Abstract. Background. The gold standard treatment for Anterior Cruciate Ligament injury is reconstruction (ACL-R). Graft failure is the concern and ensuring a durable initial graft with rapid integration is crucial. Graft augmentation with implantable devices (internal brace reinforcement) is a technique purported to reduce the risk of rupture and hasten recovery. We aim to compare the short-term outcome of ACL-R using augmented hamstring tendon autografts (internally braced with neoligament) and non-augmented hamstring autografts. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study comparing augmented and non-augmented ACL-R. All procedures were performed in a single centre using the same technique. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] was used to assess patient-reported outcomes. Results. There were 70 patients in the augmented and 111 patients in the control group. Mean graft diameter in the augmented group was 8.82mm versus 8.44mm in the non-augmented. Six strand graft was achievable in 73.5% of the augmented group compared to 33% in the non-augmented group. Two graft failures were reported in the non-augmented group and none in the augmented group. Patient satisfaction rates were higher in the augmented group. There was a statistically insignificant improvement in the postoperative KOOS in the augmented group compared to the non-augmented group (p 0.6). Irrespective of augmentation status, no correlation was found between the functional score and age, or femoral tunnel width. Conclusion. Augmented ACL-R may achieve superior graft diameters, lower failure rates and better patient reported outcomes when compared to nonaugmented ACL-R. Prospective trials are needed to examine this further

The primary purpose of this study was to assess whether patients presenting with clinical graft laxity following primary anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring autograft reported a significant difference in disease-specific quality-of-life (QOL) as measured by the ACL-QOL questionnaire. Clinical ACL graft laxity was assessed in a cohort of 1134/1436 (79%) of eligible patients using the Lachman and Pivot-shift tests pre-operatively and at 12- and 24-months following ACL reconstruction. Post-operative ACL laxity was assessed by an orthopaedic surgeon and a physical therapist who were blinded to each other's examination. If there was a discrepancy between the clinical examination findings from these two assessors, then a third impartial examiner assessed the patient to ensure a grading consensus was reached. Patients completed the ACL-QOL questionnaire pre-operatively, and 12- and 24-months post-operatively. Descriptive statistics were used to assess patient demographics, rate of post-operative ACL graft laxity, surgical failures, and ACL-QOL scores. A Spearman rho correlation coefficient was utilised to assess the relationships between ACL-QOL scores and the Lachman and Pivot-shift tests at 24-months post-operative. An independent t-test was used to determine if there were differences in the ACL-QOL scores of subjects who sustained a graft failure compared to the intact graft group. ACL-QOL scores and post-operative laxity were assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). There were 70 graft failures (6.17%) in the 1134 patients assessed at 24-months. A total of 226 patients (19.9%) demonstrated 24-months post-operative ACL graft laxity. An isolated positive Lachman test was assessed in 146 patients (12.9%), an isolated positive Pivot-shift test was apparent in 14 patients (1.2%), and combined positive Lachman and Pivot-shift tests were assessed in 66 patients (5.8%) at 24-months post-operative. There was a statistically significant relationship between 24-month post-operative graft laxity and ACL-QOL scores (p < 0.001). Specifically, there was a significant correlation between the ACL-QOL and the Lachman test (rho = −0.20, p < 0.001) as well as the Pivot-shift test (rho = −0.22, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the scores collected from the graft failure group prior to failure occurring (mean = 74.38, SD = 18.61), and the intact graft group (mean = 73.97, SD = 21.51). At 24-months post-operative, the one-way ANOVA demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the ACL-QOL scores of the no laxity group (mean = 79.1, SD = 16.9) and the combined positive Lachman and Pivot-shift group (mean = 68.5, SD = 22.9), (p = 0, mean difference = 10.6). Two-years post ACL reconstruction, 19.9% of patients presented with clinical graft laxity. Post-operative graft laxity was significantly correlated with lower ACL-QOL scores. The difference in ACL-QOL scores for patients with an isolated positive Lachman or Pivot-shift test did not meet the threshold of a clinically meaningful difference. Patients with clinical laxity on both the Lachman and Pivot-shift tests demonstrated the lowest patient-reported ACL-QOL scores, and these results exceeded the minimal clinically important difference

Abstract

Bioabsorbable screws for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have been shown to be associated with femoral tunnel widening and cyst formation.

To compare a poly-L-lactide–hydroxyapatite screw (PLLA-HA) with a titanium screw with respect to clinical and radiological outcomes over a 5 year period.

40 patients were equally randomized into 2 groups (PLLA-HA vs titanium) and ACLR performed with a 4 strand hamstring graft with femoral tunnel drilling via the anteromedial portal. Evaluation at 2 and 5 years was performed using the International Knee Documentation Committee assessment (IKDC), Lysholm knee score, KT 1000 arthrometer, single-legged hop test. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to evaluate tunnel and screw volume, ossification around the screws, graft integration and cyst formation.

There was no difference in any clinical outcome measure at 2 or 5 years between the 2 groups. At 2 years, the PLLA-HA femoral tunnel was significantly smaller than the titanium screw tunnel (p=0.015) and at 5 years, there was no difference. At 2 years the femoral PLLA-HA screw was a mean 76% of its original volume and by 5 years, 36%. At 2 years the tibial PLLA-HA screw mean volume was 68% of its original volume and by 5 years, 46%. At 5 years, 88% of femoral tunnels and 56% of tibial tunnels demonstrated a significant ossification response. There was no increase in cyst formation in the PLLA-HA group and no screw breakages.

The PLLA-HA screw provides adequate aperture fixation in ACLR with excellent functional outcomes. It was not associated with femoral tunnel widening or increased cyst formation when compared with the titanium screw. The resorbtion characteristics appear favourable and the hydroxyapatite component of the screw may stimulate osteoconduction, contributing to these results. The PLLA-HA screw is a good alternative to a titanium screw in ACLR, which may aid revision procedures and allow for imaging without artifact.

The aim of this study was to determine Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) graft and contralateral ACL (CACL) survival in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with hamstring autograft following netball injuries, and determine factors associated with repeat ACL injury and return to netball. From a prospectively collected database, a consecutive series of 332 female netballers who underwent primary ACLRs using hamstring autografts were identified. Subjects were surveyed at a minimum of five years following reconstruction, including details of further ACL injuries to either knee, return to netball or other sports and psychological readiness with the ACL-RSI score. 264 participants (80%) were reviewed at the mean follow up of 9 years (60-180 months). There were 12 ACL graft ruptures (5%) and 35 contralateral ACL ruptures (13%). ACL graft survival was 97% and 97%, 96% at 2, 5 and 7 years respectively. CACL survival was 99%, 94%, and 90% at 2, 5 and 7 years respectively. The 7-year ACL graft survival was 97% in those 25 or more and 93% in those under 25 years (p=0.126). The 7-year CACL survival was 93% in those 25 or more and 85% in those under 25 years (HR 2.6, 95%CI 1.3-5.0, p=0.007). A family history of ACL injury was reported by 32% of participants. A return to netball was reported by 61% of participants. The mean ACL-RSI score was 65 in those who returned to netball and 37 in those who did not (p=0.001). ACLR with hamstring autografts is a reliable procedure for netballers with a survival rate of 96% at 7 years, allowing 63% of participants to return to netball. A successful return to sport was associated with greater psychological readiness. CACL injury occurred with more than double the frequency of ACL graft rupture and was increased by 2.6x in those <25 years

To document and assess the available evidence regarding single bundle, hamstrings autograft preparation techniques for Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and provide graft preparation options for different clinical scenarios. Three online databases (Embase, PubMed and Ovid [MEDLINE]) were searched from database inception until April 10, 2021. The inclusion criteria were English language studies, human studies, and operative technique studies for single bundle hamstrings autograft preparation for ACLR. Descriptive characteristics, the number of tendons, number of strands, tendon length, graft length and graft diameter were recorded. The methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) instrument and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system for non-randomized and randomized studies, respectively. The initial search yielded 5485 studies, 32 met the inclusion criteria. The mean MINORS score across all nonrandomized studies was 8.2 (standard deviation, SD 6.6) indicating an overall low quality of evidence. The mean MINORS score for comparative studies was 17.4 (SD 3.2) indicating a fair quality of evidence. The GRADE assessment for risk of bias in the randomized study included was low. There were 2138 knees in 1881 participants, including 1296 (78.1%) males and 363 (21.9%) females recorded. The mean age was 30.3 years. The mean follow-up time was 43.9 months when reported (range 16-55 months). Eleven studies utilized the semitendinosus tendon alone, while 21 studies used both semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. There were 82 (3.8%) two-strand grafts, 158 (7.4%) three-strand grafts, 1044 (48.8%) four-strand grafts, 546 (25.5%) five-strand grafts, and 308 (14.4%) six-strand grafts included. Overall, 372 (19.7%) participants had a single-tendon ACLR compared to 1509 (80.2%) participants who had a two-tendon ACLR. The mean graft diameter was 9.4mm when reported. The minimum semitendinosus and gracilis tendon lengths necessary ranged from 210-280mm and 160-280mm respectively. The minimum graft length necessary ranged from 63-120mm except for an all-epiphyseal graft in the paediatric population that required a minimum length of 50mm. The minimum femoral, tibial, and intra-articular graft length ranged from 15-25mm, 15-35mm and 20-30mm respectively. Thirteen studies detailed intra-operative strategies to increase graft size such as adding an extra strand or altering the tibial and/or femoral fixation strategies to shorten and widen the graft. Two studies reported ACL reinjury or graft failure rate. One study found no difference in the re-injury rate between four-, five- and six-strand grafts (p = 0.06) and the other found no difference in the failure rate between four- and five- strand grafts (p = 0.55). There was no difference in the post-operative Lysholm score in 3 studies that compared four- and five-strand ACLR. One of the five studies that compared post-operative IKDC scores between graft types found a difference between two- and three- strand grafts, favoring three-strand grafts. There are many single bundle hamstrings autograft preparation techniques for ACLR that have been used successfully with minimal differences in clinical outcomes. There are different configurations that may be utilized interchangeably depending on the number, size and length of tendons harvested to obtain an adequate graft diameter and successful ACLR

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a commonly performed operation. A variety of graft options are used with the most popular being bone-patellar-tendon-bone and hamstring autograft. There has been an increase in the popularity of hamstring autograft over the past decade. The aim of the study was to assess the ten year subjective knee function and activity level following four-strand semitendinosis and gracilis (STG) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. 86 patients underwent anterior cruciate reconstruction by two knee surgeons over a 12 month period (January 1999 to December 1999). 80 patients meet the inclusion criteria of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. The same surgical technique was used by both surgeons involving four-strand STG autograft, single femoral and tibial tunnels and aperture graft fixation with the Round headed Cannulated Interference (RCI) screw. Patient evaluation was by completion of a Lysholm Knee Score and Tegner Activity Level Scale at a minimum of ten years from reconstructive surgery. This was by initial postal questionnaire and subsequent telephone follow-up. 80 patients underwent anterior cruciate reconstruction with average age 30.9 years (15 to 58 years). There was a 77.5% (62 patients) response at ten years to the questionnaire. The median Lysholm Knee Score at ten years was 94 (52 to 100). The median activity level had decreased from 9 to 5 at ten years according to the Tegner Activity Scale. 73% of patients reported a good or excellent outcome on the Lysholm score. The group of patients was further divided into those that required meniscal surgery and those that did not. The patients that did not require meniscal surgery had a median Lysholm score of 94 and those that required meniscal surgery had a similar median Lysholm score of 92.5. However it was noted that 8 patients required medial and lateral partial menisectomies at the time of original reconstruction. This group of patients had a median Lysholm Knee Score of 83.5 and Tegner Activity Scale of 4 at ten years following reconstruction. 17 of the 62 patients (27.4%) required re-operation because of further knee symptoms, with 4 patients requiring revision of the anterior cruciate following re-rupture. In conclusion anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with four-strand STG hamstring autograft provides a reliable method of restoring knee function, with a 6% revision rate for re-rupture at ten years. Combined partial medial and lateral menisectomy at the time of the initial reconstruction is a poor prognostic indicator of function at ten years

The aim of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is to regain functional stability of the knee following ACL injury, ideally allowing patients to return to their pre-injury level of activity. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical, functional and patient-reported outcomes following primary ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft. A prospective case-series design (n=1610) was used to gather data on post-operative ACL graft laxity, functional testing performance and scores on the ACL quality of life (ACL-QOL) questionnaire. Demographic data were collected for all patients. Post-operative ACL laxity assessment using the Lachman and Pivot-shift tests was completed independently on each patient by a physiotherapist and an orthopaedic surgeon at the 6-, 12- and 24-months post-operative appointments. A battery of functional tests was also assessed including single leg Bosu balance, and 4 single-leg hop tests. The hop tests provided a comparative assessment of limb-to-limb function. Patients completed the ACL-QOL at all time points. The degree and frequency of post-operative laxity was calculated. A Spearman's rank correlation matrix was undertaken to assess for relationships between post-operative laxity, functional test performance, and the ACL-QOL scores. A linear regression model was used to assess for relationships between the ACL-QOL scores, as well as the functional testing results, and patient demographic factors. ACLR patients were 55% male, with a mean age of 29.7 years (SD=10.4), mean BMI of 25 (SD=3.9), and mean Beighton score of 3.3 (SD=2.5). At clinical assessment 2-years post-operatively, 20.6% of patients demonstrated a positive Lachman test and 7.7% of patients demonstrated a positive Pivot-shift test. The mean ACL-QOL score was 28.6/100 (SD=13.4) pre-operatively, 58.2/100 (SD=17.6) at 6-months, 71.8/100 (SD=18.1) at 12-months, and 77.4/100 (SD=19.2) at 24-months post-operative. Functional tests assessing operative to non-operative limb performance demonstrated that patients were continuing to improve up to the 24-month mark, with limb symmetry indices ranging from 96.6–103.1 for the single-leg hop tests. Spearman's correlation coefficient demonstrated a significant relationship between the presence of ACL graft laxity and ACL-QOL score at 12- and 24-months post-operative (p < 0 .05). Functional performance on the single leg balance and single-leg hop tests demonstrated significant correlations to the 6-, 12- and 24-month ACL-QOL scores (p < 0 .05). There was no statistically significant correlation between the functional testing results and the presence of ACL graft laxity. This study demonstrated that up to 20.6% of patients had clinically measurable graft laxity 2-years after ACLR. In this cohort, patients with graft laxity demonstrated lower ACL-QOL scores, but did not demonstrate lower functional testing performance. Patient-reported ACL-QOL scores improved significantly at each time point following ACLR, and functional performance continued to improve up to 2-years after surgery. The ACL-QOL score was strongly correlated to the patient's ability to perform single-limb functional tests, indicating that the ACL-QOL score accurately predicted level of function

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture with associated meniscal pathology commonly occurs in a young, active population. Preserving a greater proportion of the meniscus may improve long-term outcomes by maintaining shock absorption and knee stability. However, meniscal repair procedures involve longer healing and rehabilitation than meniscal debridement, which could affect return to work and activity. The purpose of this study was to examine the functional outcomes and quality of life scores through two years in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) who had meniscal repair, meniscal debridement, or no meniscal damage at the time of reconstruction. Data for 1814 skeletally mature patients with isolated primary ACL-R was prospectively collected at a single centre from January 2010 to December 2015. Functional testing of operative to non-operative limb performance was completed at one- and two-years following surgery and included single-leg balance, single-leg hop for distance, timed six-meter hop, triple-hop for distance, and triple cross-over hop for distance. ACL-Quality-of-life questionnaires (ACL-QoL) were completed pre-operatively and at 1- and 2-years post-operatively. Descriptive statistics were completed for patient demographics and intra-operative pathology. Unpaired t-tests using 95% confidence intervals were conducted to compare groups. The patient cohort was 45% female, with a mean age of 31 years (SD 11, range 14–66). Meniscal injury was detected in 1229/1814 knees (67.8%). There were 729 debridements and 538 repairs performed. Graft choice was hamstring autograft in 85.8% of cases, bone-patellar-tendon-bone autograft in 2.5%, allograft in 10.1% and other graft types in 1.5%. Pre-operative ACL-QoL scores were 29 and 28.5 for knees without and with meniscal damage, respectively (p>0.05). Of 1814 patients, 1269 (69.9%) completed the ACL-QoL at the two-year appointment, and 1225 (67.5%) completed the functional testing. At two years post-operative, patients with no meniscal damage at surgery demonstrated superior limb symmetry performance on triple-hop for distance compared to patients with meniscal damage (98.4% vs 97.1%, p < 0 .05, CI 0.1–2.5%). No other functional testing parameters showed statistical significance. There was no difference in functional outcome between patients undergoing an isolated meniscal repair versus debridement at one- or two-years. ACL-QoL scores were statistically significantly higher at one- and two-years post-operative for patients without meniscal damage (1-year: 73 vs 70.2, p < 0 .05, CI 0.51–5.1, 2-years: 79.2 vs 76.1, p < 0 .05, CI 0.79–5.4). ACL-QoL scores were minimally higher for isolated meniscal debridement compared to isolated meniscal repair at both time points (1-year: 71.4 vs 68, p < 0 .05, CI 0.4–6.4, 2-years: 78.3 vs 74, p < 0 .05, CI 1.3–7.3). Functional outcomes do not differ at one or two years post-operatively for patients undergoing meniscal repair versus debridement concomitant with ACL-R. Quality of life scores were statistically significantly higher for the patients with no meniscal pathology at both one- and two-years post-operative. ACL-QoL scores were also statistically significantly different for the meniscal repair and debridement groups however these differences are unlikely to be clinically significant. Extended follow-up is needed to determine if the differences detected in ACL-QoL scores are sustained over time, as well as the long-term role of meniscal injury on functional outcomes

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is an effective procedure to address patellofemoral instability, however there remains no clear consensus on the optimum technique. Variations in patella tunnel and the use of patella fixation devices are reported in the literature, as are the associated complications of patella fracture and hardware irritation. We present the early results using a two tunnel, Endobutton free technique. 24 MPFL reconstructions (14 female, 10 male) were performed by a single surgeon, using two 3.5mm medial patellar tunnels exiting anteriorly and a looped, extra-synovial hamstring autograft. Femoral fixation was achieved using an non-absorbable interference screw. Mean age was 25.5 years, with a mean follow-up of 21.7 months. Mean Kujala scores were 60.8 preoperatively and 87.9 postoperatively (p<0.0001). No patient experienced further dislocation or patella fracture post-operatively. One patient required interference screw removal. The surgical technique presented has outcomes comparable with the literature. It requires a shorter tendon graft, and removes the need for a patellar fixation device, reducing potential irritation and cost

No consensus exists regarding the optimal graft choice between allogenic and autologous graft. Incidence of septic arthritis following ACL reconstruction is rare but may dependent on the graft type. Our meta-analysis assesses the difference in incidence of septic arthritis after ACL reconstruction across three groups of grafts: hamstring autografts, bone patellar tendon bone (BPTB) autografts and allografts of any type. A literature search was performed without language restriction on PubMed and EMBASE databases. We identified 245 infected ACL grafts across 15 included studies that provided a breakdown of infection incidence by graft type. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to estimate the overall infection rates and those for different graft types. Summary risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and reported for each outcome. Publication bias with respect to infection rates was estimated using a funnel plot. Our meta-analysis shows an overall ACL graft infection rate of 0.6% (CI 0.3% – 1.3%). The incidence was highest in autologous hamstring grafts at 1.1% at (CI 0.8% – 1.6%). That of allografts and autologous BPTB grafts was similar at 0.5% (CI 0.2%–1.0%) and 0.4% (CI 0.2% – 0.7%), respectively. Full breakdown of the meta-analysis results by study and graft type is reported in Figure 1. Septic arthritis after ACL reconstruction remains a rare (<1%) but a serious complication. Allograft rates of infection were not higher than those the autografts, contrary to the theoretical concerns. Therefore a higher infection risk should not be cited as a reason for not using it. The reason for the apparently higher infection rate with hamstring autografts is unclear and requires further research. The results of our meta-analysis may aid informed discussions between surgeons and patients about the risk of infection after ACL reconstructive surgery and graft choice

Background The minimum size required for a successful quadrupled hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction remains controversial. The risks of ACL re-tear in younger patients who tend to participate in a higher level of sports activity, and female athletes who have numerous predisposing factors, are poorly defined. Purpose To identify risk factors for graft re-tears within 2 years of ACL surgery. The hypotheses are that female sex, a smaller size graft, and younger patients will increase the odds of failure. Study Design Cohort Study. Level of evidence, 3. A cohort of 503 athletes undergoing primary, autograft hamstring ACL reconstruction, performed by a single surgeon using the same surgical technique and rehabilitation protocol, between September-December 2012, was followed for a total duration of 2 years. Return to play was allowed between 6 and 12 months post-surgery upon completion of functional testing. Exclusion criteria included infections, revisions, double bundle techniques, multi-ligament injuries, non-compliance, BTB/allografts/hybrid grafts. Primary outcome consisted of binary data (ACL graft re-tear or no tear) as measured on physical exam (Lachman and pivot shift) and MRI. Multivariate logistic regression statistical analysis with model fitting was used to investigate the predictive value of sex, age, and graft size on ACL re-tear. Secondary sensitivity analyses were performed on the adolescent subgroup, age and graft size as categorical variables, and testing for interactions among variables. Sample size was calculated based on the rule of 10 events per independent variable for logistic regression. The mean age of the 503 athletes was 27.5 (SD 10.6; range = 12–61). There were 235 females (47%) and 268 males (53%) with a 6 % rate of re-tears (28 patients; 17 females). Mean graft size was 7.9 (SD 0.6; range = 6–10). Univariate analyses of graft size, sex, and age only in the model showed that younger age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80–0.93; P = .001] and smaller graft size (OR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.18–0.70; P = .003) were significantly predictive of re-tear. Female sex was correlated with re-tear but was not significant (OR = 1.8; 95% CI = 0.84–3.97; P = .13). Multivariate analysis with all 3 variables in the model showed similar significant results. Graft size < 8 mm (OR = 2.95; 95% CI = 1.33–6.53; P = .008) and age < 25 (OR = 7.01; 95% CI = 2.40–20.53; P = .001) were significantly predictive of re-tear. Entire model was statistically significant (Omnibus test P = .001; Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic P = .68; Receiver Operating Curve [ROC] = 0.8). Surgeons should counsel their patients who are female, younger than 25 and with a graft size less than 8 mm accordingly and consider modifying their surgical or rehabilitation techniques to mitigate these re-tear risks

Introduction. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common sporting injury, often managed surgically with patella-tendon or hamstrings autograft. Surgeons are under increasing pressure for open transparent assessment of their performance. Scoring systems can be used to assess outcome. More than 50 different scoring systems have been identified to assess the ACL deficient knee. Aims. The survey is investigating the use of ACL scoring systems between knee surgeons in the United Kingdom as a method of assessing performance. Method. 134 knee surgeons in the United Kingdom, performing ACL reconstruction, were asked to complete a written questionnaire regarding their use of scoring systems & outcome measures. Written questionnaires were sent and responses were received by post. Results. 81 (60%) surgeons responded to the questionnaire by stating their preferred scoring system. 40 (49%) surgeons routinely use ACL scoring systems versus 41 (51%) surgeons who do not. The Lysholm (I and II) knee scoring scale (80%) and Tegner activity score (67.5%) were most commonly used (57.5% both of them) followed by the Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) (30%), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee score (22.5%), Medical Outcome Study 12 Item Short Form (SF12) (20%), the Medical Outcome Study 36 Item Short Form (SF 36) (12.5%), Cincinnati Knee Scoring System (10%), and ACL Quality of Life scoring system (7.5%). Recommendations. The routine use of ACL scoring systems by 49% of surgeons raises the question - should all surgeons be using scoring systems in their ACL practice? This would be relatively easy to do as most patients are followed up post operatively for 6 months. This will help to adopt a transparent assessment of the performance of every consultant to the procedure they perform

Purpose. The majority (73%) of orthopaedic surgeons in Canada prefer using semitendinosus-gracilis (STG) autograft for ACL reconstruction. However, there is large variation in tendon size between individuals which makes pre-operative estimation of graft size unpredictable. Inadequate graft size may require an alternative source of graft tissue that should be planned prior to surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine if clinical anthropometric data and MRI measurements of STG tendons can be used to predict hamstring graft size. Method. One-hundred and fourteen patients with ACL deficiency awaiting reconstruction using hamstring autograft were retrospectively evaluated. The following information was obtained from patient charts: height, weight, body mass index (BMI), age, and gender. Cross-sectional area (CSA) of gracilis (G) and semitendinosus (ST) tendons were determined from pre-operative MRI scans using NIH ImageJ analysis software. Actual STG graft diameters were obtained from operative reports. Correlations between patient height, weight, BMI, age, gender, ST-CSA, G-CSA, STG-CSA and intraoperative graft size were calculated to determine the association between these variables. Multiple stepwise regression was performed to assess the predictive value of these variables to intraoperative graft diameter. In addition, three investigators with no radiological experience made independent measurements of the ST and G tendons to determine the inter-rater reliability (ICC) of MRI measurements. Results. All variables were independently correlated with intraoperative graft size (p<0.001). However, based on multiple stepwise regression analysis, only models including STG-CSA (r2=.212; p<.001); STG-CSA and sex (r2=.285; p<.001); and STG-CSA, sex and weight (r2=.294; p<.001) were found to be significant predictors of graft size (when co-variation in other factors was controlled). Inter-class correlation coefficients demonstrated very high agreement between raters for measurements of the ST, G and STG (.816, .827, .863, respectively). Conclusion. Measurement of tendon CSA from MRI images is very reliable. A model including STG-CSA, sex and weight was found to be strongly predictive of hamstring graft diameter for ACL reconstruction. This model may enhance our ability to predict adequate graft size and identify instances that other graft tissues may be a better option. The results of this study may improve pre-operative planning for ACL reconstruction