Abstract
Purpose
The ideal timing for a Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) remains a highly controversial topic in the treatment of displaced acetabular fractures in the elderly with damage to the articular surface of the acetabulum or femoral head. Acute THA offers early rehabilitation but a high incidence of heterotopic ossification has been reported. Its incidence and consequences on the patient's function are not clear.
The goal of this study is to compare the incidence of heterotopic ossification following acute THA of acetabular fractures compared to delayed THA, and to evaluate its functional effects on the patient.
Method
In this retrospective consecutive case series of acetabular fractures; 20 patients were treated with acute THA and 20 patients were treated with delayed THA after failed conservative or surgical treatment. The incidence of heterotopic ossification (using Brooker's classification) was obtained and functional outcomes were evaluated using SF-12, WOMAC, Harris Hip Score surveys.
Results
Heterotopic ossification (HO) was found in 55% (13/20) in the acute THR group compared to 25% (5/20) in the delayed THA group. The relative risk of having significant HO (grades 2–3-4) when the prosthesis was done acutely was 3.4 times higher then when it was delayed. (p=0.01). Furthermore, significant difference in functional outcome was noted in the acute THA group. In fact, seven of eight (7/8) patients in the first subgroup of patients with no HO or grade 1 HO had excellent or good HHS scores. However, only three of eight (3/8) patients with grade 2 or 3 HO showed excellent or good HHS scores. The specific heterotopic ossification grade did not correlate with function.
Conclusion
The incidence of HO was significantly higher in patients with acute THA compared to delayed THA for acetabular fractures. Interestingly, in the acute THA group, patients with grades 2 and 3 HO seem to have worst functional outcomes than patients with no HO or grade 1 HO.