Durable humeral component fixation in shoulder arthroplasty is necessary to prevent painful aseptic loosening and resultant humeral bone loss. Causes of humeral component loosening include stem design and material, stem length and geometry, ingrowth vs. ongrowth surfaces, quality of bone available for fixation, glenoid polyethylene debris osteolysis, exclusion of articular particulate debris, joint stability, rotator cuff function, and patient activity levels. Fixation of the humeral component may be achieved by cement fixation either partial or complete and press-fit fixation. During the past two decades, uncemented humeral fixation has become more popular, especially with short stems and stemless press fit designs. Cemented humeral component fixation risks difficult and complicated revision surgery, stress shielding of the tuberosities and humeral shaft periprosthetic fractures at the junction of the stiff cemented stem and the remaining humeral shaft. Press fit fixation may minimise these cemented risks but has potential for stem loosening. A randomised clinical trial of 161 patients with cemented vs. press fit anatomic total shoulder replacements found that cemented fixation of the humeral component provided better quality of life, strength, and range of motion than uncemented fixation but longer operative times. Another study found increased humeral osteolysis (43%) associated with glenoid component loosening and polyethylene wear, while stress shielding was seen with well-fixed press fit humeral components. During reverse replacement the biomechanical forces are different on the humeral stem. Stem loosening during reverse replacement may have different factors than anatomic replacement. A systemic review of 41 reverse arthroplasty clinical studies compared the functional outcomes and complications of cemented and uncemented stems in approximately 1800 patients. There was no difference in the risk of stem loosening or revision between cemented and uncemented stems. Uncemented stems have at least equivalent clinical and radiographic outcomes compared with cemented stems during reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Durable humeral component fixation in shoulder arthroplasty is associated with fully cemented stems or well ingrown components that exclude potential synovial debris that may cause osteolysis

Removal of a well-fixed humeral component during revision shoulder arthroplasty presents a challenging problem. If the humeral component cannot be extracted simply from above, an alternate approach must be taken that may include compromising bone architecture to remove the implant. Two potential solutions to this problem that allow removal of the well-fixed prosthesis are making a humeral window or creating a longitudinal split in the humerus. A retrospective review was performed at the Mayo Clinic to determine the complications associated with performing humeral windows and longitudinal splits during the course of revision shoulder arthroplasty. This study included 427 patients from 1994–2010 at Mayo Clinic undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty. From this cohort, those who required a humeral window or a longitudinal split to assist removal of a well-fixed humeral component were identified. Twenty-seven patients had a humeral window produced to remove a well-fixed humeral component. Six intra-operative fractures were reported from this group: 5 were in the greater tuberosity and 1 was in the distal humeral shaft. At the latest radiographic follow-up, 24 of 27 windows healed, 2 patients had limited inconclusive radiographic follow-up (1 and 2 months), and 1 did not have follow-up at our institution. Twenty-four patients underwent longitudinal osteotomy to extract a well-fixed humeral component. From this group, 1 had intra-operative fracture in the greater tuberosity. At most recent radiographic follow-up, 22 of 24 longitudinal splits healed, 1 had short follow-up (1 ½ months) with demonstrated signs of healing, and 1 did not have follow-up at our institution. In both groups, there were no cases of window malunion and no components have developed clinical loosening. Data from this study suggests humeral windows and longitudinal splits can assist with controlled removal of well-fixed humeral components with a high rate of union and a low rate of intra-operative and post-operative sequelae

Introduction. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty continues to have a high complication rate, specifically with component instability and scapular notching. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify the effects of humeral component neck angle and version on impingement free range of motion. Methods. A total of 13 cadaveric shoulders (4 males and 9 females, average age = 69 years, range 46 to 96 years) were randomly assigned to two studies. Study 1 investigated the effects of humeral component neck angle (n=6) and Study 2 investigated the effects of humeral component version (n=7). For all shoulders, Tornier Aequalis® Reversed Shoulder implants (Edina, MN) were used. For study 1, the implants were modified to 135, 145 and 155 degree humeral neck shaft angles and for Study 2 a custom implant that allowed control of humeral head version were used. For biomechanical testing, a custom shoulder testing system that permits independent loading of all shoulder muscles with six degree of freedom positioning was used. (Figure 1) Internal control experimental design was used where all conditions were tested on the same specimen. Study 1. The adduction angle and internal/external humeral rotation angle at which impingement occurred were measured. Glenohumeral abduction moment was measured at 0 and 30 degrees of abduction, and anterior dislocation forces were measured at 30 degrees of internal rotation, 0 and 30 degrees of external rotation with and without subscapularis loading. Study 2. The degree of internal and external rotation when impingement occurred was measured at 0, 30 and 60 degrees of glenohumeral abduction in the scapular plane with the humeral component placed in 20 degrees of anteversion, neutral version, 20 degrees of retroversion, and 40 degrees of retroversion. Statistical analysis was performed with a repeated measures analysis of variance with a Tukey post-hoc test with a significance level of 0.05. Results. Study 1. Adduction deficit angles for 155, 145, and 135 degree neck-shaft angle were 2 ± 5 degrees of abduction, 7 ± 4 degrees of adduction, and 12 ± 2 degrees of adduction (P <0.05), respectively. Impingement-free angles of humeral rotation and abduction moments were not statistically different between the neck-shaft angles. The anterior dislocation force was significantly higher for the 135degree neck-shaft angle at 30 degrees of external rotation and significantly higher for the 155 degree neck shaft angle at 30 degrees of internal rotation (P<.01). The anterior dislocation forces were significantly higher when the subscapularis was loaded (P <0.01). Study 2. Maximum external rotation was the limiting position for impingement particularly at 0 degrees of abduction. Maximum external rotation before impingement occurred increased significantly with increasing humeral retroversion (p < 0.05) (Figure 2). No impingement or subluxation occurred at any humeral version in 60 degrees of glenohumeral abduction. Conclusion. In reverse shoulder arthroplasty, 155 degree neck-shaft angle was more prone to impingement with adduction but had the advantage of being more stable. In addition, 40 degrees of retroversion has the largest range of humeral rotation without impingement

Introduction

Cement pressurisation in the distal humerus is technically difficult due to the anatomy of the humeral intramedullary (IM) cavity. Conventional cement restrictors often migrate proximally or leak, reducing the effect of pressurisation during implantation. Theoretically with a better cement bone interdigitation, the longevity of the elbow replacement can be improved. The aim of this cadaveric study was to evaluate the usefulness of a novel technique for cementation.

The 2021 Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry report indicated that total shoulder replacement using both mid head (TMH) length humeral components and reverse arthroplasty (RTSA) had a lower revision rate than stemmed humeral components in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) - for all prosthesis types and diagnoses. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of component variables in the various primary total arthroplasty alternatives for osteoarthritis in the shoulder. Data from a large national arthroplasty registry were analysed for the period April 2004 to December 2020. The study population included all primary aTSA, RTSA, and TMH shoulder arthroplasty procedures undertaken for osteoarthritis (OA) using either cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) or non-cross-linked polyethylene (non XLPE). Due to the previously documented and reported higher revision rate compared to other anatomical total shoulder replacement options, those using a cementless metal backed glenoid components were excluded. The rate of revision was determined by Kaplan-Meir estimates, with comparisons by Cox proportional hazard models. Reasons for revision were also assessed. For a primary diagnosis of OA, aTSA with a cemented XLPE glenoid component had the lowest revision rate with a 12-year cumulative revision rate of 4.7%, compared to aTSA with cemented non-XLPE glenoid component of 8.7%, and RTSA of 6.8%. The revision rate for TMH was lower than aTSA with cemented non-XLPE, but was similar to the other implants at the same length of follow-up. The reason for revision for cemented aTSR was most commonly component loosening, not rotator cuff deficiency. Long stem humeral components matched with XLPE in aTSA achieve a lower revision rate compared to shorter stems, long stems with conventional polyethylene, and RTSA when used to treat shoulder OA. In all these cohorts, loosening, not rotator cuff failure was the most common diagnosis for revision

The advent of modern anatomic shoulder arthroplasty occurred in the 1990's with the revelation that the humeral head dimensions had a fixed ratio between the head diameter and height. As surgeons moved from the concept of balancing soft tissue tension by using variable neck lengths for a given humeral head diameter, a flawed concept based on lower extremity reconstruction, improvements in range of motion and function were immediately observed. Long term outcome has validated this guiding principle for anatomic shoulder replacement with improved longevity of implants, improved patient and surgeon expectations and satisfaction with results. Once the ideal humeral head prosthesis is identified, and its position prepared, the surgeon must use a method to fix the position of the head that is correct in three dimensions and has the security to withstand patient activities and provide maximal longevity. Based again on lower extremity concepts, long stems were the standard of care, initially with cement, and now, almost universally without cement for a primary shoulder replacement. The incredibly low revision rates for humeral stem aseptic loosening shifted much of the attempted innovation to the challenges on the glenoid side of the reconstruction. However, glenoid problems including revision surgery, infections, periprosthetic fractures, and other complications often required the removal of the humeral stem. And, in many cases, the overall results of the procedure and the patient's long-term outcome was affected by the difficulty in removing the stem, leading surgeons to compromise the revision procedure, avoid revision surgery, or add to the overall morbidity with humeral fractures and substantial bone loss. With improved technology, including bone ingrowth methods, better matching of the proximal stem geometry to the humerus, and an understanding that the center of rotation (torque) on the humeral component is at the level of the humeral osteotomy, shorter stems and stemless humeral components were developed, now more than 10 years ago, primarily in Europe. With more than a decade of experience, our European colleagues have shown us that stemless humeral component replacement with a device that has both cortical and cancellous fixation is as effective as a stemmed device, easier to implant as well as revise when needed. The short-term results of the cancellous fixation stemless devices are acceptable, but longer follow-up is needed. Currently, the most widely used humeral components in the USA are short stem components, although the recent FDA approval of numerous stemless devices has initiated a shift from short stems to stemless devices. The truth is, short stem devices have a firm position in the USA surgeons' armamentarium today due to regulatory restrictions. A decade ago, without a predicate on the market, it was not conceivable that a stemless device that was already gaining popularity in Europe would be able to get 510K approval, and therefore would require a lengthy and expensive FDA IDE process. However, shorter stems had already been approved in the USA, as long as the stem length was 7 centimeters, matching the market predicate. Now, in 2018, based on evidence and outcomes, stemless humeral components should be the first choice when treating primary osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint. Short stem or longer stem devices should be reserved for those cases where stemless fixation is not possible, which is less than 10% of patients with primary OA of the shoulder

In older patients (>75 years of age), with an intact rotator cuff, requiring a total shoulder replacement (TSR) there is, at present, uncertainty whether an anatomic TSR (aTSR) or a reverse TSR (rTSR) is best for the patient. This comparison study of same age patients aims to assess clinical and radiological outcomes of older patients (≥75 years) who received either an aTSR or a rTSA. Consecutive patients with a minimum age of 75 years who received an aTSR (n=44) or rTSR (n=51) were prospectively studied. Pre- and postoperative clinical evaluations included the ASES score, Constant score, SPADI score, DASH score, range of motion (ROM) and pain and patient satisfaction for a follow-up of 2 years. Radiological assessment identified glenoid and humeral component osteolysis, including notching with a rTSR. Postoperative improvement for ROM and all clinical assessment scores for both groups was found. There were significantly better patient reported outcome scores (PROMs) in the aTSR group compared with the rTSR patients (p<0.001). Both groups had only minor osteolysis on radiographs. No revisions were required in either group. The main complications were scapular stress fractures for the rTSR patients and acromioclavicular joint pain for both groups. This study of older patients (>75 years) demonstrated that an aTSR for a judiciously selected patient with good rotator cuff muscles can lead to a better clinical outcome and less early complications than a rTSR

The use of shorter humeral stems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty has been reported as safe and effective. Shorter stems are purported to be bone preserving, easy to revise, and have reduced surgical time. However, a frequent radiographic finding with the use of uncemented short stems is stress shielding. Smaller stem diameters reduce stress shielding, however, carry the risk of varus or valgus malalignment in the metadiaphyseal region of the proximal humerus. The aim of this retrospective radiographic study was to measure the true post-operative neck-shaft (N-S) angle of a curved short stem with a recommended implantation angle of 145°. True anteroposterior radiographs of patients who received RTSA using an Ascend Flex short stem at three specialized shoulder centres (London, ON, Canada, Lyon, France, Munich, Germany) were reviewed. Radiographs that showed the uncemented stem and humeral tray in orthogonal view without rotation were included. Sixteen patients with proximal humeral fractures or revision surgeries were excluded. This yielded a cohort of 124 implant cases for analysis (122 patients, 42 male, 80 female) at a mean age of 74 years (range, 48 – 91 years). The indications for RTSA were rotator cuff deficient shoulders (cuff tear arthropathy, massive cuff tears, osteoarthritis with cuff insufficiency) in 78 patients (63%), primary osteoarthritis in 41 (33%), and rheumatoid arthritis in 5 (4%). The humeral component longitudinal axis was measured in degrees and defined as neutral if the value fell within ±5° of the humeral axis. Angle values >5° and < 5 ° were defined as valgus and varus, respectively. The filling-ratio of the implant within the humeral shaft was measured at the level of the metaphysis (FRmet) and diaphysis (FRdia). Measurements were conducted by two independent examiners (SA and TW). To test for conformity of observers, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. The inter- and intra-observer reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.965, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.911– 0.986). The average difference between the humeral shaft axis and the humeral component longitudinal axis was 3.8° ± 2.8° (range, 0.2° – 13.2°) corresponding to a true mean N-S angle of 149° ± 3° in valgus. Stem axis was neutral in 70% (n=90) of implants. Of the 34 malaligned implants, 82% (n=28) were in valgus (mean N-S angle 153° ± 2°) and 18% (n=6) in varus position (mean N-S angle 139° ± 1°). The average FRmet and FRdiawere 0.68 ± 0.11 and 0.72 ± 0.11, respectively. No association was found between stem diameter and filling ratios (FRmet, FRdia) or cortical contact with the stem (r = 0.39). Operative technique and implant design affect the ultimate positioning of the implant in the proximal humerus. This study has shown, that in uncemented short stem implants, neutral axial alignment was achieved in 70% of cases, while the majority of malaligned humeral components (86%) were implanted in valgus, corresponding to a greater than 145° neck shaft angle of the implant. It is important for surgeons to understand that axial malalignment of a short stem implant does influence the true neck shaft angle

Abstract. Aim. Excessive glenoid retroversion and posterior wear leads to technical challenges when performing anatomic shoulder replacement. Various techniques have been described to correct glenoid version, including eccentric reaming, bone graft, posterior augmentation and custom prosthesis. Clinical outcomes and survivorship of a Stemless humeral component with cemented pegged polyethylene glenoid with eccentric reaming to partially correct retroversion are presented. Patients and Methods. Between 2010– 2019, 115 Mathys Affinis Stemless Shoulder Replacements were performed. 50 patients with significant posterior wear and retroversion (Walch type B1, B2, B3 and C) were identified. Measurement of Pre-operative glenoid retroversion and Glenoid component version on a post op axillary view was performed by method as described by Matsen FA. Relative correction was correlated with clinical and radiological outcome. Results. 4 were lost to follow up. 46 patients were therefore reviewed. The mean follow up was 4 years (2–8.9 years). Walch B1, Pre op Retroversion: 12 (8–20), post op retroversion :11.8 (−4 to 19), correction= 0.2. Walch B2, Pre op Retroversion :18.4 (10–32), post op retroversion: 13.2 (1 −22), correction= 5.2. Walch B3, Pre op Retroversion: 19.1 (13–32)post op retroversion : 16.1 (9–25), correction= 3.0. Walch C, Pre op Retroversion: 33.3 (28–42) post op retroversion: 16.0 (6–27), correction= 17.3. 3 patients required revision surgery for rotator cuff failure. Conclusion. Partial correction of glenoid retroversion with eccentric reaming and implantation of cemented pegged polyethylene component leads to satisfactory clinical outcomes at midterm follow up. No revisions for aseptic loosening of the glenoid were required

Humeral resurfacing arthroplasty has been advocated as an alternative to stemmed humeral component designs given its ability to preserve proximal bone stock. Further, these implants have become more attractive given the possibility of stem-related complications including humeral fracture, stress shielding, and osteolysis; complications that may necessitate fixation, revision to long stem components, or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. As more total shoulder arthroplasties are performed in younger patient populations, the likelihood of increased revision procedures is inevitable. Maintaining proximal bone stock in these cases with use of a resurfacing arthroplasty not only facilitates explant during revision arthroplasty, but preservation of proximal metaphyseal bone facilitates reimplantation of components. Clinical results of these resurfacing components have demonstrated favorable results similar to stemmed designs. Unfortunately, resurfacing arthroplasty may not be as ideal as was hoped with regard to recreating native humeral anatomy. Further, resurfacing arthroplasty may increase the risk of peri-prosthetic humeral fracture, and lack of a formal humeral head cut makes glenoid exposure more difficult, which may be associated with a higher degree of neurovascular injury. Stemless humeral components are designed for strong metaphyseal fixation and avoid the difficulty with glenoid exposure seen in resurfacing designs, as these components require a formal humeral head cut. Early clinical outcomes of a single stemless design demonstrated significant improvements in clinical outcome scores, without evidence of component migration, subsidence or loosening. The only mid-term clinical results of stemless design implants are seen with the Arthrex Eclipse system (Arthrex, Naples, FL). In a prospective study involving 78 patients at 5-year follow-up, significant improvements were observed in clinical outcome scores. While there was evidence of proximal stress shielding in an older population, this did not influence shoulder function. The overall revision rate was 9% at 5 years, with no component necessitating revision as a result of humeral component loosening. Resurfacing arthroplasty and stemless humeral components in total shoulder arthroplasty remain attractive options to preserve proximal metaphyseal bone stock, avoiding stem-related complications. Early and mid-term clinical outcomes are comparable to stemmed designs and demonstrate no evidence of humeral component loosening

Introduction. Good outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) rely in part on stability of the humeral component. Traditionally humeral components have been cemented, however there has been recent interest in press-fit fixation of humeral components in RSA. Lateralization of the head center in RSA can impart larger moments on the humeral component than for anatomic reconstructions, increasing the importance of distal humeral canal preparation for implant stability. To date, the primary stability of any type of press-fit humeral prosthesis has been largely unexplored. The goal of this study is to evaluate the effect of over-reaming the distal humeral canal in a press-fit humeral component in RSA. Methods. Computed tomography (CT) data of the shoulder were obtained from 55 shoulders. Images were segmented to produce digital models of the humerus. Humeral components for RSA (2mm diameter size increments) were sized and placed per the surgical technique, including preparation of the humerus with the appropriate reamers (1mm increments). Finite element models for each specimen were created with heterogeneous bone properties derived from the CT scan. Pressfit between the bone and stem was resolved to quantify the initial contact pressure on the stem; each stem was then loaded at 566N oriented 20° lateral and 45° anterior. Overall motion of the stem was measured, as well as interfacial micromotion in the porous coating region (Fig. 1). The effect of line-to-line (L2L) reaming and over-reaming by 1 mm was evaluated using an unpaired Student's t-test, with significance defined at p<0.05. Results. Across all specimens, stem sizes 8 (n=3), 10 (n=25), 12 (n=20), 14 (n=2), and 16 (n=1) were used. Stem motion ranged from approximately 250–750μm; micromotion remained under 300μm (Fig. 2). Stem motion was significantly less for L2L reaming as compared to over-reaming for both size 10 (p=.008) and size 12 (p=.002) stems; micromotion was significantly less for size 12 (p=.002) stems. L2L reaming to a larger diameter stem resulted in significantly reduced stem motion (average 390μm versus 530μm, p<.001) and micromotion (average 53μm versus 135μm, p=.001) than over-reaming and using a smaller diameter stem. Stem rotation following L2L reaming was generally below 0.5°, and exceeded 0.75° when over-reaming. Discussion and Conclusion. Reaming of the humeral canal directly impacts the stability of humeral stems in RSA. Even with satisfactory proximal press-fit, over-reaming enables increased rotation of the stem under functional loading prior to cortical engagement, and results in increased micromotion. In cases in which the reamer and stem offerings result in over-reaming, L2L reaming to the next larger stem significantly reduces stem motion and micromotion. However, reaming up also removes distal cortical bone, and thus the strength of the prepared humerus must be considered. In conclusion, line-to-line reaming significantly reduces the micromotion of humeral stems as compared to over-reaming

Shoulder arthroplasty is effective at restoring function and relieving pain in patients suffering from glenohumeral arthritis; however, cortex thinning has been significantly associated with larger press-fit stems (fill ratio = 0.57 vs 0.48; P = 0.013)1. Additionally, excessively stiff implant-bone constructs are considered undesirable, as high initial stiffness of rigid fracture fixation implants has been related to premature loosening and an ultimate failure of the implant-bone interface2. Consequently, one objective which has driven the evolution of humeral stem design has been the reduction of stress-shielding induced bone resorption; this in-part has led to the introduction of short stems, which rely on metaphyseal fixation. However, the selection of short stem diametral (i.e., thickness) sizing remains subjective, and its impact on the resulting stem-bone construct stiffness has yet to be quantified. Eight paired cadaveric humeri (age = 75±15 years) were reconstructed with surgeon selected ‘standard’ sized and 2mm ‘oversized’ short-stemmed implants. Standard stem sizing was based on a haptic assessment of stem and broach stability per typical surgical practice. Anteroposterior radiographs were taken, and the metaphyseal and diaphyseal fill ratios were quantified. Each humerus was then potted in polymethyl methacrylate bone cement and subjected to 2000 cycles of compressive loading representing 90º forward flexion to simulate postoperative seating. Following this, a custom 3D printed metal implant adapter was affixed to the stem, which allowed for compressive loading in-line with the stem axis (Fig.1). Each stem was then forced to subside by 5mm at a rate of 1mm/min, from which the compressive stiffness of the stem-bone construct was assessed. The bone-implant construct stiffness was quantified as the slope of the linear portion of the resulting force-displacement curves. The metaphyseal and diaphyseal fill ratios were 0.50±0.10 and 0.45±0.07 for the standard sized stems and 0.50±0.06 and 0.52±0.06 for the oversized stems, respectively. Neither was found to correlate significantly with the stem-bone construct stiffness measure (metaphysis: P = 0.259, diaphysis: P = 0.529); however, the diaphyseal fill ratio was significantly different between standard and oversized stems (P < 0.001, Power = 1.0). Increasing the stem size by 2mm had a significant impact on the stiffness of the stem-bone construct (P = 0.003, Power = 0.971; Fig.2). Stem oversizing yielded a construct stiffness of −741±243N/mm; more than double that of the standard stems, which was −334±120N/mm. The fill ratios reported in the present investigation match well with those of a finite element assessment of oversizing short humeral stems3. This work complements that investigation's conclusion, that small reductions in diaphyseal fill ratio may reduce the likelihood of stress shielding, by also demonstrating that oversizing stems by 2mm dramatically increases the stiffness of the resulting implant-bone construct, as stiffer implants have been associated with decreased bone stimulus4 and premature loosening2. The present findings suggest that even a small, 2mm, variation in the thickness of short stem humeral components can have a marked influence on the resulting stiffness of the implant-bone construct. This highlights the need for more objective intraoperative methods for selecting stem size to provide guidelines for appropriate diametral sizing. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Humeral component failure in total shoulder arthroplasty has been rare with contemporary design systems. Are stemless implant designs superior to contemporary short-stem humeral component technologies? This presentation will provide information to address this question. Stemless technology became available in Europe and other parts of the world in 2004 and 2005 compared to only recently in the United States of America. Short-stem designs have developed with third generation implant systems. Advantages of short-stem implant designs include the following: the humeral canal facilitates proper head component position; modularity between the stem and head allows for modifications of version, inclination and offset to match the native anatomy and these designs are convertible for easier revision. This debate will demonstrate that short-stem implant designs provide the surgeon with more versatility to provide our patients with the best outcomes

Introduction. Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA) is recognized as an effective treatment solution for patients with rheumatoid arthritis or for traumatic conditions. Current total elbow devices can be divided into linked or unlinked design. The first design usually presents a linking element (i.e. an axle) to link together the ulnar and humeral components to stabilize the joint; the second one does not present any linkage and the stability is provided by both intrinsic design constraints and the soft tissues. Convertible modular solutions allow for an intraoperative decision to link or unlink the prosthesis; the modular connections introduce however additional risks in terms of both mechanical strength and potential fatigue and fretting phenomena that may arise not only due to low demand activities loads, but also high demand (HD) ones that could be even more detrimental. The aim of this study was to assess the strength of the modular connection between the axle and the ulnar component in a novel convertible elbow prosthesis design under simulated HD and activities of daily living (ADLs) loading. Methods. A novel convertible total elbow prosthesis (LimaCorporate, IT) comprising both ulnar and humeral components that can be linked together by means of an axle, was used. Both typical ADLs and HD torques to be applied to the axle were determined based on finite element analysis (FEA); the boundary load conditions for the FEA were determined based on kinematics analysis on real patients in previous studies. The FEA resultant moment acting on the axle junction during typical ADLs (i.e. feeding with 7.2lbs weight in hand) was 3.2Nm while for HD loads (i.e. sit to stand) was 5.7 Nm. In the experimental setup, 5 axle specimens coupled with 5 ulnar bodies through a tapered connection (5 Nm assembly torque) were fixed to a torque actuator (MTS Bionix) and submerged in a saline solution (9g/l). A moment of 3.2 Nm was applied to the axle for 5M cycles through a fixture to test it under ADLs loading. After 5M cycles, the axles were analyzed with regards to fretting behavior and then re-assembled to test them against HD loading by applying 5.7 Nm for 200K cycles (corresponding to 20 years function). Results. All 5 samples withstood all 5.2M loading cycles without any mechanical failure. At the end of 5M cycles, each axle was still stable as the measured disassembly torque was 3.96 +/−0.18 Nm. Slight signs of fretting were detected on the tapered connection after 5M cycles, however they did not compromise the mechanical connection nor the stability. Discussion and Conclusions. Currently there are no reference standards that properly define protocols for biomechanical testing of elbow prostheses. In the present study, a test to mechanically assess the strength of an axle connection under both typical ADLs and HD loads was set. The connection was able to withstand the imposed conditions. In general, testing of TEA devices should include not only standard ADLs loads but also HD loads, which could be more detrimental for the long-term survivorship. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

The humeral component has a long track record of a low rate of humeral loosening. Moreover, there are significant challenges associated with removal of a failed cemented component. Throckmorton reviewed the results of 76 total shoulder arthroplasties for osteoarthritis with minimum two year follow-up. There were incomplete lucent lines in 5/76 stems. None of the stem were judged to be at risk for loosening. Matsen published on the outcome of 131 shoulder arthroplasties for osteoarthritis with minimum two year follow-up. In this series, there were no components with shift or tilt. In addition to strong literature support for the use of an uncemented humeral component, revision of a cemented humeral component can be very difficult with a risk of significant destruction of the humerus. The cortex of the humerus tends to be thin and removing the cement can be similar to trying to remove concrete from an ice cream cone. Therefore, the extremely low rate of loosening and the challenges associated with cemented components makes the non-cemented component the ideal humeral solution

Introduction:. Studies have demonstrated both clinical and radiological success of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), with follow-up approaching 10-years. To date, most RTSA studies involve cemented fixation of the humeral components, and most involving uncemented RTSAs have used implants not necessarily designed for bony ingrowth. Cementless fixation utilizing proximally porous-coated (PPC) femoral implants has shown long term survivorship approaching 99% at greater than 10-years follow-up in total hip arthroplasty. Currently, the number of commercially available PPC RTSA implants is steadily growing, but there has been no published study examining clinical and radiographic outcomes in PPC, press-fit humeral stems. We hypothesized that the clinical and radiographic results of uncemented RTSA utilizing a PPC humeral stem would be similar to cemented RTSA stems when followed for at least 2-years. Methods:. A prospective, IRB approved RTSA outcomes registry with 261 patients that underwent RTSA by one fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon between 2005 and 2008 was reviewed. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of cuff tear arthropathy or severe rotator cuff deficiency refractory to all other treatments, and minimum 2-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Exclusion criteria were proximal humeral fractures, glenohumeral instability, rheumatoid arthritis, incomplete follow-up, and revision arthroplasty. Outcome measures included active forward elevation (aFE), active external rotation (aER), active internal rotation (aIR), Constant-Murley score (CS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Radiographs at 2 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and yearly thereafter were evaluated for humeral component position, osteolysis, humeral component radiolucent lines (RLLs), stress shielding, and scapular notching. Statistical analysis was conducted by an independent institutional statistician. Results:. The cemented (n = 37) and uncemented (n = 64) cohorts demonstrated comparable age and gender. Average follow-up was 32.4 months in the uncemented group (range 23–52) and 37.0 months in the cemented group (range 23–70). Both cohorts demonstrated significant improvements from preoperative to most recent follow-up in CS, ASES score, SSV, VAS pain, aFE, and aIR (P < 0.05). The cemented cohort showed a significant improvement in aER (P < 0.01), but the uncemented cohort did not (P = 0.14). There was no significant difference when comparing the degree of improvement in any of these values between the cemented and uncemented cohorts (P > 0.05). Radiographically, there was no evidence of humeral component loosening, osteolysis, or component failure observed in either cohort at any time point. There was no significant difference (P = 1.0) in the incidence of humeral component RLLs between the cemented (n = 1) and uncemented (n = 2) cohorts. Stress shielding was observed in 5 uncemented shoulders and 0 cemented shoulders, however this was not significantly different (P = 0.15). There was no significant difference (P = 0.30) in the incidence of scapular notching between the cemented (n = 8) and uncemented (n = 10) cohorts. Conclusion:. Cementless fixation of a porous-coated RTSA humeral stem provides equivalent clinical and radiographic outcomes compared to cemented stems at minimum 2-year follow-up. With advantages such as decreased operative time, no risk of cement-related complications, and ease of revision, cementless fixation may provide several benefits over cemented fixation. Longer-term studies are needed comparing outcomes of cemented versus cementless RTSA

INTRODUCTION. Shoulder joint prostheses have become the most commonly replaced after knee and hip artificial implants. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is the treatment option for patients with severe osteoarthritis, rotator cuff arthropathy or a massive rotator cuff tear with pseudoparalysis. Though successful, the long-term survival of such implants are limited by wear of the materials in contact [1, 2]. The aim of this study was to investigate RSA wear in vitro using a clinically relevant activities of daily living (ADLs). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four new JRI Orthopaedics Reverse Shoulder 42 mm diameter VAIOS with cobalt-chromium (CoCr) glenospheres and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) humeral components were tested. A five million cycles wear test was undertaken using the unique Newcastle Shoulder Wear Simulator with dilute bovine serum as a lubricant. “Mug to mouth” was performed as the ADL to the test prostheses in intervals of 100 cycles, following by 5 seconds of high load (450N) with no motion simulating an ADL such as “lifting an object”. This combined load cycle was then repeated. A fifth reverse shoulder prosthesis was subject to dynamic loading only in a soak control station. Wear was assessed gravimetrically and roughness (Sa) of the articulating surfaces was measured with a non-contacting profilometer. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. The mean wear rate and standard deviation of the UHMWPE components was 11.4±3.7 mm. 3. /million cycles, while the CoCr components showed minimal wear over the test duration of 0.01± 0.02 mm. 3. /million cycles (Fig.1). Wear rates are comparable with Kohut et al. (14.1 mm. 3. /million cycles) [3] and Smith et al. (14.3±1.6 mm. 3. /million cycles) [4]. The CoCr glenospheres roughness was unchanged, from 32±8 nm Sa to 28±8 nm Sa over the 5 million cycles of the test (p=0.017), while the UHMWPE humeral components became smoother, from 692±123 nm Sa to 42±29 nm Sa (Fig.2), showing a statically significant change (p<0.001). CONCLUSION. The present study is the first wear test of artificial shoulder joints using a Motion-Load-Motion configuration as a clinically relevant physiological pattern of motion and load. Results are comparable with those found in the literature for in vitro testing of reverse shoulder replacements. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. The Walch Type B2 glenoid has the hallmark features of posteroinferior glenoid erosion, retroversion, and posterior humeral head subluxation. Although our understanding of the pathoanatomy of bone loss and its evolution in Type B's has improved, the etiology remains unclear. Furthermore, the morphology of the humerus in Walch B types has not been studied. The purpose of this imaging based anthropometric study was to examine the humeral torsion in Walch Type B2 shoulders. We hypothesized that there would be a compensatory decrease in humeral retroversion in Walch B2 glenoids. Methods. Three-dimensional models of the full length humerus were generated from computed tomography data of normal cadaveric (n = 59) and Walch Type B shoulders (n = 59). An anatomical coordinate system referencing the medial and lateral epicondyles was created for each model. A simulated humeral head osteotomy plane was created and used to determine humeral version relative to the epicondylar axis and the head-neck angle. Measurements were repeated by two experienced fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons to determine inter-rater reliability. Glenoid parameters (version, inclination and 2D critical shoulder angle) and posterior humeral head subluxation were calculated in the Type B group to determine the pathologic glenohumeral relationship. Two-way ANOVAs compared group and sex within humeral version and head-neck angle, and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) with a 2-way random effects model and absolute agreement were used for inter-rater reliability. Results. There were statistically significant differences in humeral version between normal and Type B shoulders (p < .001) and between males and females within the normal group (p = .043). Normal shoulders had a humeral retroversion of 36±12°, while the Walch Type B group had a humeral retroversion of 14±9° relative to the epicondylar axis. For head-neck angle, there were no significant differences between sexes (p = .854), or between normal and Type B shoulders when grouped by sex (p = .433). In the Type B group, the mean glenoid version was 22±7°, glenoid inclination was 8±6°, 2D critical shoulder angle was 30±5° and humeral head subluxation was 80±9%. Inter-rater reliability showed fair agreement between the two experienced observers for head-neck angle (ICC = .562; 95% CI: -.28 to .809) and excellent agreement for humeral version (ICC = .962;.913 to .983). Although only fair agreement was found between observers in head-neck angle ICC, the difference in mean angle was only 2°. Discussion. Although much time and effort has been spent understanding and managing Type B2 glenoids, little attention has been paid to investigating associated humeral contributions to the Type B shoulder. Our results indicate that the humeral retroversion in Type B shoulders is significantly lower than in normals. These findings have several implications, including, helping to understanding the etiology of the B2, the unknown effects of arbitrarily selecting higher version angles for the humeral component, and the unknown effects of altered version on glenohumeral joint stability, loading and implant survivorship post-arthroplasty. Our results also raise an important question, whether it is best to reconstruct Type B humeral component version to pathologic version or to non-pathologic population means

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term results of the Kudo type-5 total elbow prosthesis and compare the results of two types of cemented ulnar components. The Kudo type-5 unlinked total elbow prosthesis (Biomet UK Ltd, Bridgend Wales) was developed in 1993. The stem of humeral component is porous-coated with a plasma spray of titanium alloy for cementless use. The ulnar component may be metal-backed with a porous-coated stem or polyethylene alone; the latter designed mainly for cement use. A metal-backed type without a porous-coated stem designed for cement use also came into being after 2003. Between 1993 and 2010, the Kudo type-5 total elbow arthroplasty was performed on 364 elbows in 274 consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The mean age of the patients at the time of the operation was 60.7 (27–86) years. Twenty elbows had Larsen grade III, 224 had grade IV, and 120 had grade V changes pre-operatively. Before the operation, 346 elbows had severe or moderate pain, 95 had gross valgus-varus instability. Clinical symptoms and revision rates were assessed 4 to 20 years (mean, 9 years) postoperatively. The mean Mayo elbow performance scores were all poor except for three initially (mean overall score, 39.5 points). The overall score had improved substantially both at the early follow-up (1 to 3 years after the operation) and the latest follow-up (4 to 20 years after the operation), with 89.5 and 84.7 points, respectively. At the latest follow-up the overall result was excellent for 185 elbows, good for 103, fair for 11 and poor for 30, with almost complete relief from pain for 298. The arc of movement had increased from a mean of 85.7 °pre-operatively to 95.1 ° post-operatively, and to 98.1 °at the latest follow-up. Spot welds around the humeral stem suggesting solid osseous integration were often seen in the elbows with cementless fixation of the porous humeral stem. At the latest follow-up, implants were removed due to infection in 3 elbows. Twenty-five elbows required ulnar component revision due to loosening of the all-polyethylene component. Two elbows required ulnar component revision due to loosening of the metal-backed component. Seven elbows required humeral component revision due to loosening of the humeral components. One elbow required revision due to dislocation. A survival analysis with revision or removal of one or both components as the end point was performed according to the Kaplan and Meier method. The overall survival rate of the prosthesis was 75.2% at 19 years. The survival of 87.0% in the metal-backed group was higher than the 74.3% in the all-polyethylene group. Loosening of the all-polyethylene ulnar component was the main reason for deterioration in the long-term outcome. We conclude that the long-term results of the Kudo type-5 total elbow arthroplasty is acceptable and cemented fixation of metal-backed ulnar component had better long-term survival than the all-polyethylene component

Experience has demonstrated in the hip and knee, related to total joint replacement arthroplasty, polymethyl methacrylate cement fixation can provide problems in terms of loosening, fragmentation, particulate wear and ultimate failure. These same problems have been recognised in total shoulder arthroplasty related to cement fixation of the glenoid. While cement fixation of the humeral component has proven much less problematic, there has been a swelling towards avoidance of using cement to secure the humeral component for fear of difficulty if revision is required. Surprisingly, with the high incidence of lucent lines, bone resorption and frank loosening, representing the most common source of failure in total shoulder arthroplasty, cementless fixation of the glenoid has not been, until now, embraced. The advent of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has demonstrated the ability for secure cementless fixation to provide long-lasting secure implant retention in implants which have inherently higher shear and stress forces passing through the implant/bone interface. In anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty a woven tantalum anchor (Trabecular Metal) has proven to demonstrate secure cementless fixation as well. This presentation will discuss the use of trabecular metal anchored glenoid implants with and without additional screw fixation for anatomic and convertible reverse arthroplasty baseplates. Avoidance of complications with successful long-lasting outcomes requires meticulous surgical attention to detail