Introduction:. Mayo 2A Olecranon fractures are traditionally managed with a tension band wire device (TBW) but locking plates may also be used to treat these injuries. Objectives:. To compare clinical outcomes and treatment cost between TBW and locking plate fixation in Mayo 2A fractures. Methods:. All olecranon fractures admitted 2008–2013 were identified (n=129). Patient notes and radiographs were studied. Outcomes were recorded with the QuickDASH (Disabilies of Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score. Incidence of infection, hardware irritation, non-union, fixation failure and re-operation rate were recorded. Results:. 89 patients had Mayo 2A fractures (69%). Of these patients 64 underwent TBW (n=48) or locking plate fixation (n=16). The mean age for both groups were 57 (15–93) and 60 (22–80) respectively. In the TBW group, the final follow-up QuickDASH was 12.9, compared with 15.0 for the Locking plate group. There was no statistically significant difference between either group (p = 0.312). 19 of the 48 TBW patients had complications (48%). There was 1 infection (2%). 15 cases of metalwork irritation (31%). 1 non-union (2%). 2 fixation failures (4%). 14 of the 48 TBW patients had re-operations (29%). There were 13 removal of metalwork procedures (27%), 1 washout (2%) and 2 revision fixations (4%). There were 0 complications and 0 re-operations in the 16 patients who underwent locking plate fixation. This was statistically significant, (p = 0.003) and (p= 0.015) respectively. TBW costs £7.00 verses £244.10 for a locking plate. Theatre costs were equivalent. A 30 minute day surgery removal of metalwork or similar case costs £1420. In this cohort, when costs of re-operation were included, locking plates were on average £177 less per patient. Conclusions:. Locking plates are superior to TBW in terms of incidence of post-operative morbidity and re-operation rate. Financial savings may be made by choosing a more expensive initial implant

Using an osteotomy of the olecranon as a model of a transverse fracture in 22 cadaver elbows we determined the ability of three different types of suture and stainless steel wire to maintain reduction when using a tension-band technique to stabilise the bone. Physiological cyclical loading simulating passive elbow movement (15 N) and using the arms to push up from a chair (450 N) were applied using an Instron materials testing machine whilst monitoring the osteotomy site with a video extensometer. Each osteotomy was repaired by one of four materials, namely, Stainless Steel Wire (7), No 2 Ethibond (3), No 5 Ethibond (5), or No 2 FiberWire (7).

There were no failures (movement of > 2 mm) with stainless steel wire or FiberWire and no significant difference in the movements measured across the site of the osteotomy (p = 0.99). The No. 2 Ethibond failed at 450 N and two of the five of No. 5 Ethibond sutures had a separation of > 2 mm at 450 N.

FiberWire as the tension band in this model held the reduction as effectively as stainless steel wire and may reduce the incidence of discomfort from the hardware. On the basis of our findings we suggest that a clinical trial should be undertaken