Abstract
Introduction
Many common fractures are inherently stable, will not displace and do not require plaster casting to achieve union in a good position. Nevertheless, many patients with stable fractures are advised that they need a cast, despite the potential for stiffness, skin problems and thromboembolism. Attempts to challenge this practice often meet the argument that patients prefer a cast for pain relief. We analysed five years of a single consultant's fracture clinic to see how many patients with stable foot and ankle fractures chose a cast after evidence-based counselling.
Materials and methods
All patients with stable fractures of the ankle or metatarsals seen between 1st June 2005 and 31st May 2010 were included. Displaced or potentially unstable ankle fractures, Jones fractures and fractures involving the Lisfranc joint were excluded. Patients were advised functional treatment but offered a cast if they wished. Patients were documented prospectively as part of a larger audit, including demographics, diagnosis and treatment in the emergency department and fracture clinic.
Results
93 patients had stable ankle fractures. One (1%) chose a cast, 77 an ankle brace and 14 the RICE regime. One was advised a cast for neurological deformity. 105 patients had fifth metatarsal fractures outside the “non-” zone. 19 (18%) chose casts and 86 followed the RICE regime. 50 patients had other stable metatarsal fractures 15 (30%) chose casts. 86% of patients had casts applied in the emergency department.
Discussion
The majority of patients with stable foot and ankle fractures do not wish to wear a cast once they understand it will not affect their outcome. In many cases this decision could have been reached in the emergency department with appropriate guidelines and education, preventing patient inconvenience and possible adverse events.
Conclusion
Most patients are happy with evidence-based functional treatment of stable fractures.
