Abstract
Introduction
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common sporting injury, often managed surgically with patella-tendon or hamstrings autograft. Surgeons are under increasing pressure for open transparent assessment of their performance. Scoring systems can be used to assess outcome. More than 50 different scoring systems have been identified to assess the ACL deficient knee.
Aims
The survey is investigating the use of ACL scoring systems between knee surgeons in the United Kingdom as a method of assessing performance.
Method
134 knee surgeons in the United Kingdom, performing ACL reconstruction, were asked to complete a written questionnaire regarding their use of scoring systems & outcome measures. Written questionnaires were sent and responses were received by post.
Results
81 (60%) surgeons responded to the questionnaire by stating their preferred scoring system. 40 (49%) surgeons routinely use ACL scoring systems versus 41 (51%) surgeons who do not. The Lysholm (I and II) knee scoring scale (80%) and Tegner activity score (67.5%) were most commonly used (57.5% both of them) followed by the Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) (30%), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee score (22.5%), Medical Outcome Study 12 Item Short Form (SF12) (20%), the Medical Outcome Study 36 Item Short Form (SF 36) (12.5%), Cincinnati Knee Scoring System (10%), and ACL Quality of Life scoring system (7.5%).
Recommendations
The routine use of ACL scoring systems by 49% of surgeons raises the question - should all surgeons be using scoring systems in their ACL practice? This would be relatively easy to do as most patients are followed up post operatively for 6 months. This will help to adopt a transparent assessment of the performance of every consultant to the procedure they perform.
