Abstract
We report our retrospective multicentre experience of managing periprosthetic knee fractures using locking plates, cemented nails and distal femoral prosthesis. The Aim of this study is to analyze the practicality of management of these injuries using modern methods of fixation or salvation. 62 patients presented to 3 centres between 2003 and 2010. After implementation of inclusion criteria, clinical, radiological and functional outcomes were evaluated in 54 patients, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. 34 patients were treated with locking plates (10 males, 24 female; mean age 76), 16 with cemented/locking nails (4 males, 12 females; mean age 84.5), and 4 with distal femoral replacement prosthesis (2 males, 2 females; mean age 79).
Locking plates which were used with a minimally invasive pattern produced the best outcomes in our study. A statistical significance of p value of less than 0.01 was found in union time between patients operated on with an open technique (6.69±2.69 months) and those operated on with a minimally invasive technique (3.6±0.91 months). Nailing with augmented cement is a useful technique in patients who are not suitable for challenging surgery & rehabilitation programmes. There was a significant difference in mean time to functional weight bearing (p< 0.01) between the plate group (4.79±2.6 months) and the nail group (2.63±0.5 months). Post-operative range of motion was also better for nails (106.36±14.33O flexion) compared to plates (93.24±26.8O), a result that approached significance (p=0.065). We recommend minimal invasive plating in uncompromised physiological conditions, as an ideal method of fracture fixation in view of statistically significant union rates. Cemented nailing is recommended in patients where early rehabilitation is essential. Distal Femoral prosthesis replacement is a useful salvage method.
