Background

Patient reported outcomes/experience measures have been a fundamental part of the NHS since 2009. Osteotomy procedures for hallux valgus produce varied outcomes due to their subjective nature. We used PROMS2.0, a semi-automated web-based system, which allows collection and analysis of outcome data, to assess what the patient reported outcome/experience measures for scarf+/− akin osteotomy for hallux valgus are at UHSM.

The exact action of the Peroneus Longus muscle on the foot is not fully understood. It is involved in a number of pathological processes like tendonitis, tenosynovitis, chronic rupture and neurological conditions. It is described as having a consistent insertion to the base of the first metatarsal, but there have also been reports of significant variations and additional slips. Our aim was to further clarify the anatomy of the main insertion of the Peroneus Longus tendon and to describe the site and frequency of other variable insertion slips. The course of the distal peroneus longus tendon and its variable insertion was dissected in 20 embalmed, cadaveric specimens. The surface area of the main insertion footprint was measured using an Immersion Digital Microscibe and 3D mapping software. The site and frequency of the other variable insertion slips is presented. There was a consistent, main insertion to the infero-lateral aspect of the first metatarsal in all specimens. The surface area of this insertion was found to be proportional to the length of the foot. The insertion in males was found to be significantly larger than females. The most frequent additional slip was to the medial cuneiform. Other less frequent insertion slips were present to the lesser metatarsals. The main footprint of the Peroneus Longus tendon is on the first metatarsal. There appears to an additional slip to the medial cuneiform frequently. Although we are unsure about the significance of these additional slips, we hope it will lead to a better understanding of the mechanism of action of this muscle and its role both in the normal and pathological foot

Increase in heel height increases peak pressure under the forefoot. Customized shoe inlays with metatarsal lift, arch support has demonstrated lowered forefoot pressure and increase in the subjective comfort. A commercial shoe brand (Roccamore) has introduced an off-the-rack stiletto with a slim (1 cm. 2. ) 8 cm heel plus 2 cm platform with metatarsal lift, arch support and heel cap claiming it will reduce the discomfort associated with high heels. The primary aim of this study was to compare the pressure under the forefoot, arch, heel and toes in this “orthopaedic” stiletto (OS) to a standard stiletto of the same heel height without inlays (SS) and a control sneaker (SN). Secondary aims were to measure the comfort under the forefoot, heel and arch during everyday use. Finally to investigate if any pressure measurements were correlated to comfort or any anatomical/clinical feature of the foot. 22 women, aged 40 (21–62), accustomed to stilettos, walked at 4 km/hr on a level treadmill in all three shoe types. Peak pressure (kPa) and pressure-time integral (kPa/sec) under 2+3rd and first metatarsal heads, the arch/midfoot and heel were measured during 10 consecutive steps at 50 Hz using Novel Pedar-X pressure distribution insoles. Standing X-rays and a standardized clinical examination were carried out. Mundermanns comfort VAS and daily steps were recorded for each shoe type during 3 full days. (0= worst to 150 mm= most comfortable). Data were compared with paired t-tests and regression analysis. Statistical significance is reported as p<0.05=, p<0.01=, p<0.001=. Peak pressure: Compared to SS the peak pressure under the 2+3 metatarsals was reduced to 82% in the OS and 60% in the SN. Under the first metatarsal it was reduced to 73% and 40%, respectively. Under the arch it was similar for SN and OS and 30% lower for the SS. Under the heel the OS was 27–28% lower than SS and SN. The same reductions, as well as similarities in the arch were seen in the pressure-time integrals, although with smaller difference between OS and SS, and conversely larger reductions in the SN to 49% under 2+3 metatarsals and 43% under the first. For forefoot, arch and heel, the comfort was rated highest for the SN and lowest for the SS. No statistical difference between OS and SS in the arch. For each mm the second metatarsal was longer than the first, the peak pressure under MT2+3 rose 13 kPa (95%CI: 7 to 19) and the pressure time integral 3 kPa/s (1–5). No effect of first ray ROM or stability. The forefoot VAS score dropped (less comfortable) 0.3 mm for each kPa/s the pressure time integral rose under the MT2+3. Peak pressure parameters or daily steps were not statistically significantly related to the forefoot comfort. A mass produced “orthopaedic” stiletto can reduce the pressure approaching those achieved in a sneaker and increase comfort for the user. An increase in pressure-time integral under 2+3 metatarsals increases the discomfort and the pressure is increased in index-minus feet

Regional anaesthetic for foot surgery has been discussed as a method of post operative analgesia. Ankle block as the sole anaesthetic for foot surgery has not been extensively reviewed in the literature. We aimed to describe our experience of forefoot surgery under ankle block. Sixty-six consecutive forefoot procedures (59 patients) were carried out under ankle block. Patients were contacted post operatively and completed a standardised questionnaire including an incremental pain assessment ranging from 0-10 (0 no pain, 10 severe pain). Forty nine female and 10 male patients (age range 20-85y) were included. Procedures included 33 first metatarsal osteotomies, 15 cheilectomies, 3 first MTP joint replacements, 5 fusions, 4 excision of neuroma and 6 other procedures. 22 patients (33% of cases) reported discomfort during the block procedure (average pain score 1.5). 6 patients reported pain during their operation(s), average score 0.26. Average pain scores at 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours following surgery were 2.0, 3.2, 2.7 and 2.1 respectively. All patients were discharged home and walking on the same day. There were no readmissions. Each patient confirmed they would have surgery under regional block rather than general anaesthesia and would recommend this technique to family and friends. There are many advantages in being able to perform these relatively small procedures under regional anaesthesia. The anaesthesia obtained permits the majority of forefoot procedures and provides lasting post-operative analgesia. Combined with intra-operative sedation, use of ankle tourniquet and same day discharge; it has very high patient acceptance and satisfaction

Regional anaesthetic for foot surgery has been discussed as a method of post operative analgesia. Ankle block as the sole anaesthetic for foot surgery has not been extensively reviewed in the literature. We aimed to describe our experience of forefoot surgery under ankle block alone. 21 consecutive forefoot procedures (18 patients) were carried out under ankle block. The blocks were performed by the senior authors. A mixture of 10ml 2% Lidocaine with 10ml 0.5 % Bupivacaine was administered to the superficial peroneal, deep peroneal, sural and saphenous nerves. Ankle tourniquet was employed in all procedures. The patients were contacted post operatively and completed a standardised questionnaire including an incremented pain assessment ranging from 0-10 (0 no pain, 10 severe pain). 17 female and 1 male patients were contacted (age range 33-67y). Procedures included 13 first metatarsal osteotomies, 3 cheilectomies, 2 first MTP joint replacements, and 5 fusions. 14 patients requested a short acting sedative (midazolam). 5 patients (27 %) reported some discomfort during the block procedure (average pain score 1.2). No patients reported any pain during their operation(s). 4 patients (22%) required supplementation of the block. Average pain score at 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours following surgery were 0.66, 2.9, 2.4 and 1.3 respectively. All patients were discharged home and walking on the same day. None complained of nausea or required parenteral analgesia; there were no readmissions. Each patient confirmed they would have surgery under local block rather than general anaesthesia and would recommend this technique to family and friends. Forefoot surgery under ankle block alone is safe and effective. Anaesthesia obtained permits the majority of forefoot procedures and provides lasting post-operative analgesia. Combined with intraoperative sedation, use of ankle tourniquet and same day discharge, it has very high patient acceptance and satisfaction

We have evaluated four different fixation techniques for the reconstruction of a standard Mason type-III fracture of the radial head in a sawbone model. The outcome measurements were the quality of the reduction, and stability.

A total of 96 fractures was created. Six surgeons were involved in the study and each reconstructed 16 fractures with 1.6 mm fine-threaded wires (Fragment Fixation System (FFS)), T-miniplates, 2 mm miniscrews and 2 mm Kirschner (K-) wires; four fractures being allocated to each method using a standard reconstruction procedure.

The quality of the reduction was measured after definitive fixation. Biomechanical testing was performed using a transverse plane shear load in two directions to the implants (parallel and perpendicular) with respect to ultimate failure load and displacement at 50 N.

A significantly better quality of reduction was achieved using the FFS wires (Tukey’s post hoc tests, p < 0.001) than with the other devices with a mean step in the articular surface and the radial neck of 1.04 mm (sd 0.96) for the FFS, 4.25 mm (sd 1.29) for the miniplates, 2.21 mm (sd 1.06) for the miniscrews and 2.54 mm (sd 0.98) for the K-wires. The quality of reduction was similar for K-wires and miniscrews, but poor for miniplates.

The ultimate failure load was similar for the FFS wires (parallel, 196.8 N (sd 46.8), perpendicular, 212.5 N (sd 25.6)), miniscrews (parallel, 211.8 N (sd 47.9), perpendicular, 208.0 N (sd 65.9)) and K-wires (parallel, 200.4 N (sd 54.5), perpendicular, 165.2 N (sd 37.9)), but significantly worse (Tukey’s post hoc tests, p < 0.001) for the miniplates (parallel, 101.6 N (sd 43.1), perpendicular, 122.7 N (sd 40.7)). There was a significant difference in the displacement at 50 N for the miniplate (parallel, 4.8 mm (sd 2.8), perpendicular, 4.8 mm (sd 1.7)) vs FFS (parallel, 2.1 mm (sd 0.8), perpendicular, 1.9 mm (sd 0.7)), miniscrews (parallel, 1.8 mm (sd 0.5), perpendicular, 2.3 mm (sd 0.8)) and K-wires (parallel, 2.2 mm (sd 1.8), perpendicular, 2.4 mm (sd 0.7; Tukey’s post hoc tests, p < 0.001)).

The fixation of a standard Mason type-III fracture in a sawbone model using the FFS system provides a better quality of reduction than that when using conventional techniques. There was a significantly better stability using FFS implants, miniscrews and K-wires than when using miniplates.

A cavovarus foot deformity was simulated in cadaver specimens by inserting metallic wedges of 15° and 30° dorsally into the first tarsometatarsal joint. Sensors in the ankle joint recorded static tibiotalar pressure distribution at physiological load.

The peak pressure increased significantly from neutral alignment to the 30° cavus deformity, and the centre of force migrated medially. The anterior migration of the centre of force was significant for both the 15° (repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), p = 0.021) and the 30° (repeated measures ANOVA, p = 0.007) cavus deformity. Differences in ligament laxity did not influence the peak pressure.

These findings support the hypothesis that the cavovarus foot deformity causes an increase in anteromedial ankle joint pressure leading to anteromedial arthrosis in the long term, even in the absence of lateral hindfoot instability.