Our aim was to determine the most repeatable three-dimensional measurement of glenoid orientation and to compare it between shoulders with intact and torn rotator cuffs. Our null hypothesis was that glenoid orientation in the scapulae of shoulders with a full-thickness tear of the rotator cuff was the same as that in shoulders with an intact rotator cuff. We studied 24 shoulders in cadavers, 12 with an intact rotator cuff and 12 with a full-thickness tear. Two different observers used a three-dimensional digitising system to measure glenoid orientation in the scapular plane (ie glenoid inclination) using six different techniques. Glenoid version was also measured. The overall precision of the measurements revealed an error of less than 0.6°. Intraobserver reliability (correlation coefficients of 0.990 and 0.984 for each observer) and interobserver reliability (correlation coefficient of 0.985) were highest for measurement of glenoid inclination based on the angle obtained from a line connecting the superior and inferior points of the glenoid and that connecting the most superior point of the glenoid and the most superior point on the body of the scapula. There were no differences in glenoid inclination (p = 0.34) or glenoid version (p = 0.12) in scapulae from shoulders with an intact rotator cuff and those with a full-thickness tear. Abnormal glenoid orientation was not present in shoulders with a torn rotator cuff

Summary. The EOS stereography system has been developed for the evaluation of prosthetic alignment. This new low-dose device provides reliable 2D/3D measurements of knee prosthesis alignment. Introduction. Achieving optimal prosthetic alignment during Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is an essential part of the surgical procedure since malpositioning can lead to early loosening of the prosthesis and eventually revision surgery. Conventional weight-bearing radiographs are part of the usual clinical follow-up after both primary TKA and revision TKA (rTKA), to assess alignment in the coronal and sagittal planes. However, proportions and angles may not be correct on radiographs since divergence exists in the vertical and horizontal planes. Furthermore estimating the exact planes by looking at the position of the patella depends on rotation in the hip joint and this may be misinterpreted by the investigator. A computed tomography (CT) scanogram can also be used. However, due to high levels of radiation and costs it is not routinely used. To this end, a new device, the EOS stereography system, has been developed. With this biplanar low-dose X-ray technique, orthogonally made 2D images and 3D reconstructions can be obtained. Advantages of EOS are that images of the leg are obtained on a 1:1 scale with an amount of radiation 800–1000 times lower than CT-scans and 10 times lower than conventional radiographs. Another advantage is that the 3D reconstructions lead to determination of the real coronal and sagittal planes. However, the software for creating 3D reconstructions is developed for the lower limbs without knee prosthesis material. Consequently a reliability study concerning the generation of 2D images and 3D reconstructions of a leg containing a knee prosthesis has not been performed yet. Therefore objective of this study was to investigate interobserver and intraobserver reliability of knee prosthetic alignment measurements after rTKA using EOS. Patients and Methods. Forty anteroposterior and lateral images of 37 rTKA patients were included. Two observers independently performed measurements on these images twice. Measured angles were varus/valgus angle in 2D (VV2D) and 3D (VV3D). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to determine relative reliability and the Bland and Altman method was used to determine absolute reliability. T-tests were used to test potential differences between the two observers, first and second measurement sessions and 2D and 3D measurements. Results. Relative interobserver reliability was excellent for both VV2D and VV3D with ICCs > 0.95, and no significant differences between the two observers. For the absolute reliability of VV2D, a bias of −0.16° (95%CI: −0.31–0.01) existed between both observers. Absolute reliability of VV3D was good. Relative intraobserver reliability was excellent for both VV2D and VV3D with ICCs > 0.97. No significant difference and no bias between the first and second measurements were found. A significant difference existed between the angles measured in 2D and 3D (p=0.01). Discussion / Conclusion. The EOS low-dose stereography system provides reliable varus/valgus measurements in 2D and 3D for the alignment of the knee joint with a knee prosthesis. However, significant differences exist between the varus/valgus measurements in 2D and in 3D. Therefore, a validation study is suggested to investigate the difference between the 2D measurements and 3D reconstructions and to find a possible explanation for this difference

Summary. Biomechanical studies comparing fixation constructs are predictable and do not relate to the significant clinical problems. We believe there is a need for more careful use of resources in the lab and better collaboration with surgeons to enhance clinical relevance. Introduction. It is our impression that many biomechanical studies invest substantial resources studying the obvious: that open reduction and internal fixation with more and larger metal is stronger. Studies that investigate “which construct is the strongest?” are distracted from the more clinically important question of “how strong is strong enough?”. The aim of this study is to show that specific biomechanical questions do not require formal testing. This study tested our hypothesis that the outcome of a subset of peer reviewed biomechanical studies comparing fracture fixation constructs can be predicted based on common sense with great accuracy and good interobserver reliability. Patients & Methods. Between 2000 and 2012, we found 254 peer reviewed biomechanical studies in prestigious orthopaedic journals comparing construct ‘A’ versus construct ‘B’ to evaluate load to failure in order to determine ‘which construct is the strongest?’. Eleven studies comparing fracture fixation constructs were randomly selected from different journals based on our sense that the answer was obvious prior to performing the study. Three-hundred independent observers; including orthopaedic- and general- surgeons affiliated with the Science of Variation Group (. www.scienceofvariation.org. ), predicted the outcome of these biomechanical studies. Observers were presented the original published illustrations of different treatment modalities and were asked to answer one question: “which construct is the strongest?” Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated according to standardised formulas. The agreement among the observers was calculated by using a multirater kappa, described by Siegel and Castellan. The kappa values were interpreted as proposed by Landis and Koch. Results. Accuracy was the same or greater than 80% for all studies except for study 1. The level of experience had no influence on the accuracy of predicting outcomes. Sensitivity averaged 84%, ranging from 60% (for study 1) to 99% (for study 7), specificity 86%, ranging from 60% (for study 1) to 99% (for study 7), and accuracy averaged 86% from 60% (for study 1) to 99% (for study 7). The overall categorical rating of inter-observer reliability according to Landis and Koch was moderate (κ = 0,53; SE = 0.01), ranging from κ = 0,03 (SE = 0.01) to κ = 0,95 (SE = 0.01). Analyses of SOVG subgroups identified excellent agreement among Canadian surgeons. Moderate and substantial agreement were found in most of other subgroups: ranging from first year medical students to specialists 20 years or more in practice; and specialists who practice in Australia, Europe and United States. Study 5 was easiest to predict based on common sense (Accuracy 97%, inter-observer reliability 0,88). Study 1 was predicted with least accuracy 61% and the lowest kappa value 0,04. Conclusions. The outcomes of biomechanical studies comparing fracture reduction and fixation constructs are highly predictable with good inter-observer reliability

The aim of this study was to validate the use of three models of fracture fixation in the assessment of technical skills. We recruited 21 subjects (six experts, seven intermediates, and eight novices) to perform three procedures: application of a dynamic compression plate on a cadaver porcine model, insertion of an unreamed tibial intramedullary nail, and application of a forearm external fixator, both on synthetic bone models. The primary outcome measures were the Objective Structural Assessment of technical skills global rating scale on video recordings of the procedures which were scored by two independent expert observers, and the hand movements of the surgeons which were analysed using the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device.

The video scores were significantly different for the three groups in all three procedures (p < 0.05), with excellent inter-rater reliability (α = 0.88). The novice and intermediate groups specifically were significantly different in their performance with dynamic compression plate and intramedullary nails (p < 0.05). Movement analysis distinguished between the three groups in the dynamic compression plate model, but a ceiling effect was demonstrated in the intramedullary nail and external fixator procedures, where intermediates and experts performed to comparable standards (p > 0.6). A total of 85% (18 of 21) of the subjects found the dynamic compression model and 57% (12 of 21) found all the models acceptable tools of assessment.

This study has validated a low-cost, high-fidelity porcine dynamic compression plate model using video rating scores for skills assessment and movement analysis. It has also demonstrated that Synbone models for the application of and intramedullary nail and an external fixator are less sensitive and should be improved for further assessment of surgical skills in trauma. The availability of valid objective tools of assessment of surgical skills allows further studies into improving methods of training.