Aim. Our aim was to compare the Wilkins'-modified Gartland classification and AO classifications of supracondylar humeral fracture with respect to: -Inter-observer reliability; Association of fracture-grade with radiological quality of reduction; Association of fracture-grade with complications. Methods. The unit database was interrogated to identify all operated supracondylar fractures between 2007–2011. Radiographs from each case were evaluated by four observers (three consultants, one trainee) and classified according to Gartland and the AO system. Inter-observer reliability was calculated using Cohen's Kappa coefficient. Radiological quality of reduction was evaluated using a new scoring system, combining the anterior humeral line, the lateral capitello-humeral angle (LCHA) and Baumann's angle, (compared to reference values). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference in scores between the fracture grades. Case notes were reviewed for pre- and post-operative complication, and chi-squared test performed to compare the incidence between different fracture grades. Results. 83 cases were identified for fracture classification and 66 for assessment of reduction and complications. Inter-observer reliability was 0.58 for Gartland (moderate agreement), and 0.70 for the AO classification (good agreement). ANOVA demonstrated no significant difference in the overall reduction scores between the different grades of either classification. Mean scores for LCHA were lower for Gartland-2b (p=0.02) and AO-3 (p=0.007) groups (compared to Gartland-3 and AO-4). Complications were more frequent with the higher grades of fracture in both classifications (p<0.05). Conclusion. The AO classification has greater reliability and should be considered as an alternative to the Gartland classification. A higher grade of fracture is not associated with inferior radiographic outcomes. Surgeons should be aware that restoration of the LCHA is more difficult with the Gartland-2b and AO-3 fractures, probably because of the intact posterior cortex. A greater rate of complications should be expected with higher grades of fracture

Ultrasonography of the hip was performed sequentially by two different examiners in 75 infants. The ultrasound strips were reviewed twice by three paediatric orthopaedic surgeons and classified by the Graf method. The intraobserver and interobserver agreement between the interpretations was analysed using simple and weighted kappa coefficients calculated for agreement on the Graf classification and for grouping as normal (types 1A to 2A), and abnormal requiring treatment (types 2B to 4). When examining the same ultrasound strip, intraobserver agreement for the Graf classification was substantial (mean kappa 0.61), but interobserver agreement was only moderate (kappa 0.50). For the grouping into normal and abnormal, the mean kappa value for intraobserver agreement was 0.67 and for interobserver agreement 0.57. Because of the significant differences in agreement between normal and abnormal hips, we analysed a subgroup of those with at least one abnormal interpretation. Intraobserver agreement within this subgroup showed moderate reliability (kappa 0.41), but interobserver agreement was only fair (kappa 0.28). Interpretations of two different strips performed sequentially showed significantly lower agreement with an intraobserver kappa value of 0.29 and an interobserver value of 0.28. In the subgroup with at least one abnormal reading, the intraobserver kappa was 0.09 and the interobserver 0.1. Our findings suggest that both the technique of performing ultrasonography and the interpretation of the image may influence the result

Aims

Abduction bracing is commonly used to treat developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) following closed reduction and spica casting, with little evidence to support or refute this practice. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of abduction bracing after closed reduction in improving acetabular index (AI) and reducing secondary surgery for residual hip dysplasia.

Aims

The goal of closed reduction (CR) in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is to achieve and maintain concentricity of the femoral head in the acetabulum. However, concentric reduction is not immediately attainable in all hips and it remains controversial to what degree a non-concentric reduction is acceptable. This prospective study is aimed at investigating the dynamic evolution of the hip joint space after CR in DDH using MRI.