We report our retrospective multicentre experience of managing periprosthetic knee fractures using locking plates, cemented nails and distal femoral prosthesis. The Aim of this study is to analyze the practicality of management of these injuries using modern methods of fixation or salvation. 62 patients presented to 3 centres between 2003 and 2010. After implementation of inclusion criteria, clinical, radiological and functional outcomes were evaluated in 54 patients, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. 34 patients were treated with locking plates (10 males, 24 female; mean age 76), 16 with cemented/locking nails (4 males, 12 females; mean age 84.5), and 4 with distal femoral replacement prosthesis (2 males, 2 females; mean age 79). Locking plates which were used with a minimally invasive pattern produced the best outcomes in our study. A statistical significance of p value of less than 0.01 was found in union time between patients operated on with an open technique (6.69±2.69 months) and those operated on with a minimally invasive technique (3.6±0.91 months). Nailing with augmented cement is a useful technique in patients who are not suitable for challenging surgery & rehabilitation programmes. There was a significant difference in mean time to functional weight bearing (p< 0.01) between the plate group (4.79±2.6 months) and the nail group (2.63±0.5 months). Post-operative range of motion was also better for nails (106.36±14.33. O. flexion) compared to plates (93.24±26.8. O. ), a result that approached significance (p=0.065). We recommend minimal invasive plating in uncompromised physiological conditions, as an ideal method of fracture fixation in view of statistically significant union rates. Cemented nailing is recommended in patients where early rehabilitation is essential. Distal Femoral prosthesis replacement is a useful salvage method

Introduction. Fracture around the knee can lead to posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) of the knee. Malunion, malalignment, intra-articular osseous defects, retained internal fixation devices, and compromised soft tissues may affect the outcome of total knee replacement (TKR). On average, the posttraumatic patient subsets were 10.4 years younger than those for primary knee OA. Recently, there were several studies reporting the outcome of THA for posttraumatic OA hip. However, no current literature defines the comparative functional outcome between PTOA and primary OA knee. The purpose of our study was to compare the midterm outcomes of patients undergoing TKR following periarticular knee fractures/ligamentous injuries versus primary osteoarthritis (PO) of the knee. Materials and methods. Retrospective chart reviews of patients underwent TKR between 2008 and 2013 were identified. 136 patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws or ligament reconstruction while 716 patients were primary OA. Mean follow up time was comparable in both groups. Demographic data, medical comorbidities, WOMAC, visual analogue scale, and complications were recorded. Results. There were significantly different in age (56.5 vs 63.8 years, p<0.0001), gender (48.5% vs 63.1% of female, p=0.0014), and obese (62.3% vs 76.0%, p=0.025) between PTOA and PO groups, respectively. The PO group had higher comorbidities than PTOA group including anticoagulant usage (51% vs 30.9%, p=0.0002), number of disease ≥ 4 (69.6% vs 45.3%, p<0.0001), ASA class ≥3 (38.8% vs 21.6%, p<0.0001), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.6 vs 2.8, p<0.0001). The PTOA group had longer operative time (110.9 vs 100.1 minutes, p<0.0001) than PO group. Preoperatively anatomical axis of the knee was approximately valgus in PTOA but varus alignment in PO group (p<0.0001). However, postoperatively anatomical and mechanical axis was comparable in both groups. Postoperative VAS (1.8 vs 1.2, p=0.002) at 1 year follow up and pain component of WOMAC (77.8 vs 85.7, p=0.013) in PTOA group was worse than PO group, respectively. On the contrary, there was no difference in postoperative complication and readmission rate between groups. Conclusion. Total knee replacement for Post-traumatic OA was associated with poorer functional outcome compared to those for primary osteoarthritis in midterm follow up

Vascularised soft tissue transfer may be helpful in the salvage of severe sepsis involving avascular tissues hosting joint replacements or other metal work. Transferred tissue covers the exposed implants and delivers intravenous antibiotics. Twenty-one cases for the knee, elbow and shoulder are presented. Gastrocnemius flaps were used for seven knee replacements and 10 knee fractures. Antegrade radial artery flaps were used for two elbow replacements. Pectoralis major or minor flaps were used for two shoulder replacements. All procedures were performed by an orthopaedic surgeon with supplementary plastics training. Synchronous bony surgery included revision arthroplasty in seven cases, conversion to fusion in one case and preservation of existing hardware in the remainder. Sepsis was eliminated in the longterm in 9 of 10 knee fracture fixation cases, 5 out of 7 knee replacements and both elbow replacements. Both shoulder replacements remained septic despite multiple repeat procedures. Complications included necrosis of two gastrocnemius flaps, one from pre-existing partial compartment syndrome and one when combined with fusion of the knee. One other knee replacement developed further sepsis three years post procedure. No limb required amputation. These procedures are well within the remit of orthopaedic surgeons, the non reliance on plastics surgeons allowed prompt treatment combined with bony procedures. Results were good for the knee and elbow but disappointing for the shoulder—this, probably related to the natural mobility of the joint

Introduction. Around the knee high-energy fractures/dislocation may present with vascular injuries. Ischaemia time i.e. the time interval from injury to reperfusion surgery is the only variable that the surgeon can influence. It has been traditionally taught that 6-8 hours is revascularisation acceptable. There are only limited case series that have documented the time-dependent lower limb salvage rate (LSR) or the lower limb amputation rate (LAR). We have conducted a meta-analysis to look at LSR and LAR to inform clinical standard setting and for medicolegal purposes. Methods. Two authors conducted an independent literature search using PubMed, Ovid, and Embase. In addition the past 5 years issues of Journal of Trauma, Injury and Journal of Vascular surgery were manually scrutinised. Papers included those in the English language that discussed limb injuries around the knee, and time to limb salvage or amputation surgery. The Oxman and Guyatt index was used to score each paper. Results. 21 retrospective case series articles were identified from 8 different journals. A total of 1575 patients were compiled, 92 patients were lost or died. 263 lower limbs underwent amputation and 1220 limbs were salvaged. 984 lower limbs were salvaged within the 8 hours. The LAR increased with time from 3% with reperfusion surgery in less than 4 hours to 13% at 6 hours and 32% at 8 hours. A lower LAR of 20% for patients presenting after 12 hours was seen

We present a retrospective review of a single-surgeon series of 30 consecutive lengthenings in 27 patients with congenital short femur using the Ilizarov technique performed between 1994 and 2005.

The mean increase in length was 5.8 cm/18.65% (3.3 to 10.4, 9.7% to 48.8%), with a mean time in the frame of 223 days (75 to 363). By changing from a distal to a proximal osteotomy for lengthening, the mean range of knee movement was significantly increased from 98.1° to 124.2° (p = 0.041) and there was a trend towards a reduced requirement for quadricepsplasty, although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.07). The overall incidence of regenerate deformation or fracture requiring open reduction and internal fixation was similar in the distal and proximal osteotomy groups (56.7% and 53.8%, respectively). However, in the proximal osteotomy group, pre-placement of a Rush nail reduced this rate from 100% without a nail to 0% with a nail (p < 0.001). When comparing a distal osteotomy with a proximal one over a Rush nail for lengthening, there was a significant decrease in fracture rate from 58.8% to 0% (p = 0.043).

We recommend that in this group of patients lengthening of the femur with an Ilizarov construct be carried out through a proximal osteotomy over a Rush nail. Lengthening should also be limited to a maximum of 6 cm during one treatment, or 20% of the original length of the femur, in order to reduce the risk of complications.