minimize loss to follow-up. Survivorship analysis was performed with use of the Kaplan-Meier curves to determine the overall and aseptic survival rates at final follow-up. Patient and implant factors commonly associated with aseptic failure were extracted and Cox proportional hazards model was used. A consecutive series of 2609 unilateral primary THA patients implanted with an Accolade®TMZF femoral hip stem were included. Mean time from primary surgery was 12.4 years (range 22 days to 19.5 years). Cumulative survival was 96.1% ± 0.2 at final follow-up. One hundred and seven patients underwent revision surgery with aseptic loosening of the femoral component was the most common cause of aseptic failure in this cohort (33/2609, 1.3%). Younger age and larger femoral head offset were independent risk factors for aseptic failure. To our knowledge, this is the largest series representing the longest follow-up of this taper-wedge cementless femoral implant. Despite early concerns, the Accolade® TMZF stem has excellent survivorship in this cohort. Trunnionosis as a recognized cause for revision surgery was rare. Younger age and larger femoral head offset were independent risk factors for aseptic failure

Abstract. Objectives. Total hip replacement (THR) is one of the most successful and cost-effective interventions in orthopaedic surgery. Dislocation is a debilitating complication of THR and managing an unstable THR constitutes a significant clinical challenge. Stability in THR is multifactorial and is influenced by surgical, patient and implant related factors. It is established that larger diameter femoral heads have a wider impingement-free range of movement and an increase in jump distance, both of which are relevant in reducing the risk of dislocation. However, they can generate higher frictional torque which has led to concerns related to increased wear and loosening. Furthermore, the potential for taper corrosion or trunnionosis is also a potential concern with larger femoral heads, particularly those made from cobalt-chrome. These concerns have meant there is hesitancy among surgeons to use larger sized heads. This study presents the comparison of clinical outcomes for different head sizes (28mm, 32mm and 36mm) in primary THR for 10,104 hips in a single centre. Methods. A retrospective study of all consecutive patients who underwent primary THR at our institution between 1st April 2003 and 31st Dec 2019 was undertaken. Institutional approval for this study was obtained. Demographic and surgical data were collected. The primary outcome measures were all-cause revision, revision for dislocation, and all-cause revision excluding dislocation. Continuous descriptive statistics used means, median values, ranges, and 95% confidence intervals where appropriate. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate time to revision. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to compare revision rates between the femoral head size groups. Adjustments were made for age at surgery, gender, primary diagnosis, ASA score, articulation type, and fixation method. Results. 10,104 primary THRs were included; median age 68.6 years with 61.5% females. A posterior approach was performed in 71.6%. There were 3,295 hips with 28 mm heads (32.6%), 4,858 (48.1%) with 32 mm heads and 1,951 (19.3%) with 36 mm heads. Overall rate of revision was 1.7% with the lowest rate recorded for the 36mm group (2.7% vs. 1.3% vs. 1.1%). Cox regression analysis showed a decreased risk of all-cause revision for 32mm & 36mm head sizes as compared to 28mm; this was statistically significant for the 32mm group (p = 0.01). Risk of revision for dislocation was significantly reduced in both 32mm (p = 0.03) and 36mm (p = 0.03) head sizes. Analysis of all cause revision excluding dislocation showed no significant differences between head sizes. Conclusion. There was a significantly reduced risk of revision for all causes, but particularly revision for dislocation with larger head sizes (36mm & 32mm vs. 28mm). Concerns regarding increased risk of early revision for aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear or taper corrosion with larger heads appear to be unfounded in this cohort of 10,104 patients with a mean of 6.0-year follow-up. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Aims. Dislocation is a major concern following total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteoarthritis (OA). Both dual-mobility components and standard acetabular components with large femoral heads are used to reduce the risk of dislocation. We investigated whether dual-mobility components are superior to standard components in reducing the two-year dislocation and revision risk in a propensity-matched sample from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register (DHR). Methods. This population-based cohort study analyzed data from the DHR and the Danish National Patient Register. We included all patients undergoing primary THA for OA from January 2010 to December 2019 with either dual-mobility or standard acetabular components with metal-on-polyethylene or ceramic-on-polyethylene articulations with a 36 mm femoral head. The samples were propensity score-matched on patient and implant characteristics. The primary outcome was the difference in the absolute risk of dislocation within two years, with a secondary outcome of the difference in the absolute risk of revision surgery of any cause within the same timeframe. The cumulative incidence of dislocation was calculated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, while the difference in absolute risk was estimated using absolute risk regression (ARR). Results. We included 4,499 patients with dual-mobility components and 4,499 patients with standard components after propensity score-matching. Both groups had a mean age of 75 years (SD 8.5), included approximately 60% females, and had a two-year survival of 95.3% (95% CI 94.6 to 95.9). The dual-mobility group was 80% less likely to dislocate within two years (ARR 0.20 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.28); p < 0.001), with no significant difference in the risk of revision compared to standard components (ARR 1.15 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.48); p = 0.293). Conclusion. Dual-mobility components are associated with a reduced risk of dislocation and with no significant difference in the risk of revision for any cause within two years of THA when compared to standard acetabular components with 36 mm femoral heads. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2025;107-B(1):50–57

Previous reports on the outcomes of isolated head and liner exchange in revision total hip arthroplasty have found high rates of instability following these surgeries. Most reports have studied constructs using ≤28mm femoral heads. The purpose of this study was to determine if modern techniques with the use of larger head sizes can improve the rate of instability after head and liner exchange. We identified 138 hips in 132 patients who underwent isolated head and liner exchange for polyethylene wear/osteolysis (57%), acute infection (27%), metallosis (13%), or other (2%). All patients underwent revision with either 32mm (23%), 36mm (62%), or 40mm (15%) diameter heads. Crosslinked polyethylene was used in all revisions. Lipped and/or offset liners were used in 104 (75%) hips. Average follow up was 3.5 (1.0–9.1) years. Statistical analyses were performed with significance set at p<0.05. Revision-free survivorship for any cause was 94.6% and for aseptic causes was 98.2% at 5 years. 11 (8%) hips experienced a complication with 7 (5%) hips requiring additional revision surgery. Following revision, 4 (3%) hips experienced dislocation, 5 (4%) hips experienced infection, and 1 (1%) hip was revised for trunnionosis. No demographic or surgical factors significantly affected outcomes. Our study shows that isolated head and liner exchange using large femoral heads and modern liners provides for better stability than previous reports. The most common complication was infection. We did not identify specific patient, surgical or implant factors that reduced the risk of instability or other complication

The benefit of dual mobility cup (DMC) for primary total hip arthroplasties (THA) is still controversial. This study aimed to compare 1) the complications rate, 2) the revisions rate, 3) the survival rate after monobloc DMC compared to large femoral heads (LFH) in primary THA. Between 2010 and 2019, 2,075 primary THA using cementless DMC or LFH were included. Indications for DMC were patients older than 70 years old or with high risk of dislocation. Every other patient received a LFH. Exclusion criteria were cemented implants, femoral neck fracture, a follow-up of less than one year. 1,940 THA were analyzed: 1,149 DMC (59.2%), 791 LFH (40.8%). The mean age was 73 ±9.2 years old in DMC group and 57 ±12 in LFH group. The complications and the revisions have been assessed retrospectively. The mean follow-up was 41.9 months ±14 [12–134]. There were significantly fewer dislocations in DMC group (n=2; 0.17%) compared to LFH group (n=8; 1%) (p=0.019). The femoral head size had no impact on the dislocations rate in LFH group (p=0.70). The overall complication rate in DMC (n=59; 5.1%) and LFH (n=53; 6.7%) were not statistically different (p=0.21). No specific complication was attributed to the DMC. In DMC group, 18 THA (1.6%) were revised versus 15 THA in LFH group (1.9%) (p= 0.71). There was no statistical difference for any cause of revisions in both groups. The cup aseptic revision-free survival rates at 5 years were 98% in DMC group and 97.3% in LFH group (p=0.78). Monobloc DMC had a lower risk of dislocation in a high-risk population than LFH in a low-risk population at the mid-term follow-up. There was no significant risk of specific complications or revisions for DMC in a large cohort. Monobloc DMC can be safely used in a selected high-risk population

This study aimed to examine the changing trends in the reasons for total hip replacement (THR) revision surgery, in one country over a twenty-one year period, in order to assess whether changes in arthroplasty practices have impacted revision patterns and whether an awareness of these changes can be used to guide clinical practice and reduce future revision rates. The reason for revision THR performed between January 1999 and December 2019 was extracted from the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR). The results were then grouped into seven 3-year periods to allow for clearer visualization of trends. The reasons were compared across the seven time periods and trends in prosthesis use, patient age, gender, BMI and ASA grade were also reviewed. We compared the reasons for early revision, within one year, with the overall revision rates. There were 20,740 revision THR registered of which 7665 were revisions of hips with the index procedure registered during the 21 year period. There has been a statistically significant increase in both femoral fracture (4.1 – 14.9%, p<0.001) and pain (8.1 – 14.9%, p<0.001) as a reason for hip revision. While dislocation has significantly decreased from 57.6% to 17.1% (p<0.001). Deep infection decreased over the first 15 years but has subsequently seen further increases over the last 6 years. Conversely both femoral and acetabular loosening increased over the first 12 years but have subsequently decreased over the last 9 years. The rate of early revisions rose from 0.86% to 1.30% of all revision procedures, with a significant rise in revision for deep infection (13-33% of all causes, p<0.001) and femoral fracture (4-18%, p<0.001), whereas revision for dislocation decreased (59-30%, p<0.001). Adjusting for age and gender femoral fracture and deep infection rates remained significant for both (p<0.05). Adjusting for age, gender and ASA was only significant for infection. The most troubling finding was the increased rate of deep infection in revision THR, with no obvious linked pattern, whereas, the reduction in revision for dislocation, aseptic femoral and acetabular loosening can be linked to the changing patterns of the use of larger femoral heads and improved bearing surfaces