Aims. This study evaluated the effect of treating clinician speciality on management of zone 2 fifth metatarsal fractures. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with acute zone 2 fifth metatarsal fractures who presented to a single large, urban, academic medical centre between December 2012 and April 2022. Zone 2 was the region of the fifth metatarsal base bordered by the fourth and fifth metatarsal articulation on the oblique radiograph. The proportion of patients allowed to bear weight as tolerated immediately after injury was compared between patients treated by orthopaedic surgeons and podiatrists. The effects of unrestricted weightbearing and foot and/or ankle immobilization on clinical healing were assessed. A total of 487 patients with zone 2 fractures were included (mean age 53.5 years (SD 16.9), mean BMI 27.2 kg/m. 2. (SD 6.0)) with a mean follow-up duration of 2.57 years (SD 2.64). Results. Overall, 281 patients (57.7%) were treated by orthopaedic surgeons, and 206 patients (42.3%) by podiatrists. When controlling for age, sex, and time between symptom onset and presentation, the likelihood of undergoing operative treatment was significantly greater when treated by a podiatrist (odds ratio (OR) 2.9 (95% CI 1.2 to 8.2); p = 0.029). A greater proportion of patients treated by orthopaedic surgeons were allowed to immediately bear weight on the injured foot (70.9% (178/251) vs 47.3% (71/150); p < 0.001). Patients treated by podiatrists were immobilized for significantly longer (mean 8.4 weeks (SD 5.7) vs 6.8 weeks (SD 4.3); p = 0.002) and experienced a significantly longer mean time to clinical healing (12.1 (SD 10.6) vs 9.0 weeks (SD 7.3), p = 0.003). Conclusion. Although there was considerable heterogeneity among zone 2 fracture management, orthopaedic surgeons were less likely to treat patients operatively and more likely to allow early full weightbearing compared to podiatrists. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(9):942–948

Introduction. Fifth metatarsal fractures are a common injury suffered by professional footballers. It is frequently reported in the media that such an injury will result in a 6-week absence from play. The purpose of this study was to assess frequency of media reporting of fifth metatarsal fractures, the time that is predicted by the media before the player will return to soccer and the actual time taken for the player to return to play. Methods. Internet search engines identified 40 professional footballers that suffered 49 fifth metatarsal fractures between 2001 and 2011. Information was collected from various media and team websites, match reports, photography and video evidence to provide data regarding the mechanism of injury, playing surface conditions, frequency of fractures per season, fracture treatment, estimated amount of time to be missed due to the injury and time taken to return to play. Results. 49 fractures were identified in the 40 players. 6 players suffered a recurrence of a previous fifth metatarsal fracture. 3 players sustained 5. th. metatarsal fractures in their contralateral foot. There was a trend of increased reporting of fifth metatarsal fractures over the course of the decade. 43% of fractures were sustained without contact with another player, 24% were suffered in a tackle. 77% of fractures were sustained in dry conditions. 90% of fractures were treated surgically. Mean return to play time was 14.6 weeks (range 5 to 34 weeks). The mean estimated absence in the media was 7.8 weeks (range 2 to 16 weeks), median 6 weeks. Conclusions. Fifth metatarsal fractures are being commonly reported in professional footballers with an increasing trend. Most are treated surgically. It appears that the commonly quoted period of 6 weeks before return to play is unrealistic. It should be expected that a player would be unavailable for 3 months

Introduction

Treatment pathways of 5^th metatarsal fractures are commonly directed based on fracture classification, with Jones types for example, requiring closer observation and possibly more aggressive management.

The October 2024 Foot & Ankle Roundup. 360. looks at: Hemiarthroplasty for hallux rigidus; Fixed or mobile-bearing ankle arthroplasty? A meta-analysis; Bone grafting for periprosthetic bone cysts following total ankle arthroplasty; Diabetic foot ulcer after first-ray amputation; Early motion after ankle surgery: the path to faster recovery?; Are podiatrists and orthopaedic surgeons approaching zone 2 fifth metatarsal fractures in the same way?

Fifth metatarsal fractures in sport are known to be associated with acceleration and cross cutting movements when running. It is also established that playing surface has an impact on the ground reaction forces through the foot, increasing the strain through the fifth metatarsal. But what impact does boot design have on these forces? Current thought is that boots that utilise a blade stud design resist sideways slipping of the planted foot more than boots with a rounded stud. This study aims to compare ground reaction forces through the fifth metatarsal in 2 two different designs of rugby boot to assess what impact stud design might have. The forces across the foot were measured using Tekscan in-shoe pressure plates in 24 rugby players. Each player was asked to complete an agility course to measure acceleration, cutting and cross-cutting in the two different designs of rugby boot, reproducing true playing conditions. The boots used were the Canterbury Phoenix Club 8 Stud boot and the Canterbury Speed Club Blade boot. The trial was conducted on an 4G artificial pitch at the Cardiff Arms Park rugby ground. Ethical approval was obtained from Bath University and a research grant was provided by British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. The blade boot had significantly higher contact pressures than the stud boot on the fifth metatarsal in the combined movements (17.909 ± 10.442 N/cm2 Blade Vs 16.888 ± 9.992 N/cm2 Boot; P < .0125; n= 864 steps in each boot group). The blade boot also produced higher pressure during cross-cutting (32.331 ± 13.568 N/cm2 Vs 27.651 ± 15.194 N/cm2 p < 0.007). Pressures were also higher in both acceleration and cutting, although not significantly so. These results will guide clinicians advising athletes in shoe design, especially those predisposed to or rehabilitating from a fifth metatarsal fracture

Background. Fractures of the metatarsal bones are the most frequent fracture of the foot. Up to 70% involve the fifth metatarsal bone, of which approximately eighty percent are located proximally. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) has been shown to be a useful adjunct in the treatment of delayed fractures and non unions. However, there is no study looking at the success rate of LIPUS in fifth metatarsal fracture delayed unions. Objectives. The aim of our study was to investigate the use of LIPUS treatment for delayed union of fifth metatarsal fractures. Study Design & Methods. A retrospective review of patients who were treated with LIPUS following a delayed union of fifth metatarsal fracture was conducted over a three-year period (2013 – 2015). Delayed union was defined as lack of clinical and radiological evidence of union, bony continuity or bone reaction at the fracture site if 3 months has elapsed from the initial injury. Results. There were thirty patients (9 males, 21 females) in our cohort. The average age was 39.3 years. Type 2 fractures made up 43% of our cohort. Twenty-seven (90%) patients went on to progress to union clinically and radiologically following LIPUS treatment. Smoking (p=0.014) and size of fracture gap (p=0.045) were predictive of non-union. Conclusions. This is the first study looking at the use of LIPUS in the treatment of delayed union of fifth metatarsal fractures. We report a success rate of 90%. There is a role in the use of LIPUS in delayed union of fifth metatarsal fractures and can serve as an adjunct prior to consideration of surgery

Fifth metatarsal fractures are common and the majority unite regardless of treatment. A sub-type of these fractures carries a risk of non-union and for this reason many centres follow up all 5. th. metatarsal fractures. In 2011, a standardised protocol was introduced to promote weight-bearing as pain allowed with a tubigrip or Velcro boot according to symptoms. No routine fracture clinic appointments were made from A&E but patients were provided with information and a help-line number to access care if required. Some patients still attended fracture clinics, but only after review of their notes/X-rays by an Orthopaedic Consultant, or after self-reported “failure to progress” using the special help-line number. Audit of a year prior to the introduction of the protocol and the year following it was performed. All x-rays taken at presentation in A&E were reviewed and classified independently (KBF/JM) for validation. During 2009/2010, 279 patients presented to A&E with a 5. th. metatarsal fracture and were referred to a fracture clinic. 106(38%) attended 1 appointment, 130(47%) attended 2 appointments and 31 (11%) attended 3 or more appointments – 491 appointments in total. 3% failed to attend the clinic. Operative fixation was performed in 3 patients (1.07%). In 2011/2012, of 339 A&E fractures, only 63 (19%) attended fracture clinic. 37 (11%) attended 1 appointment, 12 (4%) 2 and 9 (3%) 3 or more appointments – 96 appointments in total. Four patients (1.17%) required operative fixation. Our study did not demonstrate any added value for routine outpatient follow-up of 5. th. metatarsal fractures. Patients can be safely allowed to weight bear and discharged at the time of initial presentation in the A&E department if they are provided with appropriate information and access to a “help line” run by experienced fracture clinic staff. The result is a more efficient, patient-centred service

Introduction. Fifth metatarsal fracture is a common injury. Current practice supports conservative management, with surgery in the event of non-union. Early fracture clinic review is not perceived to improve patient experience or increased detection of non-union. A new protocol standardises treatment to symptom level and discharges patients from ED with advice but without any routine follow-up arranged. A leaflet advises on management, prognosis and helpline details and there is an open-access policy for those whose symptoms persist to investigate potential non-union. Method. A prospective audit evaluated the protocol, surveying patients at 8-weeks and 6-months post-injury. A minor injuries unit continued to refer to fracture clinic and was the control group. During 6-months 46 acute fractures were recorded in the new protocol(group 1) and 47 in the control(group 2). 1 patient in each group was known to experience non-union. 31 of group 1 and 22 of group 2 responded to at least one survey. Results. Satisfaction with information provided at initial presentation was high for both protocols. 87%(27/31) satisfied in group 1 and 90%(20/22) group 2(p=1.0000). At 8-weeks 82%(19/23) were satisfied with their progress following the new protocol compared to 89%(17/19) in the control(p=0.6729). At 6-months 88%(22/25) were satisfied compared to 76%(13/17) respectively(p=0.4133). The new protocol is not associated with a significant symptoms increase. At 8 weeks 22%(5/23) described their pain severity as >5/10 reducing to 8%(2/25) by 6-months. Compared to 10%(2/19) of the control at 8-weeks and 6%(1/17) at 6-months. Patients rating fracture management overall as ‘good or excellent’ were comparable between both new, 67%(21/31) and traditional, 77%(17/22) protocols(p=0.5441). Conclusion. No significant difference in patient satisfaction and symptom levels between the old and new protocol was found. The new protocol reduces unnecessary patient appointments. This reduces demands on fracture clinic while maintaining a safe, resource efficient service

Introduction. Many common fractures are inherently stable, will not displace and do not require plaster casting to achieve union in a good position. Nevertheless, many patients with stable fractures are advised that they need a cast, despite the potential for stiffness, skin problems and thromboembolism. Attempts to challenge this practice often meet the argument that patients prefer a cast for pain relief. We analysed five years of a single consultant's fracture clinic to see how many patients with stable foot and ankle fractures chose a cast after evidence-based counselling. Materials and methods. All patients with stable fractures of the ankle or metatarsals seen between 1st June 2005 and 31st May 2010 were included. Displaced or potentially unstable ankle fractures, Jones fractures and fractures involving the Lisfranc joint were excluded. Patients were advised functional treatment but offered a cast if they wished. Patients were documented prospectively as part of a larger audit, including demographics, diagnosis and treatment in the emergency department and fracture clinic. Results. 93 patients had stable ankle fractures. One (1%) chose a cast, 77 an ankle brace and 14 the RICE regime. One was advised a cast for neurological deformity. 105 patients had fifth metatarsal fractures outside the “non-” zone. 19 (18%) chose casts and 86 followed the RICE regime. 50 patients had other stable metatarsal fractures 15 (30%) chose casts. 86% of patients had casts applied in the emergency department. Discussion. The majority of patients with stable foot and ankle fractures do not wish to wear a cast once they understand it will not affect their outcome. In many cases this decision could have been reached in the emergency department with appropriate guidelines and education, preventing patient inconvenience and possible adverse events. Conclusion. Most patients are happy with evidence-based functional treatment of stable fractures

Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures distal to the tuberosity, also known as Jones’ fractures, are troublesome fractures to manage with a high incidence of delayed union and nonunion. We conducted a retrospective study of 32 patients with fractures of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity over a three year period. The aim was to assess healing with non-weight bearing and variations of weight bearing mobilization including minimal, partial and full weight bearing. This is one of the largest reported series of such fractures. These fractures were classified as acute fractures (14 fractures), fractures with features of delayed union (15 fractures) and fractures with features of nonunion (three fractures) at presentation according to the radiological classification used by Torg in 1984. These patients were treated in a plaster cast and mobilised either non-weight bearing or with variations of weight bearing. These patients were followed up for a mean of 16 months. Our findings correspond with those observed by Torg and we describe a correlation between the radiological appearance of the fracture at presentation and the clinical course. Prevailing guidelines for the management of these fractures are ambiguous. A standardized classification is important because there is great variability in the types of fractures and appropriate treatment. It is important that radiological features are correlated with clinical features and appropriate treatment instituted. The treatment of choice for acute fractures is immobilization of the limb in a below-knee non-weight bearing plaster for 6 to 8 weeks. Fractures with delayed union may eventually heal if treated non-operatively, although this may take up to 20 weeks. An active athlete will benefit from early surgery. Fractures with symptomatic nonunion require surgery

The August 2024 Foot & Ankle Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: ESWT versus surgery for fifth metatarsal stress fractures; Minimally invasive surgery versus open fusion for hallux rigidus; Diabetes and infection risk in total ankle arthroplasty; Is proximal medial gastrocnemius recession useful for managing chronic plantar fasciitis?; Fuse the great toe in the young!; Conservative surgery for diabetic foot osteomyelitis; Mental health and outcome following foot and ankle surgery.

In foot and ankle surgery incorrect placement of implants, or inaccuracy in fracture reduction may remain undiscovered with the use of conventional C-arm fluoroscopy. These imperfections are often only recognized on postoperative computer tomography scans. The apparition of three dimensional (3D) mobile Imaging system has allowed to provide an intraoperative control of fracture reduction and implant placement. Three dimensional computer assisted surgery (CAS) has proven to improve accuracy in spine and pelvic surgery. We hypothesized that 3D-based CAS could improve accuracy in foot and ankle surgery. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and utility of a multi-dimensional surgical imaging platform with intra-operative three dimensional imaging and/or CAS in a broad array of foot and ankle traumatic and orthopaedic surgery. Cohort study of patients where the 3D mobile imaging system was used for intraoperative 3D imaging or 3D-based CAS in foot and ankle surgery. The imaging system used was the O-arm Surgical Imaging System and the navigation system was the Medtronic's StealthStation. Surgical procedures were performed according to standard protocols. In case of fractures, image acquisition was performed after reduction of the fracture. In cases of 3D-based CAS, image acquisition was performed at the surgical step before implants placement. At the end of the operations, an intraoperative 3D scan was made. We used the O-arm Surgical Imaging system in 11 patients: intraoperative 3D scans were performed in 3 cases of percutaneus fixation of distal tibio-fibular syndesmotic disruptions; in 2 of the cases, revision of reduction and/or implant placement were needed after the intraoperative 3D scan. Three dimensional CAS was used in 10 cases: 2 open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the calcaneum, 1 subtalar fusion, 2 ankle arthrodesis, 1 retrograde drilling of an osteochondral lesion of the talus, 1 Charcot diabetic reconstruction foot and 1 intramedullary screw fixation of a fifth metatarsal fracture. The guidance was used essentially for screw placement, except in the retrograde drilling of an osteochondral lesion where the guidance was used to navigate the drill tool. Intraoperative 3D imaging showed a good accuracy in implant placement with no need to revision of implants. We report a preliminary case series with use of the O-arm Surgical Imaging System in the field of foot and ankle surgery. This system has been used either as intraoperative 3D imaging control or for 3D-based CAS. In our series, the 3D computer assisted navigation has been very useful in the placement of implants and has shown that guidance of implants is feasible in foot and ankle surgery. Intraoperative 3D imaging could confirm the accuracy of the system as no revisions were needed. Using the O-arm as intraoperative 3D imaging was also beneficial because it allowed todemonstrate intraoperative malreduction or malposition of implants (which were repositioned immediately). Intraoperative 3D imaging system showed very promising preliminary results in foot and ankle surgery. There is no doubt that intraoperative use of 3D imaging will become a standard of care. The exact indications need however to be defined with further studies

Background

Due to the overwhelming demand for trauma services, resulting from increasing emergency department attendances over the past decade, virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) have become the fashion to keep up with the demand and help comply with the BOA Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidelines. In this article, we perform a systematic review asking, “How useful are VFCs?”, and what injuries and conditions can be treated safely and effectively, to help decrease patient face to face consultations. Our primary outcomes were patient satisfaction, clinical efficiency and cost analysis, and clinical outcomes.

Aims

Virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) are advocated by recent British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOASTs) to efficiently manage injuries during the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary aim of this national study is to assess the impact of these standards on patient satisfaction and clinical outcome amid the pandemic. The secondary aims are to determine the impact of the pandemic on the demographic details of injuries presenting to the VFC, and to compare outcomes and satisfaction when the BOAST guidelines were first introduced with a subsequent period when local practice would be familiar with these guidelines.

Aims

The Edinburgh Trauma Triage Clinic (TTC) streamlines outpatient care through consultant-led ‘virtual’ triage of referrals and the direct discharge of minor fractures from the Emergency Department. We compared the patient outcomes for simple fractures of the radial head, little finger metacarpal, and fifth metatarsal before and after the implementation of the TTC.

Aims: To explore potential predictors of functional outcome after conservative treatment of acute fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal. These fractures are the most frequent fracture of the foot. The factors that influence final clinical outcome are rarely investigated. Regression analysis regarding this problem was never performed. Methods: The study design was observational and retrospective. Adults, conservatively treated for an acute fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal included. All patients were given a plaster cast at the emergency department and were instructed not to bare weight (NWB) on the affected limb for at least one week. The further modalities of treatment were decided by individual surgeons according to their current clinical practice. A validated scoring system was used. Additional questions were asked about residual cosmetic and shoe problems and also about intensity of pain and the general feeling of comfort. The respective influences of factors on clinical outcome were examined using multiple linear and logistic regression modeling. Results: 38 patients (11 men, 27 women) were analysed. The mean age was 48 years. 6 had a Jones fracture, while 32 had a tuberosity avulsion fracture. The mean non-weight bearing period was 2 weeks and 4 days (range 1 to 5 weeks) while the cast was worn for a mean of 5 weeks and 3 days (range 1 to 10 weeks). Three Jones fractures and all the avulsion fractures were healed at the end of treatment. The mean follow-up time was 298 days, ranging from 51 to 603 days. The mean result of the ankle score at follow-up was 77.5 (range 20 to 100). Thirteen of the 38 patients reported problems in wearing shoes. Only 8 patients experienced cosmetic problems. The mean linear analogue score for pain was 2.34, that for general comfort was 8.11. Overall, the most significant predictors of poor functional outcome at final follow-up evaluation were increasing duration of NWB and longer follow-up time. Longer NWB was importantly associated with worse global score, pain, comfort and reported stiffness. Neither gender nor fracture type had any significant influence on the overall clinical outcome. Conclusions: The most important variable linked to final clinical outcome is the duration of the non-weight bearing period. Neither gender, age, length of casting nor even fracture type, had any significant influence on the overall clinical outcome. Therefore NWB should be kept to a minimum for acute avulsions