Aims. This study aimed, through bioinformatics analysis and in vitro experiment validation, to identify the key extracellular proteins of intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD). Methods. The
Purpose of study and background. Degeneration of the intervertebral disc is a strong contributor of low back pain. Studies have shown that both, mechanical unloading and overloading, lead to disc degeneration. This is intuitively clear if one considers that an intervertebral disc essentially is a poro-elastic material embedded with cells, which depend on fluid flow for the transport of nutrients and waste products. As such, mechanical loading is also required for regeneration. It is unclear, however, how much loading is beneficial or detrimental for the healthy or degenerated disc. Methods and Results. We developed a loaded disc culture system for the long-term study of disc physiology. This way we could control both the mechanical and biochemical conditions. If no loading was applied, about half of the cells died within a week. Cells died under a low dynamic loading regime after three weeks. A diurnal loading regime rescued cell viability,
Background. While the human embryonic, foetal and juvenile intervertebral disc (IVD) is composed of large vacuolated notochordal cells, these morphologically distinct cells are lost with skeletal maturity being replaced by smaller nucleus pulpous cells. Notochordal cells are thought to be fundamental in maintaining IVD homeostasis and, hence, their loss in humans may be a key initiator of degeneration, leading ultimately to back pain. Therefore, it is essential to understand the human notochordal cell phenotype to enable the development of novel biological/regenerative therapies. Methods. CD24+ notochordal cells and CD24- sclerotomal cells were sorted from enzymatically-digested human foetal spines (7.5–14 WPC, n=5) using FACS. Sorting accuracy was validated using qPCR for known notochordal markers and Affymetrix cDNA microarrays performed. Differential gene expression was confirmed (qPCR) and Interactive Pathway Analysis (IPA) performed. Results. CD24+ve notochordal cells (mean 10.4%) and CD24-ve sclerotomal cells (mean 60.9% CD24-) were successfully sorted. Higher expression of notochordal markers CD24 and brachyury was identified in CD24+ve cells. Hierarchical clustering and PCA mapping revealed distinct differences in the
Introduction. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common form of spinal deformity. It occurs mainly in girls and progresses during pre-pubertal and pubertal growth, which is a crucial period for bone mass acquisition. The cause and molecular mechanisms of AIS are not clear; at present the consensus is that AIS has a multifactor cause, with many genetic factors. During the past 5 years, considerable effort has been devoted to identify a gene or genes that cause a predisposition to AIS. Many loci for this disorder have been mapped to different chromosome regions, but no genes have been clearly identified as being responsible for AIS, and, most importantly, the resulting protein defects remain to be shown. We aimed to identify the gene(s) that could be involved in AIS and to validate their involvement by both genetic and functional analyses. Methods. A large multiplex AIS French family was chosen for this study on the basis of clinical and radiological data. Whole genome genotyping of the 20 members of this family led to the mapping of a dominant disease-causing gene to two critical genomic intervals (Edery and colleagues, Eur J Hum Genet, accepted [2011]), but the causative mutation remains to be identified. In parallel,
CRP is an acute-phase protein that is used as a biomarker to follow severity and progression in infectious and inflammatory diseases. Its pathophysiological mechanisms of action are still poorly defined. CRP in its pentameric form exhibits weak anti-inflammatory activity. The monomeric isoform (mCRP) exerts potent proinflammatory properties in chondrocytes, endothelial cells, and leucocytes. No data exist regarding mCRP effects in human intervertebral disc (IVD) cells. This work aimed to verify the pathophysiological relevance of mCRP in the aetiology and/or progression of IVD degeneration. We investigated the effects of mCRP and the signalling pathways that are involved in cultured human primary annulus fibrosus (AF) cells and in the human nucleus pulposus (NP) immortalized cell line HNPSV-1. We determined messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein levels of relevant factors involved in inflammatory responses, by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and western blot. We also studied the presence of mCRP in human AF and NP tissues by immunohistochemistry.Aims
Methods
Mesenchymal stem-cell based therapies have been
proposed as novel treatments for intervertebral disc degeneration,
a prevalent and disabling condition associated with back pain. The
development of these treatment strategies, however, has been hindered
by the incomplete understanding of the human nucleus pulposus phenotype
and by an inaccurate interpretation and translation of animal to
human research. This review summarises recent work characterising
the nucleus pulposus phenotype in different animal models and in
humans and integrates their findings with the anatomical and physiological
differences between these species. Understanding this phenotype
is paramount to guarantee that implanted cells restore the native
functions of the intervertebral disc. Cite this article:
This article reviews the current knowledge of
the intervertebral disc (IVD) and its association with low back
pain (LBP). The normal IVD is a largely avascular and aneural structure
with a high water content, its nutrients mainly diffusing through
the end plates. IVD degeneration occurs when its cells die or become
dysfunctional, notably in an acidic environment. In the process
of degeneration, the IVD becomes dehydrated and vascularised, and
there is an ingrowth of nerves. Although not universally the case,
the altered physiology of the IVD is believed to precede or be associated
with many clinical symptoms or conditions including low back and/or
lower limb pain, paraesthesia, spinal stenosis and disc herniation. New treatment options have been developed in recent years. These
include biological therapies and novel surgical techniques (such
as total disc replacement), although many of these are still in
their experimental phase. Central to developing further methods
of treatment is the need for effective ways in which to assess patients
and measure their outcomes. However, significant difficulties remain
and it is therefore an appropriate time to be further investigating
the scientific basis of and treatment of LBP.