Abstract
Introduction
Foot and ankle is a well-established and growing sub specialty in orthopaedics. It accounts for 20 to 25 per cent of an average department's workload. There are two well established foot and ankle specialist journals but for many surgeons the Journal of Bone and Surgery (JBJS) remains the preeminent journal in orthopaedics and a highly sought after target journal for publication of research. It is our belief that foot and ankle surgery is underrepresented in the JBJS. We undertook a study to test this hypothesis.
Methods
We analysed all JBJS (British and American editions) volumes over a 10 year period (2001 to 2010). We recorded how many editorials, reviews, original papers and case reports were foot and ankle related.
Results
of 2197 original papers published in JBJS Br only 114 (5%) were foot and ankle related. Nine out of 181 (5%) case reports, 2 out of 71 (3%) aspects of current management, none of the 51 editorials and only 3 out of 97 (3%) of reviews were foot and ankle related.
In the JBJS American edition 174 out of 2117 original papers (8%), 28 out of 401 (7%) case reports, 4 out of 103 (4%) current concept reviews, 8 out of 115 (7%) instructional course lectures were foot and ankle related.
Of 35 Editors on the JBJS British edition only 2 were dedicated foot and ankle surgeons, one of whom is retired.
Our study reveals that foot and ankle related research accounts for a very small proportion of JBJS publications. Foot and ankle surgery needs to be proportionally represented at the editorial board level to reflect the fast growing interest in foot and ankle conditions and related research.
