The Cochrane Collaboration has produced five new reviews relevant to bone and joint surgery since the publication of the last Cochrane Corner These reviews are relevant to a wide range of musculoskeletal specialists, and include reviews in Morton’s neuroma, scoliosis, vertebral fractures, carpal tunnel syndrome, and lower limb arthroplasty

The Cochrane Collaboration has produced three new reviews relevant to bone and joint surgery since the publication of the last Cochrane Corner. These are relevant to a wide range of musculoskeletal specialists, and include reviews in lateral elbow pain, osteoarthritis of the big toe joint, and cervical spine injury in paediatric trauma patients

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery published in the A and B volumes remains the premier Orthopaedic Journal of the world. Like other specialist scientific journals it is coming under increasing pressure from the move to more electronic publication on the Internet and the wider availability of freely downloadable information. The need to move to the new technology must be balanced against the needs of the majority of our subscribers, who still require the paper journal, and with the financial requirements of a charitable based not-for-profit publication. The paper will discuss how these pressures might be met and the plans for the redesign of our website to deliver a wider range of material, including the possibility of electronic pre-prints. The future of the Combined subscription CD-ROM will also be addressed together with the exciting future possibilities offered by the developments in digital information technology

The statistical quality of 103 original articles published in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British Volume) in 1984 was assessed. Some papers were found to be deficient: thus, it was not always clear how series were selected and sometimes neither the data nor the results were clearly presented. Sample sizes were frequently inadequate for the conclusions reached and statistical techniques should have been used more frequently. A majority of papers were descriptions of case series for which no comparative data were made available. It is suggested that collaborative research would best advance knowledge about the relative benefits of various managements, and that statistical advice could make a substantial contribution

Duplicate publication in orthopaedic journals may further an author’s academic career but this is at the cost of both scientific integrity and knowledge. Multiple publications of the same work increase the workload of editorial boards, misguide the reader and affect the process of meta-analysis. We found that of 343 ‘original’ articles published in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery in 1999, 26 (7.6%) had some degree of redundancy. The prevalence of duplicate publications in the orthopaedic literature appears to be less than that in other surgical specialties but it is still a matter of concern. It is the author’s responsibility to notify the editor of any duality when submitting a paper for publication

Osteomyelitis is one of the oldest diseases known. It took many years before the acute infection could be brought under control with antibiotics and chronic osteomyelitis remains difficult to manage. The modern history of the disease is reflected in the pages of the

Introduction

Foot and ankle is a well-established and growing sub specialty in orthopaedics. It accounts for 20 to 25 per cent of an average department's workload. There are two well established foot and ankle specialist journals but for many surgeons the Journal of Bone and Surgery (JBJS) remains the preeminent journal in orthopaedics and a highly sought after target journal for publication of research. It is our belief that foot and ankle surgery is underrepresented in the JBJS. We undertook a study to test this hypothesis.

Over a 13-year period we studied all patients who underwent major hip and knee surgery and were diagnosed with objectively confirmed symptomatic venous thromboembolism, either deep venous thrombosis or non-fatal pulmonary embolism, within six months after surgery. Low-molecular-weight heparin had been given while the patients were in hospital.

There were 5607 patients. The cumulative incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism was 2.7% (150 of 5607), of which 1.1% had developed pulmonary embolism, 1.5% had deep venous thrombosis and 0.6% had both. Patients presented with deep venous thrombosis at a median of 24 days and pulmonary embolism at 17 days after surgery for hip fracture. After total hip replacement, deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism occurred at a median of 21 and 34 days respectively. After total knee replacement, the median time to the presentation of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism was 20 and 12 days respectively. The cumulative risk of venous thromboembolism lasted for up to three months after hip surgery and for one month after total knee replacement. Venous thromboembolism was diagnosed after discharge from hospital in 70% of patients who developed this complication.

Despite hospital-based thromboprophylaxis, most cases of clinical venous thromboembolism occur after discharge and at different times according to the operation performed.

From 1998 to July 2003 admissions for elective arthroplasty surgery in Derriford Hospital were nursed alongside other orthopaedic and general medical patients. Since August 2003 a policy of pre-operative MRSA screening and a unit reserved exclusively for MRSA-free joint replacement patients have been used. No transfers from other wards were allowed. Patients positive on screening underwent eradication and were admitted to a different ward where they received teicoplanin on induction (in addition to standard policy cephradine). All post-operative wound infections following THR & TKR were monitored (NINSS surveillance system). Infections within 3 months were recorded. A control of non-screened hip hemi-arthroplasty patients was used to ensure a departmental wide reduction in MRSA was not occurring.

1.9% MRSA carriage rate was detected over the study. Before screening, 0.59% of 3386 cases were acutely infected with MRSA. After institution of screening and a dedicated MRSA free unit, 0.10% of 1034 were acutely infected. This was a 6-fold decrease (p<0.05). The infection noted was in a patient treated outside the ringfenced unit on High Dependency. In fact the infection rate on the ringfenced unit was zero. MRSA infection in the control was statistically unchanged during this period.

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) published in the British volume of the JBJS from United Kingdom based institutes have been analysed to review the level of involvement of junior doctors over the past 25 years (1988 to 2012) which included three different training eras: Pre-Calman (1988 to 1995), Calman (1996 to 2006), and MMC (2007 to 2012). Authors were divided into: Senior doctors, Registrars, Fellows, Senior House Officers/ Foundation Doctors, and Others. The level of involvement has been identified as being first author, senior author or co-author.

One hundred and fifty nine RCTs have been identified with a total of 705 authors. Eighty eight registrars, 32 fellows and 19 SHO/ Foundation doctors have been involved in RCT published over the last 25 years (19.7%). Registrars constituted 15% of all authors in the pre-Calman, 12% in the Calman and 11% in the MMC periods. They constituted 33% of all first authors in the pre-Calman, 21% in the Calman, and 12% in the MMC periods. With regards to SHO/ Foundation doctors, they were only 2% of all authors in the pre-Calman, 3% in the Calman, and 4% in the MMC periods. They were not the first author in any RCT in the pre-Calman period, rising to 7% in both the Calman and MMC periods.

Our study shows that registrars involvement was at its highest in the pre-Calman era with gradual decline in their involvement in the subsequent training eras. SHO/Foundation doctors involvement remains very low, however showing increasing rate in the MMC era.

Since Aug‘03 pre-operative MRSA screening & a ward reserved exclusively for MRSA free joint replacement patients has been used. All postoperative wound infections within 3 months following THR & TKR were monitored.

Before screening, 0.59% of 3386 were acutely infected with MRSA. After institution of study policy, 0.10% of 1034, were infected with MRSA.. This was a 6 fold decrease (p< 0.05). The rate of MRSA infection in a control of hemiarthroplasties was unchanged during this period.

A policy of MRSA screening & an MRSA free joint replacement ward reduces the incidence of acute MRSA infections.

Aims

We have previously reported cryoablation-assisted joint-sparing surgery for osteosarcoma with epiphyseal involvement. However, it is not clear whether this is a comparable alternative to conventional joint arthroplasty in terms of oncological and functional outcomes.

The role of joint preserving surgery for Rheumatoid Forefoot is being explored. This involves a Scarf osteotomy of the first Metatarsal along with shortening osteotomy of the lesser metatarsals. This prospective study includes 49 patients (17 Bilateral; Total 66 procedures) with Rheumatoid Forefoot deformities who underwent Scarf Osteotomy of the First Metatarsal and Weil osteotomy of the lesser metatarsals. The minimum follow up was 33 months and the maximum follow up was 58 months with a mean of 43.95 months. All patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically. AOFAS score for forefoot was collected prospectively. The majority (90%) were females with mean age of 56.1 years. There was a significant improvement in the HVA, IMA and SP. The AOFAS score improved significantly from a mean of 39.8 to 88.7(p=< 0.001). Subjective improvement was also noted with In our study patients rated their outcome as excellent in 51 feet (77.27%), good in twelve feet (18.18%) and as fair in three feet (4.54%). Before surgery no patient was pain free but 44 feet (66.66%) caused severe,19 feet (28.78%) caused moderate and 3 feet (4.54%) caused mild pain. After surgery 55 feet (83.33%) were pain free, 7 feet ((10.6%) caused moderate, 4 feet (6.06%) caused mild pain. Residual deformity in terms of recurrence of lesser toes varus deformity was reported in 5 feet (7.5%). Stiffness of toes was reported in 5 feet and 11 (16.7%) had some residual pain. Forefoot joint preserving reconstructive procedure for rheumatoid forefoot is a reliable procedure and should be considered as a safe method for treating rheumatoid forefoot deformities. However in severe hallux valgus with radiological destruction of the first MTPJ we recommend a primary fusion. Therefore joint preserving surgery should be regarded as a complement to various surgical treatments of rheumatoid forefoot

The treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and associated extra-articular deformity of the leg is challenging. Current teaching recognises two possible approaches: (1) a total knee replacement (TKR) with intra-articular bone resections to correct the malalignment or (2) an extra-articular osteotomy to correct the malalignment together with a TKR (either simultaneously or staged). However, a number of these patients only have unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis and, in the absence of an extra-articular deformity would be ideal candidates for joint preserving surgery such as unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) given its superior functional outcome and lower cost relative to a TKR [1). We report four cases of medial unicondylar knee replacement, with a simultaneous extra-articular osteotomy to correct deformity, using novel 3D printed patient-specific guides (Embody, UK) (see Figure 1). The procedure was successful in all four patients, and there were no complications. A mean increase in the Oxford knee score of 9.5, and in the EQ5D VAS of 15 was observed. To our knowledge this is the first report of combined osteotomy and unicompartmental knee replacement for the treatment of extra-articular deformity and knee osteoarthritis. This technically challenging procedure is made possible by a novel 3D printed patient-specific guide which controls osteotomy position, degree of deformity correction (multi-plane if required), and orientates the saw-cuts for the unicompartmental prosthesis according to the corrected leg alignment. Using 3D printed surgical guides to perform operations not previously possible represents a paradigm shift in knee surgery. We suggest that this joint preserving approach should be considered the preferred treatment option for suitable patients