Aims. Cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) are commonly used for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be used as a salvage procedure when fixation fails in these patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the complications of THA following failed intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation using a CMN. Patients and Methods. Patients who underwent THA were identified from the 5% subset of Medicare Parts A/B between 2002 and 2015. A subgroup involving those with an intertrochanteric fracture that was treated using a CMN during the previous five years was identified and compared with the remaining patients who underwent THA. The length of stay (LOS) was compared using both univariate and multivariate analysis. The incidence of infection, dislocation, revision, and re-admission was compared between the two groups, using multivariate analysis adjusted for demographic, hospital, and clinical factors. Results. The Medicare data yielded 56 522 patients who underwent primary THA, of whom 369 had previously been treated with a CMN. The percentage of THAs that were undertaken between 2002 and 2005 in patients who had previously been treated with a CMN (0.346%) more than doubled between 2012 and 2015 (0.781%). The CMN group tended to be older and female, and to have a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index and lower socioeconomic status. The mean LOS was 1.5 days longer (5.3 vs 3.8) in the CMN group (p < 0.0001). The incidence of complications was significantly higher in the CMN group compared with the non-CMN group: infection (6.2% vs 2.6%), dislocation (8.1% vs 4.5%), revision (8.4% vs 4.3%), revision for infection (1.1% vs 0.37%), and revision for dislocation (2.2% vs 0.6%). Conclusion. The incidence of conversion to THA following failed intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation using a CMN continues to increase. This occurs in elderly patients with increased comorbidities. There is a significantly increased risk of infection, dislocation, and LOS in these patients. Patients with failed intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation using a CMN who require THA should be made aware of the increased risk of complications, and steps need to be taken to reduce this risk. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):91–96

To conduct a meta-analysis for intertrochanteric hip fractures comparing in terms of efficacy and safety short versus long intralomedullary nails. A pubmed search of the last 10 years for intertrochanteric fracture 31A1-31A3 according to the AO/OTA classification was performed. Baseline characteristics of each article were obtained, complication measures were analyzed: Peri-implant fracture, reoperations, deep/superficial infection, and mortality. Clinical variables consisted of blood loss (mL), length of stay (days), time of surgery (min) and nº of transfusions. Functional outcomes were also recorded. A meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.4. Twelve studies were included, nine were retrospective. The reoperations rate was lower in the short nail group and the peri-implant fracture rate was lower in the long nail group (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.88) (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.43). Surgery time and blood loss was significantly higher in the long nail group (MD −12.44, 95% CI −14.60 to −10.28) (MD −19.36, 95% CI −27.24 to −11.48). There were no differences in functional outcomes. The short intramedullary nail has a higher risk of peri-implant fracture; however, the reoperation rate is lower compared to the long nail. Blood loss and surgery time was higher in the long nail group

From January 2003 to December 2004, 160 consecutive intertrochanteric hip fractures has been treated at the Orthopaedic Rizzoli Institute by a new short intra-medullary rod, which can be distally locked, combined with two sliding screws that insert into the femoral neck and head. The rod is an undersized, titan one. It can be inserted percutaneously. Fractures were classified pre-operatively according to stability and post-operatively according to the type of operative reduction. The failure rate and post-operative stability were then compared according to the type of fracture and to the quality of operative reduction. Results indicate that the pre-operative fracture classification is a significant determinant of post-operative stability. The type of operative reduction was not as significant a determinant of post-operative stability, but an anatomical reduction gives better clinical results. Overall results shows that stable fractures has always healed and only minor complications has been observed. Unstable fractures has a percentage of drawbacks of 1.5% (3 in 160 pts) due to a wrong screw positioning ( 2 proximal and 1 distal ). Three patients died in the early post-operative period due to cardiac failure. No intraoperative fracture, no displacement of the fracture site and no “cut out” were observed

The April 2024 Trauma Roundup. 360. looks at: The infra-acetabular screw in acetabular fracture surgery; Is skin traction helpful in patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures?; Reducing pain and improving function following hip fracture surgery; Are postoperative splints helpful following ankle fracture fixation?; Biomechanics of internal fixation in Hoffa fractures: a comparison of four different constructs; Dual-plate fixation of periprosthetic distal femur fractures; Do direct oral anticoagulants necessarily mean a delay to hip fracture surgery?; Plate or retrograde nail for low distal femur fractures?

The benefit of using a long intramedullary device for the treatment of geriatric intertrochanteric hip fractures is unknown. The InterTAN device (Smith and Nephew, Memphis TN) is offered in either Short (180–200 mm) or Long (260–460 mm) constructs and was designed to provide stable compression across primary intertrochanteric fracture fragments. The objective of our study was to determine whether Short InterTANs are equivalent to Long InterTANs in terms of functional and adverse outcomes for the treatment of geriatric intertrochanteric hip fractures. 108 patients with OTA classification 31A–1 and 31A–2 intertrochanteric hip fractures were included in our study and prospectively followed at one of four Canadian Level-1 Trauma Centres. Our primary outcomes included two validated primary outcome measures: the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), to measure function, and the Timed Up and Go (TUG), to measure motor performance. Secondary outcome measures included blood loss, length of procedure, length of stay and adverse events. A pre-injury FIM was measured by retrospective recall and all postoperative outcomes were assessed on postoperative day 3, at discharge, at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. Unpaired t-tests and Chi-square tests were used for the comparison of continuous and categorical variables respectively between the Short and Long InterTAN groups. A statistically significant difference was defined as p<0.05. Our study included 71 Short InterTAN and 37 Long InterTAN patients with 31A–1 and 31A–2 intertrochanteric hip fractures. Age, sex, BMI, side, living status and comorbidities were similar between the two groups. The mean operative time was significantly lower in the Short InterTAN group (61 mins) as compared to the Long InterTAN group (71 mins)(p0.05). There were 5 periprosthetic femur fractures in the short InterTAN group versus 1 in the long InterTAN group. Non-mechanical adverse outcomes such as myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infections, pneumonia and death all had similar incidence rates between the two InterTAN groups. Both the Short and Long InterTAN patient cohorts displayed similar improvements in performance and overall function over the course of a year following intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation. The recorded operative times for Short InterTAN fixation were significantly shorter than those recorded for the Long InterTAN patients. Alternatively, a significantly higher proportion of Short InterTAN patients sustained periprosthetic femur fractures within a year of implantation as compared to the Long InterTAN group

Introduction and Objective. Hip fractures represent one of the most challenging injuries in orthopaedic practice due to the associated morbidity, mortality and the financial burden they impose on the health care systems. By many still considered as the gold standard in the management of intertrochanteric fractures, the Dynamic Hip Screw utilizes controlled collapse during weight bearing to stabilize the fracture. Despite being a highly successful device, mechanical failure rate is not uncommon. The most accepted intraoperative indicator for lag screw failure is the tip apex distance (TAD), yet lateral femoral wall thickness (LWT) is another evolving parameter for detecting the potential for lateral wall fracture with subsequent medialization and implant failure. The aim of this study is to determine the mean and cut off levels for LWT that warrant lateral wall fracture and the implications of that on implant failure, revision rates and implant choice. Materials and Methods. This prospective cohort study included 42 patients with a mean age of 70.43y with intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with DHS fixation by the same consultant surgeon from April 2019 to December 2019. The study sample was calculated based on a confidence level of 90% and margin of error of 5%. Fracture types included in the study are 31A1 and 31A2 based on the AO/OTA classification system. LWT was assessed in all patients preoperatively using Surgimap (Nemaris, NY, USA) software. Patients were divided into two groups according to the post-operative integrity of the lateral femoral wall, where group (A) sustained a lateral femoral wall fracture intraoperatively or within 12 months after the index procedure, while in group (B) the lateral femoral wall remained intact. All patients were regularly followed up radiologically and clinically per the Harris Hip Score (HHS) for a period of 12 months. Results. At 12 months five patients (12%) suffered a postoperative lateral wall fracture, while in 37 patients (88%) the lateral femoral wall remained intact. The mean preoperative LWT of patients with a postoperative lateral wall fracture was 18.04 mm (SD ± 1.58) compared to 26.22mm (SD ± 5.93) in the group without a lateral wall fracture. All patients with post-operative lateral femoral wall fracture belong to 31A2 group, while 78.4% of the patients that did not develop post-operative lateral femoral wall fracture belong to 31A1 group. Eighty percent of patients in group (A) experienced shortening, collapse, shaft medialization and varus deformity. The mean Harris hip score of group (A) was 39.60 at 3 months and 65.67 at 6 months postoperatively, while that of group (B) was 80.75 and 90.65 at 3 and 6 months respectively, denoting a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). Treatment failure meriting a revision surgery was 40 % in group (A) and 8% in group (B) denoting a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). The cut-off point of LWT below which there is a high chance of post-operative lateral wall fracture when fixed with DHS is 19.6mm. This was shown on the receiver operating curve (ROC) by plotting the sensitivity against the 100 % specificity with a set 95% confidence interval 0.721 – 0.954. When lateral wall thickness was at 19.6 mm, the sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 81.8%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.838, which was statistically significant (P = 0.015). Conclusions. Preoperative measurement of LWT in elderly patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures is decisive. The cut off point for postoperative lateral wall fracture according to our study is 19.6 mm; hence, intramedullary fixation has to be considered in this situation

Intertrochanteric fractures are common, accounting for nearly 30% of all fracture related admissions. Some have suggested that these fractures should be treated in community hospitals so as not to tax the resources of Level One trauma centers. Since many factors predictive of fixation failure are related to technical aspects of the surgery, the purpose of this study was to compare radiographic parameters after fixation comparing trauma fellowship trained surgeons to non-fellowship trained community surgeons to see if these fractures can be treated successfully in either setting. Using our hospital system's trauma database, we identified 100 consecutive patients treated with cephalomedullary nails by traumatologists, and 100 consecutive patients treated by community surgeons. Quality of reduction, neck shaft angle (NSA), tip-to apex distance (TAD) were compared. The mean TAD for the trauma group was 10mm compared to 21mm for the community group (p<0.001). The mean postoperative NSA for the trauma group was 133 degrees compared to 127 degrees for the community group (p<0.001). The mean difference in the NSA of the fractured side compared to the normal hip was 2.5 degrees of valgus in the trauma group compared to 5 degrees of varus for the community group (p<0.001). There were 93 good reductions in the trauma group compared to 19 in the community group (p<0.001). There were no poor reductions in the trauma group and 49 poor reductions in the community group (p<0.001). Fellowship trained traumatologists achieved significantly more accurate reductions and implant placement during cephalomedullary nailing of intertrochanteric hip fractures

Purpose: The results of surgical treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures using a sliding hip screw-plate and Norian-SRS, as an adjuvant means of stabilization, are presented. Material – Methods: 103 patients (27 male, 76 female) with intertrochanteric hip fractures, were treated with a sliding hip screw. Their age ranged from 56 to93 years (av. 68,9y) . In group A (50 patients) we only used a sliding hip screw -plate, while in group B ( 53 patients) we also used Norian-SRS above the upper surface of the sliding hip screw. Results: Postoperative follow-up ranged from 5 to17 μnνϵς. Mobilization was initiated on the 2nd day with partial weight bearing. A group progressed to full weight bearing in 3 , while B group in 2 months. 8 patients in group A and 2 in group B developed varous deformity. Screw cut out developed in 5 patient of group A and none of group B. Backsliding of the screw ranged from 0 to 16 mm. (av. 4,95 mm.) in group A and from 0 to16mm. (av. 3,25mm.) in group B. Conclusion: Norian-SRS augmentation of intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with a sliding hip screw-plate, increases the stability of the osteosynthesis, permitting earlier rehabilitation and mobilization of the patient and leading to better functional results

Purpose: To compare failure rates, and patient functional outcomes, using the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and Medoff Sliding Plate (MSP) for unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures. Method: One hundred and sixty three consecutive patients with unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures, from three hospitals, were prospectively randomized to DHS or MSP. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were designed to focus on isolated unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures in ambulatory patients over age 60, without previous hip fractures or significant subtrochanteric extension. Patients were stratified by mental status and treating hospital. Randomization was performed intra operatively, after placement of a 135 degree guide wire. Follow up assessments were performed at regular intervals for a minimum of six months. The primary outcome was re-operation rate. The secondary outcome was patient function, using a validated outcome measure, the Hip Fracture Functional Recovery Score. Tertiary outcomes included: mortality, hospital stay, quality of reduction and mal union rate. Results: 86 patients were randomized to DHS and 76 to MSP. The groups had similar patient demographics and pre fracture status (medical and functional). The patients had similar hospital course except there were more transfusions in the MSP group (2 vs. 1 unit). The quality of reduction was the same for each group but the operative time was longer in the MSP group (61 vs. 50 min). The rate of re-operation was low (3/86 in DHS and 2/76 in MSP) with no statistically significant difference. The indication for re-operation differed for the two groups as all three failures in the DHS group were related to screw cut out and both failures in the MSP arm were because of non union. The functional outcomes were the same for both groups with functional recovery scores at six months of 51% in the DHS arm and 49% in the MSP arm. Conclusion: The two techniques produced similar results for the clinically important outcomes of the need for further surgery and functional status of the patients. For this challenging sub group of hip fractures, based on the equivalent results in this study either implant is a reasonable choice

Background. Radiation exposure remains a significant occupational hazard for Orthopaedic surgeons. There are no references values for trauma procedures performed with Image Intensifier (II). We aimed to determine and compare reference values for patient radiation exposure for common trauma operations, and to analyse the effect of surgeon grade on II usage. Methods. Data collected prospectively from 849 cases between 01/05/2013 and 01/10/2014 were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed to calculate reference values for dose area product (DAP), screening time (ST), and number of II images taken for common trauma procedures where n>9 (n=808). Results. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation required significantly less radiation than proximal femoral nail (PFN) for intertrochanteric hip fractures for median DAP (668mG/cm2 vs 1040mG/cm2, p<0.001), ST (00:36 vs 00:48, p<0.001), and number of II images (65 vs 110, p<0.001). Radiation exposure was statistically significantly less when Consultant Orthopaedic surgeons were first surgeon compared to Staff grade doctors and Orthopaedic trainees for DAP (90.55mGy/cm2 vs 175.5mGy/cm2 vs 366.5mGy/cm2), screening time (00:26 vs 00:32 vs 00:36), and number of II images (49 vs 59 vs 66). Conclusions. We reported reference values for common trauma operations that are essential to enable monitoring of patient radiation exposure. PFN required greater radiation exposure than DHS for intertrochanteric hip fracture. Increased surgical experience lead to lower radiation exposure in trauma operations, which could be developed to assess trauma competence within surgical training. Level of evidence. III

Purpose. To observe the follow-up results of standard cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty with double loop and tension band wiring technique for treatment of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis. Materials and Methods. From May 2000 to May 2006, 86 cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasties were performed in elderly patients who had unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The mean age at the time of surgery was 82 years old. The average follow-up period were 5.3 years. We evaluated post-operative results after operation by clinical and radiographic methods. Results. Clinically, the final follow-up of Harrsi hip score was noted 79.2. The mean time needed for full weight bearing following surgery was 4.2 weeks and 82.5% of patients regained their preoperative ambulatory level. All patients achieved union in lesser trochanter fracuture, but great trochanter displacement were observed in 4 cases. There was one case of acetabular erosion. Post-operative superficial infections were found in 2 cases. 1 case with stem subsidence(<5 mm) showed satisfactory results without further subsidence in follow-ups. Conclusion. If we properly apply indications in technique with cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric hip fracture in elderly, we will achieve systematic postoperative rehabilitation, pain control and handy nursing which is its one of merits

The December 2013 Trauma Roundup. 360 . looks at: Re-operation for intertrochanteric hip fractures; Are twin incisions better than one round the acetabulum?; Salvage osteotomy for calcaneal fractures; Posterior dislocation; Should MRSA be covered in open fractures?; Characterising the saline load test; Has it healed: hip fractures under the spotlight; and stem cells present in atrophic non-union

Increasing incidence of osteoporosis, obesity and an aging population have led to an increase in low energy hip fractures in the elderly. Perceived lower blood loss and lower surgical time, media coverage of minimal invasive surgery and patient expectations unsurprisingly have led to a trend towards intramedullary devices for fixation of extracapsular hip fractures. This is contrary to the Cochrane review of random controlled trials of intramedullary vs extramedullary implants which continues recommends the use of a sliding hip screw (SHS) over other devices. Furthermore, despite published literature of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of SHS citing benefits such as reduced soft tissue trauma, smaller scar, faster recovery, reduced blood loss, reduced analgesia needs; the uptake of these approaches has been poor. We describe a novel technique one which remains minimally invasive, that not only has a simple learning curve but easily reproducible results. All patients who underwent MIS SHS fixation of extracapsular fractures were included in this study. Technique is shown in Figure 1. We collated data on all intertrochanteric hip fractures that were treated by a single surgeon series during period Jan 2014 to July 2015. Data was collected from electronic patient records and radiographs from Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). Surgical time, fluoroscopy time, blood loss, surgical incision length, post-operative transfusion, Tip Apex Distance (TAD) were analyzed. There were 10 patients in this study. All fractures were Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) type A1 or A2. Median surgical time was 36 minutes (25–54). Mean fluoroscopy time was similar to standard incision sliding hip screw fixation. Blood loss estimation with MIS SHS can be undertaken safely and expeditiously for extracapsular hip fractures

Elderly patients undergoing surgery for a hip fracture are at risk of thromboembolic events (TEV). The risk of TEV is now rare due to thromboprophylaxis. However, hip fracture treatment has evolved over the last decade. The risk of TEV may have been modified. The objective of this study was to determine the risk of symptomatic TEV following surgery for a hip fracture, in an elderly population. Retrospective cohort study of all patients > 65 years old undergoing surgery for a femoral neck or intertrochanteric hip fracture in two academic centers, between January 1st 2008 and January 1st 2019. The follow-up was fixed at 3 months. The cumulated risk of thromboembolic events was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and a predictive logistic regression model was used to determine risk factors. 3265 patients were eligible for analysis. The mean age was 83.3 ±8.1 years old and 75.6% of patients were female. The mortality was 7.55% (N=112) at 3 months. 98.53% of this cohort received thromboprophylaxis. The cumulated risk for a thromboembolic event was 3.55% at 1 month and 6.41% at 3 months (N=99). There were 9 fatal pulmonary embolisms. 89.19% thromboembolic events occurred within 20 days following surgery. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio 1.909 [1.179–3.089]), renal failure (odds ratio 1.896 [1.172–3.066]) and the use of a bridge between different types of anticoagulant (odds ratio 2.793 [1.057–7.384]) were associated with TEV. The risk of bleeding was 5.67% at 1 month and 9.38% at 3 months (N=142). 77% of bleeding events were hematomas. The risk of thromboembolic events is higher than expected in a population treated for this condition. Most thromboembolic events occur shortly following surgery. The risk of bleeding is high and most of them are hematomas. Future research could focus on the management of thromboprophylaxis in elderly patients undergoing surgery for a hip fracture

The February 2014 Trauma Roundup. 360 . looks at: predicting nonunion; compartment Syndrome; octogenarian RTCs; does HIV status affect decision making in open tibial fractures?; flap timing and related complications; proximal humeral fractures under the spotlight; restoration of hip architecture with bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the elderly; and short versus long cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients over 65 years

While hidden blood loss has been shown to occur in hip fractures the timing and cause have not yet been demonstrated. This study investigated the degree of pre-operative blood loss within the first 24hrs after intertrochanteric hip fracture. 188 patients with extracapsular hip fractures had their full blood count taken on admission and after 24 hours. The haemoglobin (Hb) and haematocrit (Hct) were noted at each time. Fractures were grouped as undisplaced or displaced. Those who were operated on prior to the 24hr blood sample were excluded. All patients with intracapsular or sub-trochanteric fractures were excluded, as were any who received a blood transfusion prior to their 24hr blood sample being taken. The tests for differences between blood samples and the existence of displacement were performed using paired and independent Student’s t-test. The level of significance was set at P< 0.05. All data was analysed using SPSS statistical software version 11. The overall fall in the Hb within 24hr was significant (1.6 g/dl, P< 0.001), as was the fall in the haematocrit (0.05, P< 0.05). Displaced fractures had a significantly lower Hb at 24hrs than undisplaced (10.6g/dl vs 11.8 g/dl, P=0.001). The fall in Hb was significantly greater in displaced fractures compared to undisplaced (1.7g/dl vs 1.2g/dl, P< 0.05). Changes in the Hct mirrored those of the Hb. This study identified a significant blood loss that occurs within the first 24hrs after an intertrochanteric hip fracture, prior to theatre. The cause is unlikely to be secondary to dehydration as the Hct fell with the Hb. Thus the most likely cause is the trauma itself. The admission Hb is possibly an inaccurate measure of the true value and patients may be more shocked than first thought. A more liberal resuscitation policy may be warranted

Aims. We aimed to characterise the effect of expeditious hip fracture surgery in elderly patients within 24 hours of admission on short-term post-operative outcomes. Patients and Methods. Patients age 65 or older that underwent surgery for closed femoral neck and intertrochanteric hip fractures were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program between 2011 and 2014. Multivariable propensity-adjusted logistic regressions were performed to determine associations between early surgery within 24 hours and post-operative complications, controlling for selection bias in patients undergoing early surgery based on observable characteristics. Results. A total of 26 051 patients were included in the study; 5921 (22.7%) had surgery within 24 hours of admission, while 20 130 (77.3%) patients had surgery after 24 hours. Propensity-adjusted multivariable logistic regressions demonstrated that surgery within 24 hours was independently associated with lower odds of respiratory complications including pneumonia, failure to extubate, or reintubation (odds ratio (OR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67 to 0.90), and extended length of stay (LOS) defined as ≥ 6 days (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.90). Conclusion. In elderly patients with hip fractures, early surgery within 24 hours of admission is independently associated with less pulmonary complications including pneumonia, failure to extubate, and reintubation, as well as shorter LOS. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1216–22

The Failed Femoral Neck Fracture. For the young patient: Attempt to preserve patient's own femoral head. Clinical results reasonably good even if there are patches of avascular necrosis. Preferred methods of salvage: valgus-producing intertrochanteric femoral osteotomy: puts the nonunion under compression. Other treatment option: Meyer's vascularised pedicle graft. For the older patient: Most reliable treatment is prosthetic replacement. Decision to use hemiarthroplasty (such as bipolar) or THA based on quality of articular cartilage, perceived risk of instability problem. In most patients THA provides higher likelihood of excellent pain relief. Specific technical issues: (1) hardware removal: usually remove after hip has first been dislocated (to reduce risk of femur fracture); (2) Hip stability: consider methods to reduce dislocation risk: larger diameter heads/dual mobility/anteriorly-based approaches; (3) Acetabular bone quality: poor because it is not sclerotic from previous arthritis; caution when impacting a pressfit cup; low threshold to augment fixation with screws; don't overdo reaming; just expose the bleeding subchondral bone. A reasonable alternative is a cemented cup. The Failed Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture. For the young patient: Attempt to salvage hip joint with nonunion takedown, autogenous bone grafting and internal fixation. For the older patient: Decision to preserve patient's own hip with internal fixation versus salvage with hip arthroplasty should be individualised based on patient circumstances, fracture pattern, bone quality. THA is an effective salvage procedure for this problem in older patients. If prosthetic replacement is chosen special considerations include:. THA vs. hemiarthroplasty: hemiarthroplasty better stability; THA more reliable pain relief. Removal of hardware: be prepared to remove broken screws in intramedullary canal. Management of bone loss: bone loss to level of lesser trochanter common. Often requires a calcar replacement implant. Proximal calcar build-up size dictated by bone loss. Length of stem: desirable to bypass screw holes from previous fixation, if possible. Stem fixation: cemented or uncemented fixation depending on surgeon preference, bone quality. If uncemented, consider diaphyseal fixation. Greater trochanter: often a separate piece, be prepared to fix with wires or cable grip. Residual trochanteric healing, hardware problems not rare after THA

Purpose. To compare the clinical and radiological results between internal fixation using the proximal femoral nail system and bipolar hemiarthroplasty in reverse oblique intertrochanteric hip fracture in elderly patients. Materials and Methods. From January 2005 to July 2012, we reviewed 53 patients who had been treated surgically for reverse oblique intertrochanteric fracture and been followed up on for a minimum of 2 years. The patients, all over 70 years old, were divided into two groups for retrospective evaluation: one group was treated with open reduction and internal fixation using the proximal femoral nail system (31 cases), and the other group was treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty (22 cases). Results. Early ambulation postoperatively and less pain at postoperative three months were significantly superior in the bipolar hemiarthroplasty group. However, by 24 months postoperatively, the open reduction and internal fixation group had higher Harris scores and correspondingly less pain than the bipolar hemiarthroplasty group. There were no significant differences in union rate, duration of hospitalization or lateral wall fracture healing between the two groups. Four patients in the open reduction and internal fixation group underwent reoperation. Conclusions. In the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the reverse oblique type, if the patient's health and bone quality are good, open reduction and internal fixation is considered to be the better choice. However, in cases of severe communition of fracture and poor bone quality along with high risk of early reduction failure, bipolar hemiarthroplasty is an alternative offering advantages in terms of early ambulation, less pain at early stages, and lower risk of reoperation

Cases of intertrochanteric hip fractures as a result of osteoporosis have been increasing in recent years. Treatment of these types of fractures is often performed with intramedullary (IM) nails or compression hip screws (CHS) . [1]. IM nails are composed of a stem, which is inserted into the medullary canal of the femur, and a lag screw that is placed inside the head of the femur. One problem with this type of device is that both the left and right femurs are fixed with IM nails that have right-hand threaded lag screws. Therefore, on left femurs, the right-handed threads may not provide satisfactory fixation in the bone. This insufficient fixation could cause rotary motion and slippage in the femoral head, which would inhibit fracture healing. This study used three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) to examine the fixation and rotational characteristics in reference to the thread direction of the lag screw and the relative angle between the stem and lag screw. In this study, a 3D CAD model of a left femur and four proximal femoral IM nail designs were analyzed in FEA for stress and displacement. An intertrochanteric femoral fracture was created so that the femoral head and diaphysis were separated. The four IM nails were designed to with either left or right-handed lag screw threads (figure .1) and with relative stem-lag screw angles of 125 or 135 degrees. (Traditional IM nails use a right-handed screw and a relative angle of 125 degrees.). The results showed the femoral head displacement was smaller when using the left-handed lag screw. It is thought that this difference between the left and right-handed screws is caused by the direction of rotation, which would cause the left-handed screw to tighten and the right-handed screw to loosen within the femoral head. The femoral head displacement also decreased with a screw-stem angle of 135 degrees in comparison to the standard 125 degree angle. The standard right-handed screw with 125 degree relative angle was shown to have the largest displacement of all four types of tested IM nails, whereas the left-handed, 135 relative degree design produced the smallest displacement of all four implants. These results show how using a left-handed lag screw with proper relative angles in the left femur, effectively reduces femoral head displacement when compared to traditional right-handed lag screw IM implants. This is important for the promotion of intertrochanteric fracture healing