Heterotopic ossification is the formation of lamellar bone in soft tissues and is a common complication of high-energy combat injury. This disabling condition can cause pain, joint ankylosis, and skin ulceration in the residua of amputees. This project is aimed at developing a novel treatment to dissolve hydroxyapatite in heterotopic ossification and prevent the crystallisation of this this mineral at sites of ectopic bone formation. Previously reported results demonstrated that hexametaphosphate could dissolve hydroxyapatite at physiological pH. Further work has been undertaken to investigate the mechanism of this dissolution and establish a means of temporal control of action. In addition, physicochemical analyses of samples of human heterotopic ossification have yielded important insights into the nature of this pathological tissue. Techniques include mapped micro X-ray fluorescence, mapped Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and micro computed tomography. Formulation engineering work has begun in order to develop an appropriate delivery vehicle for this agent. This includes rheological testing and hexametaphosphate elution profiles. Finally, micro CT analysis has shown that hexametaphosphate is able to dissolve human heterotopic ossification tissue. In summary, this work has moved us closer towards our goal of a novel injectable agent for the treatment and prevention of heterotopic ossification

Purpose. The ideal timing for a Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) remains a highly controversial topic in the treatment of displaced acetabular fractures in the elderly with damage to the articular surface of the acetabulum or femoral head. Acute THA offers early rehabilitation but a high incidence of heterotopic ossification has been reported. Its incidence and consequences on the patient's function are not clear. The goal of this study is to compare the incidence of heterotopic ossification following acute THA of acetabular fractures compared to delayed THA, and to evaluate its functional effects on the patient. Method. In this retrospective consecutive case series of acetabular fractures; 20 patients were treated with acute THA and 20 patients were treated with delayed THA after failed conservative or surgical treatment. The incidence of heterotopic ossification (using Brooker's classification) was obtained and functional outcomes were evaluated using SF-12, WOMAC, Harris Hip Score surveys. Results. Heterotopic ossification (HO) was found in 55% (13/20) in the acute THR group compared to 25% (5/20) in the delayed THA group. The relative risk of having significant HO (grades 2–3-4) when the prosthesis was done acutely was 3.4 times higher then when it was delayed. (p=0.01). Furthermore, significant difference in functional outcome was noted in the acute THA group. In fact, seven of eight (7/8) patients in the first subgroup of patients with no HO or grade 1 HO had excellent or good HHS scores. However, only three of eight (3/8) patients with grade 2 or 3 HO showed excellent or good HHS scores. The specific heterotopic ossification grade did not correlate with function. Conclusion. The incidence of HO was significantly higher in patients with acute THA compared to delayed THA for acetabular fractures. Interestingly, in the acute THA group, patients with grades 2 and 3 HO seem to have worst functional outcomes than patients with no HO or grade 1 HO

Heterotopic Ossification (HO) is a known complication that can arise after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). In most cases it is asymptomatic, however, in some patients it can limit range of motion and lead to poor outcomes. The objective of this review was to assess and report incidence, risk factors, prophylaxis, and management of HO after TEA. A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed to retrieve all relevant studies evaluating occurrence of HO after TEA. The search was performed in duplicate and a quality assessment was performed of all included studies. A total of 1907 studies were retrieved of which 45 studies were included involving 2256 TEA patients. HO was radiographically present in 10% of patients and was symptomatic in 3%. Less than 1% of patients went on to surgical excision of HO, with outcomes following surgery reported as good or excellent as assessed by range of motion and Mayo Elbow Performance Scores (MEPS). TEA due to ankylosis, primary osteoarthritis, and posttraumatic arthritis are more likely to develop symptomatic HO. HO is an uncommon complication following TEA with the majority of patients developing HO being asymptomatic and requiring no surgical management. Routine HO prophylaxis for TEA is not supported by the literature. The effectiveness of prophylaxis in high risk patients is uncertain and future studies are required to clarify its usefulness. The strength of these conclusions are limited by inconsistent reporting in the available literature

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a well-known complication of traumatic elbow injuries. The reported rates of post-traumatic HO formation vary from less than 5% with simple elbow dislocations, to greater than 50% in complex fracture-dislocations. Previous studies have identified fracture-dislocations, delayed surgical intervention, and terrible triad injuries as risk factors for HO formation. There is, however, a paucity of literature regarding the accuracy of diagnosing post-traumatic elbow HO. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to determine the inter-rater reliability of HO diagnosis using standard radiographs of the elbow at 52 weeks post-injury, as well as to report on the rate of mature compared with immature HO. We hypothesized inter-rater reliability would be poor among raters for HO formation. Prospectively collected data from a large clinical trial was reviewed by three independent reviewers (one senior orthopedic resident, one senior radiology resident, and one expert upper extremity orthopedic surgeon). Each reviewer examined anonymized 52-week post-injury radiographs of the elbow and recorded: 1. the presence or absence of HO, 2. the location of HO, 3. the size of the HO (in cm, if present), and 4. the maturity of the HO formation. Maturity was defined by consensus prior to image review and defined as an area of well-defined cortical and medullary bone outside the cortical borders of the humerus, ulna, or radius. Immature lesions were defined as an area of punctate calcification with an ill-defined cloud-like density outside the cortical borders of the humerus, ulna or radius. Data were collected using a standardized online data collection form (CognizantMD, Toronto, ON, CA). Inter-rater reliability was calculated using Fleiss’ Kappa statistic and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for HO formation in general, as well as mature HO at 52 weeks post injury. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio (version1.4, RStudio, Boston, MA, USA). A total of 79 radiographs at the 52-week follow-up were reviewed (54% male, mean age 50, age SD 14, 52% operatively treated). Inter-rater reliability using Fleiss’ Kappa was k= 0.571 (p = 0.0004) indicating moderate inter-rater reliability among the three reviewers. The rate of immature HO at 52 weeks was 56%. The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified male sex as a significant risk factor for HO development (OR 5.29, 1.55-20.59 CI, p = 0.011), but not for HO maturity at 52 weeks. Age, time to surgery, and operative intervention were not found to be significant predictors for either HO formation or maturity of the lesion in this cohort. Our study demonstrates moderate inter-rater reliability in determining the presence of HO at 52 weeks post-elbow injury. There was a high rate (56%) of immature HO at 52-week follow-up. We also report the finding of male sex as a significant risk factor for post traumatic HO development. Future research directions could include investigation into possible male predominance for traumatic HO formation, as well as improving inter-rater reliability through developing a standardized and validated classification system for reporting the radiographic features of HO formation around the elbow

Background. Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a known complication following total hip arthroplasty, with increased incidence in certain patient populations. Current prophylaxis options include oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and radiation therapy, but an optimal radiation protocol has yet to be clearly defined. We performed a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial in high-risk total hip arthroplasty patients to determine the efficacy of 400 cGy versus 700 cGy doses of radiation. Methods. 147 patients at high risk for HO undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) at Rush-St. Luke's- Presbyterian medical center were randomized to either a single 400 cGy or 700 cGy dose of radiation. High risk was defined as diagnosis of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), hypertrophic osteoarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, or history of previous heterotopic ossification. Radiation was administered over a 14 × 6 cm area of soft tissue and given on the first or second post-operative day. A blinded reviewer graded anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs taken immediately post-operatively and at a minimum of 6 months post-operatively. Progression was defined as an increase in Brooker classification from the immediate post-operative to the long-term post-operative radiograph. Operative data including surgical approach, use of cemented implants, revision surgery, and post-operative range of motion data were also collected. Results. A significantly greater portion of patients who received the 400 cGy dose demonstrated progression of HO than patients who received the 700 cGy dose. No pre-operative factors were associated with a higher rate of progression. Patients who progressed had less flexion on physical exam than patients who did not progress, but this was not clinically significant. Conclusion. To the authors' knowledge this is the largest randomized prospective study to date comparing two single-dosages of radiation treatment. 700 cGy demonstrates superiority over 400 cGy in preventing HO formation following total hip arthroplasty in high-risk patients and may be the more effective treatment in this population

Electron Microscopy and Synchrotron analysis of Heterotopic Ossification (HO) from blast-related amputees' has shown that HO is bone with a disorganised structure and altered remodelling. This research performs mechanical testing of HO to understand its biomechanical properties in an attempt to create an accurate model to predict its morphological appearance. The hypothesis of this work is that HO is mechanically mediated in its formation. Synchrotron mechanical analysis of HO samples was performed to measure Young's modulus, ultimate strength and density distribution. A novel algorithm based on Wolf's law was implemented in a Finite Element (FE) analysis model of HO to take into account the differing mechanical and biological properties measured and the presence of HO outside the skeletal system. An HO modeling factor, which considers boundary conditions, and regulates recruitment of the soft tissue into bone formation, results in a re-creatable formation of HO within the soft tissues, comparable to the appearance of HO seen in military amputees. The results and model demonstrates that certain types of HO are under the control of endogenous and exogenous mechanical stimulus. HO can thus be mechanically exploited in the casualty management and rehabilitation process to achieve better clinical outcomes

Previous reports of the prevalence of Heterotopic Ossification (HO) in limbs from UK blast-related amputees from Afghanistan, is demonstrated to be 57.1%. With the end of UK military operations in Afghanistan in 2014 the aim of this study is establish the rate of HO, assess causality demographics and ascertain risk factors for the formation of HO during the entire period of operations in Afghanistan. Military databases, case notes and radiographs were scrutinised to quantify and qualify the prevalence and risk factors for the formation of HO. 256 servicemen sustained 398 military trauma related amputations. The overall prevalence of HO was 65.9%. Significant (p<0.05) risks identified for the formation of HO included a blast mechanism of injury, a zone of injury the same as the subsequent amputation, and an increased number of debridements prior to closure. Positive correlation existed between the number of amputations and the presence and grade of HO (p=0.04). HO presents clinical problems to military blast injury patient populations. This study demonstrates that both a blast mechanism of injury and an increased injury load are key factors in the increased prevalence of HO seen in military trauma

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is the formation of bone in extraskeletal sites. It is a major problem for combat-related casualties with 64% of such patients showing radiological evidence of the disease. Of these, 19% require surgical excision. Current prophylaxis is problematic due to poor efficacy and unsuitability in a military setting. Our novel anti-HO strategy is to use an inorganic reagent to inhibit the deposition of HA and disperse any pre-formed mineral. Literature review identified several potentially effective agents. These were tested for their ability to disperse solid monoliths of HA. In addition, a standard HA synthetic reaction was performed in the presence of each agent to establish their inhibiting activity. One reagent (a condensed phosphate) dispersed a solid monolith of HA by 38% (mass loss) over 30 days. This reagent was also shown to inhibit HA crystal synthesis yield by 28%. Early work on a hydrogel delivery system has produced favourable results. These preliminary data demonstrate proof of concept that HA may be dispersed and its formation inhibited by a non-toxic polyphosphate. This work will form the justification for development into in vitro osteogenic cell culture models and animal HO models

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is the formation of lamellar bone in extra-skeletal soft tissues. Its exact pathogenic mechanism remains elusive. Previous studies demonstrate observation only of HO at the microscopic scale. This study uses scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Back-scatter electron (BSE) imaging and mechanical testing to detail the organic and non-organic elements of HO, compared to normal bone, to guide stem cell and bio-modelling research into HO. Samples analysed were 5 military blast related HO patients, 5 control cadaveric samples (age and sex matched). Samples were imaged using SEM, BSE and the I13 beam Synchrotron x-ray diffraction scanner using validated quantitative and qualitative techniques of measurement. Appearances seen in HO compared to normal bone were characterised by the presence of a hyper-vascular network and high lacunae (osteocyte) counts, two distinct zones of bone mineral density distribution, with a tendency for hypermineralisation with kurtosis of the grey scale plots (mineral content as a weight percentage of Ca. 2+. was calibrated to atomic weight of C, Al and HA). Direction of dependence and collagen orientation in HO suggest isotropic properties. This research demonstrates that HO is bone, however its characteristics suggest a high metabolic turnover and disorganised ultra-structure consistent with an inflammatory origin

Currently, there is no animal model in which to evaluate the underlying physiological processes leading to the heterotopic ossification (HO) which forms in most combat-related and blast wounds. We sought to reproduce the ossification that forms under these circumstances in a rat by emulating patterns of injury seen in patients with severe injuries resulting from blasts. We investigated whether exposure to blast overpressure increased the prevalence of HO after transfemoral amputation performed within the zone of injury. We exposed rats to a blast overpressure alone (BOP-CTL), crush injury and femoral fracture followed by amputation through the zone of injury (AMP-CTL) or a combination of these (BOP-AMP). The presence of HO was evaluated using radiographs, micro-CT and histology. HO developed in none of nine BOP-CTL, six of nine AMP-CTL, and in all 20 BOP-AMP rats. Exposure to blast overpressure increased the prevalence of HO.

This model may thus be used to elucidate cellular and molecular pathways of HO, the effect of varying intensities of blast overpressure, and to evaluate new means of prophylaxis and treatment of heterotopic ossification.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:572–6

Abstract. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is being increasingly used for complex, displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. The main goal of the current study was to evaluate the functional and radiographic results after primary RSA of three or four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. Between 2012 and 2020, 70 consecutive patients with a recent three- or four-part fracture of the proximal humerus were treated with an RSA. There were 41 women and 29 men, with a mean age of 76 years. The dominant arm was involved in 42 patients (60%). All surgeries were carried out within 21 days. Displaced three-part fracture sustained in 16 patients, 24 had fracture dislocation and 30 sustained a four-part fracture of the proximal humerus. Patients were followed up for a mean of 26 months. The mean postoperative OSS at the end of the follow-up period was 32.4. The mean DASH score was 44.3. Tuberosity non-union occurred in 18 patients (12.6%), malunion in 7 patients (4.9%), heterotopic ossification in 4 patients (2.8%) and scapular notching in one patient. Anatomical reconstruction was achieved in 25 patients (17.5%), the influence of greater tuberosity healing on shoulder function could not be demonstrated. Heterotopic ossification seems to affect OSS and QDASH, we found statistically significant relation between HO and clinical outcomes. Patients with heterotopic ossification had significantly lower postoperative scores on DASH and OSS (P = .0527). Despite expecting good functional outcome with low complication rate after RSA, the functional outcome was irrespective of healing of the tuberosities

Radial head fractures are relatively common, representing approximately one-third of all elbow fractures. Outcomes are generally inversely proportional to the amount of force involved in the mechanism of injury, with simple fractures doing better than more comminuted ones. However, the prognosis for these fractures may also be influenced by associated injuries and patient-related factors (age, body index mass, gender, tobacco habit, etc.) The purpose of this study is to evaluate which factors will affect range of motion and function in partial radial head fractures. The hypothesis is that conservative treatment yields better outcomes. This retrospective comparative cohort study included 43 adult volunteers with partial radial head fracture, a minimum one-year follow up, separated into a surgical and non-surgical group. Risk factors were: associated injury, heterotopic ossification, worker's compensation, and proximal radio-ulnar joint implication. Outcomes included radiographic range of motion measurement, demographic data, and quality of life questionnaires (PREE, Q-DASH, MEPS). Mean follow up was 3.5 years (1–7 years). Thirty patients (70%) had associated injuries with decreased elbow extension (−11°, p=0.004) and total range of motion (−14°, p=0.002) compared to the other group. Heterotopic ossification was associated with decreased elbow flexion (−9°, p=0.001) and fractures involved the proximal radio-ulnar joint in 88% of patients. Only worker's compensation was associated with worse scores. There was no difference in terms of function and outcome between patients treated nonsurgically or surgically. We found that associated injuries, worker's compensation and the presence of heterotopic ossification were the only factors correlated with a worse prognosis in this cohort of patients. Given these results, the authors reiterate the importance of being vigilant to associated injuries

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine the functional outcome, imaging and complications of conversion of hip fusion to uncemented total hip replacement. Method. The study group comprised eighteen patients who had undergone conversion of unilateral hip fusion to total hip replacement between 1996 and 2007. There were five men and 13 women. The diagnosis prior to fusion was traumatic injury in eight patients, developmental dysplasia in three patients, and septic arthritis in seven patients. Four of the patient who had septic arthritis in childhood had spontaneous hips fusion while the other underwent surgical arthrodesis. The mean age at the time of conversion was 53 years (range, 21–77) and the mean time between fusion and conversion to hip replacement was 33 years (range, 11–60). Mean follow up was five years (range 2–15 years). Data was collected by retrospective review of a prospective database. Uncemented acetabular components were used in all cases and uncemented femoral components were used in all but two patients. In three patients with abductor and soft tissue deficiency an intraoperative decision was made to use a constrained acetabular liner. Results. The Harris hip score increased from a mean of 49 pre operatively to 75 at a mean of five years p<0.001. There was poor correlation between patient age, duration of hip fusion and hip scores at six months, 12 months and at final follow-up at a mean of five years. Heterotopic ossification developed in seven of the 18 (39%) patients. It was grade one in four patients, grade two in one patient, grade three in one patient and grade four in one patient. Four complications occurred in four of the 18 (22%) patients. Two patients (11%) had neurological injury in the common peroneal nerve distribution. In one patient heterotopic ossification resulted in joint ankylosis. This patient underwent reoperation to excise the heterotopic ossification 16 months after the initial hip replacement procedure. One patient developed a deep venous thrombosis. There were no hip dislocations. One acetabular component was loose and had migrated at 15 years follow up. Conclusion. Conversion of hip fusion to hip replacement carries an increased risk of heterotopic ossification and neurological injury. We advise prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification. When there is concern about hip stability we suggest that the use of a constrained acetabular liner is considered. Despite the potential for complications, this procedure had a high success rate and was effective in restoring hip function

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a relatively common complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA), but is rather rare after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In both cases, it is usually asymptomatic and is most commonly identified as an incidental finding on post-operative radiographs. However, in severe cases it can result in decreased range of motion and pain. There are several risk factors that have been shown to be associated with development of HO. These include male gender, ceramic-on-ceramic bearings, prior stroke, and hypertrophic osteoarthritis. Heterotopic ossification can be treated with physical therapy during the maturation phase (12 to 24 weeks), but surgical intervention is required if the stiffness persists. All heterotopic bone should be excised with careful attention to neurovascular structures. Patients should begin prophylaxis following HO excision and prior to any subsequent surgeries. Heterotopic ossification prophylaxis consists of NSAIDs, radiotherapy, or a combination of both modalities. These therapies are not without complications, therefore, routine administration of prophylaxis for all patients is not indicated. Several new pathways of inhibiting extra-skeletal bone formation in HO are under investigation (retinoid acid receptor agonists, apyrase, and LDN-193189). Future studies should focus on identification of patients at risk for HO as well as better therapeutic options with less side effects

Patients with longstanding hip fusion are predisposed to symptomatic degenerative changes of the lumbar spine, ipsilateral knee and contralateral hip. In such patients, conversion of hip arthrodesis to hip replacement can provide relief of such symptoms. However, this is a technically demanding procedure associated with higher complication and failure rates than routine total hip replacement. The aim of this study was to determine the early functional results and complications in patients undergoing hip fusion conversion to total hip replacement, performed or supervised by a single surgeon, using a standardised approach and uncemented implants. We hypothesised that a satisfactory functional improvement can be achieved in following conversion of hip fusion to hip replacement. Eighteen hip fusions were converted to total hip replacements. A constrained acetabular liner was used in 3 hips. Mean follow up was 5 years (2 to 15 years). Two (11%) hips failed, requiring revision surgery and two patients (11%) had injury to the peroneal nerve. Heterotopic ossification developed in 7 (39%) hips, in one case resulting in joint ankylosis. No hips dislocated. Conversion of hip fusion to hip replacement carries an increased risk of heterotopic ossification and neurological injury. We advise prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification. When there is concern about hip stability we suggest that the use of a constrained acetabular liner is considered. Despite the potential for complications, this procedure had a high success rate and was effective in restoring hip function

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) is a bone conserving alternative to total hip arthroplasty. We present the early 1 and 2-year clinical and radiographical follow-up of a novel ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) HRA in a multi-centric Australian cohort. Patient undergoing HRA between September 2018 and April 2021 were prospectively included. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) in the form of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), HOOS Jr, WOMAC, Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and UCLA Activity Score were collected preoperatively and at 1- and 2-years post-operation. Serial radiographs were assessed for migration, component alignment, evidence of osteolysis/loosening and heterotopic ossification formation. 209 patients were identified of which 106 reached 2-year follow-up. Of these, 187 completed PROMS at 1 year and 90 at 2 years. There was significant improvement in HOOS (p< 0.001) and OHS (p< 0.001) between the pre-operative, 1-year and 2-years outcomes. Patients also reported improved pain (p<0.001), function (p<0.001) and reduced stiffness (p<0.001) as measured by the WOMAC score. Patients had improved activity scores on the UCLA Active Score (p<0.001) with 53% reporting return to impact activity at 2 years. FJS at 1 and 2-years were not significantly different (p=0.38). There was no migration, osteolysis or loosening of any of the implants. The mean acetabular cup inclination angle was 41.3° and the femoral component shaft angle was 137°. No fractures were reported over the 2-year follow-up with only 1 patient reporting a sciatic nerve palsy. There was early return to impact activities in more than half our patients at 2 years with no early clinical or radiological complications related to the implant. Longer term follow-up with increased patient numbers are required to restore surgeon confidence in HRA and expand the use of this novel product. In conclusion, CoC resurfacing at 2-years post-operation demonstrate promising results with satisfactory outcomes in all recorded PROMS

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is the formation of bone at extra-skeletal sites. Genetic diseases, traumatic injuries, or severe burns can induce this pathological condition and can lead to severe immobility. While the mechanisms by which the bony lesions arise are not completely understood, intense inflammation associated with musculoskeletal injury and/or highly invasive orthopaedic surgery is thought to induce HO. The incidence of HO has been reported between 3% and 90% following total hip arthroplasty. While the vast majority of these cases are asymptomatic, some patients will present decreased range of motion and painful swelling around the affected joints leading to severe immobility. In severe cases, ectopic bone formation may be involved in implant failure, leading to costly and painful revision surgery. The effects of surgical-related intraoperative risk factors for the formation of HO can also play a role. Prophylactic radiation therapy, and anti-inflammatory and biphosphonates agents have shown some promise in preventing HO, but their effects are mild to moderate at best and can be complicated with adverse effects. Irradiation around surgery could decrease the incidence of HO. However, high costs and the risk of soft tissue sarcoma inhibit the use of irradiation. Increased trials have demonstrated that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are effective for the prevention of HO. However, the risk of gastrointestinal side effects caused by NSAID has drawn the attention of surgeons. The effect of the selective COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of HO in patients undergoing THA. Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) such as BMP2 identified another novel druggable target, i.e., the remote application of apyrase (ATP hydrolyzing agent) in the burn site decreased HO formation and mitigated functional impairment later. The question is if apyrase can be safely administered through other, such as systematical, routes. While the systemic treatments have shown general efficacy and are used clinically, there may be great benefit obtained from more localised treatment or from more targeted inhibitors of osteogenesis or chondrogenesis. In the surgical setting, prophylaxis for HO is regularly indicated due to the considerable risk of functional impairment. Heterotopic ossification is a well-known complication of total hip arthroplasty, especially when the direct lateral approach is used. Possible intraoperative risks are the size of incision, approach, duration of surgery and gender that can be associated with higher rates of HO or increase of the severity of HO. Like inflammation and tissue damage/ischemia are likely to be the key in the formation of HO, kindness to the soft tissues, tissue preserving surgery, pulse lavage to remove bone inducing factors and avoiding damage to all tissues should be erased as a comorbidity. Incision length, tissue dissection and subsequent localised trauma and ischemia, blood loss, anesthetic type and length of surgery may all contribute to the local inflammatory response. Data suggest that the surgeon may control the extent and nature of HO formation by limiting the incision length and if possible the length of the operation. Currently resection of HO is generally suggested after complete maturation (between 14–18 months), since earlier intervention is thought to predispose to recurrence. Reliable indicators of maturation of HO are diminishing activity on serial bone scans and/or decreasing levels of alkaline phosphatase. Although usually asymptomatic, heterotopic bone formation can cause major disability consisting of pain and a decreased range of motion in up to 7% of patients undergoing THA. Patients benefit from early resection of the heterotopic ossification with a proper and reliable postoperative strategy to prevent recurrence of HO with clinical implications

Fracture of the acetabulum can result in damage to the articular surface that ranges from minimal to catastrophic. Hip arthroplasty may be required for more severe injuries due to marked articular surface damage, post traumatic degenerative changes, persistent malunion or nonunion, or occasionally avascular necrosis and destruction of the femoral head. These problems may be seen following both closed and open fracture treatment, but prior open reduction and internal fixation often makes subsequent THA more difficult due to soft tissue scarring and retained hardware. In select acute acetabular fracture cases with severe initial comminution of the joint, open reduction and fixation can be technically impossible or so clearly destined to early failure that initial fracture treatment with combined limited fixation and simultaneous THA is the best option, especially in osteoporotic elderly fracture patients. Problems which may be encountered during any THA in a patient with a prior acetabular fracture include: difficult exposure due to soft tissue defects and scarring, presence of heterotopic ossification, and nerve palsy from the original fracture or subsequent osteosynthesis. Retained hardware can present significant challenges and frequently is left in place or removed in part or completely, when intraarticular in location or blocking preparation of the acetabular cavity and placement of the cup. Additional potential problems include residual deformity and malunion, persistent pelvic dissociation or nonunion of fracture fragments, cavitary or segmental bone loss from displaced or resorbed bone fragments, and occasionally occult deep infection. Preoperative assessment and planning should include careful consideration of the most appropriate surgical approach, which may be impacted by the need for hardware removal. Screening laboratory studies and aspiration of the hip may prove helpful in excluding associated deep infection. Intraoperative sciatic nerve monitoring may be of assistance in patients with partial residual nerve deficits or where extensive posterior exposure and mobilization of the sciatic nerve is needed for hardware removal or excision of heterotopic ossification. Metal cutting tools to allow partial removal of long plates and adjunctive equipment for removal of broken or stripped screws should be routinely available during these cases. Careful preoperative planning regarding implant and reconstructive options can also ensure availability of proper components and equipment. Often implants and techniques developed for revision surgery for management of major bone deficiencies are needed. Reported results suggest that surgery is frequently prolonged, can be associated with greater blood loss and may result in increased risk of post-arthroplasty heterotopic ossification when compared to routine primary procedures. Bone stock and fracture union may be better in patients with prior internal fixation than in those with nonoperative treatment of major displaced acetabular fractures. Available long-term results document more durable results with lower rates of aseptic loosening with uncemented acetabular fixation compared to cemented acetabular components. These patients are at higher risk of revision and failure than patients undergoing THA for simple osteoarthritis, though initial short-term results are comparable to conventional hip arthroplasty patients, as long as early wound healing problems and deep infection can be avoided, which is a greater risk for acute THA for initial fracture care. The application of newer implant designs, highly porous ingrowth materials, and methods for management of acetabular bone deficiency developed for revision THA have helped improve results in this challenging subset of primary THA patients

Background. Total ankle arthroplasty is an accepted alternative to arthrodesis of the ankle. However, complication and failure rates remain high compared to knee and hip arthroplasty. Long-term results of the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR) are limited, with variable complication and failure rates observed. This prospective study presents the long-term survivorship and the postoperative complications of the STAR prosthesis. Additionally, clinical outcomes and radiographic appearance were evaluated. Methods. Between May 1999 and June 2008, 134 primary total ankle arthroplasties were performed using the STAR prosthesis in 124 patients. The survivorship, postoperative complications and reoperations were recorded, with a minimum follow-up period of 7.5 years. Clinical results were assessed using the Foot Function Index (FFI) and the Kofoed score. The presence of component migration, cysts and radiolucency surrounding the prosthesis components, heterotopic ossifications and progression of osteoarthritis in adjacent joints were determined. Results. The cumulative survival was 78% after a 10-year follow-up period (Figure 1). An ankle arthrodesis was performed in the 20 ankles that failed. Fourteen polyethylene insert fractures occurred. Other complications occurred in 29 ankles, requiring secondary procedures in 21 ankles. Nevertheless, the postoperative clinical results improved significantly. Osteolytic cysts were observed in 59 ankles and the surface area of these cysts increased during follow-up, without any association with the prosthesis alignment or clinical outcome. Heterotopic ossifications at the medial malleolus were present in 58 cases and at the posterior tibia in 73 cases, with no effect on clinical outcome. Osteoarthritis of the subtalar joint and talonavicular joint developed in 9 and 11 cases, respectively. Conclusion. The long-term clinical outcomes for the STAR were found to be satisfactory. These results are consistent with previous studies; however, the survival and complication rates are still disappointing compared to the results obtained in knee and hip arthroplasty. Higher rates of successful outcomes following ankle arthroplasty are required, and these results highlight the need for further research to clarify the origin and significance of the reported complications. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis with revision or removal of the tibia and/or the talus component for any reason as the endpoint, showing 78% (95% confidence interval 0.63–0.88) survival at 10.28 years follow-up. For figure, please contact authors directly

BACKGROUND CONTEXT. Ceramic bearings are widely used in total hip arthroplasty (THR) along with metal and polyethylene bearings. There were several studies in past few years evaluating the advantage of one over the other. The young population with high activity levels has an increased risk of wear debris production at bearing surface and subsequent implant failure. Recently, interest and use of a ceramics with high wear resistance has been growing. Early reports on ceramic on ceramic THR have demonstrated excellent clinical and radiological results. PURPOSE. To evaluate clinical, functional and radiological outcomes of cement-less ceramic on ceramic primary total Hip Replacement (THR) in young patients (<50 years age) with diagnosis of avascular necrosis femoral head. STUDY DESIGN. Single - centre, prospective comparative study of prospectively collected outcomes, with a minimum of 12 month follow-up. PATIENT SAMPLE. 30 patients who underwent cement-less ceramic on ceramic primary THR in young patients (< 50 years age) for avascular necrosis of femoral head. OUTCOME MEASURES. For clinical evaluation, Harris hip scores was measured pre-operatively and post-operatively at predefined intervals. For radiological evaluation, Post- operative radiographs were checked for alignment of femoral stem, loosening of stem, presence of heterotopic ossification, loosening of acetabular component at predefined regular intervals. METHOD. This study included 30 patients, who underwent cement-less ceramic on ceramic primary THR in young patients (< 50 years age) for avascular necrosis of femoral head between July 2013 to April 2015 with a minimum of 12 month follow –up. RESULTS. The mean Harris hip score in our study increased from 32.73 pre-operatively to 87.8 post-operatively at the latest follow up with 90% hips having good to excellent results. This improvement was statistically significant (p<0.005). On evaluation of alignment of femoral stem 27 stems were central (90%) and 3 stems found to be in valgus (10%) and none to be in varus position. There was no significant correlation between stem alignment and clinical outcome based on Harris hip score. Not a single case of focal osteolysis, stem loosening or heterotopic ossification was seen in our study till latest follow-up. None of the major complication was noticed during evaluation of our cases except minor chronic hip pain in one patient which did not restricted his daily living activities. CONCLUSION. In our study, we found better results of ceramic on ceramic THR for younger patients(<50 years age) comparable to previous studies with no serious complication found in any patient. Based on our study, we recommend ceramic on ceramic THR for younger patients in the age group of less than 50 years of age. We need a study of large sample size with long term follow up to further confirm the findings of our study